datagathered through a data collection mechanism built into the software are also provided,suggesting a successful achievement of initial design goals.IntroductionDespite steadily increasing dependency of modern societies on technology, society-wideunderstanding of technology (necessary, for example, in informed and critical decision-making)is usually lacking. Since about 70 percent of Americans are past the school age, updating theirtechnological literacy requires access to opportunities outside of formal education. Youngergenerations have yet to develop their technological skills and interests, but opportunities for thatin a structured, pre-college education are limited. The importance of inducing technologicalliteracy and interests in younger
years. As part of this collaboration, students at MSU have beenworking with an existing smaller, older, factory testbed at MSU and learning from students at UMabout operating more modern and comprehensive factory hardware, controls, and software in thecontext of the RFT. One major goal of this activity is to provide students at MSU with practicalmanufacturing experiences beyond what could be made available at such a teaching school, andto serve as a model for other similar collaborations. Through this experience, MSU students (pri-marily undergrads) were able to work as part of a large research team, and learn from the researchexperience of the graduate students at UM. Students learned and worked together both remotelyand during extended site
- SUNY, Long Island, NY, November 13-15, 2008 with the purposeof examining curricular and technology issues. From these forums has emerged the upcoming"Manufacturing Education Transformation Summit 2009" 5 to be held at the University of Texas- Austin, June 16-19, 2009 with the purpose of expanding the group involved in the discussionsof manufacturing education. All of these activities have been tracked through a Wiki site 6, that isused by the group as a focal point for activity, and a place for others to contribute and steer theprocess.Manufacturing Education Leadership Forum: Vision for ProgressKey objectives of this Forum were to illuminate critical linkages among manufacturingeducation, a vibrant industrial sector and a healthy economy, and
curriculum documents was revisited and used as thefoundation for a new document, Curriculum 2015 3. The current structure of this document isshown below. Part I - Surveying the landscape: What Industry Needs From Our Graduates Predicting the future through research Innovation in education K-12 recruiting and outreach Part II - Surveying the educational process: 2 year program issues and recommendations 4 year program issues and recommendations Graduate program issues and recommendations Part III - Goals and Strategies: The role of education in preparing for our future in manufacturing A plan to revitalize
a given countryor around the world must become part of the means to prepare the future manufacturingworkforce. Organizations such as SME, IMS and others should become change agentsand enable extensive global academic and industry collaboration, ongoing changes incurricular content to address the needs of industry, emphasis on learning over teaching,programs to develop a new generation entrepreneurs, and provisions for access tomanufacturing education at any time and anywhere. Beyond preparing a competentworkforce through the educational process outlined, the change agents must assume theresponsibilities in educating the public on the scope and the prospects of manufacturingin the future. They must also become the leading proponents to shape
, metal, glass, rubber, wood, food and clothing products. All werelocated in or near the city of Phnom Penh, the farthest away being approximately 50 km from thecity. Before traveling to Cambodia numerous contacts with government and NGO operationswere made to set up visits before arriving in country. However, these contacts, in the end werenot utilized, as these organizations seemed more interested in directing our work beyond thescope of our original plans and in limiting our visits to their own contacts. Therefore, wedecided to wait until we arrived in-country to make our own contacts and found great success infinding a variety of companies that were happy to speak with us. Within one week of arriving,more contacts and referrals were available
Paper ID #12143Teaching Global Manufacturing & Supply Chain Management through StudyAbroad Program: A Case StudyDr. Esther Rodriguez-Silva PhDDr. Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University Page 26.1475.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Teaching Global Manufacturing & Supply Chain Management through Study Abroad Program: A Case StudyAbstractIn the 21st century’s globalized economy, like any manufacturing enterprise, today’s engineersface competition from all directions. Engineers must understand
Paper ID #18931Maximizing STEM Relevance Through Project-Based Learning for Fresh-man EngineersDr. Aditya Akundi, University of Texas, El Paso Aditya Akundi is currently affiliated to Industrial Manufacturing and Systems Engineering department, and Research Institute for Manufacturing and Engineering Systems at University of Texas, ElPaso. He earned a Bachelor of Technology in Electronics and Communication Engineering from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India. He earned a Master of Science in Electrical and Computer En- gineering at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). Intrigued by Systems Engineering , he
AC 2009-1793: ENHANCING MACHINE-SAFETY EDUCATION THROUGH THEUSE OF VIRTUAL MACHINERYDarrell Wallace, Youngstown State University Darrell Wallace received his BS and MS in Mechanical Engineering from The Ohio State University. He received a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Ohio State in 2006. Dr. Wallace has worked actively in a variety of manufacturing industries since 1991 and is currently an Assistant Professor at Youngstown State University in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. Darrell R. Wallace, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Dept. of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Youngstown State University One University Plaza Youngstown, Ohio 44555 Email
, pp. 75-91, 1997.4. Smith, K., Sheppard, S., Johnson, D., and Johnson, R., Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 87-101, 2005.5. Barrows, H. and Tamblyn, R., Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education, Springer, New York, NY, 1980.6. Barrows, H., “Problem-Based Learning in Medicine and Beyond: A Brief Overview,” in Wilkerson, L. and GIjeseaers, W., eds., New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 68, pp. 3-11, 1996. Page 12.498.8
Paper ID #27182Exposing Students to STEM Careers through Hands-on Activities with Dronesand RobotsDr. Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University Dr. Vukica Jovanovic is an Associate Professor of Engineering Technology in Mechanical Engineering Technology Program. She holds a Ph.D. from Purdue University in Mechanical Engineering Technology, focus on Digital Manufacturing. Her research is focused on mechatronics, digital manufacturing, digital thread, cyber physical systems, broadening participation, and engineering education. She is a Director of Mechatronics and Digital Manufacturing Lab at ODU and a lead of Area of
AC 2012-5384: INFUSING A SUSTAINABLE GREEN MANUFACTURINGCOURSE INTO MANUFACTURING/MECHANICAL ENGINEERING TECH-NOLOGY PROGRAMDr. Devi K. Kalla, Metropolitan State College of Denver Devi K. Kalla received a Ph.D. in industrial engineering from Wichita State University in 2008. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering Technology at Metro State College of Denver. He has a strong experience on composite manufacturing, machining, and modeling. His research interests include environmentally conscious manufacturing, green manufacturing/sustainable engineering, energy efficient manufacturing processes, and automated design and product development.Prof. Aaron Brown, Metropolitan State
Paper ID #6927Holistic Consideration of Best Practices in Product Design, Quality, and Man-ufacturing Process Improvement through Design for ValueDr. Merwan B Mehta, East Carolina University Dr. Merwan Mehta is an Associate Professor at East Carolina University in the Technology Systems Department at Greenville, NC. Prior to joining academics, he has over twenty years of experience work- ing as a machine tool design engineer, manufacturing engineer, manufacturing manager, vice-president, partner, and consultant. His present research interests are improving manufacturing productivity through Lean manufacturing principles
wastecontribute to higher production cost. So is low capacity utilization and shift-to-shift outputvariation [1]. When product line change-over times are too long, the result is low utilization andproductivity. The search for ways for reducing production costs through improved effectivenessand efficiency is never ending. Companies have tried improvements through different initiativessuch as Lean, Lean 5S, Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, Total Productive Maintenance, bettertechnologies, layoffs, etc. so as to remain profitable. 5S is a methodology based on 5 simpleconcepts aimed at achieving a clean, organized, and comfortable work environment. It isgenerally believed that 5S initiative is a foundation for more disciplined actions [2] and whenproperly
a B.E. in Aeronautical Engineering and is presently completing her M.S. in Aerospace Systems Engineering.Dr. Morgan M. Hynes, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Morgan Hynes is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity and Director of the FACE Lab research group at Purdue. In his research, Hynes explores the use of engineering to integrate academic subjects in K-12 classrooms. Specific research interests include design metacognition among learners of all ages; the knowledge base for teaching K-12 STEM through engi- neering; the relationships among the attitudes, beliefs, motivation, cognitive skills, and engineering skills of K-16 engineering learners; and teaching
has a heavyemphasis on theory and mathematical modeling as opposed to a more practice based curricula,which was the standard engineering education approach until the modern approach gained favorin a shift that occurred between 1935 and 1965.6 As a result of this shift, many engineeringstudents do not spend much of their time engaged in actual design and build processes until latein their degree program.7Maker spaces have an opportunity to revolutionize the current system by providing an extra-curricular means for students to engage in more hands-on projects and develop a large range ofthe skills that are currently being underdeveloped. Maker spaces go beyond the traditionalmachine shop environment familiar to the undergraduate curriculum
measure given parts with a prescribed measurement tool. Themeasurements are then used to fill in the blanks provided as part of the written procedure. It wasdesired to add an R&R to outline the steps that can be taken to characterize the performance ofgages and instruments used in a production setting in terms of errors that affect themeasurements1. A second reason for the R&R was to move students beyond simply performingmeasurements to a higher level of intellectual behavior by having students apply the informationpresented to a new problem2. A third reason for the R&R was to address student dissatisfactionwith the format of the existing written procedure labs. Of all the procedures involved insuccessfully using team-based learning
of two ormore students who work together to maximize their own and each other’s learning. This could beachieved through assigning students to one of the following four types of CL: formal, informal,collaborative base groups, and academic controversy. This helps provide one another withefficient and effective help and assistance. It is also a chance to exchange information ormaterials, discuss the concepts and strategies being learned, decide how to solve problems, andprovide for the necessary support and encouragement.Regarding the technical dimension of collaborative learning, computer-mediated communicationtools have played an important role in facilitating group learning processes among groupmembers who may live in different geographical
evaluation this spring through assessment by a small groupof users (both students and faculty). Any necessary changes will be made prior to the plannedimplementation for all freshman during the upcoming 2012-13 academic year. Page 25.62.21 IntroductionManufacturing knowledge is one of the critical elements of mechanical engineering design, helpingto bring designs from concept to prototype in an engineering setting. Our objective is to distribute asingle semester of manufacturing curriculum into every year of an undergraduate’s education. Thisworks in parallel with the prior developed SPIRAL curriculum [1–5]. Our goal is to give studentsa more
engineering is a liaison between design and production. They need to be proficient in communicating in both spheres and often to non-engineers. This is particularly true when either providing or receiving feedback (2g, 4b).2. Communication and collaboration skills are critical in particular communicating technical information to non-engineers (2.a-c).3. A critical skill is the ability to work through ambiguity (1j, 4d).4. A manufacturing engineer must be able to deal with conflict (4f).5. Skill is needed in identifying solutions to failures (1.c) and getting buy-in for the proposed solution (2a-c, e).6. There must be comfort working on tasks with deliverables that are beyond one’s control and an ability to manage completing work under these
, that focus on education trends and relations with universities. Most recentlySME and CIRP collaborated to sponsor an entire conference specifically dedicated to issues ofmanufacturing engineering education24.The conference, named “Looking Forward: Innovations in Manufacturing EngineeringEducation”, was held June 22 through 25, 2005, in San Luis Obispo on the CaliforniaPolytechnic State University (Cal Poly) campus. The international conference was actually thethird such SME/CIRP joint event (and the fourth SME event) in the past decade25,26,27. Theobjective of the event was to help shape the future of manufacturing engineering education byfostering communication among a global set of participants. Sessions were provided for industryand
personnel. These partnerships should extend beyond colleges ofscience, engineering, and technology to include representatives from colleges of education,business, and a few others. Additionally, representatives from the pK-12 sector should beincluded to provide perspective on foundational education preparation. These partnershipsexemplify the essence of a P-20 model [6]. The model addresses the development of the studentfrom pK-12 through higher education to participate in the workforce. Recent decisions for bringing back manufacturing sent overseas have been based on therealization that manufacturing in the U.S. is only slightly more than the cost of manufacturing inChina, and less than the cost of manufacturing in eastern Europe [7
design for manufacturability considerations. • Visualize components in a system and prepare and interpret schematics of the system. Through exposure to textbook figures, video footage, and industrial tours, students will gain knowledge of manufacturing machinery, manufacturing environments, and their inner workings and system-level relationships. Page 12.511.4 • Communicate effectively using standard industry terminology through hand-written technical documents, formal written documents, and oral presentations. By making writing an important student deliverable though the use of tour journals, optional
Center of Excellence for Advanced Technological Education in Florida, FLATE. FLATE, now in its 10 year of op- eration, addresses curriculum, professional development, and outreach issues to support the creation of Florida’s technical workforce. Richard has over 30 years of experience working with the K-14 education community. Other funded efforts include projects for the NIH and the US Department of Education. The latter was for the development of an engineering curriculum for elementary school applications. The for- mer is for development of electric field mediated drug and gene applicators and protocols. This effort has generated over 20 patents and protocols currently in Phase II trials.Dr. Marie A. Boyette, FLATE
that phase.Moreover, students submitted a final report to the instructor and industry mentor. The final reportwas a 15-20 page document that included detailed description of the project phases. Theinstructor served as the facilitator and mentor for all the projects.4. Benefits and Challenges of Industry ProjectsThe main benefit to the students is the exposure to real life problems and applying what theylearn in class to solve them. Students also improve their communication and teamwork skills.The faculty advisor benefits from the industry projects through collaborating and networkingwith local industry, using real life examples to illustrate course topics, preparing students forcareers in engineering, and potential research and publication
to predict, is very quick due to generation of high stresses reaching far beyond theendurance limit of the cutting tool 7. Other study shows that tool failure in microdrilling is alsodue to chip logging 8. Cutting force characteristics and tool vibration signals change slightlyduring microdrilling operation before tool breaks. The investigator extends the study to monitorthe static component of cutting force through use of segmental averages and wavelettransformations in micro end-milling7. Failure of a tool occurs very quickly if the cutting forceincreases beyond the strength of the tool. When cutting force increases during cutting, it deflectsthe fragile tool. The deflection of the tool and the stress increases with time. The
design and manufacturing of microturbomachinery. Some students study materials, dynamics, or thermal aspects ofturbomachinery, while others explore and develop various micromanufacturing technologies formicroturbine fabrication. The nature of micromachinery requires the development of novelmicromanufacturing technologies for superalloys and other robust engineering materials. Theselected participants study micromilling, electrical discharge micromachining, electrochemicalmicromachining, and vacuum assisted microcasting. They complete a research methodologyworkshop and then apply to their own projects through setting objectives, planning schedule,performing experiments, documenting data, presenting results at the campus-wide poster session
sustainability is rather obvious given events like the demise of thePennsylvania oil industry, how can we promote sustainable practices in our daily activities?Cognizant of this need, Kofi Annan, General-Secretary of the United Nations, in 2001 remarkedthat “Our biggest challenge in this new century is to take an idea that seems abstract-sustainabledevelopment-and turn it into a reality for the entire world’s people.”5 The United NationsDecade of Education for Sustainable Development 2005-20145 proposed “reorienting educationalprograms by rethinking and revising education from nursery school through university to includea clear focus on the development of knowledge, skills, perspectives and values related tosustainability that is important to current
interesting and fun concept to theinstructor and students.Earlier rapid prototyping projects from a decade ago involved toy design and development. Inaddition, students re-engineered existing commercial ZOOB designs for the former InfinitoyCompany. An example Re-engineering Proposal by Martin Pabian, then a BS ManufacturingEngineering major can be found below1: ZOOB Reverse Engineering Project Proposal by Martin Pabian Rapid Prototyping and Reverse EngineeringBackground: Citroid System is the organic technology behind ZOOB brand toys. The open-ended, ergonomic design has the potential for a wide array of applications far beyond toys, fromcomplex mathematical
, 2021 MAKER: Design of a Virtual CNC Mill by Unity Software AbstractIt requires a lot of hands-on experience to learn how to operate a computer numerical control (CNC)mill. Virtual Reality (VR) can serve as a way to teach how to properly operate it. The goal of thisresearch is to create a virtual CNC mill that can provide interactive training for students. The Unitysoftware was used for this goal. Unity is a game development engine used to produce video games,utility software, and more. The functionality of the CNC simulation was created with C# scripting.The visual representation of the CNC mill was built through 3D modeling, and then transferredinto FBX 3D models which are compatible