, University Copyright Officer; Mr. Ray Cook, Engineering Technician, Mr. Jason Wagner, Engineering Technician; Mr. Bradford Johnson, Computer Technician at Texas State University, San Marcos.REFERENCES 1. ABET. (2012). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2012-2013. Retrieved from www.abet.org/engineering-criteria-2012-2013/ 2. Anderson, M.S. (2000). Normative Orientations of University Faculty and Doctoral Students. Science and Engineering Ethics, 6(4) 443-461. 3. Arlow, P., & Ulrich, T. A. (1988). A longitudinal survey of business school graduates' assessments of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(4), 295-302. 4. Bayles, M. (1988). Professional Ethics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing. 5. Boyd, D
6 Engineering Ethics 7 10 5 Graduate Studies Civil Engineering Community Engagement in Engineering Education 8 8 4 Multidisciplinary Engineering Two Year College Computers in Education 9 6 3 New Engineering Educators Environmental Engineering Mechanics Aerospace Mechanical Engineering 10 Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
curriculum. EuropeanJournal of Engineering Education, 25, 303-313.[3] Bucciarelli, L. Ethics and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(2), 141-149. Page 24.1197.11[4] McCuen, R. (1979). The ethical dimensions of professionalism. Journal of Professional Activities, 105 (12), 89-105.[5] Vesilind, P., & Gunn, A. (1998). Engineering, ethics, and the environment. New York, NY: CambridgeUniversity Press.[6] Herkert, J. (2001). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role ofprofessional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7 (3), 403-414.[7] Rest, J., Narvaez
believed thatdesigning the questions using this sequence would allow students to best reflect on their researchexperience. Questions were grouped into the seven categories presented in the SCONUL documentand described below: 1. Identify: Able to identify a personal need for information. 2. Scope: Can assess current knowledge and identify gaps. 3. Plan: Can construct strategies for locating information and data. 4. Gather: Can locate and access the information and data they need. 5. Evaluate: Can review the research process and compare and evaluate information and data. 6. Manage: Can organise information professionally and ethically. 7. Present: Can apply the knowledge gained: presenting the
, Microethics, and Macroethics:Product Liability as an Ethical Issue in Engineering Design, International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), 2003, pp. 163–167. 9. Herkert J., “Future Directions in Engineering Ethics Research: Microethics, Macroethics, and the Role of Professional Societies,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, no. 3, pp. 403-414, 2001. 10. Gentile, M., Giving Voice to Values: How to Speak Your Mind When You Know What’s Right. Yale University Press, 2010. 11. Kelvin Thompson, Aimee DeNoyelles, Baiyun Chen and Linda Futch (2013). Discussion Prompts. In K. Thompson and B. Chen (Eds.), Teaching Online Pedagogical Repository. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida Center for