artifacts.Due to the smaller sample size of participants afforded in this research – participation of studentsin co-curriculars is a limiting factor – we employed a quasi-experimental design. A control groupwould serve as a measure of no treatment nor exposure to new practices – just business as usual.Our assumption is that a pre-PT problem solving discussion assessment serves the same purposeas a post-assessment of a control group. That is, the students in the program are sophomore, junior,and senior undergraduates, who already bring to the study an established approach to ill-structuredproblems that has been developed over their academic careers thus far. We therefore treat the pre-PT problem solving discussion data as the control group baseline for
be held until we get them to this, this stage in their career. And all that is how we kind of push them from, "This is your design. You're gonna be out there and you're gonna be the one people are asking questions to in the future." April-18-6- Staff- 4In order to support a positive environment while challenging students, it is necessary for the staffto implement differentiated instruction and to be approachable. Differentiated instruction refersto the practice of personalized learning based on a students’ skill level, while approachabilityrefers to the openness and willingness of the staff to provide help [4,21] One staff highlights theimportance having a positive interaction with students in the quote below: I think there's a
: Online Teacher Professional Learning (Evaluation)IntroductionTo be successful in a 21st century global economy, engineers must develop a broad knowledgebase that allows them to contribute to diverse interdisciplinary teams and to creatively solveproblems faced by humanity [1]. In undergraduate and graduate engineering programsthroughout the United States, more higher education institutions are beginning to implement bio-inspired design (BID) into their engineering curriculum to better prepare their eventual graduatesfor a cross-disciplinary career (e.g., [2]; [3]). To do so, programs throughout the United Stateshave begun to integrate BID in various ways into their undergraduate and graduate-levelcurriculum, including through small modules, full
concern. Just because, I mean, we were in a meeting, and the project leader said, or the project sponsor said, ‘This is what we plan to do.’ I just raised my concerns […] I didn’t have any leadership responsibility in the project, per se. But I was just in a meeting and voiced my concern.In addition to identifying and communicating the need for important tests, James also gave severaladditional examples which emphasized that ethical engineering includes transparency, decision-making, and proper reporting. These examples were less detailed and presented more as a runthrough of different ways he has experienced these aspects in his career. One example was duringhis time as a postdoc when made decisions about using animal subjects
the Data Sciencecurriculum, mathematical foundations, computational and statistical thinking [11], [12]. Theworkshop participants felt this combination would provide a rich and effective series of coursesand would well prepare graduates for careers in Data Science [11]. The workshop resulted inidentifying key skills required for undergraduate Data Science majors to master includingcomputational and statistical thinking, mathematical foundations, model building andassessment, algorithms and software foundation, data curation, and knowledge transference(communication and responsibility)[11]. Six main subject areas of a Data Science Major wereidentified; data description and curation, mathematical foundations, computational thinking,statistical
challenge for sociotechnical engineering instruction is the evaluation of itseffects. Some of the difficulty results from the breadth of educators’ goals. Most of these effortsdo not define specific desired outcomes beyond increasing students’ ability to understand “thetechnical” and “the social” as deeply connected, and to appreciate that sociotechnical thinking isan important part of engineering work. That is, sociotechnical engineering programs andinterventions rarely prescribe desired career paths or other, more easily quantifiable goals fortheir students. Attempts to measure the success of sociotechnical thinking contextualizationtherefore require ascertaining how students’ thoughts about their work and identities haveshifted, if at all
institutionwho have expertise in curriculum design at different stages in their career. Three participants wererecruited. Table 2 presents the demographic information of the recruited participants. Participantsin the comparative case studies were students and teachers. Table 2. Demographic information of the participants Category Participant 1 Participant 2 Participant 3 Gender Female Male Female Qualification PhD PhD PhDProceduresThe interviewees were chosen based on their wide experience in curriculum design and associatedprojects. The recruitment of these participants was done by email. During
Engineering at Miami Dade College. During his academic career, he has taught more than 25 different undergraduate and graduate courses in Argentina, Puerto Rico, Mexico, and the USA, most of them in the Civil and Construction En- gineering fields. He is a California licensed professional engineer and a member of ASCE. Currently, he is a faculty member at Georgia Southern University and his research interests include structural analysis and design, vibrations, earthquake and wind engineering, remote sensing and education.Dr. Shahnam Navaee, Georgia Southern University Dr. Navaee is currently a full professor in the Department of Civil Engineering and Construction in the Allen E. Paulson College of Engineering and Computing
, Undergraduate Programs (IBBME) and the Associate Chair, Foundation Years (Division of Engineering Science), she is currently the faculty advisor for the Discovery Educational Program. Dawn is a recipient of the 2017 U of T Early Career Teaching Award and was named the 2016 Wighton Fellow for excellence in development and teaching of laboratory-based courses in Canadian UG engineering programs. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Discovery: Transition of an inquiry-focused learning program to a virtual platform during the COVID-19 pandemic (Evaluation)AbstractThe shift to distance learning in response to the COVID-19 pandemic has presented teachers
department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, KLE Technological University, India. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He was awarded the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and practicing
and testing tools in software testing,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Global Software Engineering, ser. ICGSE ’19. IEEE Press, 2019, p. 133–141. [Online]. Available: https://doi-org.ezproxy.fiu.edu/10.1109/ICGSE.2019.00036 [4] M. Kassab, J. F. DeFranco, and P. A. Laplante, “Software testing: The state of the practice,” IEEE Software, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 46–52, 2017. [5] A. Arcuri, “An experience report on applying software testing academic results in industry: we need usable automated test generation,” Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1959–1981, 2018. [6] M. Craig, P. Conrad, D. Lynch, N. Lee, and L. Anthony, “Listening to early career software developers,” J. Comput. Sci. Coll
online student teams farexceeded the projects of the traditional section teams. The quality of the presentations wassuperior for the online students, and the data analysis for the wind project was at a greater levelof detail for the online students. Both instructors feel this may be attributed to the ability of theonline students to work more effectively in teams than the face to face students.Both instructors believe that the interviews are a vital component to the course and allow thestudents to not only understand what a practicing engineer does in his or her career, but theinterviews add relevancy to the course material. Both instructors were disappointed in thenumber of students who viewed the videos and had expected that all students would
students’identity development and subsequent interest in STEM courses and careers (Morgan et al.,2016). Yet elementary teachers often have little preparation or background to teach engineeringand need support to be able to integrate engineering design into elementary science classroomsettings. Thus, research must examine the ways that elementary teachers verbally supportengineering practices. This paper explores how elementary teachers verbally support students’engagement in engineering practices in an NGSS-aligned unit. In particular, this paper comparesthe same teachers implementing the same curriculum across two class sections with differentstudent populations. By exploring teacher talk across two different student contexts, we aim tohelp the field
departments, despite being considerably smaller than most andlacking its own degree program. Faculty in CES participate in the administrative operation of theuniversity just as faculty from other departments do. Their position between engineering and thehumanities and social sciences has also enabled CES members to easily interact with colleaguesfrom across the university, to take on administrative roles that have normally been reserved forsenior faculty, and to consistently advance up the career ladder. Finally, CES has been able tofacilitate frequent interdisciplinary discussions and initiatives within the university.Accreditation The Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB) specifies 12 attributes whichgraduates of accredited
different types of belonging and different supports of belonging, in classroom and out-of-school learning spaces, can serve to foster STEM- related identities and career aspirations in Black youth. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The Double Bind of Constructionism: A Case Study on the Barriers for Con- structionist Learning in Pre-college Engineering EducationIntroduction In the United States, constructionist learning theory (i.e. constructionism) has been one ofthe dominant paradigms underpinning pre-college engineering education both out-of-school andin-school. Historically grounded in mathematician Seymour Papert’s research with the educa
Disagree Neutral Agree Disagree Agree Thinking of what to sketch encouraged me to think more deeply about the lesson 4.8% 33.3% 14.3% 38.1% 9.5% material. The napkin sketch exercise helped me generate methods to remember the 4.8% 23.8% 28.6% 38.1% 4.8% engineering concepts. The napkin sketch activity encouraged me to think about the lesson material in a 4.8% 14.3% 4.8% 61.9% 14.3% different manner. Sketching ability is important to my career. 0.0% 14.3% 28.6% 52.4% 4.8
Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program fo- cused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Luke Kachelmeier, University of New Mexico Luke Kachelmeier finished his bachelor’s degree from the University of New Mexico in May 2019. He completed a double major degree in applied math and psychology. His interests are in human factors
, motivations, and career goals of undergraduate students initially pursuing engineering degrees. Dissertation. University of Colorado Boulder.[20] Holbrook, A.L., M.C. Green, J.A. Krosnick. 2003. Telephone vs. face-to-face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires: comparisons of respondent satisficing and social desirability response bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67 (1), 79-125.[21] Canney, N.E., A.R. Bielefeldt. 2015. Volunteerism in engineering students and its relation to social responsibility. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Paper ID #12231, 12 pp.[22] Simmons, D.R., Y. Ye, M.W. Ohland, K. Garahan. 2017. Understanding students’ incentives for and
engineering education and has taught a vast array of under- graduate and graduate courses in applied mechanics. Apart from her academic experience she has worked in numerous industries as an Engineering Consultant. Finally, since the beginning of her career, Dr. Singh has been very active in K-12 outreach and in promoting Women in Science and Engineering. Dr. Singh is a registered Professional Engineer (P.Eng.) in the province of Alberta. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Using Assessments to Improve Student Outcomes in Engineering DynamicsAbstractEngineering Dynamics has historically been one of the most challenging courses in theengineering
courses for engineering students,especially senior undergraduate students to help them develop their competencies for futurecareers as junior engineers when they graduate. At the University of Oklahoma(OU), AME4163:Principles of Engineering Design, a course for preparing senior undergraduate students for theirfuture career in engineering through experiential learning [2]. Our goal in AME4163: Principlesof Engineering Design (POED) is to offer Junior Engineers the opportunity to learn by reflectingon doing in an immersive authentic environment. We hypothesize that by having engineeringstudents reflect on an experience related to a principle of engineering design and articulate a lessonlearned that they will develop the ability to continue identify
, throughintegrated design. This paper proposes to extend a typical mechatronics course beyond traditionalengineering topics, and to modernize the mechatronics instructions with complementary quantumengineering topics. With the recent rapid advances in quantum technologies such as quantumcommunications, sensing, computers, and algorithms, it is imperative that next generation ofengineers be trained in quantum technologies, and prepare them for their future careers in the ever-changing industry in such areas. Furthermore, due to such progress and advances in the fieldsassociated with the applications of quantum mechanics, the integration of quantum technologieswith classical mechanical systems will be inevitable both in terms of educational and
overcrowded technical curriculum allows forlittle attention to be inserting a sustained discussion of ethical, social and political issues into thisovercrowded curriculum. The injection of a discussion of ethical issues into a curriculum is madeeven more difficult when professors often defend ideologies and the use of essential categoriesthat are discipline specific and they remain committed to the pursuit of research agendas that areat times beyond the understanding of the students who are being taught and that have questionablerelevance to the careers students are pursuing. A method for teaching engineering and ICT ethicsmust connect to the life world of engineering professionals in the field and to problems occurringin that world and to the lived
EV350 areprovided in Table 4. Traditional activities are noted with a “T” and newer methods are notedwith an “N.” Methods listed that relate to students demonstrating active learning and adding toan engaging classroom atmosphere that bridge the gap between traditional and new methods arenoted with both a “T” and “N.”Table 4. List of synchronous traditional (T) and new (N) activities in EV350 with which toaward instructor points and encourage student engagement through demonstrated active learning. T N ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITY T N Asking clarifying question at the start of class regarding material assigned for the day’s lesson T N Asking a closing question at the end of class regarding experiences and career experiences N Earning
Energy Manufacturing curriculum development. Currently, he is involved in the evaluation and research of two federal grants regarding student success. One of the grants aims at providing undergraduate engineering minority students opportunities for acquiring 21st century knowledge and skills required to compete with a technology-rich workforce environment. The second grant aims at providing educational and administrative support to undergraduate student in areas of career and financial management planning. He has been selected as Research Fellow at the Educational Test- ing Service at Princeton for two consecutive summer terms. He has been program chair and president of the regional association (Southwest Educational
authentic engineering test equipment to evaluate materials. For some students,this experience may have reinforced their decision to pursue an engineering career, and theirenthusiasm may translate into increased persistence toward degree completion.Nevertheless, MPC students encountered significant challenges to learning from the lecturecontent resources and especially from the virtual approach used for some of the laboratoryactivities. Modifications to these resources proved successful during a subsequentimplementation of the course at MPC the following year. Student attitudes regarding all courseactivities improved relative to the previous MPC implementation, as had all of the objectivemeasures of student learning. In fact, although the learning
their learning and career preparation. The Vertically IntegratedProjects (VIP) Program was created to overcome this fragmented environment.Undergraduates who join VIP teams earn academic credit for their participation in discovery,design and other creative efforts that assist faculty with their research. Each team is: large – 10to 20 undergraduates each semester; vertically integrated – including sophomores through PhDstudents each semester; long-term – each undergraduate may participate for three years, with1 This paper has a companion paper at the ASEE Annual Conference that discusses the characteristics of the set ofUS VIP sites. The overview of the fundamentals of VIP at the beginning of both papers is very similar, but thecurricular