IntroductionEvery measurable quantity in the physical sciences is a tensor. Mass, distance, time, position,velocity, acceleration, momentum, force, torque, work, energy, pressure, charge, the electric andmagnetic fields, temperature, heat, entropy, stress, strain, moment of inertia, curvature—these areall tensor quantities. Every time we write down an equation, perform a calculation, take ameasurement, run a simulation, or perform an experiment, we are dealing with tensors in one wayor another. Indeed, the very laws that govern the universe are most conveniently formulated astensor differential equations. It is therefore no exaggeration to say that, as scientists andengineers, we work with tensors on a day-to-day basis throughout our entire careers. And so
solution’ when the research paper is completed.The new instructions for the research paper project and presentation are given in Figure 2 andthese deliverables are due during the last week of the quarter. The text narration in the newinstructions came mostly from the KEEN framework, depicted in Figure 1. The narrative wasadapted to fit the course description and content of EE 463. The research project intends toincrease students’ development of entrepreneurial skills to further their career in engineeringwhile understanding research trends in communications.Research Paper and Presentation Based on Author’s Air Force ExperienceThe idea of the project was based the one of the author’s Air Force experience during his twenty-six years in managing
. However, some items still needed to be cut, as thegoal of piloting these two surveys was to shorten them and combine them in to one. As a result,we looked back to interview data gathered previously [11] and determined that the best items tocut were 'My family sees me as a SCIENTIST' and 'Others ask me for help with SCIENCE'. Thefirst was cut due to statements from students that, as they became increasingly specialized intheir graduate careers, their families were less familiar with the work they were doing and theylooked to them less often for recognition and approval. The second was cut to maximizeparsimony, as it potentially conflated 'recognition' with 'performance/competence' and there wasalready an adequate number of 'recognition
the author of several technical publications, including 17 journal papers and two book chapters. She received an NSF CAREER award in 2014. Dr. Marais has worked in engineering for two decades, first in industry and then in academia. She holds a B. Eng. in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Stellenbosch, a B.Sc. in Mathematics from the University of South Africa, and an S.M and Ph.D. from the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at MIT.Hanxi Sun, Purdue University Hanxi Sun is a Ph.D. candidate at the Department of Statistics of Purdue University. Her research focuses on nonparametric Bayesian statistics and applied statistics. Hanxi received a master degree in Statistics at
Paper ID #23589Development of an Introduction to Circuits Course and Lab for MechanicalEngineering Students via Systematic Design of InstructionDr. Grant Crawford, Quinnipiac University Grant Crawford, PhD, P.E., Colonel (retired) U.S. Army, is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of Career Development for the School of Engineering at Quinnipiac University. He is the former Director of the Mechanical Engineering Program at the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York. Grant graduated from West Point in 1985 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Me- chanical Engineering. He earned a M.S. degree
identified the Chair of Scrap as something that affects how they designtoday and/or is a main takeaway from the class (which they completed more than two years priorto the interview). A set of quotes about the Chair of Scrap from actual responses is shown inTable 1.Chris1, a senior about to graduate, speaks to “vividly” remembering the Chair of Scrap from thefirst week of her college career. Pat speaks to the assignment “hammering home” through a“shock and awe” approach the need to focus on users and solving the right problem. Five of thesix refer to how almost no students talk to the users as part of the Chair of Scrap and that thatwas the main point. All six directly connect the Chair of Scrap project to learning about theimportance of engaging
to near- and long-term assessment will enable not only MAE but also otherengineering schools and departments to offer concrete learning outcomes and produce actual datato support those outcomes.There is much yet to learn. We are looking forward to the insights that that data most certainlywill provide. Still, we believe that we have made a promising start toward planning andimplementing an alternative communications curriculum that empowers students to actually be“work-ready” as communicators when they begin their professional engineering careers. And,while we must be careful with our inferences so early in the research process and from such asmall sample size, we believe that it is at least safe to suggest that the pilot ENGRC 2250 has hada
scientific writing support, and then describe our activity including asummary of possible benefits and challenges. We conclude in section 5 with some thoughts onhow we see our program developing in the future, and also with a summary of our impressionson the usefulness of this learning community initiative to provide scientific writing support toengineering graduate students.2 Engineering graduate students and scientific writing2.1 The importance of scientific writing for engineering graduate studentsGraduate students must share the results of their research, mainly by writing and publishingscientific papers, in order to disseminate their ideas and begin the path to a successful career, beit in academia or industry. Studies have shown that
and potential collaborationbetween engineering librarians and mechanical engineering faculty. For the course in this study,the plan for next year will be to use these instructional activities again. It also has started thediscussion of where additional library collaboration earlier in the mechanical engineeringprogram would be appropriate and beneficial. This additional exposure and training will buildfamiliarity with information fluency skills, which may be perceived as difficult, but are essentialin the professional environment.Works Cited[1] G. Kerins, “Information seeking and students studying for professional careers: The cases of engineering and law students in Ireland,” Inf. Res. Int. Electron. J., vol. 10, no. 1, Oct. 2004.[2] S
U.S. National Science Foundation’s Early Career Award in 2009. He is co-editor of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (CHEER) published by Cam- bridge University Press, New York, NY. Dr. Johri earned his Ph.D. in Learning Sciences and Technology Design at Stanford University and a B.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at Delhi College of Engineering.Dr. Aqdas Malik, George Mason University Aqdas Malik is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Department of Information Sciences and Tech- nology, George Mason University. His multidisciplinary academic and industry experience spans two key disciplines: Human-Computer Interaction and Social Media Communication and Analytics. He is currently engaged in a
fromtheir disciplines, they also develop and apply professional skills important to team functioning,which will translate to their future careers. The large-scale, long-term projects mirror situationsstudents will encounter in the workforce. As they join large ongoing projects, they are onboardedby peers, but also take responsibility for their own learning as they get up to speed. They dealwith decisions made in previous years and with documentation developed by others; conversely,their own documentation becomes a resource for the team. They also learn and apply professionalcommunication skills, communicating problems to the appropriate individuals and navigatingconflict. 6. Multi-disciplinary teams are encouraged but not required. Multi
. One thousand and eighty-four responses were collected; 520 collected betweenweeks 1 and 3; 222 responses between weeks 4 and 6; and 342 responses collected betweenweeks 7-9. The average participation rate across the clases for participation in at least one of thefeedback commenting opportunities was 66.3%.Data were collected roughly every 3rd week on different topics. In week one students providedpersonal information about their styles of learning and engineering interests. Every weekstudents provided ‘Muddiest Point’ feedback about the concepts and content they werestruggling with [4]. Additional feedback responses were collected about exams and quizzes, thelab section of the course, career planning and goals, and end of semester comments
Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross
faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering educa- tion. While at Oklahoma State, he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he took a chair position in electrical engineering at Bucknell University. He is currently interested in engineering design education, engineering education policy, and the philosophy of engineering education.Dr. Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of industrial
Post- doctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Dr. Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico Jamie Gomez, Ph.D., is a Senior Lecturer III in the department of Chemical & Biological Engineering (CBE) at the University of New Mexico. She is a co- principal investigator for the following National Science
perspectives.Notwithstanding the issue of finance, or indicators of issues for research raised by this study,as for example, levels of required mathematical attainment, Krupczak shows there is plentyof research to be done in this area that is not being done and should be done. He writes,“one suggestion for research might be to inquire of those engineers whose career paths haveled them out of engineering into positions in which they are making contributions in otherspheres of activity. Engineering is well known for the fact that many formally trained asengineers are now fulfilling other responsibilities that may also be occupied by individualswith other types of formal training. All types of business and management are obviousexamples but individuals formally trained
degree from Clemson University. His research interests focus on teacher education and students learning issues within Engineering Education/Pedagogy and Computa- tional Thinking/Pedagogy field of studies. He received national and international recognitions including an Early Career Researcher award from European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) and a Jhumki Basu Scholar award from National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST). In addition, he is one of two scholarship recipients awarded by NARST to attend the ESERA summer re- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in 2016. He can be reached at iyeter@purdue.edu. search program in Cesk´Dr. Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Campbell
members of the “ADA Generation,” or the first children togrow up with legally mandated access to education. The oldest of these young people are now intheir late twenties and early thirties, still fairly early in their careers. Since they were often thefirst Deaf students in their engineering programs, their engineering educations have beenconducted, with very few exceptions, entirely in spoken English.The state of sign language usage in postsecondary engineering educationDeaf engineers and their sign language interpreters (hereafter, “interpreters” will refer to signlanguage interpreters in this paper) have been using sign language to communicate abouttechnical topics for many years. However, due to Deaf engineers largely being educated
Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). https://engineering.tufts.edu/me/people/faculty/kristen- bethke-wendellNicole Alexandra Batrouny, Tufts University PhD candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Tufts University. Interests: upper elementary engineering education, integrated science and engineering, collaboration in engineering, decision making in engineer- ing.Dr. Tejaswini S. Dalvi, Univeristy of Massachusetts, Boston c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Elementary Students Navigating the Demands of Giving Engineering Design Peer Feedback (Fundamental) Throughout the design process, practicing engineers seek out feedback on their
first Ph.D. in me- chanical engineering from National University of Singapore in 1997. She served as Assistant Professor and subsequently Associate Professor in mechatronics engineering at University of Adelaide, Australia, and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, respectively. In 2006, she resigned from her faculty job and came to Connecticut for family reunion. Throughout her academic career in Australia and Sin- gapore, she had developed a very strong interest in learning psychology and educational measurement. She then opted for a second Ph.D. in educational psychology, specialized in measurement, evaluation and assessment at University of Connecticut. She earned her second Ph.D. in 2010. Li has a unique
Engineering in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He completed his PhD degree majoring in Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis in Engineering Education and minoring in Educational Psychology as well as an MS degree in Petroleum Engineering at Texas Tech University. He also obtained an MEd degree from Clemson University. His research interests focus on teacher education and students learning issues within Engineering Education/Pedagogy and Computa- tional Thinking/Pedagogy field of studies. He received national and international recognitions including an Early Career Researcher award from European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) and a Jhumki Basu Scholar award from National
reflective engineer will be something that will encompass my entire engineering career but I feel that I am much more aware now, and this class is a direct link to this positive lifestyle.” —Student 03One student at a time... 13 of 20Acknowledgements The pilot course described here was conducted with partial support from Texas TechUniversity under a Seed Grant for Interdisciplinary Research. The data analysis and paperwriting were conducted with partial support from the National Science Foundation under GrantNo. 1806889. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily
, construction, experimentation,and data analysis skills. Student feedback collected for each course offering indicated thatstudents had a better visual and physical understanding of various steel LFRS systems byundergoing the complete cycle of design, fabrication, testing, and analysis. As a result, studentswere able to more fully comprehend consequences of their design decisions, lessons which theywill hopefully draw on in their future structural engineering career focusing on seismic design.IntroductionAn undergraduate course in structural steel design is typical in the civil (structures focus) andarchitectural engineering degree track. Common curriculum for this course is the analysis anddesign of: (i) steel and composite members subject to
associate professor and Associate School Head in the School of Civil and Environmen- tal Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize prac- ticing engineers’ understandings of core engineering concepts. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education.Mr. Matthew Stephen Barner, Oregon State University M.S. student at Oregon State University working under Dr. Shane Brown. Research interests include: engineering education, diffusions of innovation, concerns-based adoption model, conceptual change theory, and earthquake engineering.Dr. Masoud Ghodrat
when possible. Encourage students to attend relevant extracurricular activities. Encourage teamwork, group projects, etc. Highlight relevant news or current events relevant to the course. Relate course material to familiar phenomenon and problems that students may be called upon to solve in their intended careers. ○ Get to class early and post something on the screen (the NASA picture of the day or equivalent, quote, physical object on document camera, etc.) and ask students: what do you notice? What do you wonder? Spend the first few minutes of class talking about it. -- from Chapter 7 in [5] ○ Resources: i) Everyday Engineering Examples - blog
abstract learning and higher order thinking ability. Authors found that therewere no significant gender differences in CS skills, and the activity encouraged both men andwomen and can potentially solve the problem of underrepresentation of female students incomputer science. Authors also reported that females scored much better on higher-order thinkingskills in comparison to men.Similarly, using a mix-method design, Cakir et al. (2017) developed and evaluated a game-designworkshop in order to improve young girls’ abilities of programming and consequently enhancetheir views of the CS career. Changing young girls’ attitude help them develop their identity as acomputer scientist. Analysis of surveys, interviews and game content indicated that the
strategies in their classroom, andprepare them to value effective teaching as part of their career aspirations [5]. Furthermore,Eddy, Converse, and Wenderoth [8] discuss how these strategies developed to encourage activelearning need to acknowledge the day-to-day life of faculty as well as potential barriers describedin the literature, such as the limited effort to train faculty members on teaching methods. At theindividual level, faculty may not recognize that their teaching strategies are not as effective asother strategies; professors can lack clarity of what active learning is, or how to engage studentsin active learning strategies, and finally, they doubt about the implementation of the teachingtechniques [10], [11], [12]. Moreover, literature