Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 91 - 120 of 366 in total
Conference Session
Cross-cultural Sensitivity, Moral Imagination, and Diversity in Engineering Ethics Education
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Yousef Jalali, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Christian Matheis, Guilford College; Marc Edwards, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
Paper ID #33770A Graduate-level Engineering Ethics Course: An Initial Attempt toProvoke Moral ImaginationMr. Yousef Jalali, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Yousef Jalali is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He re- ceived a B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering and M.Eng. in Energy Systems Engineering. His research interests include interaction between critical thinking, imagination, and ethical reasoning, interpersonal and interinstitutional collaboration, diversity, equity, and inclusion, systems thinking, and chemical en- gineering learning systems. Yousef
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics and Global Issues
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christan Whysong, Virginia Tech; Jenny Lo, Virginia Tech; Kumar Mallikarjunan, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
,consumers, food safety and the environment. Rome: FAO, 2001.6 Fox, M.W. Bringing life to ethics: global bioethics for a human society. Albany, NY: State University of NewYork, 2001.7 Nottingham, S. Eat your genes: how genetically modified food is entering our diet. New York Stephen Nottingham, 2003.8 Lurquin, P.F. High tech harvest: understanding genetically modified food plants. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2002.9 Fleddermann, C. B. Engineering Ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc., 2004. Page 12.854.1210 Clancy, E. A., P. Quinn, and J. E. Miller, “Assessment of a Case Study Laboratory to
Conference Session
Ethics Instruction in Context: Civil and Construction Engineering and Engineering Technology
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jason K. Durfee, Eastern Washington University; Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
that will be covered onthe Fundamental of Engineering examination. Ethics is a topic on the FE exam and so studentsget additional exposure to this topic through this new course.Bibliography1. National Society for Professional Engineers (NSPE), “NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers,” (Accessed 2015). Available: http://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics.2. Tau Beta Pi, The Engineering honor Society, “Code of Ethics of Engineers,” (Accessed 2015). Available: http://www.tbp.org/about/InfoBook/ethics.cfm.3. Barry B., and Yadav A. (2007). “The Case Method: Using Case-based Instruction to Increase Ethical Understanding in Engineering Courses.” Purdue University. Department of Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Samson Pepe Goodrich, East Carolina University; Teresa Ryan, East Carolina University; Colleen Janeiro, East Carolina University; Patrick F. O'Malley, Benedictine College
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
; Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/27473[3] M. A. Vandehey, G. Diekhoff, and E. LaBeff, “College Cheating: A Twenty-Year Follow-Upand the Addition of an Honor Code,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 48, no. 4, pp.468–480, 2007.[4] R. Arnold, B. N. Martin, and L. Bigby, “Is There a Relationship Between Honor Codes andAcademic Dishonesty?,” Journal of College and Character, vol. 8, no. 2, Feb. 2007.[5] M. A. Graham and A. Others, “Cheating at Small Colleges: An Examination of Student andFaculty Attitudes and Behaviors.,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 35, no. 4, pp.255–60, 1994.[6] W. J. Bowers, “Student dishonesty and its control in college,” Columbia Univ., New York,NY. Bureau of Applied Social Research., Dec
Conference Session
Ethical Issues I: Sustainability and Environmental Ethics
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
April A. Kedrowicz, University of Utah; Maria Dawn Blevins, University of Utah
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
constraintamong many. Instead, we must transform engineering education to be more focused onsustainable, systems-oriented design and problem solving. A broad, sustainability-focusededucation will prepare engineering students to make the world a better place for all people.This project helped us understand sophomore Mechanical Engineering students’ views onsustainability and the relationship of sustainability to engineering. With these results as abackdrop, we are now interviewing faculty and students to develop a more nuanced picture oftheir views on sustainability. This will help us understand the culture of sustainability in thedepartment so that we can develop a targeted, integrated, developmental curriculum.References1. Obama, B. (2011). State of the
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology; Julie E. Sharp, Vanderbilt University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
Paper ID #11190Ethics for BeginnersDr. Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn Dyrud is a full professor in the Communication Department at Oregon Institute of Technology and regularly teaches classes in business and technical writing, public speaking, rhetoric, and ethics; she is part of the faculty team for the Civil Engineering Department’s integrated senior project. She is active in ASEE as a regular presenter, moderator, and paper reviewer; she has also served as her campus’ representative for 17 years, as chair of the Pacific Northwest Section, and as section newsletter editor. She was named an
Conference Session
New Media for Ethics Education
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Valerie H. Summet, Rollins College; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
Paper ID #29719Science Fiction as an Entry Point for Ethical Frameworks in Engineeringand Computer Science EducationDr. Valerie H. Summet, Rollins College Dr. Valerie Summet is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science at Rollins College, a liberal-arts school located in Winter Park, FL. Her research interests include human-computer interaction and CS education. She earned a BS in Computer Science from Duke University and an MS and PhD in Computer Science from the Georgia Institute of Technology.Prof. Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering
Conference Session
Sustainability and Humanitarian Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Khanjan Mehta, Penn State University; Duarte B. Morais, North Carolina State University; Yu Zhao, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Mary Lynn Brannon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
ventures in Kenya, Tanzania, India, China and other countries.Duarte B Morais, North Carolina State UniversityYu Zhao, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Yu Zhao is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Educational and School Psychology and Special Education at the Pennsylvania State University. Her research interests include educational measurement and assessment. She is also interested in applications of item response theory and structural equation modeling in educational testing.Mary Lynn Brannon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Mary Lynn Brannon, Instructional Support Specialist at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at the Pennsylvania State University, has a
Conference Session
Understanding our Students & Ethical Development
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elizabeth A. McBride-Pluskwik, Iron Range Engineering, a program of Minnesota State University, Mankato; Puteri S. Megat Hamari, Minnesota State University, Mankato
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
] L. Kohlberg, " Essays on Moral Development: The Philosophy of Moral Development.," New York: Harper & Row., 1981.[3] B. Puka, "The Moral Domain: Essays In The Ongoing Discussion Between Philosophy And The Social Sciences.," in The Majesty and Mystery of Kohlberg’s Stage 6. In T Wren (Ed.),, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990, pp. 182-223.[4] J. Aronfree, "Moral Development From the Standpoint Of A General Psychological Theory.," in Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues , New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1996, pp. 54-69.[5] R. A. Dienstbier, "The Roles of Emotions in Moral Socialization.," in Emotions, Cognition, and Behavior , New York, Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp. 424-514.[6] J. M
Conference Session
Engaging Ethics in Teams and Communities
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Torres, Purdue University; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Megan Kenny Feister, California State University, Channel Islands; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Danielle Corple, Purdue University; Katharine E. Miller, Purdue University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
Paper ID #19709Investigating the Contextual and Shifting Nature of Ethics within Engineer-ing Design Teams across TimeDavid Torres, Purdue University David is a third year doctoral candidate in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue University pursuing a PhD in Organizational Communication with a minor in data analysis and research methodol- ogy. His research interests reside at the intersection of organizational communication, identity, design, and organizational ethics.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Danielle Corple, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David H. Torres, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Katharine E. Miller; Megan Kenny Feister, California State University, Channel Islands; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, University of South Florida
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
Organizational Communication with a minor in data analysis and research methodology. His research interests reside at the intersection of organizational communication, identity, design, and organizational ethics.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her
Conference Session
Engineering Social and Human Ethical Impacts
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Debra S. Fuentes, Brigham Young University; Stephanie Claussen, Colorado School of Mines; Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance under- standing of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she
Conference Session
Assessing Social Responsibility & Sustainability
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Justin L Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sarah Aileen Brownell, Rochester Institute of Technology; Richard A House, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Alexander T. Dale, Engineers for a Sustainable World
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods, Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
Scale (SSDS), was designed to measure four sustainability-related outcomes: (a) confidence in responding to wicked problems and awareness of (b) global,(c) social, and (d) environmental responsibilities as a designer. The SSDS was implementedpre-post within a course context as part of a multi-university initiative called the WickedProblems in Sustainability Initiative (WPSI) during the Fall of 2014.The primary objective of this paper was to provide an overview of the reliability of the SSDSand to consider where the SSDS may still be improved for optimal alignment with WPSIobjectives and outcomes. Our secondary goal was to consider where WPSI may be improved inthe future in light of the survey results, which included the survey items and written
Conference Session
Understanding Students' Authentic and Reflective Experiences of Ethics Education
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Landon Bassett, University of Connecticut; Jennifer Pascal, University of Connecticut; Richard Tyler Cimino, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Scott Duplicate Streiner, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
] W. Huang and J.C. Ho, “Improving moral reasoning among college students: a game-basedlearning approach,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 6, no.5, pp. 583-596, 2018.Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1374979.[8] J. R. Rest, D. Navaez, S. J. Thoma, M. J. Bebeau, “DIT-2: Devising and testing a revisedinstrument of moral judgement,” J. Ed. Psych., vol. 91, pp. 644-659, Dec. 1999.[9] J. Borenstein, M. J. Drake, R. Kirkman, J. L. Swann, “The Engineering and Science Issues Test(ESIT): a discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 16(2),pp.387-407, Jun. 2010.[10] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. Kenny Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, A. D Mead, “Thedevelopment of an instrument for
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
; Leitch, K. (2007). Improved Pedagogy For Ethics Instruction. ASEE Annual Conference. Honolulu, HI. 10. Haws, D. R. (2001). Ethics Instruction in Engineering Education: A (Mini) Meta-Analysis. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(2), 7. 11. McGinn, R. (2003). “Mind the Gaps”: An Empirical Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(4), 26. 12. Barry, B. (2009). Engineering ethics curriculum incorporation methods and results from a. A Dissertaion in Engineering Education, Purdue University. 13. Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., & Guido-DiBrito, F. (1998). Student development in college : theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 14. King, Patricia M.; Mayhew, Matthew J. (2002). Journal of
Conference Session
Reimagining Engineering Ethics
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jessica Koehler, Wake Forest University; Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University ; Michael Lamb, Wake Forest University; Alana Demaske, Wake Forest University; Carlos Santos, Wake Forest University; Michael D. Gross, Wake Forest University; Dylan Franklin Brown, Wake Forest University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
theengineering classroom, the study selection process was not designed to be comprehensive nor toidentify exemplars. However, this review lays the foundation for a more rigorous and systematicreview in the future. In the following four sections, we present a summary of our literaturereview and present the following for each of the four selected virtues: (a) definition of the virtue,(b) role of the virtue in engineering education, (c) teaching the virtue in engineering education,and (d) summary paragraph.Critical Thinking: An Intellectual VirtueDefining Critical Thinking as a VirtueCritical thinking represents “the cognitive skills of analysis, interpretation, inference,explanation, evaluation, and of monitoring and correcting one’s own reasoning” [28
Conference Session
New Areas of Ethical Inquiry
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kenneth Stafford Sands II, Florida Gulf Coast University; Annie R. Pearce, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida; Min Jae Suh, Sam Houston State University; Christine Marie Fiori, Drexel University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
Documents Provided by Sample Construction Programs to Fill Gaps Figure 1. Exploratory Sequential Design of this Study [13]Conceptual FrameworkTo move toward an understanding of how ethics is taught in construction education, we need tounderstand the curriculum components. Therefore, we use Eash’s [16] curriculum componentsmodel as a conceptual framework for this research. Eash’s [16] curriculum components include:(a) framework of assumptions about the learner and society; (b) aims and objectives; (c) contentor subject matter with its selection, scope, and sequence; (d) modes of transaction, for example,methodology and learning environments; and (e) evaluation. These components “must all bewell
Conference Session
Engaging Ethics, Internationally
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Xiaofeng Tang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Wei Zhang, Zhejiang University; Shuxin Yang, Chinese society for engineer education(CSEE)
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
.” Journal of KunmingUniversity of Science and Technology, Vol. 14, No. 2: 5-10.[11] Dong, X. 1996. “The Background and Status Quo of Engineering Ethics Education in the UnitedStates.” Research in Higher Education of Engineering, No. 3: 73-77.[12] Xiao, P. 1999. Engineering Ethics [Gong Cheng Lun Li Xue]. China Railway Publishing House.[13] Yu, B., and Fan, Y. 2014. “An Overview on Engineering Ethics Research in China.” Journal ofKunming University of Science and Technology Vol. 14, No. 3: 10-17.[14] Wang, W. and Ren, J. 2007. “A New Start for Engineering Ethics in China: A Review of EngineeringEthics Conference.” Studies in Ethics No. 4.[15] Wang, Y., and Liu, Z. 2014. “A Quantitative Analysis on Engineering Ethics Education Research inChina
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Poster Session
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia; Araba Dennis, University of Virginia; Kathleen Eggleson, Indiana University School of Medicine-South Bend; Anderson Sunda-Meya, Xavier University of Louisiana; Kathryn Haas, Saint Mary's College, Indiana
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
: i. Fully Engaged Learners, ii.Consistent Viewers, iii. Sporadic Learners, iv. One-Week Engaged Learners. Similar to Smith’s[5] reliance on the Kolb and Felder-Soloman models, Roy and colleagues suggest that betterunderstanding learners is an important step to developing effective teaching methods, yet theystop short of including personality traits and other characteristics in their scope of consideration.2.2 Personality characteristics The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), notably mentioned in the introduction, is alongstanding and well know measure of personality types. The MBTI is generated using a shortquestionnaire and responses are mapped against four axes; (a) introversion-extroversion, (b)intuition-sensing, (c) thinking-feeling
Conference Session
Awareness, Expectations, and Recognition of Ethics
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Michael F. Young, University of Connecticut
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
​, 249–265 (2013).12. Young, M.F., Slota, S., Cutter, A.B., Jallette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., Simeono, Z., Tran, M., & Yukhymenko, M., "Our Princess Is in Another Castle: A Review of Trends in Serious Gaming for Education." ​Review of Educational Research​, ​82​(1), 61-89 (2012).13. Bodnar, C.A., Anastasio, D., Enszer, J.A., & Burkey, D.D., "Engineers at Play: Games as Teaching Tools for Undergraduate Engineering Students.” ​Journal of Engineering Education​, ​105​(1), 147-200 (2016).14. Young, M. F., Slota, S. T., Travis, R. & Choi, B. “Game narrative, interactive fiction, and storytelling: Creating a “time for telling” in the classroom.” ​In​: Garo P. Green and James C. Kaufman, eds. ​Video Games and Creativity
Conference Session
Ethical Design
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Scott A. Civjan, University of Massachusetts, Amherst; Nicholas Tooker, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
ethics instruction 74%, 62%, and 69% of responses chose the same options, whilethose only taking the steel design class were less consistent in their responses, with 59%, 60%,and 66% choosing those same options, respectively. Most of the other options for the scenarioresponses are regarded either as more passive (tending towards a perspective of “it’s not myproblem”) or more active (taking significantly more action up through whistleblower actions).For Scenario 1 the only other options selected more than once by those taking both classes werea (16%) and h (5%), both more passive actions. For the cohort receiving only traditional ethicsinstruction in the capstone seminar, multiple students chose a (6%), b (9%), d (6%), and e (4%)which include
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rosalyn W. Berne, University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
whorates the qualities of the embryos, those who deliver the full-term babies that result). Inthis way, engineering ethics emerge from the pages of the ethics cases and academicarticles, to be enlivened inside a dynamic network of multiple people and technologiesfor the students to engage intellectually, and also with empathy. References[1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (nd). Infertility. FastStats homepage. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/infertility.htm{2] “SART,” American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), May 2018. Retrieved from research/press-releases-and bulletins/SART_Data_Release_2015_Preliminary_and_2014_Final/[3] B. Saunders, “First, do no harm
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Issues Part One
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Bowler, Michigan Technological University; Susan Amato-Henderson, Michigan Technological University; Thomas David Drummer, Michigan Technological University; Joanna M. Schreiber, Michigan Technological University; Joseph H. Holles, University of Wyoming; Ted W. Lockhart, Michigan Technological University; Jingfang Ren, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
Ethics, 12, 571 – 582. 4. Newberry, B. (2004) “The Dilemma of Ethics in Engineering Education,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 343 – 351. 5. Rest, J. R. (1982) “A Psychologist Looks at the Teaching of Ethics,” Hastings Center Report, 12, 29 – 36. 6. Rest, J. R. (1986) Moral Development: advances in research and theory (New York: Praeger). 7. Rest, J. R. and Narváez, D. F. (Eds.) (1994) Moral Development in the Professions: psychology and applied ethics (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates). 8. Chan, S. and Leung, P. (2006) "The effects of accounting students' ethical reasoning and personal factors on their ethical sensitivity," Managerial Auditing Journal, 21 (4), pp. 436 - 457. 9. Armstrong, M.B., Ketz
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics - Courses and Curricula
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brock Barry, United States Military Academy; Matthew Ohland, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
AC 2009-224: ENGINEERING ETHICS CURRICULUM INCORPORATIONMETHODS AND RESULTS FROM A NATIONALLY ADMINISTEREDSTANDARDIZED EXAMINATION: BACKGROUND, LITERATURE, ANDRESEARCH METHODSBrock Barry, United States Military Academy Brock E. Barry is a post-doctoral research assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Barry received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University and holds a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering Technology from the Rochester Institute of Technology and a M.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado at Boulder. Dr. Barry has accepted a position as an Assistant Professor within the Department of Civil & Mechanical
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida; Laurie A. Pinkert, University of Central Florida
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
distinct from and, we argue, secondary to how individuals are orientedtoward ethics generally. Frameworks emphasize how individuals value, in terms of the practical rational andmotivational aspects of decision-making, while foundations of ethics emphasize what individuals value, orhow value priorities are structured for each individual. In the context of engineering, you might imagine ascenario where an individual engineer approaches a problem X with a certain implicit value orientation (callit A). A second engineer approaches that same problem X with a different value orientation, B. Aframework-based approach to engineering ethics might help us understand that these two engineers maymake different decisions, but they do not – and cannot – help us
Conference Session
Integration of Liberal Education into Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tom A. Eppes, University of Hartford; Ivana Milanovic, University of Hartford; Frederick Sweitzer, University of Hartford
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
of American Colleges and Universities, Washington, DC, 2010.3. Derek Bok, “Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More,” Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2006.4. Arum, R., and Roksa, J. “Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses,” University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2011.5. Valenzuela, M., Allen, J. and Swenty, B., “Liberal Education: A Survey of Goals,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE National Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, Paper AC 2008-973.6. Commission on the Future of Higher Education, “A Test of Leadership: Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education,” U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC
Conference Session
Integrating Social Justice in Engineering Science Courses
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines; Jon A. Leydens, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
with a clear and thorough presentation of the theory and application of the principles of engineering mechanics. Emphasis is placed on developing the student’s ability to analyze problems – a most important skill for any engineer. [9, p. v, emphasis added]Our goal here is not to debunk the ES nor to call for their exclusion from the engineeringcurriculum. The ES are crucial in engineers’ toolboxes and professional formation. Our goal hereis to make visible that they a) play important normative roles and have been amazingly durableyet can be contested, b) reinforce ideologies and mindsets, and c) can blind engineers to socialinjustices and the need for engaging in SJ by addressing the SJ dimensions already inherent
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Michael C. Loui, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
-730.[10] Fleddermann, C. B. 2007. Engineering Ethics. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall.[11] Martin, M. W., and Schinzinger, R. 2009. Introduction to Engineering Ethics. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw- Hill.[12] Martin, M. W., and Schinzinger, R. 2005. Ethics in Engineering. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.[13] Harris, C. E., Jr., Pritchard, M. S. and Rabins, M. J. 2008. Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases. 4th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.[14] Michael Davis, 1997. Developing and using cases to teach practical ethics. Teaching Philosophy, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 353-385.[15] Bates, R., Broome, Jr., T., Burge, Jr., L., Hollander, R., Loui, M. 2012. Ethics education & resources: a summary of issues facing the field and resources to address
Conference Session
Approaches to Teaching Ethics
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yilmaz Hatipkarasulu, University of Texas, San Antonio; Suat Gunhan, University of Texas, San Antonio
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
AC 2012-3849: A CLASSROOM DISCUSSION OF APPLIED ETHICSYilmaz Hatipkarasulu, University of Texas, San Antonio Yilmaz Hatipkarasulu holds M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in civil engineering from Louisiana State University. He is currently the Coordinator of the Construction Science and Management program at the University of Texas, San Antonio.Dr. Suat Gunhan, University of Texas, San Antonio Suat Gunhan received both his bachelor’s of architecture and master’s of science in architecture degrees from Dokuz Eylul University, and a Ph.D. degree in civil engineering from Illinois Institute of Technol- ogy. He is currently an Assistant Professor at the Construction Science and Management program at the University of Texas
Conference Session
Reimagining Engineering Ethics
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Grant A. Fore, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Justin L. Hess, Purdue University; Andrew Katz, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
Paper ID #29561Ethics in Engineering or Engineering in Ethics?Mr. Grant A Fore, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Grant Fore is a Research Associate in the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute (SEIRI) at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. As a SEIRI staff member, Grant is involved in research development, qualitative and mixed methods research, and programmatic assessment and evalu- ation. His research interests include ethics and equity in STEM education, the intersubjective experience of the instructor/student encounter, secondary STEM teacher professional development