Paper ID #12674Exploring Implicit Understanding of Engineering Ethics in Student TeamsDr. Eun Ah Lee, University of Texas at Dallas Eun Ah Lee is a graduate student at University of Texas at Dallas. She received her PhD in science education from Seoul National University in Korea and has worked for STEM education in which she has strong interest. Currently, she is studying for dual masters’ degree in Applied Cognitive Science and in Emerging Media and Communication for her professional development.Prof. Nicholas Gans, University of Texas, Dallas Nicholas Gans is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical
Paper ID #13104Understanding the Communicative and Social Processes of Engineering Ethicsin Diverse Design TeamsDr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment
Task Planning, 2001 7–12 (2001). doi:10.1109/ISATP.2001.92895823. Elfes, A. Dynamic control of robot perception using multi-property inference grids. in , 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1992. Proceedings 2561–2567 vol.3 (1992). doi:10.1109/ROBOT.1992.22005624. Sugie, H., Inagaki, Y., Ono, S., Aisu, H. & Unemi, T. Placing objects with multiple mobile robots-mutual help using intention inference. in , 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1995. Proceedings 2, 2181–2186 vol.2 (1995).25. Lin, P., Abney, K. & Bekey, G. A. Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics. (The MIT Press, 2011).26. Anderson, M. & Anderson, S. L. Machine Ethics
n % Literature review 7 78% Knowledge of research area 6 67% Independence 5 56% Technical presentation 4 44% Research ethics awareness 4 44% Data analysis and presentation 4 44% Networking 3 33% Scientific method 3 33% Creativity 3 33% Knowledge of bioenergy 3 33
Computer Engineering, 2) Department of Physics, 3) Departments of Biology and of Women, Gender, & Sexuality Studies, Portland State University, Oregon, USA j.e.morris@ieee.orgAbstractThe goals of the program described below are to: Address the need for greater technical awareness in the general student population Extend the breadth of nanotechnology education for science and engineering majors, and Expose both student groups to the social, economic, and ethical issues of nanotechnologies.This has been accomplished by three junior-level lecture courses and a
profession involved in the application of mathematical and science for the needsof humanity10. Engineers may graduate from ABET accredited programs that ensure engineersmeet the standards of the profession11. One responsibility listed is understanding “professional,ethical and social responsibilities”11. Ethics for engineers deal with professionalism andunderstanding implications of their work12. The American Society for Engineering Education’sethics code appears to encourage safety by reducing conflicts of interests and partiality12.The disciplines of engineering can be put into 4 main groups; chemical, civil, electrical, andmechanical13. These groups are split into smaller concentrations with specific specialties. Despitethe concentrations
example study; and, Critically examine how the framework was used in these studies to explore, plan, Page 26.303.3 implement, reflect on, document, and demonstrate research quality.Ethical validation as a sixth validation construct and core aspect of research qualityBased on conversations at the first longitudinal workshop, over the past two years the authorshave collaborated with Dr. Alice Pawley from Purdue University to pursue the idea of ethicalvalidation as an additional, sixth dimension of the quality framework. These explorations wereprompted by the recognition in our own work that: i) ethical considerations extend
strength and ... between the samples. However, modulus of elasticity did not vary greatly variabilty... between the samples, however variability or occurred between the tested samples and ...between the samples; however, published values. variability... 3. As stated in ASCE's Code of Ethics; As stated in ASCE’s Code of Ethics, "Engineers shall hold paramount the “Engineers...” safety, health and welfare of the public...." 4. Slope of stress-strain curve in Figure 1 The slope of the stress-strain curve in shows [...] Figure 1 shows... 5. As a civil engineer, the strength of
2undergraduate bioengineering curriculum (Table 1). The lecture content related to biomaterial fortissue engineering and ethics and nanobiotechnology techniques. Sample lecture content from theBMEN310 learning modules includes learning of hierarchical organization of extracellularmatrix of bone and soft tissues in different length scales.Table 1. Courses in which modules introducing the concepts of nanotechnology were developed # of Concepts Introduced Using two lecturesCourse Semester students Cellular engineering, drug delivery andBMEN 220: Introduction to
, and family structure. Our program has demonstrated past success in addressingissues important to the field and accreditation boards, such as functioning on multidisciplinaryteams, understanding ethical responsibilities, developing a sense of the global and societalcontext of STEM work, and supporting the idea of life-long learning.1-4In the eight years since the program was founded, it has grown and developed considerably.Structural changes throughout these years include adding distance students in an off-campusprogram 280 miles away, broadening the program to include multiple science majors, funding ahalf-time graduate assistant, and staffing changes in the faculty mentors. Program improvementshave included annual retreats for scholars
26.118.2Here the sustainable development of technology falls well within the umbrella of grandchallenges facing humanity. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)also requires engineering students to be exposed to sustainability in the context of technologydesign and development through student outcome (c): “an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability.” 4The National Academy of Engineering echoes this emphasis on sustainability in engineeringprograms in its description of the Engineer of 2020, calling engineering students to: “… be leaders in the
, and NCIIA. Dr. Sacre’s current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas – innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global preparedness in engineering. She is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Dr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Service Professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of
improvements. water emissions. Tragedy of the Students play out Harden’s Tragedy of the One of our collaborations has developed a Commons Commons using gold fish. Students series of ethics games; one of which is a more discuss ethics of sustainability. Note, this complex version of the simple gold fish is a common exercise available in many module. versions. Page 26.8.4Summary of Critical CollaborationsThe collaborations that enabled a successful first two years of this program aresummarized in Figure 1. Drs. Parrish and Bilec
Wright State engineering programs. Moreover, it wasshown that EGR 101 had the greatest effect on the group termed ‘Support Seekers’, composed ofstudents with below median ACT math scores but above median high school GPA’s. The latterindicates greater work ethic and ability to persevere in engineering, while the former mayarguably indicate below median ‘ability’. Thus, the mitigation of ACT math score associatedwith the F04-F06 cohorts was due to the fact that the low ACT math students who enrolled inEGR 101 were predominantly ‘support seekers’, who had the work ethic and perseverancerequired to progress through the remedial math sequence before enrolling in EGR 101. On thecontrary, low ACT math students from the incoming cohorts of Fall 2007
-faculty and student-student engagement. Every effort was made to ensure thatthe speaker diversity reflected that of the REU students, so that students could envisionthemselves taking the speakers’ paths. Further student-faculty interaction was provided throughweekly faculty research seminars. Each week, one faculty member presented brief vignettes oftheir research interests to the group, enabling students to learn of other imaging related researchbeyond their own projects.In addition to the program-related activities, students participated in several University-wideenrichment events. These activities included a weekly brown-bag seminar series on topics suchas Ethics, GRE preparation, Getting into Graduate School, and Abstract Writing
Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and assistive technology.Ms. Kavitha Durga RamaneProf. William G Graziano, Purdue University, West Lafayette Page 26.1501.1
engi- neering undergraduates, and data visualization. His teaching practice includes formal cooperative learning and integrating communications, ethics, and teaming across the curriculum. He is a founding developer of the CATME system, a free, web-based system that helps faculty assign students to teams, conduct self- and peer-evaluations, and provide rater training. He can occasionally be found playing guitar at a local open mic.Dr. David Jonathan Woehr, University of North Carolina Charlotte David J. Woehr is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of Management at The University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from the Georgia Institute of
Performance as well as on the editorial boards for Organizational Research Methods, and the European Journal of Work and Organizational PsychologyRichard . Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Richard Layton is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Tech- nology. He received a B.S. from California State University, Northridge, and an M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Washington. His areas of scholarship include student teaming, longitudinal studies of engi- neering undergraduates, and data visualization. His teaching practice includes formal cooperative learning and integrating communications, ethics, and teaming across the curriculum. He is a founding developer of the
Center for Professional &Research Ethics. An in-person session is conducted to discuss with the students the importanceof ethics and why responsible conduct of research is important to all - not only to researchers. Page 26.511.6Networking SocialsThe community of ASPIRE scholars have the opportunity to meet once each semester withfaculty, alums and other local industry professionals. Alumni can provide valuable insight andmotivation to the students to persist to degree completion. Direct networking with local industryprofessionals can supplement career placement services to enhance employment opportunitiesfor ASPIRE scholars.Graduate School
understand, and the document states that the goal was not to be aninclusive of all engineering. Additional recommendations for K-12 engineering instruction havecome from the 2009 NAE/NRC report, which state that engineering at this level shouldemphasize engineering design, incorporate developmentally appropriate mathematics, scienceand technology skills and promote engineering habits of mind11. The engineering “habits ofmind” mentioned in this document refers to the values, attitudes and thinking skills associatedwith engineering and these include: (1) systems thinking, (2) creativity, (3) optimism, (4)collaboration, (5) communication, and (6) attention to ethical considerations11. Therefore, asmore K-12 schools and teachers are integrating
, theteacher may simply use an exercise to engage students in discussion and hands-on practice. Forlarger classes, the students can be assigned to small groups using the class exercise as aninstrument leading to group projects. Woods and Howard [7] effectively used class exercises forInformation Technology students to study ethical issues. Day and Foley [8] used class timeexclusively for exercises, having their students prepare for class with materials provided online.Bishop and Verleger [9] presented a comprehensive survey of the research that reviewed differentways of using class exercises in the classroom, often referred to as the "flipped classroom."Frydenberg [10] primarily used hands-on exercises to foster student understanding in dataanalytics
individuals in team projects. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Information technology education, Newark, NJ, USA.12. Van Duzer, E. and McMartin, F. (2000). Methods to improve the validity and sensitivity of a self/peer assessment instrument. IEEE Transactions on Education 43(2), 153-158.13. Shuman, L. J., Clark, R. M., Besterfield-Sacre, M., and Yildirim, T. P. (2008). Work in Progress - Ethical Model Eliciting Activities (E-MEA) - extending the construct. Piscataway, NJ, USA.14. Sindelar, M., Shuman, L., Besterfield-Sacre, M., Miller, R., Mitcham, C., Olds, B., and Page 26.1160.11 Wolfe, H. (2003). Assessing engineering students
industry. Also, guest lectures on sustainability, BIM technology, ethics,and green markets potential are delivered.4 Page 26.352.4MethodologyThe Green-BIM teaching method was used to teach a construction management course offered atthe California State University Long Beach. The effectiveness of the Green-BIM teachingmethod was evaluated to see if we can close achievement gaps between the majority group andthe minority groups by means of students’ interview and exit survey. Besides the traditionalassessment tools such as homework, quizzes, tests, exams, lab reports, oral presentations, andprojects, a rubric assessment tool was developed and used
Environmentalengineering by Fall in spite of her FoK in mechanics. She was extremely frustrated with the step-by-step formulaic process that her teacher taught in statics as it removed all creativity and desirefor understanding of the physical phenomena. Realizing that most of her 18-yr old classmates areaccustomed to this process and “just listen and do it” [her tone of voice actually hints that theydo this uncritically], in contrast, she says: “I actually stop and wonder if this is the right thingthat I should be doing [amazing sense of ethical responsibility towards her knowledge] or if thisprocess is actually going to teach me what the professor wants to teach me [amazing sense ofmeta-cognition].” Realizing that her critical reflection takes more time and
attributes such asleadership, outgoingness, and caring. They primarily perceived professionals in STEM fields tohave strong mental/academic skills and attributes such as good time management skills, problemsolving skills, and work ethic. From these responses, only two of six respondents listedcommonalities between teaching and STEM (leadership and intelligence). All respondantsindicated that they did not have internship or coop experiences in their current STEM fields.Phase 2: Exploratory Survey In Spring 2015, 25 surveys were completed by applicants (4 paper and 21 electronic),which was a 46% response rate of all applicants to the program. The participant pool was 76%females and 24% males; 16% indicating that they transferred into the
and review the audio recording. In some cases, thestudent was asked to conduct additional real practice interviews. The PI determined when thestudent was ready to commence actual data collection interviews. Between interviews, the audiorecordings were transcribed; several of them were collected before data was analyzed.Students involved in the research at the UC Berkeley campus have been undergraduate studentsstudying an engineering discipline. These students also began their training with an onlinecertificate program offered through CITI for ethical human subjects research. The students eachread the book Interviewing as Qualitative Research by Irving Seidman, along with publicationson prior work. Student then each took turns completing
Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE and IEEE.Richard . Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Richard Layton is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Tech- nology. He received a B.S. from California State University, Northridge, and an M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Washington. His areas of scholarship include student teaming, longitudinal studies of engi- neering undergraduates, and data visualization. His teaching practice includes formal cooperative learning and integrating communications, ethics, and teaming across the curriculum. He is a founding developer of the CATME system, a free, web-based system that helps faculty assign students to teams, conduct self
End of Program Project Presentations ParticipantsStatus meetings or professional development workshops were held every Tuesday morning.Topics that were covered during the 2014 program are provided in Table 2. At the statusmeetings, each participant reports orally what he/she has accomplished in the past week andhis/her plans for the current week. Workshops were organized to provide participantsfundamental and professional skill development through interactive exercises to better preparethem for a successful research experience and tools for graduate school. In addition, threefundamental areas - communication, investigation and documentation – were emphasized inthese workshops [8-10]. Participants were trained on ethics related
devices for a hands-oninvestigation of artificial organs; (3) to introduce fundamental engineering principles throughexperiments with artificial organs; (4) to investigate the factors affecting artificial organ perfor-mance and design criteria; and (5) to explore the complicated ethical issues regarding the techno-logical advances that blur the boundaries between machines and organisms.The development of the undergraduate modules began in year one and was performed by sum-mer interns and teams of students in the Junior/Senior Engineering Clinic, under the supervisionof the investigators. Piloting the modules in undergraduate courses and conducting formativeassessment began in year two. In year three we will continue to use and refine the modules