blendof curriculum modification, textbook selection, grading policy refinement, an interactiveimplementation structure, and a meticulously crafted week-by-week schedule. Thiscomprehensive approach ensures alignment with the overarching goal of equipping students witha complete understanding of automotive engineering principles, encompassing both traditionaland emerging technologies.The first step in reshaping the Automotive Engineering course involves a modification of thecourse description to reflect the expanded scope and objectives of the revamped curriculum. Thismodification is guided by the recognition that the automotive industry is undergoing a profoundtransformation with the emergence of EVs and AI integration into vehicle systems. As
comments, that higher valueassigned to the embedded course appears to have arisen from multiple reasons. Students valued learning the differences between technical writing and generalwriting. After years of taking general writing courses, engineering students appeared to havea need to receive formal training and feedback on how to write as an engineer. Positivecomments about the embedded course reflected that need: “[the course] showed me thedifference between the way that writing was taught to me my who life and how technicalwriting should look,” “[the course] showed me that [technical writing] isn’t so easy that youcan just do it without learning about it,” “[the course] was very different than othertraditional writing courses,” and “[the
, this diversity arises from the need to tailor the introduction ofmechanical engineering concepts to specific program requirements, instructional settings, and thecharacteristics of the incoming cohort of first-year students.Understanding freshman retention rates is crucial in unraveling the diverse outcomes of first-yearstudents pursuing mechanical engineering degrees. An often-quoted statistic is that fifty percentof engineering majors either drop out or change majors before graduating [1]. Given thesestatistics, freshman retention rates can serve to evaluate the effectiveness of educationalprograms, reflecting the intricate challenges and strengths unique to each institution. Accordingto the Arizona Board of Regents of several Arizona
simply going over the material. • It gives more societal worth as well as individual worth. If you reflect on event on a horrible tragedy of engineering done poorly, it gives you more worth and responsivity. • incorporating the history and background of a engineering principal can create a good foothold/base for any student to start expanding their knowledge of a said principle • I believe that being able to see the work of these individuals in front of me rather than in a textbook, as in through videos or interactive walkthroughs of their accomplishments in the field makes it much easier to visualize, therefore allowing me to be more interested as I see their work come to life rather than just be
thinking [6].This work in progress focuses on instructor and student perceptions of how the engineeringdesign process is enacted during such projects. We aim to understand how instructors balanceanalytical skills, creativity, and detailed design in course activities. This work also investigateshow students apply prior knowledge of the design process and how their understanding of thedesign process is further shaped by their experiences in the mechanical design course. We alsoaim to elucidate where faculty and students hold differing perceptions of what course activitiesare considered design work and where design concepts might be obfuscated by an activity orclass structure. Understanding these perceptions can help faculty reflect on their course
, communication & use of media, assessment &evaluation, tolerance for ambiguity & uncertainty [10]; and interpersonal relations &collaboration [11]. A summary of survey development and its validation are discussed in thenext section. III. METHODSA. Survey development A comprehensive and systematic approach has been used to develop the surveys thataccurately reflect the research goals of this project. Although a detailed description andapproaches used for survey development and its validity assessment are available in Hang [8],we present a summary of the survey development process in this paper for continuity. The 3primary goal of the surveys is to
introductorymechanical engineering design course that involved both lecture (2 credits) and laboratory (1credit) sessions. Learning objectives for the mini-mill experience were to: (1) learn the safetyand controls of a manual milling machine and basic milling operations that included fixed,material scaffolds designed by the course instructor; (3) practice reading and manufacturing fromstandard engineering drawings; and (2) independently apply knowledge of milling machinecontrols and operations to create a basic part with adaptive, pedagogical scaffolding fromteaching assistants and machinists. All deliverables for this exercise were individually completedby students and required a mixture of hands-on activity, written reflection, and online trainingand survey
. Students can ask any remaining questions they may have 14 Wrap-Up and Reflection about the program and reflect on what they learned about the nature of engineering practice over the semester.Example Lecture: Week 3 – Differentiating STEM Fields Since the first year of most engineering programs consists of mainly science and mathematicscourses, it was pertinent to explicitly describe how engineering is different from these fields and howtechnology interacts with them. The lecture extended these topics to also cover STEAM, where the ‘A’stands for art. The notion of combining art into these fields that are usually viewed as inartistic hasdiscovered a resurgence in the importance of
. This lab is equipped with cutting-edge technology, including the Gigabot3+ Material Extrusion 3D printer, Raise3D E2, Sovol 3D printer, Einscan Pro 3D scanner forreverse engineering, FLIR thermal imaging camera, and other relevant equipment and tools asshown in figure 2. This lab offers students a conducive environment to work on materialsextrusion and materials jetting based AM and prototyping. Students gain practical experience indesigning, creating, and analyzing components using extrusion-based AM techniques by activeengagement in the semester projects and research. The establishment of this lab was madepossible through support from state and federal research grants, reflecting a commitment toadvancing STEM education and research at the
of the post-quiz, correct responses had impressively increased to 60%, and incorrect responseshad decreased to 30 %. This overall improvement reflects positively on the effectiveness of theeducational video applied between the assessments, particularly in enhancing the understanding ofdislocations in materials science.ConclusionsIn conclusion, this paper highlights the significance of addressing the challenges students face invisualizing complex concepts in materials science education, particularly pertaining to dislocationsand their influence on material properties. The development of animated visual aids emerged as apromising solution to enhance understanding and engagement in the classroom setting.Through meticulous planning and
this paper,only Steps 1-3 and 6-8 will be used. However, statics can only be applied to a staticallydeterminate problem. For example, the proposed process can solve statically indeterminateproblems (internally and externally) when Steps 1 to 8 are used.A structured problem-solving approach is used in statics book [6] with the following steps: RoadMap, Modeling, Governing Equations, Computation, and Discussion and Verification.Furthermore, the statics [3] and mechanics of materials [16] textbooks use the SMART problem-solving methodology, i.e., Strategy, Modeling, Analysis, and Reflect and Think. Both are like theapproach used in this paper. A significant difference is that this paper formulates all equationssymbolically, and then the unknowns
earlier, allowing students to focus on‘understanding’ the content rather than just ‘knowing’ the content [8]. The difference being thatlecture based teaching tends to focus on theory and strict processes, limiting students to findingone particular ‘right’ answer. Active learning methods, such as flipped-classrooms,think-pair-share activities, and case study reflections, push students to defy their normalcognitive boundaries of what engineering “is” [9, 10]. This education method can ease the oftenfrustrating transition that seniors experience during capstone design courses where students areexpected to translate isolated concepts learned in classrooms to suddenly very technicallycomplex projects [11]. The frustration that students experience
intosustainability initiatives. It provides an opportunity for reflection on the journey of a newlydeveloped program. We aim to inspire others to work together and encourage students tomotivate others to join similar collaborations and empower students to lead sustainableinnovations in their communities and beyond.IntroductionIn the face of escalating environmental concerns and the urgent need for sustainable solutions,the role of higher education institutions in fostering innovation and preparing future engineers ismore critical than ever. The integration of sustainability into higher education, particularlythrough collaborations with sustainability centers, has been a topic of interest in recent literature[1-4]. Studies highlight the transformative
Paper ID #42530Minkyung Lee is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Learning and Performance Systems at PennState University and serves as a Graduate Assistant at the Leonhard Center, an engineering educationcenter at Penn State. Her academic journey and professional contributions reflect her dedication to thefield of educational technology and design. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Designing and Evaluating Virtual Reality Applications for a Machine Design Course IntroductionMachine design is an iterative decision-making process that requires students to select and assemblemachine elements to create a device that performs a desired task. A machine
] J. B. Perry, E. Buten, A. Nightingale, E. Treadway, and A. Johnson, “Designing and Implementing Open-Ended Problems in Engineering Science Courses,” 2023.[28] J. Swenson et al., “Consideration for Scaffolding Open-ended Engineering Problems: Instructor Reflections after Three Years,” in 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2021, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637392.[29] J. Mills and D. Treagust, “Engineering Education, Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer,” Aust J Eng Educ, vol. 3, Jan. 2003.Appendices:Example problems: Ice and Water A cube of ice with side length 𝑙 is floating in a cup filled with water. The submerged height of the ice is ℎ. When the ice melts, does the
, where critical thinking skills are needed. These findings suggest that theseactive learning strategies effectively promote student learning and problem-solving abilities.However, additional student learning outcomes, such as critical thinking skills andentrepreneurial mindsets, could be correlated with the types of assignments and activitiesadministered in the class. Instructors may choose to design a course with combined activelearning strategies to optimally achieve multiple learning outcomes.Reference[1] R.A. Howell, “Engaging students in education for sustainable development: The benefits of active learning, reflective practices and flipped classroom pedagogies,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 325, 129318, 2021.[2] S. Freeman, S
exam problems. Reflecting on thebike frame project, the majority of students perceived the experience improved theirunderstanding of structural analysis and provided an opportunity to apply statics to real-worldscenarios. Taken together, these results suggest that the Wooden Bike Frame Challenge improvesstudent knowledge of advanced statics concepts, specifically structural analysis, and connectsthese concepts to real-world design scenarios.While it is not the first statics based PBL exercise, the Wooden Bike Frame Challenge is avaluable addition to the engineering education literature. Prior studies have presented PBLexercises that have students construct: (1) suspension systems modeling 2D and 3D particleequilibrium scenarios [1, 21]; (2
learning, 5. providing mentorship, not supervising, as students choose objectives, methods, and testing and assessment process of their project, 6. enabling students to reflect on what they learned from their projects and how these projects relate to the real world through survey and open discussions, 7. having consistent follow-up through scaffolded PBL assignments, as well as providing formative feedback for improvement, and 8. making project prepared and presented for external audience to motivate student accomplishment [16].Although PBL activities have been employed in courses to help students quickly learn newconcepts as well as prepare students with skills such as leadership, team building, ethical
own equation sheets inthe work cited in [30] and [31]. Advantages and disadvantages of student-produced versusinstructor-provided equation sheets are not well studied, although in [32] a student specificallymentioned that preparation of the sheet assisted in studying. However, in [33], the possibility of astudent forgetting to write down an equation needed on their equation sheet and thus not having iton the test was raised.Some research has addressed deeper questions of equation sheets, their advantages, and theirpossible down side, with [34] indicated that students trying to transfer knowledge from calculusto physics and later to engineering relying heavily, perhaps too heavily, on equation sheets. In[35], a student reflection mentioned
cold-water flow rate on hot-water outlet temperature.These results lead to a significant improvement (p-value = 0.034) for Q6R with a moderate effectsize (ES = 0.54). With improvement in all questions, overall, the DLM implementation wasbeneficial for the students as there is > 10% improvement with a medium effect size.4. Motivational OutcomeIn addition to pre- and post-test, we also conducted motivational survey. Participant consists of 75students from 3 different universities in the United States. The participant responses are shown inFig. 6 from a survey assessing the Shell & Tube Heat Exchanger DLM features listed in table 2.The plot reflects a predominantly positive evaluation of the modules' features. Notably, featuresfacilitating
is repeated until one victor emerges. After this, the instructor typicallypresents the true conclusion, which is always an entertaining time—especially if a team wascorrect but was not voted up to the next level.Students are asked to reflect on the experience together in a classroom-wide discussion. Themain takeaways typically regard:• The criticality of due process, the formality of investigations, and the correct handling/ interpretation of evidence.• The power of perception, and how remaining impartial is paramount when the stakes are so high.• The nuance and broadness of engineering as a profession and skillset. Equipment can be very sensitive to small elements, and a broad knowledge base is needed to not only understand the
completed the survey near the end of each school term, with the Winter termsurveys completed in March 2023, and the Spring term surveys completed in June 2023. TheMECH-431 courses were complete by the time the survey was taken by enrolled students, so theywere able to reflect on the course as a whole at the time of completing the surveys.4.1 HypothesisResults are determined in this study by inductive reasoning. Based on the results of the literaturereview, it is clear that some dynamics systems and controls undergraduate laboratory courses atother institutions have effectively employed hands-on laboratory exercises at low cost. Therefore,a reasonable resulting hypothesis is that low cost physical laboratory experiments can beemployed effectively in
specific skills and experiences that can inspire them andopen doors to various career paths. In engineering programs, research is an excellent way ofproviding project-based learning opportunities to students while working toward meaningfulgoals that have the potential to change society for the better.In this paper, we describe the efforts of a team of undergraduate mechanical engineering studentsin creating and demonstrating an experimental silicone venous valve model and flow controlsystem for use in future scientific research aimed at ultimately reducing the impact of awidespread but often unseen disease. We describe the experimental test systems and reflect onstudent learning from this project. In order to understand on a basic level the need