(Freshman) Yes 3% 23% No 74% Do not wish to specifyFigure 1: Demographic attributes of the first-year studentsSurvey results and discussionsThis section presents the survey results of self-efficacy questions. Table 1 shows the list of self-efficacy questions for freshmen and seniors.Table 1: Self-efficacy survey questions Q. # Population Self-efficacy Questions Group D1 I am confident that I know what is required to avoid academic integrity issues (e.g., acknowledging the
. Meche, “Use of ethical dilemmas to contribute to the knowledge and behavior of high school students,” The High School Journal, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 50–57, Apr. 2001. 9. C. Tan-Willman and D. Gutteridge, “Creative thinking and moral reasoning of academically gifted secondary school adolescents,” Gifted Child Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 149–153, Oct. 1981. 10. J. Ramberg and B. Modin, “School effectiveness and student cheating: Do students’ grades and moral standards matter for this relationship?,” Social Psychology of Education, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 517–538, Apr. 2019. 11. G. Miller, H.M. Jerónimo, Q. Zhu, Editors’ Introduction to Thinking through Science and Technology: Philosophy, Religion, and
labeled I-Courses within the department. The “I” herebecame a quick code for inclusion of neurodiverse learners while also referring to our aim ofpersonalizing education for individual students. This way of referring to courses also mirroredthe university’s coding for courses aimed at developing competency in written communication(W courses) and quantitative skills (Q courses). It should be noted that our coding of redesignedengineering courses as I-Courses was only implemented within the department, as largersystemic structures and policies at the university related to course naming did not allow ourcourses to be designated as such in the course catalog.The infusion of codes representing a range of strengths-based language and symbolic
. https://www.ojed.org/index.php/jis/article/view/400Groen, C. J., McNair, L. D., Paretti, M. C., Simmons, D. R., & Shew, A. (2018a). Exploring professional identity development in undergraduate civil engineering students who experience disabilities [Paper presentation]. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-- 30052Haverkamp, A., Butler, A., Pelzl, N. S., Bothwell, M. K., Montfort, D., & Driskill, Q. L. (2019). Exploring transgender and gender nonconforming engineering undergraduate experiences through autoethnography. Proceedings of the 2019 Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity
PrairieLearn’s collaborative assessments to extract the timestamp ofeach student’s submissions to a given collaborative problem. Each submission was labeled asquick (Q), medium (M), or slow (S) based on its duration and whether it was shorter or longerthan the 25th and 75th percentile. We then applied sequence compacting techniques, sequentialpattern mining, and correlation analysis to identify latent patterns that characterize variousproblem-solving strategies across three database query languages (SQL, MongoDB, Neo4j). Theobjective of this study is to investigate the potential of temporal information - the amount of timespent on each submission attempt – in uncovering the recurrent patterns in groups’ submissionsequences. The next step is to perform
). Specifically, they valued practicalexamples of how to be more receptive, what to do in problematic situations, how to respond tobias, as well as the ‘coming out’ activity (3). 5.1.4. Recommendations for improvement to Safe Zone Level 1 workshopsSeveral respondents indicated that the conference workshops did not offer sufficient time (12).One suggestion, if scheduling for longer workshops is not possible, was to have the option ofparticipants to voluntarily stay afterwards for more discussion and Q&A, at the discretion of thefacilitator. Further suggestions for improvements of future Safe Zone workshops were to providehandouts as a packet at the beginning of the session (note: that was the norm but it’s possiblethat a facilitator forgot
:23, pp. 2914-2921, 2003.[39] G. B. Lesinski, S. Sharma, K. A. Varker, P. Sinha, M. Ferrari, and W. E. Carson, “Release of Biologically Functional Interferon-Alpha from a Nanochannel Delivery System,” Biomedical Microdevices, 7:1, 71-79, 2005. doi: 10.1007/s10544-005-6174-8[40] M. Wang, and S. Chen, “On Applicability of Poisson-Boltzmann Equation for Micro- and Nanoscale Electro-osmotic Flows,” Communications In Computational Physics, 3:5, pp. 1087-1099, 2008.[41] M. P. Sinha, and J. Houseman, “Miniature Mass Spectrometer for Chemical Sensing in Homeland Defense Applications,” Proceedings of SPIE, 5048:119, pp. 119-127, 2003.[42] M. Q. Patton, “Qualitative evaluation and research methods” (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA
.[20] Y. Kafai, D. Fields, and K. Searle, "Electronic textiles as disruptive designs: Supporting and challenging maker activities in schools," Harvard Educational Review, vol. 84, pp. 532-556, 2014.[21] D. Bertaux, Ed., Biography and Society: The Life History Approach in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981, p.^pp. Pages.[22] A. Schutz, Phenomenology of the Social World. Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1967.[23] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1989.[24] D. Schuman, Policy analysis, education, and everyday life. Lexington, MA: Heath, 1982.
financial aid, mentoring, diversityand inclusion and Q&A sessions. The PTG interview weekend was free of cost to the student andfamilies and sponsored by the HC. Finalists’ interviews were held with interview panels thatconsisted of a PTG team member, an industry representative, and a student representative. Onceaward notifications were made, follow up communications were conducted by phone and emailsto answer any questions the students and their families may have had before committing to theprogram.Addressing PTG Students’ Social Engagement Through Peer Mentoring and Living LearningCommunities.Transitioning from high school to a university setting is a challenge for most students, no mattertheir socio-economic or demographic background. For
. 31: p. 37-59. 16. Malcom, S. M., Hall, P. Q., and Brown, J. W. The double bind: The price of being a minority woman in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1976.T-SITE: A UMBC COMMUNITY OF TRANSFER SCHOLARS 11 17. Martin, S., Marshall, A., and Zhu, L., “S-STEM Programs for Computing and Engineering Majors.” Presentation at the 22nd National Conference on Students in Transition, October 19-21, 2015, Baltimore Maryland. 18. Maryland Department of Business and Economic Development. CyberMaryland. [Report] [cited 2014 July 7]; Available from: http://issuu.com/cybermaryland/docs/cyberreport#. 19. Maton, K., Hrabowski III, F
high attrition rates among science, mathematics & engineering undergraduate majors: final report to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation on an ethnographic inquiry at seven institutions. Ethnography and Assessment Research, Bureau of Sociological Research, University of Colorado, 1994.[4] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving engineering: A multi‐year single institution study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6-27, January 2012.[5] J. Gill, M. Ayre and J. Mills, “Revisioning the Engineering Profession: How to Make It Happen!,” In Gender and Diversity: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, Vol. 1, IGI Global. 2019, pp. 427-442.[6] Q. Li, H. Swaminathan and J. Tang
might refer to the output of the circuit (O) as next state (Q+) revealing aconflation of the two ideas.We identified the emergent themes across the two datasets in two stages. First, we compared thethemes generated from the prior studies to each other to determine which themes were domain-general and which were domain-specific. Second, we compared each theme’s supportingevidence (constructed from comparisons amongst the three other granularities) to find similartrends in how each theme emerged from the data. Similar trends in each theme’s supportingevidence were grouped and renamed to describe the trend, which resulted in three themes.LimitationsWhile the goal of our work is to identify the patterns and nuances in students’ interactions
Conference on Mathematics Education in a Global Community, Palermo, Italy, 2007.11. Allen, K., The Statistics Concept Inventory: Development and analysis of a cognitive assessment instrument instatistics (Doctoral dissertation), SSRN Electronic Journal, 2006, doi:10.2139/ssrn.213014312. Wilcox, B., Caballero, M., Baily, C., Sadaghiani, H., Chasteen, S., Ryan, Q., and Pollock, S., “Development anduses of upper-division conceptual assessments”, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020115 – Published 23September 2015, http://journals.aps.org/prstper/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.02011513. Streveler, R., Miller, R., Santiago-Roman, A., Nelson, M., Geist, M., and Olds, B., “Rigorous Methodology forConcept Inventory Development: Using the 'Assessment Triangle
academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In Zimmerman, B.J. & Schunck, DH. (Eds.) (2001). Selfregulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives . New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, 138. 14 Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A.V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science , 312, 26 May, 2006. Page 26.962.11 15 Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N.M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences
. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 465-481.[50] Lindlof, T. R. & Taylor, BC (2002). Qualitative communication research methods.[51] Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.[52] Zhu, Q., Zoltowski, C. B., Feister, M. K., Buzzanell, P. M., Oakes, W. C. & Mead, A. D. (2014). The development of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decisionmaking in project-based design teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods. To appear in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN.[53] Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings
. Service oriented programming: A new paradigm of software reuse.In Software Reuse: Methods, Techniques, and Tools, volume LNCS 2319, pages 39-47, 2002.8. K. Sung, C. Hillyard, R. L. Angotti, M. W. Panitz, D. S. Goldstein, and J. Nordlinger. Game-themedprogramming assignment modules: A path-way for gradual integration of gaming context into existingintroductory programming courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2010.9. Q. Yu, X. Liu, A. Bouguettaya, and B. Medjahed. Deploying and managing web services: issues,solutions, and directions. The VLDB Journal, 17:537-572, May 2008.
that influence faculty motivation of effective teaching practices in engineering,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013, https://peer.asee.org/19604[13] A. Furco, and B. E. Moely. “Using learning communities to build faculty support for pedagogical innovation: A multi-campus study,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 83, no. 1, 128-153, 2012.[14] H. M. Matusovich, M. C. Paretti, L. D. McNair, and C. Hixson. “Faculty motivation: A gateway to transforming engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 2, 302-330, 2014.[15] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Thousand Oaks
middle levelthermodynamics course of the industrial engineering curriculum. After the completion of thismodule, students should be able to (i) use Fourier’s Law of heat conduction to determine rate ofheat flow (Q/t) and heat rate constant (K) when given other parameters such as dimensions of thematerials and temperature at both ends of materials, (ii) determine the thermal conductivity ofdifferent materials (such as steel, brass, copper and aluminum) and (iii) determine which materialis suitable to be selected for other applications considering the thermal conductivity of thematerials. Following are the questions that have been developed to demonstrate students’mastery of the concepts that ECP will be used improve students learning outcomes in
and limited each student’s engagement,consisting of two hours of short PowerPoint presentations with limited time for Q&A. At ourpre-REU mentor meeting in 2018, we agreed to a “gallery”-style check-in format that used low-tech posters (printed sheets taped to a wall or poster board), to which mentors, graduate students,and other faculty in the department and across campus were invited. The new format was verywell received both by the mentors and the REU students the past two summers, primarily due tothe increased interaction each REU student had with a larger number of researchers. Attendanceat the check-in meetings also increased since graduate students, post-docs, and faculty who werenot REU mentors came to talk to the students. The
relationships and in particular how the brain supports processes of vision and attention.The assignment was to read the provided materials and submit three or more questions for Dr.Appelbaum, who was the guest speaker in class the following week. Dr. Appelbaum’s lecture,“Reverse Engineering the Brain: Primer for EEG and BCI approaches”, provided an introductionto electroencephalography (EEG) signal and data collection, and brain computer interfacetechniques. In addition to providing some general technical background and a discussion of someof the challenges often encountered, Dr. Appelbaum discussed some of his research on visualattention. The lecture was followed by a lively Q&A session.Stage 2 (Restatement) and Stage 3 (Relation to Engineering
investigation to explore this disconnect in the context of undergraduate engineering education. The primary tasks of the research are: (i) To assess the Faculty knowledge of SDT; (ii) To develop a measurement framework for assessing the classroom environment as it relates to SDT; and (iii) To determine the association among Faculty knowledge of SDT, student motivation, learning environment, and student learning.6. A longitudinal, quasi-experimental design is employed where both instructors and students in the various Engineering Departments at Florida Atlantic University (FAU) are the participants. The research design and measurement framework (e.g. Learning Climate Questionnaire or LCQ; Riverside Situational Q-sort
and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, 1-38.25. Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V. & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, Vol Page 24.746.14 312, 26 May, 2006.26. International Center for Home Education
-veteran-and-service- member-deficit-in-engineering-through-professional-formation-and-community-advocacy- year-1[18] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2002.[19] A. Minichiello and H. Wilkinson, “Board 230: CAREER: ‘Support our Troops’: Re- storying Student Veteran and Service Member Deficit in Engineering through Professional Formation and Community Advocacy—Year 2,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Jan. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://strategy.asee.org/board-230-career-support-our-troops-re-storying- student-veteran-and-service-member-deficit-in-engineering
in Engineering at WSU: A Modelfor a Women's Mentoring Program,” College Student Journal 47 (3), pp. 421-428 (2013).[4] K. A. Griffin, D. Pérez II, A. P. E. Holmes, C. E. P. Mayo, “Investing in the future: Theimportance of faculty mentoring in the development of students of color in STEM,” NewDirections for Institutional Research 2010 (148) pp. 95-103 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.365[5] B. Bilgin, A. E. Felder, H. Darbi, R. Nazempour, S. Reckinger, R. A. Revelo, and D. Ozevin,“Looking Ahead: Structure of an Industry Mentorship Program for Undergraduate EngineeringStudents,” Advances in Engineering Education 10 (3), (2022). DOI: 10.18260/3-1-1153-36031[6] L. Guessous, B. Sangeorzan, Q. Zou, and X. Wang, “Industrial Mentors: An Often
then analyzed withpathfinder software (with Minsowski r = infinity and q = n - 1, i.e., 19) to generate a networkstructure of the KS-survey data. 1. The term aggregate is most related to what two terms in this list? (type in two terms in the box below separated by a comma): List: admixtures, cement, columns, concrete, curing, finishing, floor, formwork, materials, one way, placing, prestressed, rebar, reinforced, slab, system, two way, wall, water 2. The term admixtures is most related to what two terms in this list? (type in two terms in the box below separated by a comma) List: aggregate, cement, columns, concrete, curing, finishing, floor
TourScholars were taken on an industry field trip to Proctor and Gamble in Pineville, LA, where theytoured the laundry detergent production facility. Over lunch, the students had a uniqueopportunity for a Q&A session with the P&G engineering team. Members of the grant team andfaculty mentors accompanied the scholars on this industry tour. The drive to and from the facilityprovided an opportunity for community building between students and the faculty memberspresent.End-of-Year SurveyAt the conclusion of the year, the SSP students shared their feedback on the program through asurvey administered by an external evaluator. Among the twenty-four students in the first cohort,twenty responded to the survey.The survey was comprised of eight
., Lock, R., 2013, “Understanding engineering identity through structural equation modeling,” 2013 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2013.668478718. Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., Lock, R., 2016, “Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 105 No. 2, pp. 312-340. https://doi/pdf/10.1002/jee.2011819. Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., Smith, P. C., 2002, “Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self‐report scales,” Personnel Psychology, Vol. 55 No.1, pp. 167-194. https://doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1744- 6570.2002.tb00108.x20. van Hoof, A., Raaijmakers, Q. A
15- October 19, 2019.[37] L. Hirshfield, A. Huang-Saad, and J. Libarkin, "Mapping engineering outcomes to the lean launch curriculum in the context of design," in American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE 2017, Columbus, OH, USA, June 24-28, 2017. [38] C. Q. Li, R. S. Harichandran, N. O. Erdil, M. Carnasciali, and J. Nocito-Gobel, “Assessing the growth in entrepreneurial mind-set acquired through curricular and extra- curricular components,” in American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE 2019, Tampa, FL, USA, June 15-October 19, 2019. [39] Jamison, D, “Framework for integrating entrepreneurial minded learning in