. Although it is not a LO, I was also told that my assumptions were not clearly applicable to solving problem. I did much better this week at clearly identifying all components of the problem and making sure all of the mass balances matched my process flow diagram. My assumption also were clearly used to identify my problem solving process as a real engineer would do. You could clearly see all steps of my process and my technical presentation looked professional. All of these skills can translate to my engineering career in the real world.”In first and third statements of this text (in red), the student described their experience andstatus with topics associated with problem solving and mass balances
to change. Curry [7] makes clear that critique can in fact foreclose action, by preserving the institutions (and intellectual traditions) that reward the critical project; this project of critique, and the career-building it facilities, we think, are precisely the second- university’s manifestations of engineering education research. When I imagine that as a doubter I somehow stand outside the second university, outside of the STEM establishment in its educational and workforce expressions, I mistake the nature of my life circumstances, my day-to-day security. There are few “outsides” for the tenured academic, and in particular, wherever I, the cis-gendered, abled, white, U.S.-born tenured
phase of their careers ifthey could collaborate with an international team during their educational phase [14]. Moreover,international virtual exchange programs are not associated with high cost and investmentcompared to study abroad programs and are timely and more flexible; hence can be adopted asan alternative or supplement to study abroad programs [13].IVE allows for international and intercultural interactions among students, which substantiallylowers the barriers for participating in such exchange. It is clear that IVE has potential tocontribute to sustainability, and develop the ability to collaboratively contribute to the alleviationof global sustainability issues, such as climate change [15].The InVEST (International Virtual
outpacing the supply, with renewable and environmental jobsincreasing by nearly 250% in the last five years alone [13].Engineering education can produce individuals equipped to address and prevent environmentaland social issues such as environmental toxicity, air and water pollution, and climate change.Numerous studies have shown that chemical toxicity, environmental degradation, and pollutionhave disproportionately burdened people of color, yet people of color have been historicallyexcluded from engineering education [14]. Justice- and impact-oriented STEM careers andeducational pathways may help attract and retain people of color in STEM fields and producesolutions to planetary damages [15]. A study of EOP Framework implementation at Oregon
Paper ID #38773Instructional Development at a Time of Involuntary Changes: Implicationsfor the Post-Pandemic EraDr. Qin Liu, University of Toronto, Canada Dr. Qin Liu is a Senior Research Associate with the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineer- ing Education and Practice (ISTEP), Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada. Her research interests include engineering students’ learning experiences and outcomes, includ- ing competency development and career pathways.Dr. Greg Evans, University of Toronto, Canada GREG EVANS PhD, P.Eng, FCEA, FAAAS is the Director of the Institute for
Paper ID #40551Innovations in Remote Teaching of Engineering Design TeamsProf. Soyoung Kang, University of Washington Soyoung Kang (she/her) is an assistant teaching professor and Clary Family Foundation early career pro- fessor in the mechanical engineering department at the University of Washington (UW). She is also the executive director of the Engineering Innovation in Health (EIH) program that partners teams of multidis- ciplinary undergraduate and graduate students with health professionals to develop technical solutions to pressing health challenges. Dr. Kang works closely with faculty from across the UW to foster
have relied heavily on my black female identity to position myself in my work. I have come across some papers that include the experiences of Black students that do not identify as African American, and this has truly helped me find a space that I can relate to. I remind myself of my whole identity and have found ways to integrate who I am into class discussions. I find that consistently acknowledging my own different perspectives and sharing them in class by making relevant connections helps me to shift my training of only seeing my differences as tools for career advancement. Moving forward, I want to look towards other areas of study such as education or psychology that may highlight stories of Caribbean students in their literature
/hers), mycurrent adviser, provided her perspective as an engineering faculty member without personalexperiences related to disabilities. Over the last 25 years, she has worked with manyundergraduate and graduate students to provide them with accommodations in the classroomsetting. Robyn E. Sandekian (she/her/hers), my mentor, provided her perspective as a staffmember and as a prior engineering student who experienced and received informalaccommodations for severe anxiety and depression during her academic career. As a staffmember, she has experienced the frequent tension between wanting to support a student andbeing limited by institution policy and law.Additionally, the interview participants and I are not just graduate students with
time of data collection. The College ofEngineering contains eight departments and around 6,000 undergraduate students, with alarge number of community college transfer students. There are differences between thesystems that support students at the department, school, and university levels, as there are atany large university. At the university level, a student affairs office oversees a variety ofresources, including recreation, counseling/psychological services, and career services. Theofferings by specific engineering departments are more varied, but the faculty in thesedepartments and department-focused administrators of undergraduate degree programs arepartial advisors as well. Support staff at all levels try to reach students using various
Paper ID #33345Remote Versus In-hand Hardware Laboratory in Digital Circuits CoursesDr. Rania Hussein, University of Washington Dr. Rania Hussein is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the department of electrical and computer en- gineering (ECE) at the University of Washington (UW). Throughout her career, she has developed and taught courses at all levels in electrical, computer engineering, and computer science at different insti- tutions. In response to the emergency transition to online teaching due to COVID-19, she founded the remote hardware lab at UW ECE to promote a cost-efficient and equitable access to hardware
ideas rather than immediately ruling them out because of a closed, stubborn mindset. … I realized that the rest of the semester would look very different from what we originally envisioned, but I also realized that was okay and that it was more important to keep an open mind and remain optimistic about the possibilities still remaining. I believe that both being flexible and keeping an open mind are important skills in many different aspects of life as well as in my future career. Often times, I will face unexpected situations, so I believe it is important to know how to quickly react to ensureIn this quote showing an Emerging level, the student critiques their personal and academicgrowth through
identities, social locations, and values are relevant to thiswork.First author (RSK) is an early-career contingent faculty member at Smith College, a privateliberal arts women’s college with one engineering degree program. They are a white-passing transperson of Chinese and European descent who lives and works on unceded Nipmuc and Pocumtucterritory. They approach this paper from the perspective of a new engineering educator whoseformal training is in mechanical engineering and who aspires to teach towards principles ofcollective liberation from systems of oppression and domination.Second author (JSR) approached this research from the perspective of an engineering educatorwho places a premium on interdisciplinarity and inclusion. She has taught
. Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is a research fellow and lecturer focusing on engineering education at the University of Michigan. She earned a B.A. in sociology and psychology from Case Western Reserve University and an M.A. and Ph.D. in Higher Education from the University of Michigan. Her research interests include cultural beliefs about what engineers do and who they are, students’ career thinking and trajectories, and ways to effectively facilitate more diverse, inclusive, and equitable engineering environments.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the
workplace adjustment for engineers and the corresponding influence on job satisfaction and intentions to persist. Rohini’s other interests include faculty development and engineering pathways of graduating engineers.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering
strongly hold a desire to help others as a motivator in their job selection and that more serviceengagement as students correlates with expectations that helping others will be more integratedinto one’s career as an engineer.Paterson et al [23] quantitatively assessed intercultural development using the InterculturalDevelopment Inventory (IDI) to answer two questions: the first is whether service-orientedexperiences attract engineering students with an intercultural mindset and the second is whetherparticipation in service-oriented experiences leads to elevated intercultural proficiency forengineering students. The answer to the first question was a clear yes; students attracted to suchprograms scored significantly higher on the IDI which is
strongly that attention toengineering ethics should be incorporated at the outset of a student’s academic career. Inaddition, many of the instructors in the first-year design course noted regular discussions withstudents about tradeoffs and ethical dilemmas embedded in their project. Thus, the goal of theScaffolding Ethics project was to more systematically incorporate ethical considerations into thefirst-year engineering design course.During the academic year 2019-2020, we established a research and design team within DukeUniversity’s Bass Connection program. The Scaffolding Ethics team, composed of threeundergraduates and three professors from the Pratt School of Engineering and the KenanInstitute for Ethics, met each week to determine and
Paper ID #34426Lab Every Day!! Lab Every Day?? *&%#ing Lab Every Day!? ExaminingStudent Attitudes in a Core Engineering Course Using Hands-on LearningEvery Day of ClassDr. Erin A. Henslee, Wake Forest University Dr. Erin Henslee is a Founding Faculty and Assistant Professor of Engineering at Wake Forest University. Her research spans biomedical engineering, e-sports, and STEM education. Prior to joining Wake Forest she was a Researcher Development Officer at the University of Surrey where she supported Early Career Researchers. She received her BS degrees in Engineering Science and Mechanics and Mathematics from Virginia
co-creation are at the heart of her teaching approaches, whether in lecture, work- shop, and laboratory settings. She has been actively involved in ethics, equity and leadership education in engineering since 2011.Dr. Aleksander Czekanski , CEEA-ACEG Dr. Aleksander Czekanski is an Associate Professor and NSERC Chair in Design Engineering in Lassonde School of Engineering at York University, Toronto. Before beginning his academic career in 2014, Dr. Czekanski worked for over 10 years in the automotive sector. Dr. Czekanski attention is dedicated to newly established Lassonde School of Engineering (York). He devotes his efforts towards the enrichment of Renaissance Engineering program by including interdisciplinary
undergraduate and graduate courses in power electronics, power systems, renewable energy, smart grids, control, electric machines, instrumentation, radar and remote sensing, numerical methods, space and atmosphere physics, and ap- plied physics. His research interests included power system stability, control and protection, renewable energy system analysis, assessment and design, smart microgrids, power electronics and electric machines for non-conventional energy conversion, remote sensing, wave and turbulence, numerical modeling, elec- tromagnetic compatibility and engineering education. During his career Dr. Belu published ten book chapters, several papers in referred journals and in conference proceedings in his areas of
sessions over taking the pre-calculus course during the summeris that students do not pay the extra summer tuition and housing, the student is not stressed bylearning the concepts for a passing grade, as well as the pre-calculus and its pre-requisites are notnormally offered during the summer.The afternoon sessions of the bootcamp were four hours a day, and were designed to introducestudents to the relationships and distinction between Mechanical Engineering, ElectricalEngineering, Computer Engineering, Civil Engineering and Computer Science majors. Theactivities were selected to present projects in multiple majors, and help them realize that many ofthe ENGR and CS careers rely on the application of math and critical thinking. During the
, 2018.Career Plans of Undergraduate Engineering Students: Characteristics and Contexts. In R.Freeman, and H. Salzman (eds.), U.S. Engineering in the Global Economy, Chicago, IL: TheUniversity of Chicago Press.[6] Marterlaro, N., Ju, W., The Needfinding Machine. Soro A, Brereton M, Roe P. (eds)Social Internet of Things. Internet of Things (Technology, Communication and Computing)2019. Springer, Cham. P., 51-84[7] Castro, S. Cognitive Workload Measurement and Modeling Under Divided Attention, Journalof Experimental Psychology, Human Perceptions and Performance, 45 (6), April 2019,[8] Karanian, B. with Mitiguy, P. Designing Collaboration for Generational Entrepreneuship,presentation at Munich University, July 2020.[9] Pope. D. Keeping Kids Engaged
industry in students’ projects present a win-winbenefits for all parties involved [3], [4], [5]. From experiential learning projects, students gethands-on experience working on a project and can exercise room for error with minimal risk totheir careers - a chance that might not be afforded in a work environment [4]. Both industry andschools could benefit from partnerships that allow students to exercise their creativity becausestudents may raise questions that might otherwise be missed by industry representatives andfaculty. Furthermore, the industry might benefit as there may be minimal capital investmentswhen students carry out a project [3], given that is properly scoped and managed.Another way for students to interact with experts is to
York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Tech- nology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional en- gineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and
[computing] projects are neat applications of the course material as it takes the beam problems off the page in a way, and often the CPs can model more than one type of problem. I think it's also practical to work with writing codes. Even if we never use MATLAB again after undergrad, there will be a need for writing programs like these later in our careers. At least I hope so.”Two students in Dynamics (FA19) wrote: “I liked the computing projects because they are an excellent way of applying MATLAB coding and technical writing to the concepts taught it class. I believe by telling what the code to do and then explaining it in a technical paper, I gained a better understanding of the mechanics and theory of the concepts
advantage” (in this article, we callthis privilege), the education of the dominant group, and practice and accountability[6]. Thisstudy takes an additional step to differentiate between allies and advocates, tying the differenceto programmatic levels and participation: Advocates are active and effective proponents of gender diversity and equity, specifically in terms of increasing the number of female faculty, encouraging the hiring and promotion of female faculty in administrative positions, and ensuring the fair and equitable treatment of women within partner institutions. They are committed to increasing their understanding of gender bias and its impact on the academic careers of women. Allies are men