. ScienceTechnology, & Human Values 25(2): 195-225.Newberry, Byron. (2004). The Dilemma of Ethics in Engineering Education. Science andEngineering Ethics 10: 343-351.Van De Poel, I.R., H Zandvoort, & M. Brumsen. (2001) Ethics and Engineering Courses at DelftUniversity of Technology: Contents, Educational Setup and Experiences. Science andEngineering Ethics 7(2): 267-282.Yadav, Aman, Gregory Shaver & Peter Meckl. (2010). Lessoned Learned: Implementing theCase Teaching Method in a Mechanical Engineering Course. Journal of Engineering Education.55-69.
Research: Microethics , Macroethics andthe Role of Professional Societies.” Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3): 403–14.[23] Ladd, J. 1985. “The Quest for a Code of Professional Ethics: An Intellectual and Moral Confusion.”In Ethical Issues in the Use of Computers. Wadsworth Publ. Co.[24] Tuana, N. 2013. “Embedding Philosophers in the Practices of Science: Bringing Humanities to theSciences.” Synthese 190 (11): 1955–73.[25] Rasco, J. and Power, C. 2015. “What Pushes Scientists to Lie? The Disturbing but Familiar Story ofHaruko Obokata.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/feb/18/haruko-obokata-stap-cells-controversy-scientists-lie.[26] Hill, K. 2016. “The Government Wants Silicon Valley to Build Terrorist-spotting Algorithms
discuss faculty having limited knowledge about teaching ethics(7% vs. 1%; χ2 = 4.519, p = 0.104) and the difference between teaching ethical theories andstudents engaging in ethical behavior (10% vs. 2%; χ2 = 5.631, p = 0.060). Respondents fromsmall, master’s granting programs were most likely to discuss the limitation of facultyknowledge (40%; χ2 = 31.076, p = 0.009), to talk about assessment (20%; χ2 = 32.518, p = 0.005)or the theory versus practice (40%; χ2 = 23.619, p = 0.072). Respondents from doctoral grantinginstitutions with moderate research activity were most likely to discuss how students have alimited amount of exposure to these topics (14%; χ2 = 23.742, p = 0.070).Goals/OpportunitiesIn addition to discussing challenges around ethics
: Microethics, macroethics and the role ofprofessional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics 7(3). 403–414.9. Bocong, L. (2012) From a Micro-Macro Framework to a Micro-Meso-Macro Framework. In Christensen,S., Mitcham, C., Li B., & An, Y. (Eds.). Engineering, Development, and Philosophy: American, Chinese, andEuropean Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.10. Van De Poel, I., Fahlquist, J., Doorn, N., Zwart, S., Royakkers, L. (2012). The Problem of Many Hands:Climate Change as an Example. Science and Engineering Ethics 18. 49-67.11. Van de Poel, I., Royakkers, L., and Zwart, S. (2015). Moral Responsibility and the Problem of ManyHands. New York: Routledge.12. Thaler, R. & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and
: Microethics ,Macroethics and the Role of Professional Societies.” Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3): 403–14.[21] Nieusma, Dean. 2004. “Alternative Design Scholarship: Working Toward Appropriate Design.”Design Issues 20 (3): 13–24.[22] Riley, Donna, Amy Slaton, and Joseph R. Herkert. 2015. “What Is Gained by Articulating Non-Canonical Engineering Ethics Canons?” In Proceedings of American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference.[23] Tang, X. & Nieusma, D. 2015. “Institutionalizing Ethics: Historical Debates Surrounding IEEE’s 1974Code of Ethics.” In Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.[24] Cech, Erin A., and Tom J. Waidzunas. 2011. “Navigating the Heteronormativity of Engineering