eventually followed by a growing hightechnology sector, which continues to be supported by the college today. On average, 60% ofstudents entering this university are first generation college students. The school is an entrancepoint for those who have not previously considered higher education. In a high technology area,there are both job opportunities and a culture of engineering innovation. Given these realities,the College of Engineering sees itself as the vanguard of attracting underrepresented students forits region.2. Underrepresented Groups in EngineeringThe lack of engineers in the USA is a huge problem, made worse by the retiring of a generationoriginally motivated by the space race.1,2 and a declining interest in engineering.3 Moreengineers
. Recognizing this disconnect,some in the discipline have begun reaching out beyond the ivory tower, to talk about thepractical applications of their discussions for concrete environmental policies6,7.The clear motivation to increase exposure of civil engineering students to content beyondtraditional technical civil engineering skills has created a number of approaches to accomplishthis objective. Three common approaches are (1) requiring humanities courses to be taken asgeneral education requirements as part of the Bachelor of Science degree, (2) exposing civilengineering students to the humanities in civil engineering courses taught by broadly read civilengineering professors8, and (3) introducing modules or blocks of learning in the civilengineering
in aprofessional setting. Both oral presentations and poster sessions are held. To begin, abstracts aresubmitted and reviewed by a faculty committee for acceptance. Then papers are reviewed andrecommendations made prior to final submittal. Finally, the program for the event is establishedand disseminated. This Symposium was a success right from the start and student involvementfrom all across the campus has continually grown for this event over the years. In mid-May thetenth annual Symposium will be held with hundreds of students expected to contribute andparticipate.In order to further promote undergraduate research, a group of six faculty members and twoadministrators authored a grant proposal to Institutionalize Undergraduate Research
., Greenberg, H. C., & Yang, M. C. (2008). Prompt versus problem: Helping students learn to frame problems and think creatively. In Third International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition (p. 2nd). 22. Hunter, A. T., Cushenbery, L. & Friedrich, T. (2012). Hiring an innovative workforce: A necessary yet uniquely challenging endeavor. Human Resource Management Review. 22(4): 303-322. 23. Charyton, C., Jagacinski, R. J., & Merrill, J. A. (2008). CEDA: A research instrument for creative engineering design assessment. Psychology of Aesthetics and Creativity in the Arts. 2(3): 147-154. 24. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy. Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Press, New York, NY, 163-167. Page 12.167.12[32] Timmerman, B. and Lindgard, R. 2003. Assessment of active learning with upper division computer sciencestudents. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (Boulder, CO), ASEE/IEEE, Nov.5–8, 2003.[33] Trytten, D. 1999. Progressing from Small Group Work to Cooperative Learning: A Case Study fromComputer Science, Frontiers in Education 1999, available through IEEE Xplore.[34] Walker, H. M. 1997. Collaborative learning: a case study for CS1 at Grinnell College and Austin. InProceedings of the Twenty-Eighth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science
Paper ID #12529CLICS – Integrating Data from Campus Sustainability Projects across Disci-plinesProf. Susan E. Powers, Clarkson University Susan E. Powers is the Spence Professor of Sustainable Environmental Systems and the Associate Direc- tor of Sustainability in the Institute for a Sustainable Environment at Clarkson University. She received her Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Michigan in 1992 and has had a variety of academic appointments at Clarkson University ever since. Her research includes technical and envi- ronmental assessment of sustainability efforts and energy and climate education
1 Session XXXX Pioneering Approach for Offering the Convergence MS Degree in Mechatronics and Associated Graduate Certificate Aleksandr Sergeyev Mechatronics, Electrical, and Robotics Engineering Technology, College of Computing, Michigan Technological University Houghton, Michigan Adrienne Minerick College of Computing, Michigan
performance goals, andapproach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable." [2]Teamwork is identified as one of the most important abilities sought by employers of engineers[3-4]. This skill need is reflected in ABET criteria for accrediting engineering programs:Programs must demonstrate that their students have “an ability to function on multidisciplinaryteams.” [5] To enable the success of their graduates and employers of their graduates,engineering programs must prepare and document that their graduates can effectively developand consistently contribute value to multidisciplinary teams.Teaching engineering students teamwork, although vital to success of the student and theprogram, is attempted in many different ways, with varied success
instructional design – “hybrid” in the sensethat students are provided with both depth and breadth learning experiences – can capitalize onthe strengths of both approaches to provide students an optimal design education experience.This paper will report the effectiveness of this instructional design in students internalizing andsubsequently owning key concepts and practices of the engineering design process. The class isorganized in two parts: a “design boot camp” in which students are involved in designchallenges from the first day of class for the first half of the semester, and an in-depth challengeduring the second half. The design boot camp is structured along the lines of the engineeringdesign process; student teams iterate through the cycle of
Session 2261 Reflection as an Assessment Measure Barbara M. Olds Colorado School of Mines Golden, CO 80401I. IntroductionAs I teach and advise engineering students, I am constantly amazed at their motivation, theircapacity for hard work, their intelligence. But I am also often amazed at their lack of self-awareness, at their “can’t see the forest for the trees” approach to getting through each hour, eachday, each semester, a college education. They refer, often jokingly, to “getting out,” instead ofgraduating, and they
psychological wellness and supports academic success. Dr. Collins Eaglin is involved in several areas of education research including student retention, curriculum redesign, and faculty development. She is active nationally in the American Psychological Association and is on the accreditation board of the International Association of Counseling Centers.Nathaniel Ehrlich, Michigan State University NAT EHRLICH is a Research Specialist at Michigan State University's Institute for Public Policy and Social Research (IPPSR). Nat has taught psychology at the University of Michigan and City College, City University of New York, and conducted research in a wide variety of topics, including
experience descriptors: 1. Exceptionally good experience: “Irealized that I myself am on the path to being a pioneer,” 2. Good experience: “This projectreally confirmed that I enjoy the work I do,” 3. Mundane experience: " I didn't feel that I was abig part of the research,” and 4. Disappointing experience: "I wouldn't say I learned somethingsignificant during this study.” Most participants had a good experience, but insight from theother three experience descriptors give valuable perspective into the varied experiences. Thisanalysis is helpful to both graduate students interested in research and professional development(i.e. blended) experiences, and educators creating blended experiences in that it demonstratesthat a common blended experience can
of Engineering.”Literature reviewA 2002 report by the Pew Internet & American Life project states that “an overwhelming number ofcollege students reported that the Internet, rather than the library, is the primary site of theirinformation searches. Nearly three-quarters (73%) of college students said they use the Internet morethan the library . . .” [2]. And students’ access to and use of the Internet has only increased in the pastten years. In 2011, 95% of undergraduates reported that they have Internet access via desktop, laptop,and tablet computers, cell phones, and game consoles, among other devices [3]. While it is importantto recognize the abundance of information on the Internet as well as undergraduates’ ability to accessit
morality as the determination of right and wrong behavior while ethics is the processby which morals are synthesized into a coherent system. Furthermore, we adopt three primarypropositions: 1. Morality is intimately involved with everyday experiences; 2. Morality and Ethics can, and should be taught; 3. Moral reflection is an important daily occurrence – Socrates The first proposition is in responses to students (and faculty, administrators, staff, etc.)who consider their daily activities to be outside the range of activities to which moral judgmentsshould be applied. This is what allows students to excuse plagiarism – it is a common activity towhich such esoteric philosophical musings as considerations of
design and implementation ofa first-year design course; integration of design in Aerospace, Architectural, Electrical and CivilEngineering; the design and construction of a new networked, heterogeneous platform computerlab dedicated to undergraduate design courses; an undergraduate teaching intern program; and aworkshop to help faculty better understand student experiences in engineering classrooms.The design and implementation of a first-year design course for all Penn State engineeringstudents was the largest single project undertaken as part of the ECSEL efforts at Penn State. Itrepresented a tremendous challenge not only because of the number of first year students, nearly2000, but also because they are taught on 19 different campuses. The
independent modes of grasping knowledge, and intention andextension as independent modes of transforming experience.2, 3 According to the Kolb’smodel, in order to learn something from the experiment (which is distinguished as thetransformation phase for constructing new knowledge through the experimentation),requires that the information first be grasped or depicted.2 In their work, Abdulwahedand Nagy2 prove that if an insufficient amount of attention is paid to pre-lab studentactivities during instructed and close-ended laboratory sessions, then the studentsprimarily grasp information about the experimental procedures. However, they onlypartially grasp the theory that underlies the laboratory procedure. During his specificteaching experience, the
remain academic, difficult to implement, and notfeasible unless preceded by a number of specific steps borrowed largely from theworld of business. These steps include: “Rethink” students–faculty future roles beyond the egocentric model building with the precept that the ideal educational output and the ideal student is one just like me! Widen the discussion and seek feed back from past and present students, research sponsors, and/or industrial clients. Identify customers’ needs on two fronts, their future manpower needs, and the support services that they are likely to require (e.g. technical consultation, applied research, testing, monitoring, setting standards, etc.), now and in the future. Reorganize internally in order
valuable in other countries or by international employers operatingwithin their own country or region. One of the world’s regions where engineeringeducation is rapidly evolving, and becoming increasingly international is: the ArabGulf Region ((Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, andOman) which faces significant challenges as it seeks to meet the demands on theengineering profession in the years to come. Engineering faculty in the Arab GulfRegion, and the young in particular, need to expand their technical knowledge anddevelop new competencies to further their technical professional development andkeep up with modern approaches to teaching and learning. This paper explores waysto effective professional development of
international employers operatingwithin their own country or region. One of the world’s regions where engineeringeducation is rapidly evolving, and becoming increasingly international is: the ArabGulf Region ((Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, andOman) which faces significant challenges as it seeks to meet the demands on theengineering profession in the years to come. Engineering faculty in the Arab GulfRegion, and the young in particular, need to expand their technical knowledge anddevelop new competencies to further their technical professional development andkeep up with modern approaches to teaching and learning. This paper explores waysto effective professional development of Region’s engineering educators to enablethem
understands. These issues areintrinsically internal to the extent that they can not be characterized without obtaining feedback from theindividual. We view these two sides of our framework as complementary data sources. Students’epistemological comments tell us about the effect of the pedagogical reforms, and pedagogical reformstheoretically affect students understanding and beliefs. Both sides of the framework are therefore necessaryto provide a comprehensive understanding of any course or curriculum reform.”In Table 3, the label/code of ‘pedagogy’ captures student comments regarding the course topicsand objectives and classroom issues. Data within the pedagogical framework relate to issuesexternal to the student. In contrast, the codes under
AC 2007-939: ASSIGNING CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDENTS TO CAPSTONECOURSE TEAMSVincent Drnevich, Purdue University Vincent P. Drnevich, P.E. is a professor of civil engineering at Purdue University since 1991. He was Head of the School of Civil Engineering from 1991 to 2000. Prior to that, he was on the faculty at the University of Kentucky. He served as Chair of the Civil Engineering Division of ASEE. He is Fellow and Life Member in the American Society of Civil Engineers, a Fellow of ASTM International, and active in the National Society of Professional Engineers.John Norris, Purdue University John B. Norris is a Doctoral Candidate at Purdue University's Krannert Graduate School of
Section Conference,March 30-31, 2007.[3]- Internal documents about the Electromechanical Engineering Faculty Committee structure: It is an eleven-member interdisciplinary and interdepartmental committee.[4]- Wentworth Course Catalog: http://www.wit.edu/prospective/academics/catalog.html[5]- Blackboard: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackboard_Learning_System, Nov. 2010.[6]- An Analysis of Trends in Online Education by Nancy Levenburg, The Technology Source Archives at theUniversity of North Carolina, February 1999[7]- The Art and Science of Education: Pedagogy Includes Technology by Glenn Ralston, The Technology SourceArchives at the University of North Carolina, February 1999, November 1998[8]- Assessment Boot Camp by Colleen Carmean, The
from an ‘answer-giver’ alone to a problem-architect” (Kulackiand Vlachos, 1995), and “the laws of politics are replacing the laws of nature as the principalfactor establishing the feasibility of many engineering projects” (Augustine, 1996). “In the average engineering project, the first 10 percent of the decisions made effectively commit between 80 and 90 percent of all the resources that subsequently flow into that project. Unfortunately, most engineers are ill- equipped to participate in these important initial decisions because they are not purely technical decisions. Although they have important technical dimensions, they also involve economics, ethics, politics, appreciation of international
projects were asked to complete weekly “audio diary” entriesresponding to discursive verbal prompts posed to them during bi-weekly visits by a student-researcher. Youth apprentices were given control of the recording devices, and each recorded“audio-diary” session lasted three to five minutes taking place one-on-one, away from the rest ofthe group. Individual sessions were organized around a selected “set” of prompts (see Table 1.).The student-researcher was able to complete between two and five sessions per visit. Promptswere generally organized around three types themes 1) comprehension of sustainability and/orwicked sustainability problem contexts 2) perspectives on learning (hands-on, schooling, groupactivities, etc.) and 3) interest in or
Session 2247 2005 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE Engineering Technology Division Curriculum Development in Mechanical Engineering Technology See You in the Funny Pages: Attempting to Rectify Student’s Long-Standing False Intuitions of Engineering Science Francis A. Di Bella, P.Eng.ABSTRACTPresent and future engineering technology students have been in a long standing,subliminal educational environment that is effecting their intuition as regards the physicallaws of science and engineering. That environment consists of
studies on human computer interactions and the ways in which technological innovations are changing how we function in the world. Since graduation, she has founded her own business with her husband, helped to start the Diversity & Inclusion department at the U.S. Olympic Committee, and lead the offline member engagement strategy as the Director of Community & Events for Levo, a startup that provides professional resources to young women.Leslie Light, Colorado School of Mines Leslie Light is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Engineering, Design, and Society Division at the Colorado School of Mines, and the Director of the Cornerstone Design@Mines program. She received a B.S. In General Engineering, Product
the end of each semester.There are several reasons for giving these tests, one, faculty have asserted the hypothesis that thesubject LO knowledge is gained through student work in other [non IPRO] courses and that theIPRO courses are unnecessary as general education requirements and two, faculty maintain thatexposure to two IPRO courses is unnecessary as whatever needs to be learned about the LOsis/can be absorbed in one 3 credit course rather than two 3 credit courses.Our first goal for the research is to measure what students actually comprehend about theLearning Objectives. Our second goal is to evaluate how much LO knowledge the non IPROdepartments provide students before/outside the IPRO courses. Next we want to learn if IPROstudents
Session 2155 Issues Driving Reform of Faculty Reward Systems to Advance Professional Graduate Engineering Education: Differentiating Characteristics Between Scientific Research and Engineering D. A. Keating,1 T. G. Stanford,1 J. M. Snellenberger,2 D. H. Quick,2 I. T. Davis,3 J. P. Tidwell,4 D. R. Depew,5 G. R. Bertoline,5 M. J. Dyrenfurth5 A. L. McHenry,6 D. D. Dunlap,7 S. J. Tricamo8 University of South Carolina 1/ Rolls-Royce Corporation 2 / Raytheon Missile Systems 3 The Boeing Company 4/ Purdue University 5 / Arizona State University East 6
relate to the outcomes of their work7. Inparticular, they recommend using perspective-taking as users to discover the complexity of theunderlying socio-technical system of use6. This attention to empathic communication isunderutilized in engineering education as a way of building core professional communication Page 26.871.2competencies. While the construct of empathy is complex, Levenson and Ruef’s9 definition(quoted in Walther et al.6) includes three essential qualities: 1) the cognitive knowing of whatanother person is feeling, 2) the emotional feeling what another individual is feeling, and 3) theact of responding to another’s experience with
Session 1793 The Novel Use of Green Engineering Concepts in Teaching Separations C. Stewart Slater, Robert P. Hesketh, Mariano Savelski, Stephanie Farrell Rowan University Department of Chemical Engineering 210 Mullica Hill Road Glassboro, NJ 08028-1701Abstract Green engineering concepts can be creatively and effectively integrated into the teachingof courses in separation processes. Through the