for a building. Senior Senior Design Students complete a capstone design project.MethodsIn order to help our students make a connection between theory and real-life application, twoapproaches were implemented to improve student’s ability to solve open-ended problems: (a) AFramework to Approach Open-ended Problems and (b) A Common Project Platform forSynthesizing Components of Open-ended Problems.Framework for Open-ended Problems (OEP)Based on our interaction with students during their capstone design projects and course projectsin some of our required courses, we realized students had a difficult time to even approachOEPs: specifically, where do they find resources, how do they make connections to knowledgeobtained in
engineering design program at RIT". Presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Conference. Accessed from http://scholarworks.rit.edu/other/647.8. Hotaling, N.; Burks Fasse, B.; Bost, L.F. Hermann, C.D.; Forest, C.R. (2012) “A quantitative analysis of the effects of a multidisciplinary engineering capstone design course” Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 101, No. 4:630-656.9. Howe, S., and Wilbarger, J.,(2006) “2005 National Survey of Engineering Capstone Design Courses,” Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, #1781.10. Lattuca, L.R.; Terenzini, P.T.; Fredericks Volkwein, J.; Peterson, G.D. (2006) “The changing face of engineering education” The Bridge Vol. 36, No. 2:5
Paper ID #13027Making Students Cognizant of Sustainability through a Multidisciplinary TermProject in Low Level CoursesDr. Goli Nossoni, Manhattan College Dr. Goli Nossoni is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental En- gineering at Manhattan College. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. from Michigan State University in Structural Engineering and Materials Science. In addition to her interest in engineering education, Dr. Nossoni specializes in the research area of materials especially concrete and corrosion of steel inside concreteDr. Nicole Leo Braxtan, Manhattan College Dr
confident while those withno prior experience more commonly indicate being somewhat confident; both groups havesimilar rates for the not confident response. The data presented here is consistent with the studyby Metraglia et.al. [9] who found that first-year engineering students from technical high schoolsthat most likely had CAD offered exhibited higher levels of self-efficacy compared to their peerswho did not have prior CAD experience.Figure 2 Student confidence following lab assignments for (a) students with no previous CADexperience compared to (b) students with previous CAD experience. Note: The studentconfidence data for Lab1 was not available due to a technological error.Recorded DemonstrationsIn each of the lab sessions, the demonstration
they aretrying to do and explaining it, and incorrect grammar and syntax. Table 3: Pre- and Post-Assessment of Wiki Abstract First draft Second draft % difference Student A 85 98 15.3 Student B 88 98 11.4 Student C 83 97 16.9 Additionally, the instructor evaluated their final technical paper, which included the finaldraft of their abstract, which was also submitted via a Microsoft Word document. Students wereevaluated based on grammar and syntax, application of the scientific method evident in theirresearch approach
was fully saturated, and a 50.8 mm (2 in) clay layer was spreadover the sand. A thin layer of sand was placed on top of the clay layer to allow for drainage inboth directions when consolidation was performed on the clay layer.In order for a clay-sand mixture to be consolidated in the liquefaction tank, it was necessary toreinforce the plexiglass tank to accommodate for the horizontal stress produced due to thevertical consolidation load. The reinforcement system is made of steel angles (see Figures 5(a)and (b)). The loading plate was aluminum reinforce with steel. The consolidometer was square,since consolidation had to be performed in which the same box tests were run. With a small loadapplied to the clay-sand mixture, there is little
. One of the most surprisingresults was w the lack of o confidence identifying g bridge or rroof trusses. This topic iss coveredextensiveely in previoous classes annd was revieewed throughhout the sem mester in Struuctural Anallysis.Howeverr, it appears the t students incorrectly think that anny non-orthoogonal membber is a trusssmember. For examplle, as shown in Figure 1, numerous llateral bracess for bridge beams may belabeled trrusses. Becaause of rich bridge b traditiions near booth universitiies, the bridgge truss exam mpleswere prim marily from a few structu ures in
AC 2011-2579: AN ENGINEERING APPROACH TO WRITING: A PILOTPROGRAM FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING GRADUATE STUDENTSChristianna Irene White, Iowa State University Institute for Transportation Christianna White has a PhD in rhetoric and professional communication, an MA in business and technical communication, and a BA in psychology. She is an editor and writing coach who specializes in working with graduate students on master’s theses or dissertations. In addition to her affiliation with the Iowa State University Institute for Transportation, she operates C I White and Associates.David J White, Iowa State University David White holds a B.S. (Univ. of Missouri-Columbia, 1997), M.S. degree (Iowa State University 1999), and a Ph.D
Engineering Education Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. https://peer.asee.org/19082[18] Seely, B. E. (1999). The other re-engineering of engineering education, 1900-1965. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(3), 285-294.[19] Sinha, K. C., Bullock, D., Hendrickson, C. T., Levinson, H. S., Lyles, R. W., Radwan, A. E., & Li, Z. (2002). Development of Transportation Engineering Research, Education, and Practice in a Changing Civil Engineering World. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 128(4), 301-313. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733- 947x(2002)128:4(301)[20] Todd, R.H., and Magleby, S.P. (2004) Evaluation and Rewards for Faculty Involved in Engineering Design
Press.21. B. S. Bloom (1956), Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals; pp. 201- 207; Susan Fauer Company, Inc.22. McGray, Douglas (2007), “Pop-up Cities,” WIRED Magazine, May 2007 Issue, Conde-Nast Publications, New York.23. TED (2008), Ideas Worth Spreading, http://www.ted.com/24. ASCE (2004), Sustainable Engineering Practice: An Introduction, Jorge A. Vanegas (Editor).25. USGBC (2008), LEED Rating Systems, US Green Building Council, http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CMSPageID=22226. EU (2008), Thematic Strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste, The European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/index.htm
Paper ID #11480Recruiting and Retaining Women Engineers: An Analysis of a SuccessfulCollege ProgramDr. Andrea L Welker, Villanova University Dr. Andrea L. Welker, PE, is a professor in the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Villanova University. Dr. Welker teaches a variety of geotechnical undergraduate and graduate classes, including soil mechanics, foundation design, geoenvironmental engineering, and geosynthetics. Her re- search focuses on the geotechnical aspects of stormwater control measures and the use of recycled materi- als in plastic pipes. In addition to teaching and performing research, she
proposed outcomes, b. Clarify common terminology for all faculty teams to apply across outcomes, c. Identify ill-defined concepts and develop common definitions for these concepts that were more clearly defined, d. Develop a philosophy for use of multiple criteria under a single outcome to address challenges combining outcomes between the four different outcome types, e. Prioritize departmental priorities about learning, including the addition, combination and deletion of some outcomes.5. We compiled a single summary of all outcomes and subjected the combined outcomes list to a common review. In this final step, we examined the outcomes one more time for redundancy, ill-defined terms
Page 24.647.6participate in the survey. A single, follow-up reminder email was sent approximately one-weeklater. The email messages provided a brief description of the study and advised the students thatall data would be collected anonymously (survey responses did not collect identify information).No incentive was provided for students to complete the survey. The nature of the surveyquestions did not require extensive analysis or manipulation of the data. A copy of the survey isincluded in Appendix B of this manuscript.ResultsThroughout the three different academic terms in-which I have read geo-poetry to my CE371classes, I found myself increasingly more comfortable with my routine, day-to-dayresponsibilities in the classroom. My interpersonal
Paper ID #18725Challenges of a Professional Issues Course in Civil Engineering: ComparisonAcross Two YearsDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the ABET assessment coordinator for the department since 2008. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a
8 33.1 22.5 6.2 12.8 0.027 Page 26.320.6*Comparison of means t-test significant for p<0.05Overall Comprehensive Final ResultsEach section was given the exact same in-class final comprehensive test with eight questions (seeAppendix B) on the same date. Figure 3 (below) shows a comparison of the mean of eachquestion from the on-line classroom to the flipped classroom. 20.0 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 On-Line 10.0 Flipped
Civil Engineers (ASCE) advocates the adoption ofthe Body of Knowledge (BOK) by civil engineering programs, which includes additional “soft”outcomes on public policy and leadership. Specifically, the Civil Engineering Department atLawrence Technological University offers a program in which our graduates have: (a) an ability to apply knowledge and principles of mathematics, science, and engineering in the solution of civil engineering problems (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze data and interpret Page 12.1532.2 results (c) an ability to design a civil engineering system
). “Ethics instruction in engineering education: A (mini) meta-analysis,” Journal of Engineering Education, 90(2), 223–229. 3. Haws, D. R. (2004). “The importance of meta-ethics in engineering education,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 204–210. 4. ASCE Code of Ethics. http://www.asce.org/code_of_ethics/ 5. NCEES Model Rules for Professional Conduct. http://ncees.org/about-ncees/publications/. 6. ASCE’s Internet Advocacy Website, American Society of Civil Engineering, http://www.asce.org/pressroom/publicpolicy/advocacy.cfm 7. Finelli, C. J., Holsapple, M. A., Ra, E., Bielby, R. M., Burt, B. A., Carpenter, D. D., Sutkus, J. A. (2012). An assessment of engineering students' curricular and co-curricular
.” Source: http://www.oculusvr.com/press/oculus-rift-developers-get- extra-boost-of-support-from-unity-technologies/[12] Seidel, Robert J. and Paul R Chatelier. 1997. Virtual Reality, Training's Future? Perspectives on Virtual Reality and Related Emerging Technologies. Springer, p. 20.[13] Sherman, William R. and Alan B. Craig. 2003. Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Application, and Design, Volume 2. Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 14, 131, 383.[14] Stein, Joel (Contributor). 2009. Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation. Demos Medical Publishing, p. 318.[15] Tan, Fabian and Adrian Tan. 2015. “A Course in the History of Ancient Engineering.” Proceedings of the ASEE's 122nd Annual Conference and Exposition. American
: http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/6134/download [Accessed Jan. 15, 2020][10] P. C. Blumenfeld, E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, and A. Palincsar. "Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning." Educational psychologist 26, no. 3-4 (1991): 369-398.[11] B. Stephanie. "Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future." The clearing house 83, no. 2 (2010): 39-43.[12] S. Hurtado , NL. Cabrera, MH Lin , L. Arellano, LL. Espinosa. Diversifying science: underrepresented student experiences in structured research programs. Res High Educ. 2009;50:189–214.[13] PW. Schultz, PR. Hernandez, A. Woodcock, M. Estrada, RC. Chance, M. Aguilar
Raspberry Pi Foundationwith the intention of teaching computer programming concepts in schools. Currently, it is used in Page 24.761.12many monitoring and accessibility applications and various other applications. It does not have ahard disk but uses a SD card for booting and persistence storage. The Model B of Raspberry Pi,which is used in our LEWAS Lab, has 512MB RAM, 2 USB ports, an HDMI port, a VGA videoport and an Ethernet port. Figure 10 shows how Raspberry Pi can be connected to the sensors tocollect data and how the data will be stored in the database.Figure 10. The flowchart to show different components of the system to be developed for
ofbuildings, including a restaurant on top of a ski mountain, fire stations, churches, an ice hockeyrink and a multi-modal transportation facility. A number of water and wastewater projects havebeen undertaken through Engineers Without Borders (EWB) in Honduras. Appendix B containsbrief project descriptions from the past two years.For several years, capstone teams have worked on a wastewater treatment system for thecommunity of Dulce Vivir in Dulce Nombre de Copán (Dulce Nombre), Honduras. Withcommunity input, the 2009-10 team researched and selected the two most desirable treatmentsystem alternatives: a septic tank-leach field or septic tank- constructed wetland combination. In2010-11, another team further designed and tested the feasibility of the
every class in a closedbook, closed notes format that included conceptual questions. Quizzes were attempted by eachstudent individually. The content covered in the quiz was from the class the week before. Thehomework was done by a group of two students. The homework was extensive; as it requiredstudents to do literature review on selected topics, and included design and analysis problems. Page 25.333.5There were two exams in the course. Each exam involved two parts: a) the in-class conceptual 4portion, and b) take-home open-book portion. The take
programs of the Biological Science Initiative:Students’ intellectual, personal and professional outcomes from participation in research. Report prepared for theHoward Hughes Medical Institute. Boulder, CO: Ethnography and Evaluation Research, 2009.[11] S.T., Ghanat, D. Garner, J. Howison, S. Banik, B. Swart, M. Verdicchio, R. Hunter (2018), Students’Perception of Summer Undergraduate Research Experience: Across the Disciplines, proceeding of 2018 AmericanSociety of Engineering Education National Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018[12] A.L. Zydney, J.S. Bennett, A. Shahid, K.W. Bauer, Faculty perspectives regarding the undergraduate researchexperience in science and engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 291-297, 2002.[13] C.M. Kardash
AC 2012-3972: TO RAISE THE BAR OR NOT: ADDRESSING THE OPPO-SITIONDr. Stephen J. Ressler, U.S. Military Academy Colonel Stephen Ressler is professor and Head of the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA) at West Point. He earned a B.S. degree from USMA in 1979, a master’s of science in civil engineering degree from Lehigh University in 1989, and a Ph.D. from Lehigh in 1991. An active duty Army officer, he has served in a variety of military engineering assignments around the world. He has been a member of the USMA faculty for 19 years, teaching courses in engi- neering mechanics, structural engineering, construction, and CE professional practice. He is a registered
Paper ID #7248A Documentary Project in a Civil Engineering CourseDr. Seamus F Freyne P.E., Mississippi State University On the civil engineering faculty at Mississippi State University, Dr. Seamus Freyne teaches structures courses and his research interests include engineering education. Page 23.40.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 A DOCUMENTARY PROJECT IN A CIVIL ENGINEERING COURSEOverviewAn innovative documentary project in an
in engineering, and the cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs.Ms. Leslie Nolen CAE, American Society of Civil Engineers Leslie Nolen, CAE, serves as director, educational activities for the American Society of Civil Engineers. She brings over 20 years of association management experience to her work with ASCE’s Committee on Education on issues of importance to the undergraduate and graduate level education of civil engineers.Dr. Decker B Hains P.E., Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army Officer serving 22 years on active duty with the US
AC 2007-2017: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR ENGINEERINGMECHANICS AND DESIGNJames Klosky, U.S. Military AcademyDecker Hains, U.S. Military AcademyTimothy Johnson, Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, USMAJakob Bruhl, US Military Academy, Dept of Civil & Mechanical EngineeringJared B. Erickson, U.S. Military AcademyJohn Richards, D/CME, USMA Page 12.217.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 An Integrated Approach for Engineering Mechanics and DesignAbstractAs part of a major curriculum update undertaken over the last three years, the United StatesMilitary Academy at West Point has implemented a new course sequence in statics
was selected by Kentucky Society of Professional Engineering and National Society of Professional Engineers as their 1996 Young Engineer of the Year.Dr. Michael Robinson P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyProf. James H. Hanson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology James Hanson is an Associate Professor of civil engineering at the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, where his teaching emphasis is structural analysis and design. He is a member of Rose-Hulman’s Com- mission on the Assessment of Student Outcomes, and has been rating student portfolios for more than eight years.Mr. Michael C. Reeves P.E., Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.Mr. Andrew B Twarek P.E., Ruby+Associates, Inc
BOK1-compliant accreditation criteria is illustrated by the tabularcomparison provided in Appendix B. The table lists the 15 BOK1 outcomes, the specificrequirements articulated for each outcome in Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21stCentury, and the associated provisions of the ABET GCBLP and CEPC. An outcome-by-outcome comparison clearly demonstrates that the BOK outcomes represent a significantly moreambitious and comprehensive standard than do the ABET criteria. For example, consider BOKOutcome 1, which includes requirements for “biology, chemistry, ecology,geology/geomorphology, engineering economics, mechanics, material properties, systems, geo-spatial representation, and information technology.” The corresponding provision of
Paper ID #6050The Goethals Infrastructure Challenge: A Proposal for a New Student Com-petitionLt. Col. Steven D Hart, U.S. Military Academy LTC Steve Hart is currently assigned as the ERDC Engineering Fellow and Director of Infrastructure Studies at West Point. He has taught numerous civil engineering courses including innovative courses on Infrastructure Engineering and Critical Infrastructure Protection and has authored numerous articles and a book chapter on these subjects. He is the developer and lead proponent of The Critical Infrastructure Symposium, now in its third year. He is active in The Infrastructure Security