). As such, lectures tend to focus on terms and definitions, and quizzes and exams emphasize memorization of such items. The result is a dry course, with little retention of concepts afterwards, little improvement in a student's insight, and little change in a student's interaction with computing technology. 1 Thus, in 2015 we invested extensive effort on creating new interactive webbased content for introducing computing technology. We focus on having students learn the fundamental concepts in computing technology, and avoid attempting to simultaneously be a
.......................................................................................................................... 4Tier 1 – Personal Effectiveness Competencies ......................................................................... 6 1.1 Interpersonal Skills ............................................................................................................ 6 1.2 Integrity ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Professionalism: ................................................................................................................. 7 1.4 Initiative............................................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Adaptability and Flexibility
work has been supported by the National Science Foundation under grant DUE-1431923/1431721/ 1432107. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of National ScienceFoundation.References1. Blikstein P. Digital fabrication and ‘making’in education: The democratization of invention. FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors. 2013:1-21.2. Wilczynski V. Academic Maker Spaces and Engineering Design. ASEE Annual Conference; 2015; Seattle, WA.3. Weinmann J. Survey and Analyis of Five Leading University Maker Spaces. Munich, Germany: Mechanical Engineering, Technical University Munich; 2014.4. Barrett T, Pizzico
-playing is to introduce students to a professional environment and to enable to not onlyfocus on their technical skills but also on their professional skills. Related styles of role-playingmay have students not only role-play different potential company positions, but also be scoredusing game-style grading to advance to new positions 1, 12.Role-playing has also been utilized to let students assume the roles of expert witnesses beinginterviewed in a mock trial with the intent of having the students encounter ethical dilemmas andpractice responding as professionals 5, 6. By placing students into a situation which forces themto ‘make the call’ in their role, the instructor is more likely to engage the students as they learnengineering ethics than
professionalpractice. In the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, one of the requirements for certification as anEngineer-in-Training (EIT), the first step towards licensure as a Professional Engineer (PE), is topass the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) Fundamentalsof Engineering (FE) examination. But one of the ways to qualify to take the FE examination isto graduate from an “undergraduate engineering curriculum in the United States accredited byABET.”1 As of September 2014, “nearly 3400 engineering programs at nearly 700 colleges anduniversities in 28 countries” had received accreditation.2 ABET states that all programs seekingaccreditation from the EAC must satisfy the General Criteria requirements at a minimum and anadditional
1.0 3-D Printer. As part of the project scoping processthe design team produced a list of design specifications as shown in Figure1.In addition, the design team performed a “state of the technology assessment” and arrived at alist of desirable attributes for their new design: • Fusion temperature is important – provide heated build platform • Air flow and temperature around build platform is important – enclose and regulate air flow • Printing time – assess nozzle diameter and allow for adjustable fusion temperature • Open Source – a good selling point with other student groupsFigure 1: The design team's assessment of the Da Vinci 1.0 3-D printer specificationsStudent OutcomesCapstone projects are a hallmark of
Fails to Exceeds with one 'no selection'. Participants most frequently (3/9) selected Meets. ● DR4: Ratings ranged across three rubric levels from Below to Exceeds with one 'no selection'. ● DR5: Ratings ranged across all four levels from Fails to Exceeds with one 'no selection'. Participants most frequently (5/11) selected Meets. ● ECE1: The majority of participants (3/4) selected Meets and the remainder (1/4) selected Below. ● ECE2: The majority of participants (3.5/4) selected Meets. ● ECE3: All participants (4/4) selected Exceeds.There was very little consistency in the ratings for indicator D3B (Document appropriateengineering design requirements using a suitable model (e.g. goals-functions-constraints
learningfor engineering and science education and be willing to take risks for the benefit of futuregenerations.Figure 1. Student work explaining wind turbine activity using engineering design worksheet.Figure 2. Student work for balloon car activity using engineering design worksheet.Figure 3. Student work for cardboard game exploring action and reaction relationship usingengineering design worksheet.References1. Friday Institute for Educational Innovation (2012). Middle and High School STEM-Student Survey. Raleigh, NC: Author.2. NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.3. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State
limited pre‐requisites understanding. However, most respond favorably to efforts to get to know them and assist them. We have learned many things about how to assist our ECASE students, and others like them, insucceeding through to graduation and into a technical career. The following is a short list ofsome challenges that we have discovered and the corresponding approach that we use to mitigatethe challenges. Many of these are corroborated in the literature as discussed in the Introductionsection of this paper. Here we consider them collectively and concretely. 1) Challenge: Students have varying needs for encouragement and prodding. Some have low confidence. Others do not yet recognize the significance of poor study