possible in class) and external (e.g. theworld is getting better). It is not yet clear if LTS is an influencing agent, or simply a benefactorof attracting such-minded people28. Interestingly, like knowledge, there are no differences in mindset between LTS and NoLTS. Mindset is thought to be central to learning outcomes. Growth mindset people tend to relishchallenges, fixed mindset people get easily discouraged by challenges. It appears engineeringbenefits from having a healthy majority of growth mindset students, this maybe a prerequisite innavigating the academic obstacles to becoming an engineering student in the first place. Futureevaluation will begin to map this mindset with dialogue about engineering experiences from theinterviews
promote 21st century skills andhelp learners build up their “habit of mind” [2] for scientific reasoning and inquiry.Computing has made possible profound leaps of innovations and imagination, resulting infundamentally new ways of science and engineering practice [3]. This paradigm shift has asignificant impact on the skills needed for a diverse science and engineering workforce who iscapable of designing and deploying cyber-based systems, tools and services. However, oureducation has not kept pace with this evolution, especially at the K-12 level. In fact, there is acrucial need to bring cyberinfrastructure (CI) learning experiences into classrooms of secondaryeducation.Environmental sustainability has become increasingly prevalent in teaching
Green Design Project Part 1: The Hybrid Powertrain ProjectAbstractSubjects that are separate in the curriculum, such as thermodynamics and mechanical design, areintegrated in practice, since thermal and mechanical systems must function cohesively in realmechanical systems (e.g. an air conditioner). With this in mind, we are beginning theimplementation of a novel, potentially transformative approach to integrating courseworkthrough five semesters of the core mechanical engineering curriculum.The centerpiece of this research is a long-term design/build/test project that will be developed bystudents over the course of five semesters. The project, a bench-scale hybrid powertrain, isimplemented in modules, so that parts of the
AC 2012-3625: REPRESENTATION GUIDANCE WITH ABSTRACT ANDCONTEXTUALIZED REPRESENTATION: EFFECTS ON ENGINEERINGLEARNING PERFORMANCE IN TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY EDU-CATIONDr. Gamze Ozogul, Arizona State University Gamze Ozogul is an Assistant Research Scientist in the Department of Electrical Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU). She received the undergraduate degree in Curriculum and Instruction in 2000 from Hacettepe University, and the M.S degree in Computer Education and Instructional Technology in 2002 from Middle East Technical University. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Technology in 2006 from ASU. She completed a Postdoctoral Research fellowship in the Department of Electrical Engineering at ASU in
://www.cecs.wright.edu/cecs/engmath/.Textbook information28 is available at http://www.wiley.com/college/rattan.Bibliography1. Kerr, A.D., and Pipes, R.B., 1987. “Why We Need Hands-On Engineering Education.” The Journal of Technology Review, Vol. 90, No. 7, p. 38.2. Sarasin, L., 1998, “Learning Style Perspectives: Impact in the Classroom.” Madison, WI: Atwood.3. Gardner, H., 1999. “Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century.” New York: Basic Books.4. Joyce, B., and Weil, M., 2000, “Models of Teaching.” Boston: Allyn and Bacon.5. Brandford, J.D., et al., Eds., “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School,” Expanded Edition, National Academy of Sciences, 2000.6. Klingbeil, N., Molitor, S., Randolph, B
other new transfer students in engineering. The C/Mstudents suffered no statistically significant lowering of their average GPA, while the otherstudents suffered about a half point (0.445 grade). The much higher graduate rate was alreadymentioned. A survey showed that 70% of the students in the C/M program now headed forgraduate school, had not intended to go to graduate school when they entered the C/M program.The information, encouragement, and word-of-mouth from C/M students who are now ingraduate school changed their minds. The director of this program has researched, presented,and published over 170 papers on transfer students, CC transfer students, Academic SuccessClasses, and other related topics. Due to these papers, schools nationally
AC 2012-3739: GRAND CHALLENGES DELI (DISCOVER, EXPLORE,LEARN, IMAGINE) PROJECTDr. Jane Hunter, University of Arizona Jane Hunter received her Ph.D. from the University of Arizona Center for the Study of Higher Education. She holds an M.S. degree in engineering management and a B.S. degree with distinction in mechanical engineering. She is the Associate Director of the Engineering Management program at the University of Arizona and is a PMI-certified Project Management Professional (PMP). Her areas of interest include engineering education, teaching strategies, assessment and evaluation of program objectives and learning outcomes, student teamwork and group dynamics, business and technology management, strategic and
, plusmembers of the public sector interested in thermodynamic principles.This project is supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) TransformingUndergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (TUES)program.ReferencesBaser, Mustafa (2006), 'Promoting conceptual change through active learning using open source software for physics simulations', Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22 (3), 336- 54.Bo-Kristensen, Mads, et al. (2009), 'Mobile City and Language Guides - New Links Between Formal and Informal Learning Environments', Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7 (2), 85-92.Bransford, J., A. Brown, and R. Cocking (2000), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School, (Washington
AC 2012-4469: LEVERAGING SIMULATION TOOLS TO DELIVER ILL-STRUCTURED PROBLEMS IN STATICS AND MECHANICS OF MATE-RIALSProf. Christopher Papadopoulos, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Christopher Papadopoulos is an Assistant Professor in the Department of General Engineering at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez. He earned B.S. degrees in civil engineering and mathematics from Carnegie Mellon University (1993) and a Ph.D. in theoretical and applied mechanics at Cornell University (1999). Prior to coming to UPRM, Papadopoulos served on the faculty in the Department of Civil Engineering and Mechanics at the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Papadopoulos has primary research and teaching interests in mechanics
AC 2012-4628: FABRICATION AND TESTING OF A SIMPLE ”BIONICARM” DEMONSTRATOR WITH AN ARTIFICIAL TENDONProf. Larry D. Peel P.E., Texas A&M University, Kingsville Larry Peel received an A.S. from Snow College, in engineering, a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Utah State University, a M.S. in engineering mechanics from Virginia Tech, and a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Brigham Young University. He has taught in the area of solid mechanics, materials science, design, and manufacturing at Texas A&M University, Kingsville for the past 11 years. His research is in the area of traditional and flexible composites, morphing structures, auxetic systems, and additive manufacturing.Prof. Mohamed Abdelrahman
the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Page 25.901.9References 1. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R., (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington DC: National Academy Press. 2. National Academy of Engineering (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 3. Toossi, R., (2011). Energy and the Environment: Choices and challenges in a changing world. Los Angeles, CA: Verve Publishers. 4. Aubrecht, G. J., (2006). Energy: Physical, environmental, and social impact
. Page 25.964.3In addition to preparing students for careers where a basic knowledge of nanotechnology isrequired, it is also essential to educate the general public regarding nanotechnology. Society isalready being affected by new developments in nanotechnology and will continue to be affectedin the future. In deciding the future of nanotechnology, both the technical experts and the publicwill participate in the decision making. Therefore it is essential to educate the general public sothat they can make informed decisions2. Although designed with science and engineering majorsin mind, this introductory course is open to and is accommodating to all majors increasing aninformed citizenry.ObjectivesThe objectives for the NanoExposed! course are
AC 2012-3927: ASSESSING AN ADAPTIVE EXPERTISE INSTRUMENTIN COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD) COURSES AT TWO CAMPUSESDr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Michael D. Johnson is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minn. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his M.S. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Johnson’s research focuses on design tools; specifically, the cost modeling and analysis of product development and
AC 2012-4896: BUILD TO LEARN: EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES TO TRAINTOMORROW’S DESIGNERSMr. Vimal Kumar Viswanathan, Texas A&M University Vimal Viswanathan is a Ph.D. student in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Texas A&M Uni- versity. He completed his bachelor’s of technology in mechanical engineering from the National Institute of Technology, Calicut, India, and master’s of science in mechanical engineering from Texas A&M Uni- versity. He is expected to complete his Ph.D. in Aug. 2012. He has published three journal papers and more than 10 conference papers. His primary research interest is the effect of physical representations in engineering idea generation process.Dr. Julie S. Linsey, Texas A&M
classroom,” Proceedings of the ASEE AnnualConference, 2003.14 Everett, L. J. and Villa, E. Q., “Assessment results of multi-intelligence methods used in dynamics,” Proceedingsof the ASEE Annual Conference, 2006.15 Everett, L. J. and Villa, E. Q., “Increasing success in dynamics course through multi-intelligence methods andpeer facilitation,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 2005.16 Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R., editors. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, andSchool (Expanded Edition). National Academies Press, 2000.17 Kypuros, J. A. and Tarawneh, C., “Multimodal Modules for Non-Calculus-Based Engineering MechanicsCurriculum,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008.18 Kypuros, J
AC 2012-4179: REMODELING INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR MOREEFFECTIVE LEARNING IN INTRODUCTORY MATERIALS CLASSESProf. Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of bridging engineering and education, capstone design, and introductory materials engineering. His research interests are evaluating conceptual knowledge, miscon- ceptions and their repair, and conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge of students in introductory materials engineering classes. He is currently conducting research on misconceptions and
remotelocation, such as a room in the school, and can be controlled from any terminal that has aninterface to control it. These terminals can be anything with internet access, even a smart phonewith 4G wireless access.One of the more popular tools right now in the field is the National Instrument’s Laboratory Page 25.1045.2Virtual Instrument Engineering Workbench (LabVIEW) software4,6,8. LabVIEW is ideal forrapid prototyping of an experiment and was designed with control and interfacing in mind. Manyindustrials current use LabVIEW software to control their equipment, including the aerospaceindustry. One of the things that LabVIEW does not do too well in
AC 2012-4920: STUDYING THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES AND AUX-ETIC BEHAVIOR OF 3D-PRINTED FASTENERSProf. Larry D. Peel P.E., Texas A&M University, Kingsville Larry Peel received an A.S. from Snow College, in engineering, a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Utah State University, an M.S. in engineering mechanics from Virginia Tech, and a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Brigham Young University. He has taught in the area of solid mechanics, materials science, design, and manufacturing at Texas A&M University, Kingsville for the past 11 years. His research is in the area of traditional and flexible composites, morphing structures, auxetic systems, and additive manufacturing.Prof. Mohamed Abdelrahman, Texas A
AC 2012-4911: STUDY OF THE BEHAVIOR OF SHAPE MEMORY POLY-MERS IN THE ACTIVE DISASSEMBLY PROCESSJ.A. Ortega-Saenz, PSJA High SchoolDr. Hua Li, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Hua Li is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department at Texas A&M University, Kingsville.Prof. Mohamed Abdelrahman, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Mohamed Abdelrahman received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering and engineering physics from Cairo University, Egypt in 1988 and 1992, respectively. He received an M.S. and a Ph.D. in measurement and control and nuclear engineering from Idaho State University in 1994 and 1996, re- spectively. He is currently the Associate Dean of
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The iCollaborate MSE Project – 2012AbstractThis paper describes the progress to-date on the various components of the iCollaborateMSE [Materials Science and Engineering] project, as well as the preliminary assessmentdata that has been collected. The overall objectives of the research are to measure ifimprovements in student learning outcomes, student engagement, and course completionrates are possible if the structure in a basic materials engineering course is transformedfrom primarily deductive practice to an Information Communication Technology (ICT)enabled inductive teaching and learning environment. There are two major componentsof this research project. The first
AC 2012-4906: USING EITHER HYDROGEN OR DITHIONITE AS RE-DUCTANT IN URANIUM CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER AT POST-LEACH URANIUM MINING SITES, SOUTH TEXASProf. Lee Clapp, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Lee Clapp is Associate Professor in environmental engineering.Prof. Mohamed Abdelrahman, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Mohamed Abdelrahman received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering and engineering physics from Cairo University, Egypt in 1988 and 1992, respectively. He received an M.S. and a Ph.D. in measurement and control and nuclear engineering from Idaho State University in 1994 and 1996, re- spectively. He is currently the Associate Dean of Engineering at Texas A&M University, Kingsville