, renewable energy, and the energy-water nexus.Yun-Han Weng, The Ohio State UniversityEmily T. Creamer, The Ohio State UniversityMatthew Judkins Mayhew, The Ohio State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 EmPOWERing a Sustainable Energy Future through Interconnected Curricular and Co-Curricular Pedagogies AbstractIn 2019, a National Research Traineeship (NRT) grant from the U.S. NationalScience Foundation seeded the establishment of a new model for graduateeducation at Ohio State University – a large, public, land-grant R-1 university inthe U.S. Midwest. This grant application involved faculty from eight differentcolleges within this university
modernindustrial ecosystem. We also discuss the challenges faced during the implementation, and somestrategies to overcome these obstacles. This course redesign is the first step toward a significantcurricular revision in our major and the deployment of PDM as a common infrastructure for allcourses. Our approach represents a shift toward driving industry practices and processes into theengineering classroom, and provides a framework to fill the gap between theory and practice.IntroductionIndustry 4.0 is transforming the manufacturing world. Engineering firms are investing heavily indigital transformation initiatives and paradigms such as the Model-Based Enterprise (MBE) arerapidly becoming the new standards for doing business [1]. Engineering and
engineers are critical to continued infrastructure investment, growth, and development.Currently, an estimated 307,570 people are employed in civil engineering jobs across the U.S.[1], and approximately 21,500 domestic degrees in civil engineering were awarded in 2020 and2021 [2], [3]. Similarly, 21,200 civil engineering job openings are projected each year due toworkers who transfer or retire from 2022 to 2032 [4] but an additional 883,600 jobs areanticipated due to the impact of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act by 2030 [5]. Withoutintervention, these conditions will lead to an increasing shortage of civil engineeringprofessionals, resulting in delays in infrastructure updates and negative economic impacts [6].This paper discusses one
development of engineering education curriculum.Education researchers unequivocally identified the importance of incorporating laboratoryexercise in engineering course curriculum design, offering valuable insights to optimize theefficacy of laboratories through several case studies [1–5]. Researchers effectively argue the casefor incorporating practical components into engineering classes, emphasizing the value ofproblem-based or project-based learning (PBL) which aims to bridge theoretical knowledge withreal-world applications [6].Numerous literatures present some innovative designs of hands-on laboratory practice under theengineering course curriculum. Kilula et al. [7] developed experimental facilities for the upper-level engineering undergraduate
incorporation of testbed networks and live exercises intoa network security curriculum. 1. IntroductionLearning information security can be challenging for new students, regardless of their background.Various factors contribute to the complexity of the field. Information security is filled with technicalterminology and acronyms, which can be rough for new students to understand. Also, understandingcomputer networking, software execution, and operating systems is crucial for comprehendinginformation security concepts[1]. Information security is always evolving as new threats andtechnologies emerge. Continuous learning and adaptability are needed to keep up. Masteringinformation security is a daunting task for all students, irrespective of their
; Department Information Systems IUPUI Oklahoma State University Email: smithun@iupui.edu Email: xiao.luo@okstate.eduAbstractIn this research-to-practice full paper, we describe our mentoring initiative, where we incorporatedmentoring into a freshman and a sophomore computing course in Spring 2023 and Fall 2022,respectively. Based on our previous work [1], these mentoring initiatives aimed to developstudents' sense of belonging, self-efficacy, and computing identity, as research [2, 3] shows senseof belonging and self-efficacy are the two main reasons for low enrollment and retainingunderrepresented computing students. First-year
positive gradients was recordedby approximately half of the students.A survey on the student experience over four years (717 students, 331 replies — 46%) consideredseven dimensions of the student experience. Overall results showed that students found theexperiment engaging, and helpful in gaining a conceptual understanding of the boundary layer.Overall, on the three challenges we identified, the equipment and the ‘guided discovery’ activitywere judged to be successful. We also show prototype improvements for future, to aid with thethird challenge, including equipment upgrades and the introduction of computational fluiddynamics (CFD).1 IntroductionBoundary layer theory has its origins in the early 20th century with Prandtl’s seminal work [1].The
partnersalso served as resources during the semester, and as evaluators during the end-of-semester designshowcase. This work seeks to better understand the impact of this experience on students. This iscurrently being investigated through quantitative and qualitative measures, including theEngineering Design Expectancy Value Scale (EDVES) and focus groups. Additionally, the workwill inform further research regarding this and other community-inspired design projects.Introduction & BackgroundEngineering programs often seek to provide their students with authentic experiences in theirengineering curriculum. Beyond broad calls for authentic experiences (e.g., [1], [2]), theseexperiences have been found to be broadly beneficial to students. In one meta
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024WIP: Using ePortfolios to Enable Life Project MentoringAmong First-Year Engineering StudentsConstanza Miranda 1,2, Mareham Yacoub 1, Rachel McClam 21 Johns Hopkins University, Whiting School of Engineering.2 Johns Hopkins University, Biomedical Engineering Department.2 Johns Hopkins University, School of Education.AbstractThis is a work in progress. ePortfolios are portfolios in electronic form. These are known topromote folio thinking, a reflective technique that allows students to describe their learningexperiences through a purposeful gathering of objects. This systematic gathering of proof oflearning and professional development could also empower students as they build a digitalpresence
. To satisfy this goal, we offer differentgeneral engineering courses. Most of our students (~80%) enroll in Introduction to Engineering Ior Honors Introduction to Engineering I. Students who are under-prepared in math and do nothave necessary prerequisites for the first semester of 8-semester engineering degree plans areenrolled in Fundamentals of Success in Engineering Study [1]. We also have a small group ofstudents (~10%) who are well ahead of the requirements and are offered to take a special sectionof Honors Introduction to Engineering I course along with the optional Honors ResearchExperience and Honors Innovation Experience courses [2]. All general engineering coursesmeet twice a week for lectures and once a week for a drill section
urbaninfrastructure and equity as a subject for critical reading and writing. At Gonzaga University, amedium-size private university, a first-year seminar is designed as a multidisciplinaryexploration of infrastructure and equity. One of the primary learning outcomes of the course is todifferentiate the ways in which knowledge is constructed across multiple disciplines, soinfrastructure’s impact on society is viewed through the lens of sociology, history, public health,economics, and engineering. At the University of Colorado Boulder, a large research-intensiveuniversity, a 1-credit civil engineering seminar course touches on the topic of infrastructureequity through the lenses of engineering ethics and sustainability. In all three courses, studentscreated
College London in 2010. Alex’s research focuses on the transfer of learning between various courses and contexts and the professional formation of engineers. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024The Mini-Mill Experience: A Self-Paced Introductory Machining Exercise for Mechanical Engineering Students Jenni M. Buckley PhD1,2, Amy Trauth PhD1,3, Alex De Rosa PhD1 1 University of Delaware, College of Engineering 2 University of Delaware, College of Education and Human Development 3 American Institutes for
has been madepublicly available via annual progress reports, we provide insight into how Federal STEMeducation efforts have made progress towards its three goals of improved STEM literacy,increased diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), and STEM workforce development. Additionally,we consider what this analysis means in the context of the greater STEM community. With theSTEM Education Strategic Plan’s tenure coming to an end, this paper concludes by encouragingdiscussion regarding the future of Federal STEM education initiatives informed by the last fiveyears’ progress and potential shortcomings.1 Introduction“Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) are the foundation for discovery andinnovation.” This is the first line
graphical way to representand organize relationships between course topics and ideas and draw connections betweenconcepts [1-2]. Mapping is achieved by drawing connecting lines between concepts in a visualrepresentation. It was introduced as an educational tool more than thirty years ago. Concept mapshave been successfully used in a variety of STEM courses [3]. As engineering educators havestrived to incorporate more active learning pedagogies in the classroom, concept maps haveemerged as a valuable learning tool [4]. They fall under the umbrella of constructivist pedagogywhereby students create their own meaning of course concepts [5]. In Mechanical Engineeringcurricula, effective use of concept maps has been demonstrated in Mechanics
thelearning of various topics and concepts introduced in a course. PLTL has been a successful peersupport intervention in traditional classroom environments in science, technology, engineeringand mathematical (STEM) education and is yet to be fully explored in an online asynchronouslearning environment [1] [2]. This National Science Foundation (NSF) sponsored work under theImproving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) program seeks to investigate theeffectiveness of PLTL in an online campus environment at Embry-Riddle AeronauticalUniversity Worldwide campus.Approximately 54% of the undergraduate population of the online campus are either militaryveterans or currently serving military personnel. As a result, a larger percentage of military andveteran
properly covert 3D CAD models into files that the 3D printers (utilized in the course) canread and use to create the modeled part. The developed understanding and skills in 3D printing islater utilized by students during course design challenges in addition to semester-concluding teamdemonstrations of respective Cornerstone projects.As alluded to, the engineering system that a Cornerstone project represents may vary amongstdifferent iterations of the ENGR 111 course; and the focus of this paper is specific to two differentsemesters with dissimilar Cornerstone systems. The Cornerstone utilized during the Spring 2022semester (Project 1) was a bench-scale windmill generation system. Alternately, the Cornerstoneutilized during the Spring 2023 semester
technology and pedagogy, online learning, outcomes and program evaluation, and survey methodology. She holds a M. S. Ed in Literacy and Language Education and a BA in English Secondary Education, both from Purdue University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024To Build or to Buy, That is the Question To Build or to Buy: That is the QuestionIntroductionSabharwal and colleagues [1] defined Learning Management Systems (LMSs) as “a vitalsoftware platform to deliver education and training courses online. They enable the creation,management, and delivery of educational content making it easier for business of all sizes andtypes to administer educational content” [1]. With the
education, especially at the pre-university and first year level.Dr. Bridget Ogwezi, ANSYS, Inc. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Understanding the Impact of Industry Sponsorship for Student Teams: a Case StudyMotivation: the rapidly-changing job landscape and its impact on student preparednessThe rapidly changing job landscape is causing significant challenges for educators and industryalike. The World Economic Forum (WEF) published their Future of Jobs 2023 Report[1], whichhighlights the impact technology has on various career sectors. Technology, digitalization, andsustainability are highlighted as sectors with some of the fastest-growing roles and analytical
Practice of almost two hundred seniorengineering managers and leaders, engineering knowledge is essential, but leadership positionscan be attained earlier if engineering students are exposed to management, public speaking, andother non-engineering coursework. The most highly recommended courses beyond anengineering curriculum included business management, public speaking, and marketing. Inaddition to taking courses, the professionals surveyed suggested involvement in activities like Page 9.344.1sports, internships, volunteering, and clubs to improve interpersonal skills.1 The same can be Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for
project-basedlearning (PBL) and hands-on exploration have on student learning across a variety of disciplinesincluding engineering. Recently, the Mechanical Engineering Department at The University ofIowa introduced undergraduate and graduate certificate programs in artificial intelligence,modeling, and simulations (AIMS) that aim to teach students: (1) the importance of uncertaintyquantification, (2) the various types of combinations (e.g., modeling and simulation-assistedmachine learning) and hybrid approaches, and (3) using hybrid models toward the design ofintelligent complex machines. This work-in-progress seeks to understand how extra/co-curricularactivities, as an extension of semester course content, can benefit student learning outcomes
enhancing engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Peru in State College: Providing Scholarswith a Global Perspective at HomeOur Story of Resilience 1 Lauren Griggs, PhD • Director, Clark Scholars Program • Director, Multicultural Engineering Program • Assistant Teaching Professor Julio Urbina, PhD • Faculty Advisor, Clark Scholars Program • Professor
learning are worthy offurther investments.I. IntroductionAs early as 1916, J. Dewey propounded the complementary ideas of experiential learning andinterdisciplinary learning.1 H. Taba, a student of Dewey's, expanded the field of progressivelearning by introducing inductive and creative learning techniques.2 Students were encouraged toorganize related concepts from two or more diverse fields of learning, into groups. Ackerman,Perkins and Jacobs3 put forth very strong arguments in favor of a combination of discipline-specific as well as complementary inter-disciplinary learning. Furthermore, they emphasized theimportance of interweaving skills and knowledge-based content in the learning process.Today, many university programs try to integrate
?Through the qualitative analysis the research team was able to gain a more in-depthunderstanding of why students selected certain solution paths.1. Introduction and BackgroundThe overall purpose of this research is to determine if the use of model eliciting activities (MEAs)in the classroom helps to improve students’ ability to solve engineering problems. Model ElicitingActivities are open-ended realistic problems constructed around a few main concepts1-8. Originallydeveloped by mathematics educators, and used at the pre-college level, we have been refocusingMEAs for use in upper division engineering courses. MEAs require the team to develop ageneralizable, mathematical model to solve the problem and to present both the solution methodand the
subside”(p. 56). They argue that “scientists must learn to actively ‘frame’ information to make it relevantto different audiences” (p. 56) Nisbet and Mooney identify three fundamental functions offrames: 1. Organizing: “central ideas, defining a controversy to resonate with core values and assumptions,” 2. Paring down: “complex issues by giving some aspects greater emphasis,” 3. Efficiently orienting readers by identifying: “why an issue matters, who might be responsible, and what should be done” (p. 56).Morrone, Basta, and Somerville (2012 quoting Fletcher, 2009)7 describe the framing process thisway: “how social actors use language—inclusive of rhetoric, metaphors, and storylines—tomobilise key stakeholders
a plan, implement the plan, and evaluate the so-lution. We find that students show significant deficiency in the overall problem solving pro-cess, whereas many professionals follow unique and effective tracing techniques in definingthe problem, and in developing and implementing the plan. We identify the improvement ar-eas and propose a set of learning activities for Software Engineering students to enhance theirtracing skills. We implement two learning activities in a Software Engineering course andreport our experience. Our study contributes to the improvement of training students in per-forming ART and other information-intensive tasks in Software Engineering.1 IntroductionA recent study by Begel and Simon1 shows that new college
best practices and aninstructor’s guide would be helpful to instructors striving to successfully implement the IC intheir curricula.While the IC provides a useful framework for the design process and its context, it is intended tobe used in conjunction with many of the technical analysis tools that are already taught inengineering curricula. Some of these tools include; voice of the customer, interactions, featuresand minimum viable product, main parameter of value, modularity, and product architecture.These tools and how they might react with the IC are further described in reference 3.An Introduction to the Innovation CanvasThe Innovation Canvas (see Figure 1) consists of a poster on which the design team can postideas, lists, and analyses
of 2014. The project comprises two major phases: (1) education ininnovation, entrepreneurship, and commercialization, and (2) identification and funding ofpromising and competitive technologies.The project’s education initiatives include: A comprehensive assessment of entrepreneurial orientation, perceptions and activity Page 24.1254.3 • across UT System campuses. • An Entrepreneurs Academy™, an online program designed to help faculty learn the fundamental concepts of starting a business and commercializing their innovations. The modules provided in the Academy combine a selection of best-in-class videos and
CPACE computational competencies. • Brief discussion of our efforts to develop and validate assessments to measure computational competencies for engineering students.Introduction The learning sciences have influenced repeated calls for improving engineering educationthat focus on providing students with the opportunities to integrate their knowledge acrossdisciplines through authentic problem solving 1- 6. Computation for engineering cannot simply beaddressed with one or two courses in computing or a few examples scattered in the curriculum,but must be integrated as part of an engineer’s training to become a “Holistic Engineer” 7. One of the challenges of preparing engineers for the rapidly changing workplace is to providethe
centrally located screen for subsequent discussion and collaborative attainment of a deeperunderstanding. This paper examines in-class-use cases involving three teachers of diversebackgrounds who participated in our project; the goal of which is to answer the followingquestions: 1) How did our tool change the way the way the teacher engages with studentthinking? 2) How did our technology support the teacher as he interacted with student ideas?3) What are the factors that enable the teacher to or prevent him from capitalizing onopportunities afforded by the tool to probe student reasoning? 4) How does this engagement, aswell as other aspects, affect the student discussions that result from using the tool? In so doing,we hope to inform future