Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sharlene Yang, Museum of Science; Lydia Beall, Museum of Science

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

science and engineering vocabulary as a way to reflect on their engineering experience and process their results. Each unit Teacher Guide provides the relevant science and engineering background information for the teacher as well as detailed lesson plans that emphasize student-centered, inquiry-based learning. Catching the Wind is an engineering unit where students use their knowledge of wind energy, creativity, and the Engineering Design Process to design blades for a windmill that will harness the wind’s energy to do work. As with all EiE units, Catching the Wind is divided into four lessons: o Lesson 1 is a storybook that features children from a variety of cultures and backgrounds and introduces

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-college Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adeel Khalid, Southern Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

has since graduated from high school and has joined the undergraduateAE program. Several others have promised to study AE and expressed interest in working in theAE industry.Recruitment StrategiesThe first step before recruitment begins is to have a set of clear goals and objectives for thecamp. These are reflected in all the recruitment materials and communications. A detailedschedule was developed and camp dates were identified over six months in advance for each Page 25.838.2camp. A camp flyer was developed and published in the university pamphlet. An initialinvitational email was sent to all the university employees. This typically

Conference Session

Focus on Elementary

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelly L. Lundstrom, Colorado School of Mines; Barbara M. Moskal, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

students who participated in the Bechtel K-5 Educational Excellence Initiative, whichwill be referred to as the treatment group. The second set of data was from elementary studentswho have not participated in the Bechtel K-5 Educational Excellence Initiative, which will bereferred to as the control group. Both the treatment and control consist of students from the sameschool district.Schools. As is reflected in Figure 1 and Figure 2 respectively, there were five schools and 12classrooms in the treatment group, and there were four schools and 11 classrooms in the controlgroup. All elementary schools are located in Adams County District 50. The total sample size forthe treatment group was 160 students, while the total sample size for the control

Conference Session

Engineering Collaboration: Faculty & Student in K-12 Programs

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Holly Anthony; Josh Price; Joe Harris

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

legacycycle, students had the opportunity to present their findings (go public) to their peers, parents,and members of the community. A complete version of the legacy cycle can be viewed inAppendix A.Implementation of this legacy cycle into my high school science classroom increased studentmotivation, generated excitement, and made students aware of possible careers in engineering. Ifeel strongly that the legacy cycle experience broadened my students’ knowledge of the Page 15.711.3application of engineering in not only the science classroom, but also in life. Student products,pictures documenting the implementation, and reflections (from both me and

Conference Session

Teacher and Counselor Professional Development

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vikram Kapila, Polytechnic University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

clearly-stated objectives, asequence of steps to be followed, and a description of expected results. These activities illustratereal-world applications of material covered in the lectures, thus reinforcing and imparting agreater sense of understanding. The discussion hour of each session provides teachers with anopportunity to reflect on and further explore the session’s work and to brainstorm ways ofintegrating these activities to illustrate pre-college science and math concepts. In summer 2009,during the guided training phase, 10 doctoral students interacted with teachers by serving asteaching assistants. Specifically, each doctoral student participated in two sessions. Thisopportunity allowed the research assistants to interact with teachers

Conference Session

Women in K-12 Engineeering & Outreach Programs

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heath Tims, Louisiana Tech University; Jim Nelson, Louisiana Tech University; Galen Turner, Louisiana Tech University; Missy Wooley, Ruston High School; Marvin Nelson, Benton High School

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

, National Science Foundation (NSF) under Page 15.247.11Award Number 0622462, and Department of Education (DoE) under Award NumberU215K090140. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NASA, NSF, or DoE.References:[1] National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind08/. 2008.[2] National Science Board. The Science and Engineering Workforce: Realizing America‟s Potential. http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents /2003/nsb0369/nsb0369.pdf . 2003.[3] Redish, Edward F. and K. Smith. “Looking Beyond

Conference Session

Think Outside the Box! K-12 Engineering Curriculum

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heath Tims, Louisiana Tech University; Krystal Corbett, Louisiana Tech University; Galen Turner, Louisiana Tech University; David Hall, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

provided more project-based learning than other courses.” ) were bothrelated to the hands-on project-based instruction in the classroom. It is also interesting to notethat the survey data reflects a somewhat neutral trend for interest in STEM disciplines. However,student comments suggest that the curriculum has influenced many students in their careerdirection. This includes some students that have a greater appreciation of STEM topics eventhough they are not planning to pursue a STEM degree.Table 1 – Results of student survey Page 15.959.8 strongly somewhat somewhat strongly

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gary Lichtenstein, Quality Evaluation Designs; Martin L. Tombari, University of Texas, Austin; Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University; Kaye Storm, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

ininterviews that they can influence students to pursue science, technology, engineering, and math(STEM) degrees after high school. The research team created a survey to see if a broader sampleof teachers would agree that teachers can influence students to study STEM after high school.The survey listed 18 items that might influence students to study STEM in college.Unbeknownst to respondents, each item reflected one of three factors: 1) teacher instruction andadvising 2) student proclivity, and 3) student traits. The survey was completed by 215 teachers,who identified student proclivity as most influential in students’ decisions whether to pursueSTEM majors in college, followed by teacher instruction & advising. The authors thendistributed a

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Daney, Downingtown Area School District & Villanova University; Aaron P. Wemhoff, Villanova University; Gerard F. Jones, Villanova University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

thiscoming spring for 200 ninth-grade students at the Downingtown STEM Academy. The projectwill focus on educating students about the function of the data center in their everyday lives andthe energy consumption issues that are central to the design of next-generation data centers.Throughout this learning process students will be asked to research and develop new andinnovative ways of addressing the issue. Student teams will present their responses to theessential question in progressively more detailed methods to garner feedback for reflection,revision, and further study. The culminating submission will be a video documentary developed,filmed, and edited by the team. These presentations will be included in a grade-wide live andonline showcase of

Conference Session

K-12 Outreach and Out-of-School Time Engineering Programming and Research

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erin Jablonski, Bucknell University; Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

. Engineering Camp is institutionally supported and instructedprimarily by faculty from the College of Engineering at Bucknell.This program provides the opportunity to deliver more than an expanded and enhanced versionof the typical one-day outreach program; it affords more time for student-instructor interactionand gives students time to reflect on their on-campus experiences and what they have learned.Currently, few high school programs are properly equipped to conduct educational laboratoriesthat introduce students to topics in engineering and technology. Because Engineering Camp is adynamic program with annual topical changes, students can (and are expected to) repeat theexperience. Also, because the topical sessions are targeted to the audience

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Krystal S. Corbett, Cyber Innovation Center; Joshua M. Coriell, Cyber Innovation Center; Sara Hahler, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

mutually exclusive.Figure 3 outlines the areas that the students disliked with the greatest area being “nothing.” Thisreflects positively on the curricula. The second highest area the students disliked was timerestraints. This may not necessarily be a reflection of the curricula, but rather, restriction of theschool and how they are implementing the modules.Conclusions and Future PlansAs the first-year pilot concludes, further analysis can be conducted on the feedback to drawformal conclusion on the success and failures of the course. As of now, only inferences and nofull conclusions can be made based on the preliminary data. To date, one can infer that thecourse has been successful at this point and has attained the goals set forth by the

Conference Session

Best Practices in K-12 and University Partnerships

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mindy Hart, EPICS; Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University; J. Jill Rogers, University of Arizona; Merredith D. Portsmore, Tufts University; Jeffrey B. Goldberg, College of Engineering, University of Arizona

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

39% Student work Samples of student work include student workbooks, wherein students document the steps of the engineering design process and reflect on what they have learned. Example pictures of student designs are below.     NEWSPAPER  CHAIRS

Conference Session

Impacts on K-12 Student Identity, Career Choice, and Perceptions of Engineers

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kerrie A Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brittany Paige Mihalec-Adkins; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

material are thoseof the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1 American Association of Engineering Societies (AAES). 2005. Diversity. Available online at: http://www.aaes.org/diversity/index.asp.2 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). 2005. ASEE Statement: Diversity. Available online at: http://www.asee.org/about/statementDiversity.cfm.3 Beede, D., Julian, T., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. 2011. Women in stem: A gender gap to innovation. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. Available online at: http://www.esa.doc.gov/Reports/women-stem-gender-gap-innovation4 National Science Foundation, National

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Marisa Exter, Purdue University; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Todd P. Shuba, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ji Hyun Yu, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Mindy Hart, EPICS; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

-school 21ParticipantsOf the 45 who completed the questionnaire, 93% are high-school students, 7% are from middle-school, and 49% have had previous experience in EPICS. 60% are female, reflecting two all-girls Page 24.826.3schools. The group as a whole have well-educated parents, with the highest level of educationcompleted of a parent or guardian was a graduate degree for 51% and a college degree of sometype for 27% of the students. However, half of public school students indicated either that theirparents had not completed any college or that they did not know what level their parents hadcompleted. Sixty percent are white, 20% African

Conference Session

K-12 Outreach and Out-of-School Time Engineering Programming and Research

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen J. Krapcho, University of Utah; Cynthia Furse, University of Utah

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

concepts is more effective thanlecturing alone8,9. The idea of improving student learning and engagement through “active”activities in the classroom is supported by many other researchers and learning theorists10,11,12. There is a moderate fee to attend the camp as we, and others13, have found that this ensures ahigher level of commitment to attending the camp. The camp is planned and run byundergraduate student ambassadors headed up by the camp director/grant coordinator. We findthat our engineering undergraduates bring a unique and valued perspective to camp planning.They reflect on those attributes of engineering that most excite them and do their best to bringthem into the activities. Cook-Sather14 and others support this model of students

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melanie R. Ford, Pennsylvania State University, Erie; Vibhuti Dave, Pennsylvania State University, Erie; Kathryn Holliday-Darr, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

the participants built the fan, instructors talked about the basics of circuits such as voltage,current and resistance. Once the design of basic fans was complete, the idea of incorporating aswitch to the circuit was introduced there by resulting in a complete design of a fan with 2speeds.At the end of the last workshop groups A-E and 1-5 switched so that all students experienced allof the workshops and the presentation by the sponsoring company.Lunch/wrap-upAt the end of all workshops and the presentation made by the Eriez Magnetics lunch was served.The wrap-up session was just simply a time for attendees to reflect on the day, for organizers togather some survey data and thank them for coming

Conference Session

Using Web-Resources and Literature to Teach Engineering in P-8

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brianna L. Dorie, Purdue University; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

part of aconstruction site – relating some engineering concepts to something relatable to children. Forexample, when explaining about concrete she talked about how sand stuck better with water.Additionally, at the end of the book there was a reflective piece on what the engineering kidslearned to help to reinforce the engineering concepts. The third book was developed by mechanical engineering professors Emily Hunt andMichelle Pantoya, and is titled Engineering Elephants.15 They use rhyming mechanics andunique comparisons to show what types of artifacts engineers work with. In several instancesthey use actual vocabulary that could be way above the developmental level of the targetedaudience, such as nano-threads, composite and

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-college Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald L. Carr, Purdue University; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. M. (2004). Draw an Engineer Test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students' ideas about engineers and engineering. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.2. Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S. & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 60-73.3. Dyehouse, M. Weber, N., Kharchenko, O., Duncan, D., Strobel, J., & Diefes-Dux, H. (2011). Measuring students’ perceptions of engineers: Validation of the draw-an-engineer (DAET) coding system with Interview

Conference Session

Curriculum Development

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David T. Allen, University of Texas, Austin; Richard H. Crawford, University of Texas, Austin; Leema Kuhn Berland, University of Texas, Austin; Karen A. High, Oklahoma State University; Anthony J. Petrosino Jr, University of Texas, Austin ; Theresa A. Dobbs, UTeachEngineering and University of Texas, Austin; Cheryl Farmer, UTeachEngineering; Jill A. Marshall, University of Texas

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

their designs, determining drag coefficients and using simple flow visualization systems to identify sources of drag. Based on this information, they refine their concept and construct an improved design. Through this process, students are introduced to key components of the engineering design process (Figure 1), including methods for quantitatively describing objectives (maximize volume while minimizing drag); generating and selecting concepts; testing, evaluating and refining the concepts; and selecting a final design. This unit ends with a reflection on the design process. Page 25.35.6Figure 1. Engineering design

Conference Session

Descriptions of Outreach Programs

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rayshun J. Dorsey, WizKidz Science and Technology Centers, Inc.; Ayanna M. Howard, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

activities [20]. In this section, we discuss specificmodules used in the after-school robotics programs, namely Assistive Robotics, Mars Roboticsand Space Robotics. We employed an after-school and Saturday program that explored variousSTEM research areas such as robotic hardware, planetary space exploration, astrobiology, flightsimulations, and engineering design challenges. The program connected students with scienceand robotics experts and offered an exciting hands-on experience that reflected true scientificprocesses. Using various activities, our students used their science and technology skills,teamwork, and their imaginations to help create solutions for real world issues. Postsecondaryengineering and science students also interacted with

Conference Session

Engineering Education Research in K-12

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen B. Wendell, Tufts University; Merredith D. Portsmore, Tufts University; Christopher George Wright, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Chris Rogers, Tufts University; Linda Jarvin, Tufts University; Amber Kendall, Center for Engineering Education and Outreach, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods, K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Science Foundation, we collaborated with local teachers todevelop a set of four engineering-design-based science curriculum units for third- and fourth-grade classrooms2. In engineering-design-based science, the process of solving the designproblem provides opportunities for students to learn and apply new science concepts andpractices. Our approach to incorporating engineering problems into elementary-grade scienceinstruction reflects the theoretical perspectives of situated and distributed cognition, and it alsodraws heavily upon the Learning by Design™ approach to middle-school science3. Otherprevious teaching experiments, including those of Roth4, Penner et al.5 , Krajcik et al.6, andCrismond7, also influenced our work.Each of our four

Conference Session

Integrating Technical Research into Professional Development and K-12 Classrooms

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chelsey Simmons, Stanford University; Beth L Pruitt, Stanford University; Kaye Storm, Stanford University; Gary Lichtenstein

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

areateachers each year. This partnership provides two components that are critical supportmechanisms to ensure classroom transfer of new content and methodology. First, IISMEappoints veteran teacher Peer Coaches to work with teachers to plan and create lessons, materialsand resources for classroom use. Second, all teachers are required to produce at least one lessonor curriculum module, called the Education Transfer Plan (ETP), before returning to theclassroom. Teachers are given a great deal of freedom to develop an ETP that reflects theirsummer experience and will be useful to them, but the ETPs must meet rigorous standards andbe aligned with California State Teaching Standards. ETPs and accompanying materials neededto implement them are shared with

Conference Session

Broadening Participation of Minority Students in and with K-12 Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine C. Chen, California Polytechnic State University; Lizabeth T. Schlemer, California Polytechnic State University; Heather Scott Smith, California Polytechnic State University; Teana Fredeen, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Minorities in Engineering

similar in terms of gender, ethnicity, and year in school.Table 1 gives the percentages of gender and ethnicity of the students. A significant number chosenot to specify their ethnicity, and thus percentages in the other ethnic groups could changedramatically. The “total number” of participants in the Table also reflects the number of campparticipants that completed both the pre and post-surveys, and might be smaller than the totalnumber of students that actually attended the camp.Table 1. Demographics of the EPIC participants for 2009 and 2010.Camp participants 2009 2010Total number (n) 124 136Female 43% 42%Male 57% 58%White/Caucasian 46% 37

Conference Session

Broadening Participation of Minority Students in and with K-12 Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine A Broom, University of British Columbia, Okanagan; Wendy Lynn Klassen, University of British Columbia, Okanagan ; Carolyn Labun, Ph.D., University of British Columbia

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Minorities in Engineering

engineering itself may both reflect as well as continue toperpetuate the perception and reality of engineering as a male career. A simple and effectivefirst step to counter stereotypes of engineering as a male field appears to be, from this study, towork towards presenting equal numbers of male and female engineers to students.Bibliography1. AAUW: American Association of University Women (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Available at: http://www.aauw.org/learn/ research/whysofew.cfm. Last accessed November 19th, 2010.2. Baker, D., & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 3-273. Brotman, J.S., & Moore

Conference Session

Research Related to Learning and Teaching Engineering in Elementary Classrooms

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Towson University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Teacher Pairs: Co-Teaching as a Means to Implement Elementary Engineering EducationAbstract Co-teaching is when teachers work together to prepare to teach, teach, and reflect onteaching and learning. This paper describes the extent and nature of co-teaching by 28 classroomand 8 enrichment teachers from 7 elementary schools as they taught integrated science-technology-engineering units (STE units) of instruction for the first time. Quantitative andqualitative research methods were utilized to explore teacher perspectives on their co-teachingexperiences, and to examine how elementary engineering implementation may be enhancedwhen classroom teachers co-teach with enrichment teachers. Participation in co-teaching variedacross

Conference Session

Technological Literacy and K-12 Engineering

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Wathen, Georgia Institute of Technology; William Hunt, Georgia Institute of Technology; Donna Llewellyn, Georgia Institute of Technology; Peter Ludovice, Georgia Institute of Technology; Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

skills gained at the lower levels. Thetaxonomy is typically applied to three domains of learning: affective, cognitive, andpsychomotor. We are concerned here only with the cognitive domain. The levels within thecognitive domain are knowledge (1), comprehension (2), application (3), analysis (4), synthesis(5), and evaluation (6). The Bloom’s categories used to describe the entries are the modifiedBloom’s categories reflecting active thinking3: Remembering (1), Understanding (2), Applying(3), Analyzing (4), Evaluating (5), and Creating (6). For analysis, each category is ranked from1-6 in the order of increasing complexity. Table 1 is a summary of the descriptions of eachcategory along with examples of students’ responses corresponding to the

Conference Session

Gender and Minority Issues in K-12 Engineering

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joan Kowalski, Penn State University - New Kensington; Tracie L. Brockhoff, Penn State University - New Kensington

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

recommendation of programparticipants are integral to the mission of the program. Participants who have reached college-age have been contacted this past summer to assess the program outcomes. Specifically, roughly75 percent of participants surveyed indicate engineering, engineering technology, or some non-traditional field of science as their intended major. One-third has chosen XXXX University,with one-fourth of this group enrolling at the XXXX XXXX Campus in particular. Feedbackfrom the questionnaire conducted reflects a strong positive impact on the participants’ interestsin careers related to engineering, engineering technology and non-traditional science. In fact, a2007 program FIRSTE participant is currently a freshman in the mechanical

Conference Session

Engineering Professional Development for K-12 Teachers

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Silvia Carreño, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Enrique Palou, Universidad de las Americas, Puebla; Aurelio López-Malo, Universidad de las Americas, Puebla

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

, their answers to the question Page 15.451.7“Describe what the engineer is doing in the picture” probe an accurate knowledge about whatand engineer does as can be seen in Box 1. However, most of them are far form actually depictan engineer in action. This means that if P-12 Mexican teachers’ perceptions of and attitudestoward engineering are not accurate, they will play a significant role in perpetuating incorrectperceptions about engineering8. This will be reflected into their curricula and in the way theydeliver messages about the nature of engineering to their students. Teachers’ perceptions matter,they influence attitudes toward, and a

Conference Session

Addressing the NGSS, Part 3 of 3: Supporting High School Science Teachers in Engineering Pedagogy and Engineering-Science Connections

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erin Shaw, University of Southern California; Minh Tuan La, University of Southern California; Richard Phillips; Erin B. Reilly, University of Southern California Annenberg Innovation Lab

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

developing PLAY!, an educational collaboration platform helping learners tap into broad interest based peer communities as well as exploring new forms of reading and writing through dynamic book prototypes. She most recently published her first digital book, Flows of Reading, to inspire educators to reflect on what can be considered as reading and what kinds of reading they perform in their everyday lives. She was Research Director for Project New Media Literacies at MIT and also has conducted classes as a Visiting Lecturer at MIT’s Comparative Media Studies Department and Harvard University’s Project Zero Summer Institute. Reilly is a graduate of Emerson College and has her Master of Fine Arts degree from Maine Media

Conference Session

K-12 Outreach and Out-of-School Time Engineering Programming and Research

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anca L. Sala, Baker College, Flint; Pattabhi Sitaram, Baker College, Flint; Tom Spendlove, Baker College, Flint

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

with sensors.The Robotics camps were very successful and, as expected, attracted many student members orpotential members of FIRST teams in our area.In 2013 faculty in the Division of Engineering and Technology discussed expanding the summerhigh school camp to cover broader engineering topics, and also to attract a wider population ofstudents than the FIRST Robotics participants. As the College is located in a county with someeconomically depressed areas, the desire was also to attract students from disadvantagedbackgrounds and introduce them to engineering. To reflect the new camp content the name waschosen as “Explore Engineering and Technology Camp”. The paper describes the organization ofthe new camp, its curriculum, the evaluation results