2006-2205: WHAT’S SO IMPORTANT ABOUT PEER REVIEW OF TEACHINGPORTFOLIO COMPONENTS? AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OFPEER-REVIEW EPISODES WITHIN ETPPJennifer Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is an assistant professor in the Department of Technical Communication at the University of Washington. She holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her interests include engineering education, learner-centered design, user-centered design, and audience analysis. Dr. Turns is currently working on multiple NSF grants dealing with engineering education including an NSF Career award exploring the impact of portfolio construction on engineering students
knowledge • Striving for in-depth understanding rather than superficial awareness • Expressing one’s ideas and findings through elaborated communication(adapted from the School of Education, University of Wisconsin, electronic portfoliowebsite, http://careers.education.wisc.edu/epcsonline/public/help/fromPortfolios.cfmIn the course curriculum, teaching and learning philosophy, and micro-teachingexperiences, students build on their prior knowledge of their discipline and teaching andlearning, demonstrate in-depth understanding by using their prior knowledge to “facilitatecomplex understanding of discrete problems,” and communicate their understandings ineffectively designed products that are of value in their professional careers. Weencouraged
Results Correlated with Student CharacteristicsStudents’ opinions of the ALPs were correlated with their “expected grade in class”, “careerplans after graduation” and “overall G.P.A.”. The student’s expected grade was measured afterapproximately one month of class so this measure is likely an indication of how well the studentsfelt they understood the material as they progressed through the class. No differences in opinionwere observed as function of “career plans after graduation” or “overall G.P.A”. For mostsurvey questions there were no trends in correlation between expected grade and survey opinion.T-tests were used to evaluate statistical significance. In each graph the error bars are twostandard errors. When the error bars do not overlap
identity, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through ser- vice, problem based learning methodologies, assessment of student learning, as well as complex problem solving. Her other research interests lie in cardiovascular fluid mechanics, sustainability, and K-12 en- gineering outreach. Dr. Pierrakos is a 2009 NSF CAREER Awardee. Dr. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in Engineering Science and Mechanics, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a Ph.D. in Biomedical En- gineering from Virginia Tech.Dr. Chris Swan, Tufts UniversityDr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, &
jobs and starting their working careers. • Program dynamics. As described in Section 2, our focus on a strong, self-sustaining cohort is a key element in GSEP’s recruitment and retention strategy. Interactions between students returning from successful years abroad with those in the preparation phase are incredibly valuable for motivation and retention; there is nothing more meaningful and credible than an enthusiastic report from a peer.In sum, sending students abroad in the fourth year provides for a broad variety of logistical andpractical benefits, striking a good balance between preparation before going abroad and time todigest the experience and give back to the program upon return.How important is the
of Washington. She also works as a Research Assistant at the University of Washington (UW) Center for Workforce Development (CWD), where she conducts qualitative research and analysis on the Project to Assess Climate in Engineering (PACE) project. Her research interests include P-20 school-community relations and community capacity building/development in low-income urban and first-ring suburban en- vironments, supporting low-income students in accessing quality educational opportunities and experi- ences, and providing pathways and supports for low-income students and other underrepresented groups to pursue STEM-related careers. Her dissertation study is focused on the role that a community-based organization
content, and real-world applications to societally-relevantproblems that they previously did not recognize. This transformation carried into theirclassrooms through design and problem-based learning units, and through increased advocacyfor sustainable energy solutions and STEM educational and career paths.Relevance and Integration in Secondary Mathematics and Science InstructionMathematics educators recognize the need to develop a more relevant curriculum for studentsand are exploring new approaches that connect mathematical concepts with real life. Scienceeducators are also increasingly situating science in societally-relevant contexts where scientificknowledge from different areas can be integrated to solve meaningful problems. There
tobuild on concepts that were covered in the Fundamentals of Metrology course withoutcompletely covering each topic again, eliminating much of the previous duplication.Prerequisites for the course include having a demonstrated knowledge of basic mathematics andcompletion of a number of reading assignments. It was also determined during needs assessmentthat OWM instructors were spending excessive time helping students with remedial mathematicstasks. Successful completion of mathematics pre-examination is often required in the continuingeducation environment; however, course titles or numbers with designated passing levels couldbe used in a university setting. In the metrology career field, most professionals already have ascientific, mathematics
consider future careers as engineers.Making Mistakes It is O.K. to fail at an engineering task because students can learn from theiris O.K. mistakes.Teacher Increase of teachers’ interest and confidence in learning and teachingMotivation engineering.Anyone can do Anyone can do and all ages can learn engineering.EngineeringEngineering is Fun Engineering is fun for teachers and will be fun for their studentsTeacher Collaboration among teachers from the same grade or different grade levelsTeamwork to incorporate engineering into their classrooms. Page 23.838.9 70.0
on when you’re away from home, like when you’rein a situation like that [being in a foreign environment]. And you realize what’s important andwhat you want to be focusing on and what you should be focusing on. -Cameroon TripParticipantsYou don’t get that when you’re in a classroom. It’s when you’re out there and you’re talking topeople that are suffering from water-borne illnesses and have children that are malnourished,that you really see the need. And I was able to really understand that more. -Guatemala TripParticipantOne of the most salient outcomes of participation in EWB that was observed was personalgrowth. Students openly recognized the impact their involvement in EWB had on theirperspective of themselves, their career and the world
Paper ID #8833A comparison of student misconceptions in rotational and rectilinear motionDr. Warren A Turner, Westfield State UniversityDr. Glenn W Ellis, Smith CollegeDr. Robert J. Beichner, North Carolina State University For much of Professor Beichner’s career he has focused his attention on redesigning introductory physics education and created the SCALE-UP (Student Centered Activities for Large Enrollment University Physics) project. SCALE-UP has been adopted at more than 250 universities and had spread to other content areas and into middle and high schools, necessitating a name change to Student Centered Active
thestudent learning process. While content knowledge is important, keeping students motivated,self-regulated, and efficacious will help students reach their academic and career goals. Page 24.91.17Table 4. Descriptive Statistics for Student Performance on Content-Based Tests Control Group Treatment Group Mean SD Mean SD PreT1 17.80 14.25 9.53 10.44 PreT2 6.77 8.10 4.73 8.01 PreT3 1.95 4.63 1.40 4.24 PreT4 1.83 5.30 1.13 3.14 T1Pre 75.56
Paper ID #9597A Study of Feedback Provided to Student Teams Engaged in Open-EndedProjectsDr. Laura Hirshfield, Oregon State University Laura Hirshfield is a Post-Doctoral Scholar at Oregon State University. She received her B.S. from the University of Michigan and her Ph.D. from Purdue University, both in chemical engineering. She is cur- rently doing research in the engineering education field, investigating technology-mediated active learning in a chemical engineering curriculum. After her post-doc, she plans to pursue a career in academia.Ms. Jaynie L. Whinnery, Oregon State University Jaynie Whinnery is a graduate
be provided with all the required information. In eithercase, the primary objective of the laboratory is not being met. Another option, contrary to thetraditional laboratory format, is to use Competition Based Learning in the course. Competition Based Learning is essentially project-based learning, still involving teams ofstudents in an open-ended assignment resembling a scaled down version of a problem they mayencounter in their career; the added twist is accounting for the performance of the resultingspecimen during final project testing with respect to other groups in the course. The hope is togenerate motivation in the students to have the best overall project and eliminate the tendency ofjust doing enough to get by. This paper
engineering problems in avariety of engineering fields. The CSA modules developed based on these software packagesrequire proprietary compatible software on users’ computers to play animation. Thesecommercial software packages are powerful, and instructors do not need to spend financial andhuman resources to develop CSA modules and programs. In addition, students have anopportunity to learn high-end simulation packages that they will use in senior level courses andin professional careers later on 43. However, because the commercial software packages arecomprehensive and require users to have full knowledge about the domain and to take time tolearn, the upfront and maintenance costs of these proprietary software packages are expensiveand can be
. She was recently recognized by the Bagley College of Engineering with the 2013 Career Award. She has also been recognized at MSU with the 2001 Outstanding Faculty Woman Award, a 2001 Hearin Professor of Engineering award, and the 1999 College of Engineering Outstanding Engineering Educator Award.Dr. Hossein Toghiani, Mississippi State University Dr. Hossein Toghiani is the Thomas B. Nusz Endowed professor and an associate professor of Chemical Engineering at Mississippi State. He received his B.S.Ch.E., M.S.Ch.E., and Ph.D. in Chemical Engi- neering from the University of Missouri-Columbia. A member of the Bagley College of Engineering Academy of Distinguished Teachers, Dr. Toghiani has taught a variety of courses
, Bethlehem, PA. with Professor Mohammed El- Aasser in the Emulsion Polymers Institute in the Department of Chemical Engineering as part of the Poly- mer Science and Engineering program. I received my Ph.D in 2000 for a dissertation entitled: ”Grafting Reactions in the Emulsion Polymerization of Vinyl Acetate using Poly(vinyl alcohol) as Emulsifier”. Upon graduation, I was hired into the Ph.D Career Development Program at Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., PA. where I conducted three one-year rotations in each of the three divisions: Polymer Chemicals Technology, Corporate R&D Science & Technology Center (CSTC) and Gases and Electronics Advanced Technology. I gained experience developing photoresist polymers for
of people with very strong physics backgrounds; and people in my discipline sort of have physics-envy, and they all ideally would like to be theoretical physicists. And so there’s a pecking order as there is in many disciplines with you know – people who are more physically based at the top and everybody else is down here. And so I’ve actually spent a lot of my career as somebody that’s not particularly good at the physics end of things either wishing I Page 23.89.13 was better or trying to justify my own existence to people who are better at that sort of thing. ((I: UM-HUM.)) And one of my mentors
Education (CIEE) and Director of the Advanced Thermal Fluids Laboratory. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineer identity, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service, problem based learning methodologies, assessment of student learning, as well as com- plex problem solving. Her other research interests lie in cardiovascular fluid mechanics, sustainability, and K-12 engineering outreach. Dr. Pierrakos is a 2009 NSF CAREER Awardee. Dr. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in Engineering Science and Mechanics, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Virginia Tech.Dr. Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University
received her BS and MSdegrees in Chemical Engineering from Michigan Technological University.JAMES HERTEL comes to teaching following 25 years in business developing automated industrial machinery. Hereceived the BSME from Marquette University and the MS from Lawrence Universityand an MSME from theUniversity of Washington, Seattle. He is currently teaching Fundamentals of Engineering I & II, Statics andMechanics of Materials and advises the Automotive Systems Enterprise.DOUG OPPLIGER is a lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan TechnologicalUniversity. He earned his BSCE from Michigan Tech and worked for several years in the Marine ConstructionIndustry. He returned to school to pursue a career in teaching and
frustration over trying to find solutions to problems for which the technical aspects were relatively mundane in comparison to the social and economic aspects. The essays from the REU program, in contrast, revolve very much around the research experience in a unique setting. The difference in student experience is also evident in the difference in post-graduation career choice of the students (with nearly all REU participants heading towards graduate education while the Haiti participants chose a number of paths including service and graduate school). Hence, it can be concluded that these three models produce three unique outcomes. • These learning experiences appear to preferentially attract women engineering students. The
education.II. Circles of Learning for Entering Students (CircLES)The Circles of Learning for Entering Students (CircLES) program is a key component of theModel Institutions for Excellence (MIE) project at UTEP.11, 12, 13, & 14 CircLES is dedicated toproviding all pre-science and pre-engineering students with opportunities to develop the skillsand knowledge associated with a successful college career, to enhance student leadership skillsand self-awareness, to make connections with the university, the engineering and/or sciencecolleges and programs, and to become acquainted with STEM faculty, staff, upper divisionstudents, and their peers. The goals of the CircLES program are to increase student persistence,improve their academic performance, and
76 17 7 66 29 5 Interesting and engaging 54 36 10 88 9 4 Frustrating and confusing 7 25 68 18 23 59 Supported by lecture 93 7 0 74 23 4 Can apply to other problems 74 21 5 70 21 9DiscussionThe grades in this course have historically been rather high. This can be attributed to the fact thatat this point in their academic careers students have seen many of these topics, either in otherclasses or on co-op. However, it is interesting to note that even with greater
research and teaching awards at the departmental, college, and national levels for his focus on freshman instruction.Mr. Warren R Hull Sr. P.E., Louisiana State University Warren R. Hull, Sr. is the Manager of engineering communications at Louisiana State University. He earned a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Louisiana State University and an M.S. in environmental health from Harvard University. His engineering career spans more than 40 years. He is a licensed Professional Engineer who was previously an engineering consultant, and is also a retired U.S. Air Force officer.Dr. Dianne Raubenheimer, Meredith College
me. If there are a limitedd number off internships available, it Page 25.800.7increasess competitionn amongst th he student bo ody. We havve found thatt the studentts who particcipateare noticeably motivated to maintain their grade point average and work ethic. The interns oftenreceive the advantage of closer advisement and mentoring in both academic and companysettings and profit from enhanced career preparation.A school benefits from internships by promoting their existence and piquing the interest ofpotential students. We have observed higher rates of graduation among students who completedinternships. This can give an institution
impacts on sustainability. The internships alsoincreased their ability to work effectively in multidisciplinary teams. Particularly encouragingare the responses that students will be more likely to consider sustainable design options in theirfuture careers, with 5 students strongly agreeing and one student agreeing.Company representatives also completed a survey, with the goal of collecting information toimprove future internship experiences. The fact that all companies want to participate in theprogram again and would recommend the program to other companies is positive. Our hope isthat these initial internships will initiate long-term partnerships that will enable the internshipprogram to continue
contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, Page 25.940.2and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.Abstract With increasing pressures on engineering and technology education programs to preparestudents for careers in ever-changing, more complex and global society, the importance ofinternational student exchange becomes an even more significant component of engineering andtechnology curricula. Utilizing an effective evaluation model to assess the value added impact ofthese programs is a critical component of the overall assessment of any engineering educationprogram—particularly those
that immerses the student in the academic literature surrounding the relationships between climate and hydrologic processes, and how these rela- tionships impact the various sectors of society, including agricultural production. Dr. Adam is a recent recipient of outstanding teaching awards at both the WSU departmental and collegiate levels.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Washington State University Dr. Brown conducts research in conceptual and epistemological change, social capital, and diffusion of innovations. In 2011 he received the NSF CAREER Award to investigate how engineers think about and use concepts that academics consider to be important.Mr. Andrew P Easley, Washington State University Andrew Easley is a
journey of joy: A caring college professor has a clear understanding of the value ofthe topics and course material that he/she teaches and their impact on the professional andpersonal development of students. As an example, if a teacher treats applied mechanics asan end in itself, he/she is not stimulating the students in putting the material in the mostmeaningful context. Although the material may eventually become “second nature” to thestudents, they may fail to appreciate and enjoy the subject because they did not perceiveits relevance and applications to their future course work and their career. This is amissed opportunity that the faculty member ought to capitalize on! And make the courseenjoyable irrespective of its standing in the overall