topic of normal and lateral strains, a conversation between two actor students, one of which suffering from a strained muscle, forms the basis of the casual discussion on the topic in an interactive way that students can easily relate to. A narrator’s voice is included to introduce the technical subject and to summarize main points. The total audio length is 10 of 14 designed to be between four to six minutes long, to limit the risk of loss of attention. The comprehension assessment tools are presented as multiple-choice quizzes, related to the situation presented in the narrative. 3. High-quality
differently”. Interpersonal 5 “People communicate better when they connect in a deeper level… Make them connections friends first and they will work better as a team.” Require group work 5 “Require group work every week [and] assign group projects”. Division of work 3 “Division of work will give a solution to help a team work better”. and setting goals for each member Others 14 A range of other suggestions included overcoming language barriers, motivation working on team-building skills, giving teams applicable and interesting
EngineeringAbstractEngineering students are often given quantitative problems as homework. Problem solvingprovides students opportunities to retrieve knowledge, apply and adjust conceptualunderstanding, and build analytical skills. Because increased motivation has been shown toproduce better learning outcomes [1] - [3], it makes sense to tailor problems to motivate students.Intuitively, adding contextual elements, such as background information, narrative, images, andlocal references, to problems may be one way of motivating students, but investigation in thisarea has been limited [8] - [10]. Therefore, this study surveyed students to gauge theirperceptions of fundamentally identical problems presented either with or without significantcontextual elements. The primary
30 years. He has been the six-time elected as the Program Chair of the ASEE International Division for approximately the past 15 years. Three times as the Program Chair for the Graduate Studies Division of ASEE. Nick has had a major role in development and expansion of the ID division. Under his term as the International Division Program Chair the international division expanded, broadened in topics, and the number of sessions increased from a few technical sessions to over eighteen sessions in the recent years. The ASEE International Division by votes, has recognized Nick’s years of service through several awards over the past years. Nick has been the recipient of multiple Service awards (examples: 2013, 2010
intensities of moment Visualize the effect of a couple moment formed by two 2 Students Forming Couples volunteers applying equal and opposite forces to a table Show and compare the reactions from mock-ups of typical 3 Show Some Restraint support conditions used in engineering Generate an internal bending moment in a cheese beam due to 4 Cutting the Cheese Beam applied shear Visualize and distinguish the difference in sign convention for 5 Breaking Bread internal shear in a sliced loaf of bread
physicists draw FBD’s,” Physics Teacher, vol. 31, pp 216-217, 1993.[17] T. Litzinger, P. Meter, C. Firetto, L. Passmore, C. Masters, S. Turns, S. Gray, F. Costanzo, and S. Zappe, “A Cognitive Study of Problem Solving in Statics,” J. Engg Educ., vol. 99, pp 337-353, 2010.[18] K. Giridharan and R. Raju, “Impact of Teaching Strategies: Demonstration and Lecture Strategies and Impact of Teacher Effect on Academic Achievement in Engineering Education,” International Journal of Educational Sciences, vol. 14 (3), pp 174-186, 2016.[19] J. Davis and T. McDonald, “Online Homework: Does it help or hurt in the long run?,” Proceedings of the 121th annual ASEE Conference, Indianapolis, USA, June 15-18, 2014.[20] J
prerequisite, and co-requisite. The course name: Statics (CE250 and ME 250). Description from the University Bulletin: “Forces and couples, free bodydiagrams, two- and three-dimensional equilibrium of a particle and rigid bodies. Principles offriction, centroids, centers of gravity, and moments of inertia. Virtual work, potential energy, andstatic stability of equilibrium. Internal forces, shear and bending moment diagrams.” Semestercredit hours: 3; Class hours: 3. Prerequisite: Physics 152, Co-requisite: MA 261.Prerequisite: Physics 152. Description from the University Bulletin: “Statics, uniform, andaccelerated motion; Newton’s laws; circular motion; energy, momentum, and conservationprinciples; dynamics of rotation; gravitation and planetary motion
., Felder, G. N., & Dietz, E. J. (1998). A longitudinal study of engineering studentperformance and retention. V. Comparisons with traditionally‐taught students. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 87(4), 469-480. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00381.x[3] Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learningstyles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 103-112.[4] Taraban, R., Anderson, E. E., DeFinis, A., Brown, A. G., Weigold, A., & Sharma, M. P. (2007). Firststeps in understanding engineering students' growth of conceptual and procedural knowledge in aninteractive learning context. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(1), 57-68. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00915.x.[5
on the free-body diagram. These forces represent the actions exerted on the free body by the ground and by the bodies that have been detached. In the diagram, apply these forces at the various points where the free body was supported by the ground or was connected to the other bodies. Generally, you should include the weight of the free body among the external forces. You should draw the weight so it acts at the center of gravity of the body. If the free body is made of several parts, do not include the forces the various parts exert on each other among the external forces. These forces are internal forces as far as the free body is concerned. 3. Clearly mark the magnitudes and directions of the
through three 50-minutes or two 75-minutes face-to-face lectures per week. Since spring 2014, a redesignedStatics using blended course format has been offered parallel to the traditional format. Theredesigned course format includes two 50-minutes lectures and one 3-hours recitation per week.This study is purposed to perform a thorough comparison between the sections using the twoinstruction methods. The sample data includes students from Mechanical and AerospaceEngineering Department, and Civil and Construction Engineering Department enrolled intoStatics course from Spring 2014 to Fall 2018. The demographic information of both studentsections was compared first. The student cumulative GPA when they were enrolled in Static wasexamined to see if
Case Study on Course-Based Outcomes Assessment toEnhance Student Learning and Course Delivery in the Engineering Sciences Core Curriculum”,Paper No. IMECE 2009-12946, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress andExposition, November 13 – 19, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, 2009.[2] A. Ghosh and E.C. Hensel, “An interpretive assessment of engineering science core courses”,Paper No. IMECE-12939, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress andExposition, November 13 – 19, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, 2009.[3] ABET Self Study Report, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute ofTechnology, June 2010.[4] A. Ghosh, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019 (in preparation)[5] W. T. Thomson, and M. D Dahleh
the studentswill enroll. Analysis of such data will give a more definite answer on the role open-endedproblems play in improved student learning and therefore minimizes the effects of readymadesolution manuals.Bibliography 1. D. Belkin, “Exclusive Test Data: Many Colleges Fail to Improve Critical-Thinking Skills,” The Wall Street Journal, June 5, 2017. 2. N.J. Mourtos, “Challenges Students Face in Solving Open-Ended Problems,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 846-859, 2010. 3. D. Adair and M. Jaeger, “Incorporating Critical Thinking into an Engineering Undergraduate Learning Environment,” International Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 23-39, 2016. 4. S.R. Singer, N.R
://jimi.cbee.oregonstate.edu/concept_warehouse/) [25].AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grantnumbers DUE #1834425 and DUE #1834417. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe NSF.References[1] T. Litzinger, P. Meter, C. M. Firetto, L. J. Passmore, C. B. Masters, S. R. Turns, G. L. Gray, F. Costanzo and a. S. E. Zappe, "A Cognitive Study of Problem Solving in Statics," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, pp. 337-353, 2010.[2] P. S. Steif and A. Dollár, "Reinventing the Teaching of Statics," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 723-729, 2005.[3] R. A. Streveler
. Ginsberg, Advanced Engineering Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, 1998.[11] E. Constans, T. R. Chandrupatla and H. Zhang, "An Efficient Position Solution for the Fourbar Linkage," International Journal of Mechanisms and Robotic Systems, vol. 2, no. 3/4, pp. 365-373, 2015.[12] A. De-Juan, R. Sancibrian and F. Viadero, "Optimal Synthesis of Function Generation in Steering Linkages," International Journal of Automotive Technology, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1033-1046, 2012.[13] J. Cabrera, A. Simon and M. Prado, "Optimal synthesis mechanisms with genetic algorithms," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1165-1177, 2002.[14] A. Kunjur and S. Krishanamury, "Genetic algorithms in mechanical synthesis," Journal for
average cost ofcollege textbooks has risen three to four times faster than the rate of inflation over the past 10years. In a single year, the average college student spends more than $1,200 on books andmaterials, as reported by the College Board [2]. The survey conducted in this research confirmsthe high cost of learning resources for engineering students. The main problem is that as the endusers, students generally have no role in selecting the course learning materials. The high andrising cost of textbooks and its impending influence on the learning of students who cannotafford such prices has been investigated and discussed by government agencies, researchers, andeven public media [1], [3], [4], [5]. Digital Affordable Learning
that influence students help-seeking behaviors.Mr. Rohit Kandakatla, Purdue University, West Lafayette Rohit Kandakatla is currently a Ph.D. candidate in School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity. He has his bachelors and masters in Electrical Engineering from India. He currently serves as the Chair-elect of the ASEE Student Division as has been an active member of the international engineering education community while serving as the President of Student Platform for Engineering Education De- velopment (SPEED) and as the Vice-President of Student Engagement for the International Federation for Engineering Education Societies (IFEES). His research interests include education policy, faculty de
, no. 3, pp. 345-352, 2000.[8] G. Byrne, “Total Quality Management in Engineering Education—A Case Study fromUniversity College Dublin (National University of Ireland-Dublin),” European Journal ofEngineering Education, vol 23 no. 4, pp. 435-442, 1998.[9] B. Sayeda, C. Rajendran, and P.S. Lokachari. "An empirical study of total qualitymanagement in engineering educational institutions of India: perspective ofmanagement." Benchmarking: an international journal, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 728-767, 2010.[10] W. Deming, Out of the Crisis, MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Studies,Cambridge, MA, p.29, 1982.[11] Nilson, L., Specifications grading: Restoring rigor, motivating students, and saving facultytime. Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2015.[12] P. Brown, H.L
is a written guide, or a set of suggested steps, for solving a certain class of problems.It is not usually a detailed process because the nature of each problem is unique and requiressome creativity in the application of the relevant concepts. Enough detail is provided so thatstudents know the order of the steps to take in solving a problem. Key assumptions may also beprovided.Here is an example Compass for drawing a FBD of a beam, truss or frame structure: 1. Create a new drawing of the structure, representing each member as a line. 2. Represent internal connections as either pinned or welded. 3. Define a global coordinate system (GCS) that is convenient for the current problem. 4. Replace all boundary icon symbols with the reaction
. Although graphs and stopmotion photography can be used to infer continuous motion, it can still be difficult to getstudents to appreciate the changing velocities and accelerations involved in the motion ofparticles and rigid bodies. To help overcome this, we have incorporated the use of an advancedmotion analysis system into several of our courses at Cal Poly.The use of motion analysis is nothing new – in fact the physics community has been using suchtechnology for years [1-3]. Some investigators have worked to develop their own motionanalysis software [4] to get around the high costs of most motion capture systems, and othershave recognized the advanced image processing capabilities of MatLab to perform motiontracking [5] (http
Assistant Professor in the Department of Bioengineering at Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU). She earned a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) in 2004 with the Rensselaer Medal award and as a member of the inaugural class of Gates Mil- lennium Scholars. In 2011, she earned a Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Rice University. Before joining FGCU in 2015, she was a visiting Assistant Professor of Biotechnology in the Division of Science and Technology at the United International College (UIC) in Zhuhai China. She has been exploring and applying evidence-based strategies for instruction since her training with ASCE’s Excellence in Civil En- gineering Education (ExCEEd) initiative in 2016
participation from others in the class.Speaker PresentationsIn order to promote professionalism and to attempt to satisfy one of the ABET criteria of‘Continuous improvement’, the students are provided with another opportunity (for extracredit) to attend technical speaker presentations. Most of these presentations (2 to 3 perterm) are held on campus during lunch hours. These presentations are sponsored by thestudent chapters of ASME, SWE, etc., and also by honor societies such as Pi Tau Sigma.Students are also encouraged to join as members of such societies. The speakers areusually from outside, either from an industry or from an R&D institution. Some times thestudents arrange the speakers from their co-op industry. Extra credit was given based
. Statics Physics II Lin. Alg. Calc II Physics I Fr Calc I Chem Fig. 1. The Mechanics Project courses in the context of a curriculum. The curriculum shown is a typical civil engineering curriculum, including math and science foundations, followed by mechanics courses (Statics, Dynamics, and Deformable Solids), followed up upper division courses. Note that only technical courses are shown.The mechanics courses were an interesting choice for educational reform because there was
first two courses of their engineering mechanics sequence, covering the materialtypically found in both statics and mechanics (or strength) of materials courses as well as theintroduction of Inquiry Based Learning Activities [1, 2]. The papers detail the process engagedin during and the reasoning behind the redesign and development of activities for what was,through all previous assessments, a popular and well received course sequence. As a result oftheir internal assessment the faculty from the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering atthe US Military Academy [USMA] at West Point determined that their first sequence ofengineering mechanics courses provided the technical content that was required, but the courseswere lacking in a few
, internalized and use them to illustrate specific technical concepts. Everyday examples utilized to date include technical scenarios arising in roller coasters, popular movies and sports. Using thematic case-based instruction to enable the simultaneous teaching of technical and soft engineering skills. Thematic Case-Based Instruction (TCBI) is an emerging technique designed to enable the simultaneous instruction of technical and so-called soft engineering skills through the coordinated application of international case studies13. Efforts have been made in Basic Mechanics I to utilize TCBI in such a way that students can not only assimilate technical information, but can also develop an
. Pennathur edits the International Journal of Industrial Engineering. His educational research interests are in physiological assessments of student learning, and design of learning interfaces. His technical research interests are in engineering for older adults, human workload assessment, ecological human-machine interface design and sociotechnical systems design and evaluation. apennathur@utep.edu http://faculty.utep.edu/apennathurElsa Villa, University of Texas-El Paso Elsa Villa is a lecturer in the Department of Teacher Education, Division of Mathematics, Science and Technology, at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). She formerly served as the Director of the Engineering Programs
. • The torque on drill bit is 410in-lbs (per manufacturer specs). • The steel plate and the drill remain stationary while the torque is applied. Figure 2. Student developed torsion example problem Figure 3. Student drawn external and internal FBD of drill in figure 2.The calculations required for the problem are the same; however, the students are able to placethe concept of torsion in context by selecting the source of the problem. This is an example of astudent developed example for the “Photo Shoot” project developed for EM 321, theintroductory
Paper ID #33353A Blend Flex Engineering Mechanics CourseDr. Jiehong Liao, Florida Gulf Coast University Dr. Jiehong Liao is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Bioengineering at Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU). She earned a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) in 2004 with the Rensselaer Medal award and as a member of the inaugural class of Gates Mil- lennium Scholars. In 2011, she earned a Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Rice University. Before joining FGCU in 2015, she was a visiting Assistant Professor of Biotechnology in the Division of Science and Technology at the
model was used to drive the reform of the course Introductory Dynamics. This course was redesigned to achieve three goals: (1) improve students’ low engagement and enthusiasm, (2) improve instructors’ experience and reduce their high workload, and (3) maintain and elevate the current standards for content. Introductory Dynamics is one of the core second-year mechanics courses in our engineering curriculum, serving approximately 800 students per year. Course revisions have led to the adoption of a spectrum of evidence-based practices such as context-rich, collaborative problem-solving sessions, and classroom response systems. These efforts have improved student satisfaction with the course and have
University Claudio holds Bachelor’s degree in Control Engineering at Higher Education Institute of Amazonia (2011), and he holds his Master’s degree in Electrical Engineering from the State University of Campinas (2014) in Brazil. Currently, he is pursuing his Ph.D. at Purdue University in Engineering Education. He has experience as a visiting graduate researcher at the University of New Mexico (USA) and professional experience at K&A Wireless as a research associate in Albuquerque (USA). Additionally, he worked at Hitachi Automotive Systems America as an Intern in Research & Development in Detroit (USA) and Senior Product Engineer at Fiat Chrysler Automobiles in Brazil. Claudio’s research focuses on under