exposure togeneral engineering principles is reduced. Third, the pre-entry engineering experience andknowledge of students is probably lower now than in previous times. This is in part explained bythe complexity and relative ‘un-repairability’ of much of today’s machines/equipment/devicesleading to fewer opportunities for young adults to experiment and learn-by-doing. The conjectureis that the combined impact of the above three has led to a decontexualisation withinundergraduate engineering programmes. What are the remedies? A lengthening of programmesto allow for the inclusion of more ‘engineering’in the curriculum; the adoption of carefullychosen industrial placement for at least a semester; the inclusion of more problem-based orproject-based
is beneficial, in that the resulting outcome statements can be assessed more effectively and consistently.8 Page 13.743.4 Level Illustrative Verbs 1 Knowledge define, identify, label, list, 2 Comprehension classify, describe, explain, generalize, paraphrase 3 Application apply, calculate, compute, demonstrate, solve 4 Analysis analyze, differentiate, formulate, organize, prioritize 5 Synthesis create, design, develop, devise, integrate, plan 6 Evaluation critique, evaluate, judge, justifyTable 1. Six levels of
Paper ID #26052The Methodological Promise of Narrative Inquiry for Exploring Student Vet-eran and Service Member Experience as ”People in Relation”Dr. Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University Angela Minichiello is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University (USU) and a registered professional mechanical engineer. Her research examines issues of access, diversity, and inclusivity in engineering education. In particular, she is interested in engineering identity, problem-solving, and the intersections of online learning and alternative pathways for adult, nontraditional
Education as well as the Past-Chair of the Continuing Professional Development Division of the American Society for Engineering Education. Dr. Springer received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Purdue University, his MBA and Doctorate in Adult and Community Education with a Cognate in Executive Development from Ball State University. He is certified as a Project Management Professional (PMP), Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR & SHRM-SCP), in Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), and, in civil and domestic mediation. Dr. Springer is a State of Indiana Registered domestic mediator.Dr. Kathryne A. Newton, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kathy Newton is an Associate Dean of Graduate Programs and
STEM pedagogy, design thinking, project-based learning and educational entrepreneurship.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of
limited in the field when panels becomesoiled over time, reducing their electric output. In this student initiated experiment, solar panelswere treated with a nanoporous silica/titania metal oxide thin film coating to impart self-cleaningproperties. Panels from an operational 1.6 kW solar array were coated in the field to model areal-world application process. The system incorporated module level micro-inverters tomonitor the power output of individual panels. The system was installed in June, and coatingsapplied in October 2017. Data collection and analysis is ongoing. Through this research project,students learned the fundamentals of solar photovoltaic technology, aspects of solar systemdesign, safe installation procedures, and principles of
Undergraduate Recruitment for the College of Engineering at the University of Arkansas. He directs the engineering recruitment office, most of the College of Engi- neering’s K-12 outreach programs, and the college’s summer programs. Specking is actively involved in the Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management divisions and is the current Chair of the ASEE Diversity Committee. Specking received a B.S. in Computer Engineering and a M.S. in Industrial Engi- neering from the University of Arkansas and is currently working on a PhD in Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas.Dr. Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University Adrienne Minerick is the Associate Dean for Research & Innovation in the
process of student outcomes in the engineering programs.IntroductionThe ABET-Engineering Commission (EAC) accreditation of engineering programs based onstudents’ learning outcome assessment (EC-2000) began in late 1990s. During the last few yearsof 1990s programs were given the choice of being evaluated based on the old criteria or the newlyestablished EC-2000 criteria. Since 2000, all engineering programs requesting accreditation forthe first time or seeking re-accreditation by ABET-EAC have been required to demonstrate thatprogram meets a set of criteria that include both the general criteria for baccalaureate degreeprograms and the program criteria required by the program lead society (e.g., ASCE, IEEE,ASME).1 The programs must also meet all
populations.Dr. Deborah A. Trytten, University of Oklahoma Dr. Deborah A. Trytten is a President’s Associates Presidential Professor and Associate Professor of Computer Science and Womens’ and Gender Studies at the University of Oklahoma. Her main research focus is diversity in engineering education and introductory software engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Advisor Perspectives on Diversity in Student Design Competition TeamsIntroductionFor the past 30 years the engineering community has placed a premium on recruiting andretaining a more diverse pool of future engineers. Research has demonstrated that studentpopulation diversity is linked to a number of
Paper ID #17200An Exercise to Promote and Assess Critical Thinking in Sociotechnical Con-textJohn Krupczak Jr, NSF Division of Undergraduate Education Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, Michigan. Former Chair of the ASEE Technologi- cal Literacy Division. Former Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education Division. Senior Fellow CASEE, National Academy of Engineering, 2008-2010.Dr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina is with the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been working on better understanding of students’ learning and issues of technological and engineer
candidates is to pull from a variety of STEM disciplines. Theteam places a high value on cross mentorship and interdisciplinary engagement amongstparticipants. Therefore, students represent majors that span the physical to life sciences as well asvarying class standing. After students are selected they meet at least three to four times with theircohort for pre-departure meetings. Pre-departure meetings provide an opportunity for students tobuild community, learn more about the host country, and receive vital information relative to visas,health and wellness, and class expectations. In addition to the pre-departure meetings the cohorthas one to two technical meetings with the lead UW faculty member. The technical meetingsintroduce students to
and disadvantages inpursuing their engineering education.Method Development“Serial Testimony” Adaptations to Create a “Series of Singular Testimonies”In developing our method, the team first discussed how the serial testimony technique could beadapted to be more appropriate for an individual interview. Three researchers from our team(Julie, Aubrie and Rachel) attended McIntosh’s lecture at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference inIndianapolis and had the opportunity to not only learn her techniques for introducing terms andmotivating thoughtful responses of UA and UD, but also to engage with others in the room andactually participate in a guided serial testimony with another individual. The first-handexperience of participating in a serial testimony
mathematics learning in the classroom. Currently, she leads all K-8 math, reading, science, and career exploration programs at MAEF. Ms. Dean is an experienced science educator having lead for years the development of informal curriculum and programs for the Science Centers in Alabama and Louisiana. She is highly experienced in curriculum development, writing, training and implementation. She has lead teacher development programs, as well as conducted pilot engineering design lessons in the classrooms. She works closely with STEM teachers in the 60,000 students Mobile County Public School System and has the reputation as a teacher leader and change agent. Her work with K-12 students, teachers and ed- ucation administrators
recognized, has contributed to scholarship more than 140 articles, presentations, books and reviews on software development methodologies, management, organizational change, and program management. Dr. Springer sits on many university and community boards and advisory committees. He received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Purdue University, his MBA and Doctorate in Adult and Community Education with a Cognate in Executive Development from Ball State University. Dr. Springer is certified as a Project Management Professional (PMP), Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR), in Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), and, in civil and domestic mediation. He is a State of Indiana Registered domestic
Paper ID #12921Black Male ”Buoyant Believers” in Engineering and Engineering-RelatedFieldsDr. Leroy L. Long III, Ohio State University Dr. Leroy L. Long III recently earned his PhD in STEM Education with a focus on Engineering Education within the Department of Teaching and Learning at The Ohio State University (OSU). He earned his Masters in Mechanical Engineering at OSU and his Bachelors in Mechanical Engineering at Wright State University. He has been a Graduate Teaching Associate with the First-Year Engineering Program and a Research Affiliate with the Center for Higher Education Enterprise at OSU. He has also served as
learning. Periodic reports weredelivered to faculty advisors to ensure student were making progress, and moving in the correctdirection. Students were evaluated using several metrics including: depth of research, ability toperform self-directed learning, quality of final project, as well as completion of a technicalreport, presentation, and poster. The project was and will be featured at several Universityexpositions including 2015 “Engineers Week Expo” held on March 14th’ 2015, “ThinkingMatters” on April 24th, 2015 . In addition to the course requirements, the resulting project willprovide a theoretical and functional platform for further educational activities at the Universityincluding additional senior design work, and a platform for further
Paper ID #18395A Framework for an Engineering Reasoning Test and Preliminary Results.Dr. John Krupczak Jr, Hope College Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, Michigan. Former Chair of the ASEE Technological Literacy Division; Former Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education Division; Senior Fellow CASEE, Na- tional Academy of Engineering, 2008-2010; Program Officer, National Science Foundation, Division of Undergraduate Education 2013-2016.Dr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina is with the department of Industrial Design and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been
., engineering, political science, social science, etc.) must be combined,as comprehensively as possible, to address these goals in an integrated and transdisciplinarymanner. An integrated approach provides a way to look at the SDGs more holistically but also toexplore how these goals might interact with other frameworks such as the Grand Challenges ofEngineering (GCE). The GCE consists of 14 projects and engineering-based goals that theengineering community proposes to accomplish by the end of this century (Grand Challenges forEngineering Committee 2008). They include: advance personalized learning; make solar energyeconomical; enhance virtual reality; reverse-engineering the brain; engineer better medicines;advance health informatics; restore
Engineering. She researches STEM mentoring experiences and mentoring intervention programs in higher education.Dr. Stephanie G. Adams, University of Texas at Dallas Dr. Stephanie G. Adams is the 5th Dean of the Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Sci- ence at the University of Texas, Dallas and President of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). Dr. Adams has held administrative and faculty positions at Old Dominion University, Virginia Tech, Virginia Commonwealth University and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Dr. Adams is an honor graduate of North Carolina A&T State University, where she earned her BS in Mechanical Engineering. She was awarded the Master of Engineering degree in Systems
intellectualcapacity as most institutions have higher requirements for enrollment in dual degree programs. Other Mechanical Engineering Computer Science / Engineering AEC Programs Civil and Environmental Engineering Architecture and Environmental Design Architecture and Architectural Engineering Interior Design Construction Management Architectural Engineering Architecture
, and recruitment and retention issues in engineering. Amy Moll, Boise State University Amy J. Moll is the Chair of the Boise State University Materials Science and Engineering Department. She has experience in R&D and manufacturing of microelectronic materials and packaging and continues that research today. Dr. Moll is also involved in development of through wafer interconnects in Si and projects developing Ceramic meso scale systems(C-‐MEMs). Cheryl Schrader, Boise State University Cheryl B. Schrader is Dean of the College of Engineering and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at
, either as individual topics,components, or units that can be used as specific learning modules, into existing coursework.In fact, many approaches have been found to be quite successful for augmenting engineering andtechnology instruction by inserting additional materials into mainstream instruction38.Addressing engineering ethics is a prime example of how specific topics can be infused intocurricula without adding additional courses. Some avenues that have been shown to work wellinclude integrating focused components (theory as well as case study analyses) into specifictechnical courses39-43, examining issues during technical problem solving in specific technicalcourses44, issues and topics for review during capstone experiences45-46, specific
it is taught by a team of three architects,one of whom specializes in environmental controls, and one structural engineer, and the size ofthe class varies from 30 to 45 students. Both architecture and architectural engineering studentsare required to take this course. The course requirements are somewhat different for the twomajors, and often less than a quarter of the class is AE students. We have come to call this theComprehensive Semester because it not only requires the use of information learned throughoutthe curriculum, but also incorporates a studio, a technology seminar, and a management courseinto a tightly knit whole. Throughout the semester, all students integrate architectural design withmechanical and structural systems design
set of constituencies around sustainability is very positive,the wide diversity and range of perspectives among them has generated numerous definitions,conceptualizations, and frameworks of sustainability, with some of them compatible, and some ofthem in conflict, with each other. [3] In addition, the magnitude and scope of the existing and evolvingbody of knowledge on sustainable development and sustainability are daunting. Furthermore, anexamination of this body of knowledge also reveals that there is no unified theory of sustainability,and sustainability is addressed in multiple forms such as principles, concepts, heuristics, strategies,guidelines, specifications, standards, processes, tools, best practices, lessons learned, and case
). Creativity: Beyond the Myth of Genius. New York: Freeman.41. Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 716-730.42. Yang, M. (2008). Prompt versus problem: Helping students learn to frame problems and think creatively. 2nd Design Creativity Workshop, Third International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition. Atlanta, GA. Page 15.151.19
. cousins, aunts,uncles, etc.) more often due to self-efficacy building vicarious learning experiences.32 Studentswho see others that are similar to themselves (closer in age or experience) being successfulengineers may enable a re-imagining of their possible selves (the selves one believes one mightbecome in the near and the more distal future 33), to more firmly believe that they can succeed inengineering.Parental influences on engineering career choice are mixed – fathers are a positive influence onengineering and mothers are a negative predictor of choosing engineering. Students whoreported that their mother/female guardian who contributed to the selection of their career pathare less likely to chose an engineering career. This finding may be
Role of Axiomatic Design in Teaching Capstone Courses Edwin Odom, Steven Beyerlein, Christopher A. Brown, Daniel Drew, Lloyd Gallup, Sam Zimmerman, and Jeremy Olberding University of Idaho/Worcester Polytechnic InstituteAbstractHelping undergraduate engineering students learn effective design practices that are applicable tothe modern workplace is one of the most complex challenges of engineering education. Onestrategy to help students master open-ended design projects is to use a systematic process.However, students often want to jump past the front end of the design process and thiscompromises the quality of the final product. This paper examines the suitability of
students usetheir knowledge from all previous courses and creative improvisation. Additionally, socio-economic and ethical issues are addressed as part of the design paradigm. Team work isemphasized. Problem recognition and statements, definition of the problem, constraints,alternative solutions and their evaluation, considerations of economics and manufacturing,scheduling, and meeting deadlines of the project are stressed. The distinctiveness of this programis the integration of students from the School of Business and the 'end-user' into the design team.The design project further hones oral and written communication skills of the team. This paperdiscusses the learning objectives and outcomes, structure of the class, organization of the
stageof an entrepreneurial or intrapreneurial venture from initial idea to growth and profitability. Theever-pressing issue of funding is presented as a manageable hurdle and options to structure anddevelop the business to attract potential investors are presented. The critical roles of engineering,marketing, finance and management are clearly explained as the entrepreneur learns practical andleading-edge approaches to bring products to market and grow the organization. Technologycommercialization projects, guest lectures and interaction / networking opportunities withsuccessful or struggling technical entrepreneurs, corporate intrapreneurs, angel investors, venturecapitalists, corporate technology managers, technology incubator directors
industry. In addition to his responsibilities at Northrop Grumman, Eric Pearson serves on the Electrical & Computer Engineering and Minority Engineering Advisory Boards at North Carolina State University, serves as an adjunct professor in the School of Engineering at California Polytechnic University in San Luis Obispo, California, and mentors several engineering managers at Northrop Grumman. In these appointments he serves as a keynote speaker throughout the year speaking and lecturing on engineering, philosophy, leadership, grief counseling and development of leadership teams for several student groups. Mr. Pearson has also served on several committees and a frequent presenter at the annual conference for the