free the industrial partners to develop realistic problems without beingconstrained by educational parameters. Once the AEPs were developed, they were reviewed bythe course instructor to ensure that the scope of the project was reasonable for the course. Eachindustrial partner presented their AEP to students using their own words, without modificationsfrom faculty members, in order to preserve the authenticity. After the industrial partner’spresentation of the problem, students worked in three-person teams to solve the AEP. During atwo-week period, the instructor facilitated a discussion among students and guided them todetermine the knowledge they must gain and information they must gather to solve each AEP. Atthe end of the two-week period
Categorical absences)? 12 How did you prepare for lecture? Multiple After lecture, you were assigned either homework, a project, or reading. 13 Multiple When do you typically complete this? If you were assigned homework problems that required multiple steps to 14 Multiple solve, how did you approach the problem? During lecture, are you able to take notes, keep up with the instructor, and 15
metacognition.MethodologySubjects and settingThe Department of Engineering and Design at Western Washington University (WWU),established in 2014 as part of a state-funded transition from Engineering Technology, hasapproximately 400 undergraduate students with about 100 students enrolled in the electricalengineering program. In the conception of the new engineering programs, project-based learningwas identified as a key component of the curriculum, and consequently the majority of courses inthe department have a weekly lab component. While the labs provide an opportunity for hands-onlearning, problem solving at all levels is primarily practiced through weekly homework problems,in introductory courses up through senior-level courses on more advanced topics.This case study
engineering and technology students.For example, the following constitute a sample of effective practice furthering our students’propensity for, and capability with, technological innovation:Phase 1 Ideation: In an introductory freshman class using creative brainstorming of howtechnological problems are addressed differently in various regions of the world.Phase 2 Development: Implementing a vertically integrated capstone project that teams studentsfrom each year of the baccalaureate program on an industry-based problem. Senior studentsmentor junior ones to develop advanced skills.Phase 3 Realization: Students work with entrepreneurs, for example in the university’stechnology park or incubator, in implementing an innovationInteraction with Context
@temple.edu.Dr. Saroj K Biswas, Temple University Saroj Biswas is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Temple University specializing in electrical machines and power systems, multimedia tutoring, and control and optimization of dynamic systems. He has been the principle investigator of a project for the development of an intelligent tutoring shell that allows instructors create their own web-based tutoring system. His current research focuses on security of cyber-physical systems based on multiagent framework with applications to the power grid, and the integration of an intelligent virtual laboratory environment in curriculum. He is an associate editor of Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive
disciplines and continue to makea significant impact in the scientific community.Microfluidics 101: How to teach K-12 students about microfluidics in a 90 minute lecture.The college of engineering at Louisiana State University has three week-long summer campsoffered to both middle- and high school students to increase interest and enrollment in STEMmajors when the students ultimately decide to attend college. These programs are calledREHAMS, XCITE, and Project NJneer and provide the students with a chance to live in auniversity setting and experience all of the engineering majors offered at Louisiana StateUniversity. During the program, students are mentored by counselors (current engineeringundergraduate students), participate in team-building
Lafayette College, her MSLS from Catholic University of America, a M.Eng. in Industrial Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and is currently working on her PhD in Engineering Education at Purdue.Ms. Iryna Ashby, Purdue University, West Lafayette Iryna Ashby is a Ph.D student in the Learning Design and Technology Program at Purdue University with the research interests focused on program evaluation and self-regulated learning. She is also part of the program evaluation team for the Transdisciplinary Studies in Technology at Purdue Polytechnic aimed to redesign undergraduate student experiences through offering a combination of deep liberal arts experiences with student-driven, hands-on project-based
university lab and faculty/graduate studentmentors, the students had to critically review relevant literature to first draft an abstract (within thefirst week of the program) and later formulate an independent research proposal (presented inWeek 4) that would become the basis for their work throughout the program (Figure 1). Studentsselected research groups and projects based their own interests. In the first two years of thisprogram, students have focused on topics such renewable energy, bio-inspired robotics, smarttextiles, manufacturing of pharmaceuticals, and informatics. Students were financiallycompensated for their work (at no expense to the faculty advisors participating each year), whichwas, therefore, considered a full-time occupation over
engineering studentsinto STEM Middle and High School teaching careers through partnerships with otherinstitutions, educational courses, scholarship, and summer internship program and outreachactivities. Through the Robert Noyce Scholarship program, XXX University in partnership withXXX Technical College and SCCPSS prepares at least twenty-eight (28) undergraduatemathematics and engineering majors and eight STEM professional to become certified middleschool or high school teachers of mathematics and/or science grades (6-12). Working withregional high schools, XXX Technical College, and STEM employers, the project team recruitshigh-quality students and professionals interested in STEM-focused teaching careers, and theprogram provides a combination of
University Maria Perez-Colon is a program advisor in the Henry M. Rowan College of Engineering at Rowan Univer- sity, NJ. She received her M.A. degree in Higher Education Administration from Rowan University, and B.A. in English from Rutgers University. Her master thesis focused on the effects of Engineers Without Borders service projects on the global-mindedness of student participants. Page 26.693.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Evaluation of a Dual First-year Student Advising ProgramIntroductionDramatic enrollment growth has prompted the College of
statistics courses and serves on numerous dissertation committees. She has also directed the evaluation research associated with several state- and federally-funded projects, especially those involving teacher professional development.Dr. Hector Estrada, University of the Pacific Hector Estrada is currently Professor of Civil Engineering at University of the Pacific; a position he has held since August 2006. Prior to joining Pacific, Professor Estrada was chair of the Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. His teaching interests include structural engineering and mechanics, the design of timber and steel structures, structural dynamics, and earthquake engineering
one and two worked with variousgovernment and private sectors investigating the role of technology adoption and innovation inimproving the efficiency of agricultural supply chain addressing the issue of global food security. This research highlights the potentials and challenges of conducting research in globalsetting. Additionally, the authors have developed a model that can be adapted by engineering andtechnology scholars to conduct research effectively in global environment. Furthermore thispaper includes different ways in which international collaborators can be efficiently involved inthe project (i) before reaching the field, (ii) during the field research and (iii) once the researcherhas left the field. This helps build
American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).Dr. Mohd Abdelgadir Khairi, Najran University I, Mohamed Khairi, my bachelor degree in computer science. I did my Masters in system science from University of Ottawa, Canada. My PH.D was in ”Master Data Management” from University of Phoenix. I have over 20 years of experience in IT industry - ten of them with Microsoft in Redmond, WA. Currently I’m assistant professor at University of Najran. In addition of teaching and Research I’m coordinator of graduation projects and field training for computer and information system college.Jinan Ziade ABD, University of Phoenix My name is Jinan Ziade. Currently a Doctoral student, ABD, at University of Phoenix working on my
projects andcross-cultural internship opportunities [3, 7]. These types of international collaborativeprograms offer students with diverse learning experiences and international experiences. Page 26.885.2Despite the wide scope of international collaboration in engineering education, currently theassessment of these efforts focuses on students’ academic performance or extracurricularexperience. Students’ high level of thinking or their personal epistemology was rarelyinvestigated. Considering the potential influences on one’s epistemic thinking from diverselearning experiences[8], and considering the critical role of personal epistemology in
activity that correlates naturally with delivering professional technicalpresentations. For this project, students completed a pre-survey about their to-date presentationexperiences and overall public-speaking confidence followed by an interactive workshop on thetheatre-based exercises mentioned above. They then completed a post-workshop survey on thesesame concepts before giving their first presentation of the semester in a technical-communicationcourse. Significantly, the workshop was conducted by a theatre professor (one of the currentpaper’s authors) who began his career with an electrical-engineering degree and several years ofexperience in industry. The paper discusses the philosophy behind this pilot study; full details onthe workshop
many research projects, funded by NSF, NASA, DoEd, KSEF and LMC. He is currently serving as an editor of Journal of Computer Standards & Interfaces.Dr. Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University (Tech.) Dr. Ertekin received his BS degree in mechanical engineering from Istanbul Technical University. He received MS degree in Production Management from Istanbul University. After working for Chrysler Truck Manufacturing Company in Turkey as a project engineer, he received dual MS degrees in engi- neering management and mechanical engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology (MS&T), formerly the University of Missouri-Rolla. He worked for Toyota Motor Corporation as a qual- ity assurance engineer for
. Page 24.1359.6Week 5: Teams and Scaffolding. Given that many engineering curricula have substantial team-based instruction (e.g., laboratory sessions, group projects), we explored the potential benefitsand challenges of incorporating team-based activities into circuits courses. Before the session,each participant completed a team-maker survey and read one of two assigned articles6,7 oneffective student teams. An initial presentation discussed challenges associated with formingteams, turning groups of students into interacting teams, assessing students individually whenthey work in teams, and dealing with social and intellectual differences among students. Via apoll and break-out group activity, participants shared their prior experiences with
26.21.2Workshop students, whose polled responses were used to categorize student response. Thedevice was developed by a team of engineering students working under the moniker “Physics inMotion” (PIM). Two of these students also led physics workshops, and incorporated the deviceinto their workshops to examine student interaction with the prototype.II. Methodsa. Design Considerations A project was undertaken by Mechanical Engineering students starting in the spring of2013. The goal of the project was to identify a need in student education and to applyengineering skills to move towards a solution to the chosen problem. The problem isolated wasinformed in part by the findings of Halloun and Hestenes, who demonstrated4 that students’misconceptions
formulatecurricula9, 10 that integrate engineering design core ideas and practice in a multidisciplinarylearning environment. This approach promotes the linking of concepts and hands-on experienceduring the learning process which helps students better remember11, 12 what they learn. Moreover,if the experience utilizes the same tools used by engineers, it can be useful for students whenentering the job market or pursuing higher education. A number of curricula have been proposedto integrate these aspects,13 for example those from Project Lead The Way (PLTW).15NGSS defines the three core ideas of engineering design14 as: (1) Definition of the problem, (2)design of solutions to the problem and (3) optimization of the solution. The curriculum describedin this
. Page 26.139.2The foremost goals of the needs assessment were to create program and course learningobjectives, as well as guidelines for a program completion certificate, with the objective of theprogram being job placement in the hybrid-electric vehicle engineering industry. The relativelynarrow focus of the program objectives was necessary considering the requirements of therequest for proposals and funding agency. This program was funded from 2010-2014 throughthe US Department of Energy Vehicle Technologies Office under American Recovery andReinvestment Act (ARRA) authority and guidelines. The emphasis in all ARRA projects was onworkforce development, job placement and economic stimulus, and the strategic objective of theHEVE program was to
is critical to get students engaged in active learningthrough activities such as solving problems, working with each other, asking questions andgetting feedback.To enhance student learning in Statics, researchers at various institutions have explored othermethods for teaching Statics, such as developing concept map and quantifying students’conceptual understanding[1, 2], developing on-line homework or learning modules[3, 4], peer-led-team-learning[5], project-based learning[6], emporium-based course delivery[7]. Among them, theflipped classroom method[8, 9, 10] has gained popularity. In a flipped classroom, the class time isdevoted to guided instruction where students work through problems with the instructor presentto provide assistance and
Paper ID #13601Design and Implementation of a Software Testing Training CourseIng. Gustavo Lopez, Universidad de Costa Rica Gustavo Lopez is a researcher at the University of Costa Rica’s Research Center on Information and Communication Technologies (CITIC), where he has worked since 2012. He has contributed to several research projects on software testing and human-computer interaction, and he has also designed and taught training courses on topics related to software testing. He received his B.Sc. in 2011 and his M. Sc in Computer and Information Science in 2015 both from University of Costa Rica. His research interests
developindependent-thinking, project management and communication skills beneficial for consultingengineering. However, other practitioners do not feel strongly that a thesis is required to cultivatethese professional skills but that proficiency depends heavily on the individual. One option toincorporate the practice of professional skills into a course-based master’s program may be toemulate the structural engineering master’s program at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology1where students must complete a practicum with the requirements of an internship coupled withreflective essays on their experiences. In the structural engineering practicum, students mustprepare 10 essays based on interviews with engineers employed by the interning firm andaddress
Paper ID #11775Does Motivation Matter for Conceptual Change: Developing Effective Qual-itative Research ApproachesDr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research
Paper ID #11190Ethics for BeginnersDr. Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn Dyrud is a full professor in the Communication Department at Oregon Institute of Technology and regularly teaches classes in business and technical writing, public speaking, rhetoric, and ethics; she is part of the faculty team for the Civil Engineering Department’s integrated senior project. She is active in ASEE as a regular presenter, moderator, and paper reviewer; she has also served as her campus’ representative for 17 years, as chair of the Pacific Northwest Section, and as section newsletter editor. She was named an
-warningsystem to allow faculty to notify students who may be at risk of failing a particular course19.Also, data have been used to understand differences across students in online learning strategiesto allow course designers to build a more personalized experience for different subgroups oflearners20,21. With an increase in the number of available data sources, colleges and universitieshave a great opportunity to explore how data can shape, enhance, and direct learning at all levels.Despite the need to investigate multiple categories of data from different areas of studentlearning, learning analtyics projects have relied heavily on learning management systems tocapture student learning processes. For example, Macfadyen and Dawson (2012)22 did a
managing director of the Center for Learning and Knowledge Man- agement of the RWTH Aachen University in February 2011. With a doctorate in Communication Science, she has been working at the IMA/ZLW & IfU Institute Cluster since 2003, from 2008 to 2010 as man- ager of the Business and Research Division: Knowledge Management. In 2004 Anja Richert completed her degree in Communication Science with a distinction at the RWTH Aachen University. In December 2007, she gained her doctorate in the field of e-learning, likewise with a distinction. In the years 2010 and 2011 she received the International E-Learning Award (IELA) for the projects ROLE and RELOAD with the e-learning solutions developed under her leadership
-traditional topics such as working with CAD and printed circuit design. Additionally itoffers students an introduction to non-linear circuit elements and modeling concepts. Many ofour students have participated in "Maker" and robotic events before coming to the University,and we believe that keeping this element of experience in the classroom is a valuable tool inmaintaining student interest. It also amortizes the learning curve required for these tools overseveral semesters, which will be of benefit when they enter the fourth year and are required to doa Capstone design project. We employ Multisim™ and UltiBoard™ from National InstrumentsInc. as our tool chain8.There were 2 sections of this course, a 3 hour section that met twice a week, and a 2
, we examine howengineering schools are helping students develop four key communication competencies:writing, creating and delivering presentations, developing and employing visual literacy skills,and participating in teams. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s(OECD) Definition and Selection of Competencies (DeSeCo) Project describes “competency” as: …more than just knowledge and skills. It involves the ability to meet complex demands, by drawing on and mobilizing psychosocial resources (including skills and attitudes) in a particular context. For example, the ability to communicate effectively is a competency that may draw on an individual’s knowledge of language, practical IT skills and
Paper ID #12997Understanding the NSF Transforming Undergraduate Engineering Educa-tion Report – Why are Industry and Academic Pathways toward KnowledgeDevelopment at Odds?Prof. Charles Pezeshki, Washington State University Charles (Chuck) Pezeshki is the Director of the Industrial Design Clinic in the School of MME at Wash- ington State University. The Industrial Design Clinic is the primary capstone vehicle for the School and focuses on industrially sponsored projects with hard deliverables that students must complete for gradua- tion. His research area is in knowledge construction as a function of social/relational