, which is our desired result of the relevant cognitive load.This theory was used in designing the instructional modules for the course where experiment-centric pedagogy was implemented, as shown in Figure 2. 1. Information 2. Purpose of the 3. Instructional module Process 4. Reflection about the module a. Module Title a. Questions a. Materials needed a. Reflection b. Placement within the b. Module objectives b. Procedures curriculum c. Formative assessment c. Primary/ Secondary audience d. Summative assessment d. Standards
about the students who were interviewed; note thatthe gender and race/ethnicity were free response questions in the application form, so thecategories chosen reflect participants’ self-designation. Participant Gender Race/Ethnicity 1 Female Hispanic 2 Female White 3 Male Hispanic 4 Male Asian 5 Female White 6 (Transgender) Female Caucasian 7 Male White
-efficacy and engineeringidentity, thereby facilitating the transition of LIAT undergraduates to graduate-level programs;and (3) it aspires to cultivate leaders proficient in technology, entrepreneurship, and innovation,who will contribute to and fortify the economy of the South Coast of New England—a regionnoted for its diversity and post-industrial economic challenges marked by significant poverty.ResultsIn its inaugural year, the AccEL program generated a large applicant pool, with 46% of eligiblestudents applying, the cohort included 8 eligible female students and a substantial number fromunderrepresented racial/ethnic backgrounds. Eight M.S. students were successfully recruited intothe first cohort of AccEL S-STEM scholars, reflecting
engineering education broadly andpedagogy specifically.This study presents an overview of ongoing efforts to integrate GAI as a pedagogical tool at aLand Grant R1 University on the East Coast of the United States. Also, we are hoping to collect awithin-case study of instructors who have successfully implemented artificial intelligence in theirclassrooms and course design. Data will be collected from the instructors through classroomobservations and interviews on their classroom implementation. These will be thematicallyanalyzed. Also, a deep exploration of students' learning experiences using the GAI will beconducted using focus group discussions and end-of-the-semester reflection. Other data sourcesthat will be thematically analyzed include the
mentalrotation and spatial visualization, and the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Visualization ofRotations (PSVT:R) which measures mental rotation.Throughout recent years, a large number of new or adapted spatial ability instruments have beendeveloped to reflect more diverse populations involved in spatial ability research. Thissystematized literature review provides a synthesis of how valid and reliable spatial abilityinstruments measure specific constructs of spatial thinking. This work is guided by the followingresearch questions.1. How do existing spatial ability tests measure spatial thinking?2. How do spatial ability instruments available in the literature demonstrate validity andreliability?Positionality StatementThe first author is a
disclosed in the application. The final participation pool was from four different engineering departments, representedmultiple gender and sexual identities, disability statuses, and racial identities. Additionally, manyof the students in the program were international students. Exact identities and participationdemographic statistics have been withheld to protect participant anonymity.Program Facilitation The program itself was based on the success of other first year mentorship programs at theuniversity [11]. The mentorship program officially began in January of 2024. The mentors werefirst invited to attend a one-hour onboarding and mentorship training, in which they were providedwith program specifics, and we reflected on
development. These business achievements are reflected in his academic activities through the designing of lectures and mobility programs with practical implementation perspectives. Ishizaki has been actively presenting and publishing his academic achievements at international conferences in the Asia Pacific region and North America such as APAIE, WERA, and NAFSA. He earned a Master of Business Administration majoring in international business at the University of Southern California in the United States of America, and a Bachelor in Law at Hitotsubashi University in Japan.Dr. Maria Anityasari, Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology Maria Anityasari is the Director of ITS Global Engagement. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh
proved to be daunting, for both participants and organizers.For best possible participant availability the workshop was held during an academicbreak on consecutive days. However, the short calendar span was not conducive toin-depth reflection or detailed course planning, and there was definitely no time forimplementation and testing. Although enthusiasm was high after the workshop, thebeginning of the spring academic semester quickly pushed planned activities to theback burner, and momentum fizzled. Course assignment changes and changes infaculty positions further complicated implementation of the course changes plannedduring the workshop. In addition, the planning and presentation of the workshop contentwas up to the organizers, and this
duties or roles, where teaching faculty alternate in delivering classes or dividethe course credit load based on specific weeks or assignments [4]. This method does notmaximize the potential of coteaching, which should enable instructors to interact with each otherin class be used to leveraging the collective knowledge and expertise of multiple teachers withinthe same classroom to enhance student learning outcomes [1], [5]. This collaborative teachingmodel fosters a dynamic learning environment, addresses the varied learning needs of students,promotes active engagement, and provides differentiated instruction. Furthermore, co-teachingencourages shared responsibility, reflection, and professional growth among teachers, ultimatelyenhancing the
was a teachingphilosophy that students learn by doing and that should apply to project management. Bydefault, project management is an active learning exercise that involves a diverse group ofindividuals. The literature in project management education supports this underlying personalbelief. “Preparing students for professional practice is enhanced by the use of ‘authentic’ tasksand assessments that reflect the practices and outputs encountered in the profession” [1]. Inorder to be authentic, it needs to be a real executable project. The literature also speaks about thedisappointment with practitioners on the skills of students and that has been confirmed withadvisory boards in our college.In addition, students who took the previous version
al. [3]. Transformational resistance is defined as an action that reflects a critique of thesocial oppression at hand, rather than conformist resistance that does not challenge the structure athand. The structure of a panel puts graduate students in the seat of authority and allows them todirectly relay their experiences to the attendees. This challenges the structure by empoweringoverlapping disempowered groups, graduate students, and LGBTQ people. Members of the panelincluded both cis and trans people, individuals who are nonbinary, individuals who are gay orlesbian, and students on the neurodivergent and asexual spectrum. When creating the panel, it wasessential to ensure that a broad swath of identities were represented. There will
taken [2]. The research ofEdmondson noticed that certain teams within the same hospital produced very differentoutcomes for the patients they oversaw. As she observed more closely why certain teams couldbecome a learning organization, she noticed that the teams did seven things positively. From theseven items she created a survey that a team could use to guide a reflection on where they are intheir growth towards becoming a learning organization.The seven survey items that Edmonson created are included in the appendix of this paper, butcan be summarized into the following categories of scenarios commonly encountered in teams:making mistakes, asking for help, taking small risks, discussing tough issues, respecting thecontribution of others
students are not in the field and possessing expertise or specific working knowledge? 14 -Does the design reflect creativity and imagination on the student’s or team’s part?Overall Is the design well written? 5quality of Does the report effectively present the design solution? 3the designpackage Does the report follow the required format and reference citation requirement? 3Total points 115The course structure was not changed significantly when the ACRP University DesignCompetition was first
to reflect on accessibility within this setting. Each timeco-researchers mentioned negative experiences related to their disability(s) or accessibility, theywere asked to consider what supports or changes could have improved their experience.Data Analysis and Trustworthiness Transcripts were de-identified before beginning any analysis to maintain co-researcherconfidentiality. After de-identification, transcripts were uploaded to Dedoose (2021) to code andanalyze the interview data. Data analysis was conducted in two rounds using thematic analysis(Braun & Clarke, 2006) through a critical lens. Salient themes were identified using aconstant-comparative, open coding process (Saldaña, 2016). Open coding was used in the firstround to
improve the sense of belonging and mitigate tokenism,” Clin. Imaging, p. 109987, 2023.[7] I. Anakok, J. Hess, S. Panuganti, and A. Katz, “WIP: Exploring Faculty Members’ Conceptualizations of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Engineering Education,” in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5.[8] M. S. Tooley and E. E. Umphress, “Work in progress - the ethics of diversity: Addressing diversity issues in undergraduate engineering ethics education,” in 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Oct. 2009, pp. 1–3. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2009.5350838.[9] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, C. Swan, D. Knight, and N. E. Canney, “Variations in Reflections as a Method for Teaching and Assessment of
0.29 I feel a sense of BELONGING to the department 5.44 6.73 0.08* * statistically significant at p≤ 0.1 level ** statistically significant at the p≤ 0.05 levelThese findings indicate that the social engagement events impacted student sense of belonging inthe makerspace and engineering department. Student data revealed that students felt like amember and part of the engineering makerspace after participation in these events and an explicitsense of belonging in the department.Table 2: Student Demographics and Belonging Change summarizes the major and demographicinformation of the students who completed both pre and post surveys. Authors calculated a“belonging change” score which reflects the difference
IMPACTSmentoring program. Reflexivity is integral in qualitative research because it forces theconsideration and exposure of researcher bias through analytical reflection and dialogue (Watt,2007). The team agreed that expanding the mentoring model was valuable, although theyexpressed concern about the effect on peer relationships among the mentees when white womenwere included. Per the guidance of Lincoln and Guba (1985), the positionality of the researchteam must be clarified, as it directly influences the administration of the study, as well as theprincipal findings and interpretations. The team includes a demographically diverse group ofmen and women who hold professor, administrator, and graduate student roles in various highereducation institutions
is underway, with plans to expand to the College of Sciences.Outcomes will be measured using interviews, surveys, reflective writings, and peer teachingobservations. Educational Research This poster will highlight an IRB-approved qualitative study that is being conducted aspart of the grant project. The research is guided by the HSI servingness framework [7]. Theoverall purpose of the research is to understand the ways in which the university is serving itsSTEM students, using a mirror approach [13] to study and self-reflect on the institution, herebyfocusing on the organization as the main unit of analysis. Findings from this research willdirectly inform plans and actions to revise policies and
in an educational context. To assess the student's performancein the workshop, a teamwork assessment questionnaire is used to help students reflect on learningand evaluate teamwork behaviours. Subsequently, semi-structured interviews and focus groupstudies are conducted after the workshop to investigate students’ perceptions of teamwork in depth.Keywords: International Students; Master’s Students; Team Performance; Engineering Education.Teamwork in Engineering Education:In the context of global higher education reform, engineering education has emerged as a strategicpriority for universities, underscoring the imperative for institutions to bolster their capacities intalent acquisition and development, scientific research and education, as
following question intended to identify the major challenges and vulnerabilities that low-income communities face post-disaster. The results are presented in box plots, where the boxranges from the first quartile (Q1) to the third quartile (Q3) of the distribution, the median isindicated by a horizontal line, the mean is represented with an “x”, and the whiskers highlight theminimum and maximum values. As evident from the box plots presented in Figure 5, the majorchallenges and vulnerabilities include: (1) lack of housing, yielding a mean of 4.69; (2) lack ofwater and food, reflecting a mean of 4.79; and (3) delayed disaster recovery, yielding a mean of4.45. 5 4.5
, requiring us to consistently reflect on oursubjectivities as researchers. Two of the authors self-identify as neurodivergent learners, whichmakes having two neurotypical learners as collaborators ideal for identifying our reflexivities,including assumptions and overgeneralizations. We consistently review our work for logicalfallacies that influence interpretation. In addition to addressing positionality, the initial surveycollected a relatively small sample size for data analysis, given the institutional size. We chose topursue our personalized implementation method to avoid current institutional barriers regardingspecific topics that would have required lengthy administrative review. However, the process didallow for further insight that we can
term, offer a continuous evaluative framework, crucial formonitoring student progress and adapting teaching strategies to meet evolving educational needs.In Fall 2021, the CATME assessment process was implemented in a third-year course on RobotManipulation (RBE 3001). The study’s sample consisted of 75 RBE students from the course,offering a representative cross-section of the RBE program’s demographic and skill diversity.This sample size and composition provide a robust basis for understanding the programming skillvariance within the cohort. The context in which these surveys were administered—during theinitial phase of the course—ensures that the data reflects the students’ current competencies andchallenges. RBE 3001 traditionally expects
consequently be less interested in pursuing a career where these are the only perceivable fieldsthat they can work in. These findings are reflected in waning undergraduate and graduate enrollment in chemical,petroleum, and chemical-related engineering. Year-to-year medium percent change in freshmanenrollment in this major had been steadily declining since 2018 in 96 institutions, with a markable10.4% decrease in 20203. In their 2021 Graduate Enrollment Census, The National ScienceFoundation found that chemical engineering had the smallest 1-year growth of 1.4% in 2020-21,and the large 5-year decline of 29.1% in 2017-21 among other engineering disciplines4. Thesestatistics demonstrate a national declining trend in pursuing chemical engineering, and
, and understand spatial relationships in a directand immediate manner [8]. However, with the emergence of CAD tools, there has been a paradigmshift in how these skills are taught and developed. CAD offers precision and efficiency but oftenat the expense of the instinctive comprehension associated with freehand sketching [9].Studies by Merzdorf et al. [10] and Contero et al. [11] have underscored the importance ofsketching instruction in augmenting spatial skills, thereby improving students’ overall designprocess in engineering education. This underlines the critical role of spatial visualization in sketchcreation, indicating that experts in the field prioritize the shape quality metrics over line quality insketches. This reflects the evolving
Columbia University: an M.S in Anthropology, an M.S. in Computer Science, a B.A. in Mathematics, and a B.S. in Applied Mathematics and Physics. Hammond advised 17 UG theses, 29 MS theses, and 10 Ph.D. dissertations. Hammond is the 2020 recipient of the TEES Faculty Fellows Award and the 2011 recipient of the Charles H. Barclay, Jr. ’45 Faculty Fellow Award. Hammond has been featured on the Discovery Channel and other news sources. Hammond is dedicated to diversity and equity, which is reflected in her publications, research, teaching, service, and mentoring. More at http://srl.tamu.edu and http://ieei.tamu.edu. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 WIP: ASSESSMENT OF
participation in engineering [9]. Engineering faculty receive limitedpedagogical training during their academic preparation, and they are even less likely to haveexposure to inclusive teaching practices [10]. Faculty play a critical role in fostering minoritizedstudents’ sense of belonging within engineering culture [11], [12], which has importantimplications for student success [13]. When instructors do not reflect on the impact of theirpositionality on the student experience, they may inadvertently perpetuate systemic biases andinjustices through their academic policies, teaching strategies, and assessment practices [14].Marginalization within engineering education is further impacted by faculty mindsets related tostudent learning [15]. When faculty
providing more scaffolding opportunitiesfor participant learning during week 2. Specifically, mentors not only made sure that participantsconduct lab exercises, but also explain reasons of why certain things do not work and explaintroubleshooting instructions. Mentors training was improved to expand upon their projectexposure to ensure they were able to explain the project development plan and ensure that everystudent in the team and the team as a whole understood the goals and were able to participate inthe project development.data collection techniques and measuresData collection consisted of three techniques: survey, reflection activity, and engineering identityformation assessment. Survey data were collected at 8 time points using established
communities in the United StatesAbstractThis paper shares and compares the experiences of initiating and sustaining two graduatestudent-led international ethnic engineering education scholarly communities for Chinese andAfrican groups. Our goal is to reflect on our lived experiences and inspire future students andacademics to cultivate such communities to broaden participation and enhance researchcapability. We adopt the Community of Practice (CoP) as the theoretical framework and opt forcomparative ethnographic narrative analysis as the method in this paper. Specifically, we focusedon the following dimensions of two communities led by the two authors: (1) the origin andpurpose; (2) the characteristics; and (3) practices. Our findings suggest that
engineering codes of ethics are taught bymore than half of the instructors [8]. Engineering design projects (70%), in-class discussions(58%), case studies (58%), examples of professional scenarios (57%), and lectures (55%) wereused to teach ESI [8]. Group-based written assignments (47%), individual reflections (33%), andindividual homework assignments graded with a rubric (31%) were used to assess ESI learning[8]. Sixty-two percent of survey respondents believed that capstone design taught undergraduatestudents about ESI [8].This paper proposes a novel approach to incorporating ethics into engineering education coursesby having students choose a case from a list of recent case studies and create a video about it. Tofacilitate in-depth student
studies [1-3]. Yet, the opportunities to develop, sustain, and grow one’sengineering identity are not uniformly distributed across students enrolled in engineering programs, nor evenamong those select students offered the opportunities to participate in mentored engineering researchinterventions [4]. Indeed, engineering students from underrepresented and structurally marginalized groups may have feweraccess points to engage with engineering peers, mentors, and professionals prior to and during their collegiatestudies [5-7]. These challenges can compound for students who may be underrepresented on multipledimensions in this field, seeing their personal identities reflected less often in their intended engineering careers(e.g., gender, sexuality