discussion. However, it was typically the same studentswho engaged in class discussion, both during the presentations and during the regularlecture. Some student feedback indicated that students wanted an opportunity to voicetheir opinions. Student B, Spring 2004, stated a need for “more discussion during ethics”(portion of the class). Page 12.847.5To stimulate more discussion amongst all students the following changes were made.First, instead of an individual assignment, the students are now required to work ingroups. This has two effects. It limits the number of duplicate cases that can be presentedbut it also forces students to discuss their positions in
compromised? How willpopulations with disabilities be enrolled in biometric databases when they lack the physical traitsthe biometric system requires? Are minorities disadvantaged in biometric applications? Theintellectual significances of this paper are: (a) to discuss social and ethical consequences ofbiometric technologies, and (b) to increase public awareness of potential violations of privacy,security, civil and human rights that may have not been fully addressed yet by lawmakers. Thefindings of this paper have been successfully incorporated in courses related with engineeringethics and technology ethics at a senior level and graduate level. This paper explains how ethicalconcepts can be incorporated in different courses either by using case of
Graff, LeTourneau University R. WILLIAM GRAFF is a professor in the School of Engineering and Engineering Technology at LeTourneau University, where he taught since 1975. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. from Purdue University in electrical engineering. Prior to joining LeTourneau University, he was assistant professor of electrical engineering at Drexel University for six years, and at Wilkes College for two years. His professional interests include antennas, microwaves, plasma, and ethics. Email: billgraff@letu.eduB.Kyun Lee, Le Tourneau University B. KYUN LEE is a professor in the School of Engineering and Engineering Technology at LeTourneau University, where he taught since
AC 2012-4656: WHEN THE LIFE LESSON IS MORE IMPORTANT THANCOURSE CONTENTProf. Amy L. Miller, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown Amy Miller is the Department Head and an Associate Professor of mechanical engineering technology at the University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown (UPJ). For 10 years, she worked for Johnstown America Corpo- ration, a leading manufacturer of railroad freight cars, as a Design Engineer and Manager. She holds a M.S. in manufacturing systems engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and a B.S. in mechanical engineering technology from the University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown. Her teaching interests include fluid mechanics, machine design, and finite element methods.Dr. Jerry W. Samples
shows theresults of a Mann-Whitney U test (SPSS version 19.0) done on the data sets for the two groups.The Mann-Whitney U test is a non-parametric statistical test used to determine if the nullhypothesis can be rejected for two independent sample populations.48 The medians of the twosamples (master’s versus doctoral) were 22.5 and 14 verbatim words in a row respectively; thedistributions of the two groups differed significantly (Mann-Whitney U = 9719.5, P < 0.05 two-tailed). Hence, the two populations were found to differ significantly in the length of the longestcopied strings, with the master’s students copying longer verbatim strings on average than thedoctoral students. b) Percentage of Verbatim Hits (/30)Figure 3 displays the
makes promises to members of the organization that the leadership team has not approved and would be unable to fulfill. You have brought these issues to the friend’s attention. After seeing no changes in behavior, you take the matter up with the president. At the next regularly scheduled meeting the president brings up all the issues you mentioned and some of her own that she has seen and calls for an immediate vote to terminate the treasurer without giving an opportunity to defend herself. You are shocked by this unilateral action. What would you do? Choose two of the following: a. Speak up in defense of the friend b. Vote against terminating but say nothing in public
University Press.4. Baird, J. S. (1980). Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in the Schools, 17(4): 515-222.5. Baldwin, D. C., Daugherty, S. R., Rowley, B. D., & Schwartz, M. D. (1996). Cheating in medical school: A survey of second-year students at 31 schools. Academic Medicine, 71: 267-273.6. Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(3): 285-301.7. Blankenship, K. L., & Whitley, B. E. (2000). Relation of general deviance to academic dishonesty. Ethics and Behavior, 10(1), 1-12.8. Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student Dishonesty and its Control in College. Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University, New
.[6] Kremer, G. (2013). Talkin’ teams: Strategies for elevating student and team skill development over project completion. Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition: Session T223. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia.[7] May, J.L., & Gandara, D.A. (2013). Team level ethical decision-making: A model proposal. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.[8] Cullen, K., & Martin, J.B. (2006). Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: a Meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 69 (2), 175-194.[9] Victor, B., & Cullen, J.B. (1987). “A theory
analyzes and resolves the assessment case, students needto identify the perspectives of stakeholders, apply various ethical theories and ethical canons tothe case, generate alternative solutions, and make a personal decision. A rubric (Appendix B)was used to assess their problem solving performance on the case analysis essay. The maximumscore is 20.Independent Variables Independent variables in the present study include students’ use of one of the twodifferent CFH environments, and students’ epistemological development scores.Measures of Epistemological development Epistemological development was measured with the Learning Environment Preferences(LEP) instrument39. The LEP is an objective measure for the Perry scheme of
ethical issues often arise in environmental science when decisions have to be made in the face of scientific uncertainty. Explanation that ethical issues that arise in environmental decision-making in the face of scientific uncertainty often include who should have the burden of proof and what quantity of proof should satisfy the burden of proof. Explanation of ethical issues that often arise in environmental economics, particularly in cost-benefit analysis. Description of ethical issues that arise in economic analysis of environmental problems include: (a) whether money should be the only measure of value, (b) whether there are distributive justice issues that should be considered when claims
major types:(a) individual assignment; (b) lecture format; (c) discussion format; and (d) small group format.The discussion format and the small group formats are the most appropriate ones for engagingthe students effectively in the learning process.Herreid13 also argued that the best technique for using cases is the “Interrupted Case Method.”This process represents much of the work conducted in engineering by letting the students’thoughts and processes continually be refined as additional data is received. The “interruptedcase method” gives students an opportunity to increase their critical thinking skills byencouraging “flexibility and the ability to see alternative approaches”13.MethodologyIn order to make a judgment regarding the validity
Paper ID #26997Resolving Moral Dilemmas Using the Creative Middle Way ApproachDr. Ashraf Ghaly P.E., Union College Ashraf Ghaly is Director of Engineering and Carl B. Jansen Professor of Engineering at Union College, Schenectady, NY. Published over 250 papers, technical notes, and reports. Supervised over 50 research studies. Registered PE in NYS. ASCE Fellow and Member of the Chi-Epsilon Civil Engineering Honor Society. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Resolving Moral Dilemmas Using the Creative Middle Way Approach Ashraf Ghaly, Ph.D., P.E., Professor
arebeginning in the Senior Design/Capstone courses, with the goal that content and activities willgradually be filtered into other courses starting with the first-year experience.7These efforts seek to address the gaps in engineering education noted above by (a) involving aspecialist in ethics and technology in the context of engineering education, (b) embeddingengineering ethics within straightforwardly “technical” courses, (c) illustrating how professionaland engineering questions encountered in upper division engineering education benefit from apan-ethical perspective, and (d) subjecting these decisions to the critical review of clients whowill have to face any ethical dilemmas arising from engineering decisions.Working to fulfill the Future of
ethical mentoring principle; (b) elucidate participantperceptions of ethical issues in six case studies; and (c) reveal what ethical behaviors participantsexpect from their respective mentor/mentee if they placed themselves in the situation of the casestudies.BackgroundThe relationship between a faculty-advisor and a graduate student has been shown to be adetermining factor of graduate student success [1], [2]. Advising relationships are typicallyformally assigned and structured so that they can help students adjust to the departmental cultureand provide them with a role model, critical information, and an advocate for their professionalsuccess [3]-[5]. Advising, when described as exceptional or as a mentoring type of relationship,can foster a
discussion of this example often allows thelecturer to introduce concepts such as the “New York Times” test for identifying ethical issues:if the action you are contemplating is one you would not wish to read about on the front page ofthe New York Times, then thoughtful ethical analysis is recommended. Similarly, under the“sweaty palms” test, if a given action, behavior or decision makes you intuitively uncomfortable– gives you sweaty palms – you should consider that unease as a symptom calling for theapplication of ethical thought.There are three additional examples in the lecturer’s deck of slides. These involve (a) the receiptof information from a marketing consultant under “shady” circumstances, (b) an invitation froma supplier to attend a
consortium of engineering education).Nupur Kulkarni, Cares for the environment - I am a Certified Leed Green Associate. I enjoy spending my hobby time in Photography, painting and traveling. Ardent faith in ethical behavior and a strong desire to make a career in ’spaces and local mediums’ Graduating in June 2017 from Savannah School of Art and Design – Geor- gia (USA) in Architecture after B. Arch from S.P. Pune University. Technical Skills such as AutoCAD, Google SketchUp, Photoshop, InDesign, Coral Draw, Illustrator, Premiere Pro, V-Ray, and Microsoft of- fice. Participated in several competitions viz. Essay writing ’Pune, People, and Places’, Green School Competition by Ethos ’In Big Tree Paradigm’ - focused on
. Case 2 – poor clientA small, residential home is experiencing foundation failure. Cracking of walls, misaligneddoors and windows and damaged utilities indicate the foundation is settling. Withoutremediation, the local municipality will condemn the building – making it unsuitable foroccupancy. Using the same criteria in terms of size and capacity as the pool piles, how manypiles should be installed to fully support this residential home? The Google Image search shownto the students for this scenario is shown in Figure 2c-1d. Case 1 – Wealthy Client b a Case 2 – Less Wealthy Client c dFigure 2 – Images shown to students prior to solving Case 1 and Case 2
offered next year and will incorporate the different service projects as ithas this past year. It has been an incredibly enriching experience for me. I look forward withgreat anticipation to its second offering.References 1. Xxx 2. Catalano, G.D., Engineering Ethics: Peace, Justice and the Earth, 2nd edition, Morgan Claypool, 2014. 3. Johnson, L.E., A Morally Deep World: An Essay on Moral Significance and Environmental Ethics, Cambridge University Press, 1993. 4. Berry, T., Dream for the Earth, Counterpoint; Reprint edition, 2015. 5. Swimme, B., The Universe Story : From the Primordial Flaring Forth to the Ecozoic Era--A Celebration of the Unfolding of the Cosmos, HarperOne; Reprint edition, 1994. 6. Swimme
) you can find and write down each one’s nutritional data from the USRDA label and cost. What is the energy cost ($/100kcal)? What is the energy density (kcal/kg)? b. Now find the most nutritious item you can find in each category in the store and write down their nutritional values and costs. What are their energy costs ($/100kcal) and energy densities (kcal/kg)? 2. Plan a day’s menu for yourself using each of three alternative budgets: a. $5 (maximum individual daily allotment for a food stamp recipient) b. $10 (low budget/student)Maximize nutrition regardless of costModule 7: Carbon FootprintFrom a physics point of view, the creation of electrical
scales are normed to a mean of 50.In the present sample, students clearly excelled in analytic thinking (mean 83.59) and were quiteguarded and impersonal in their positions (mean 14.87). Their sense of confidence (mean 59.76)and emotionality (mean 42.90) were somewhat above and below the mean, respectively. Twosample submissions provide examples of contrasts in these variables, and provide informalevidence of the validity of the LIWC results. Student A excels in analytic thinking and isconfident, but distant and not self-disclosing (e.g., through the use of pronouns like “I”), andexpresses little affect regarding the issues. In contrast, Student B is lower on analytic thinking,but high on self-disclosure (readily using pronouns like “I” and “me
0 1 2 A. Reflection is clear, concise and logical B. Connections between everyday life and ethics were made C. Connections between technical engineering concepts and ethics were made D. Moral imagination is displayed E. Factors that may influence ethical problems are recognized and considered F. Consequences of possible courses of action are weighed G. Student reflects on personal development Page 11.1287.5A clear, concise and logical reflection would be written with excellent grammar, reflect clarity
greatest good for the greatest number? - Did character Y’s response appropriately balance short term and long termconsequences? - Mill discusses various notions/definitions of “justice” in the last chapter ofUtilitarianism. When you consider character Z’s choices, which of these notions seem(s) toapply? Who do they line up with your understanding of justice?Relativism, Pluralism, and Absolutism: - Character X offered character Y a bribe, but this situation happened in a foreign countrywhere this sort of thing is more common. Is offering (and accepting) bribes in this case wrong? - We have seen that character X’s dilemma puts following principle A in direct conflictwith consequence B. How do you resolve dilemmas of this
dataregarding 17 items flagged by the PCFA. Results from this analysis provided a great deal of helpfulinformation about the previous PCFA conducted on EERI service learning data. Supportingevidence was found for several of the PCFA item-specific results. At the same time, the qualitativedata did not provide very clear support of why several other items were flagged by the PCFA. Inaggregate, it is believed that this analysis generated enough insights into the items flagged by thePCFA to make targeted and evidence-based changes to some of the items of the EERI. Thesechanges and their subsequent validity assessments will be the subject of future work. References[1] Odom, P. W., and Zoltowski, C. B (2019
ishighly recommended. Appendix B shows the topics covered in a ten-week course. Appendix Cpresents all student ratings with two-sigma outlier data shown in red. Figure 7 Conclusions from Student Surveys (See Appendix A for Details). Page 26.684.15 NOTE: (C7 and C8 Are Based on Post-Presentation Responses Only) Summary of Student Feedback and Resolve A positive student recommendation was noted26 by the associate dean of the engineeringcollege in his preparation for a successful ABET visit during the spring 2014 quarter. Studentsgiving positive feedback, I believe, have been motivated towards valuing conscience awarenessin the
the South- ern Alberta Institute of Technology in 2012. He has been a sessional instructor at the Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary, where he completed his MSc. in engineering researching engineering education. His roots in industry aided him in the development of curriculum for 3 new courses by aligning industry’s desired competencies for new grads with accreditation criteria and facility constraints. The result was applied education: practical learning activities and hands-on labs that prepared students for the real world and accelerated their time-to-competency once on the job. Connect with Brendon on LinkedIn to start a conversation. c American Society
Analysis, 2nd ed. CRC Press, 2010.[18] Qualtrics, “Qualtrics.” Provo, UT, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.qualtrics.com.[19] QSR International Pty Ltd, “NVivo.” 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.qsrinternational.com/ nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home.[20] J. Saldaña, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, Second. SAGE Publications, 2013.[21] R. A. Singleton, B. C. Straits, and M. M. Straits, Approaches to Social Research, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 1993.[22] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, N. Canney, C. Swan, and D. Knight, “Ethics Education of Undergraduate and Graduate Students in Environmental Engineering and Related Disciplines,” Environmental
intelligence,” 1950 Mind, Vol. 59, pp. 433-460.3. Cope, David, THe computers and musical style. Madison, WI : A-R Editions, 1991.4. Hart, David B. John Paul II and the Ethics of the Body. The New Atlantis (Summer 2005):65-82.5. Floridi, Luciano and J. W. Flanders. “On the Morality of Artificial Agents.” Minds andMachine 14 (2004): 349-379.6. Kaling, Mindy. The Office "Ben Franklin", Episode Number 42. [perf.] Randall Einhorn.February 1, 2007.7. Kant, Immanuel. Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing,1993.8. May, William. Pope John Paul II and Bioethic: Bodily Life and Integral to the Human Person.Undated Manuscript available at www.catholicsocialscientists.org.9. Norvig, S. Russell and P, Artificial intelligence: A
Do We Know What Works ? A Review and Critique of Current Practices in Ethics Training Evaluation,” Account. Res., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 319–350, 2016, doi: 10.1080/08989621.2016.1186547.[8] I. Van de Poel, H. Zandvoort, and M. Brumsen, “Ethics and Engineering Courses at Delft University of Technology: Contents, Educational Setup and Experiences,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 267–282, 2001, doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0048-0.[9] H. Zandvoort, G. J. van Hasselt, and J. A. B. A. F. Bonnet, “A joint venture model for teaching required courses in ‘ethics and engineering’ to engineering students,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 187–195, 2008, doi: 10.1080/03043790801980003.[10] G. L. Downey, J. C
fordiscussing moral issues, building ethical reasoning, and making ethical decisions. In this section,the following ethical theories will be briefly reviewed: (a) Consequence-based ethics(Utilitarianism), (b) deontology (duty-based ethics), (c) virtue-based ethics, and (d) ethics of care(care ethics). In consequence-based ethics, “the morality of an action … is determined solely by itsconsequences” (Boss, 2013, p. 23). Deontology, on the other hand, has to do with the belief that“doing what is right for its own sake, is the foundation of morality” (Boss, 2013, p. 27). Virtue isdefined as: “an admirable character trait … in a manner that benefits ourselves and others” andincludes characters such as “compassion, courage, generosity, loyalty, and
, 1907–39," Social Studies of Science, vol. 19, pp. 387-420, 1989.15. K. Henderson, "Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering," Science, Technology, and Human Values, vol. 16, pp. 448-473, 1991.16. K. Henderson, On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.17. B. Latour and S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.18. E. Duncker, "Symbolic Communication in Multidisciplinary Cooperations," Science, Technology, and Human Values, vol. 26, pp. 349-386, 2001.19. J. Gainsburg, et al., "A “Knowledge