assessment of student learning, academic policies, and strategic planning.Prof. Dimitris Korakakis, West Virginia University Dimitris Korakakis, Professor in the Lane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering has been involved with Senior Capstone projects in the department for more than 10 years. He has been the lead faculty for the Lane Experience in Applied Design, the research track of the department’s capstone project and for the Nanosystems minor established in 2010 through an NSF funded NUE. He is also the PI for the Solar Decathlon awards, in 2013, 2015 and recently 2017, from the Department of Energy, advising students from a variety of disciplines across the university and many of these student
learning strategy, called PeerInstruction, in an undergraduate electric circuit analysis course offered at a large publicuniversity in Colombia. Peer Instruction is an instructional approach that fosters students’collaboration to increase conceptual understanding. Data was collected from three sectionsof the course mentioned above. In two sections, students attended a traditional class format(51 students) while another section (15 students) implemented the Peer Instructionmethodology. The research question driving this project was whether Peer Instructionwould produce significantly higher learning gains than the traditional blackboard and chalkapproach. A difference was determined using a quasi-experimental study comparing thelearning gains of the
of class tointroduce entanglement. After the publication of Mermin’s original paper in 1981 he developedother variants of his device [7], [8] that are not discussed in the class. The other thoughtexperiments that Mermin subsequently developed are more appropriate for an advancedaudience; the devices he describes do not require perfectly correlated particles. The concept ofentanglement is fundamental to quantum mechanics and was first introduced by Schrödinger in1935. However, as Schroeder [9] points out, the word has been virtually absent from publicationuntil the 1980’s. Various aspects of quantum computation are revisited throughout the course asMATLAB projects. These projects escalate in complexity and are used to reinforce the value
setting, rather than in the context of projects or research reports. Technicalexperimental report writing varies from other types of technical writing as all studentsparticipated in the experiment and there is little research involved in the writing. The thermo-fluids lab course (ME 342W) has a pre-requisite, Heat Transfer, which hasits own pre-requisites including Fluid Mechanics. The lab course that typically precedes ME342W by a year is a Mechanical Engineering Materials and Laboratory course (ME 213W). Thetypical structure of ME 342W is that there is a lecture each week and a lab each week, with eachgroup performing a lab experiment once every two weeks, and having the remainder of the twoweeks to produce a completed lab report
, and educational psychology, as well as a co-PI, an external evaluator or advisory board member on several NSF-funded projects (CA- REER, iCorps, REU, RIEF, etc.). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Impact of a Research Experience Program in Aerospace Engineering on Undergraduate Students: Year TwoAbstractThis work-in-progress study is to report results from the second-year implementation of researchexperiences for undergraduates (REU) program funded by the National Science Foundation(NSF) in aerospace engineering at a Southwestern public research university. A total of 25students, who are citizens or permanent residents selected across the United States
vulnerability and inequality” [5]. Vulnerability belies the myth that we are always autonomous, and potentially equal, citizens. To assume equality among humans leaves out and ignores important dimensions of human existence….Inequality gives rise to unequal relationships of authority, and to domination and subordination….The moral precept of responsiveness requires that we remain alert to the possibilities for abuse that arise with vulnerability [5].It is crucial for engineers to recognize that they act and communicate with considerable authorityin society, and that there is potential for abuse of this authority over more vulnerable people.Many engineering projects, from large public works projects such as the Dakota
. Authors believe that it ishigh time that the discussed surface parameters, tools, filters and mathematical modeling ofmethods be included in all design, manufacturing and capstone project courses (freshmenthrough senior year). A better educated workforce would be able to contribute significantlyhigher to quality tools and advanced metrology. It is an evolutionary process, i.e., standards keepconstantly changing; however, it must transition smoothly into the curriculum. It is imperativethat course instructors keep up to date with the latest standards, and implement them as shortinteractive modules. In an ongoing effort, based upon the contents of this paper, the authors havemade several instructional modules on surface finish. These modules
growth to interdependence thatis tied to identity is the most advanced measure of growth. In this stage, a person understandsleadership roles as essential to project success and is willing and able to engage with such rolesgoing forward. Some influences on leadership identification and success, hence the negotiationprocess, are their creative contributions, complex thought, commitment, and ability to empowerteammates [53].Using the combined literature of leadership development and leadership development in collegestudents discussed above, this study utilized the data collected in an existing national survey ofcollege students to identify 30 potential contributors to the development of leadership. Appendix Acontains the full list of the
Paper ID #27895Benchmarking SUCCESS: How do non-cognitive and affective factors varyamong college undergraduates?Dr. James M Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jim Widmann is a professor and chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department at California Polytech- nic State University, San Luis Obispo. He received his Ph.D. in 1994 from Stanford University and has served as a Fulbright Scholar at Kathmandu University it Nepal. At Cal Poly, he teaches the College of Engineering’s interdisciplinary, industry sponsored, senior project class as well as course in mechanics and design. He also
multidisciplinary project is the blood-glucose response regulated bypancreatic insulin production. This relevant biomedical model system has several existingmodels for its behavior which are leveraged in the development of this module. The developmentof the analytical model follows the work of [2] and [3] who, in turn, implement the minimalBergman model, developed by Richard Bergman and colleagues [4].The first step to developing the model is understanding the physiology. The body regulates bloodglucose concentration via pancreatic secretions called endocrines (or hormones). Low bloodglucose concentration causes the pancreas to produce glucagon and high blood glucoseconcentration causes the production of insulin. In patients with diabetes (both type 1 and
development programs that are typical in industry[6-10]. Many of the workshops focus on developing skills within the coreengineering leadership competencies (FIGURE 1) [6-7]. Workshop topicsincluded: resume / interview skills, speaking to management, negotiation, elevatorspeeches, diversity, project management, delivering presentations, networking,creating a personal brand, and Emergenetics, a personal assessment tool thathighlights an individual’s genetic predispositions for thinking preferences andbehavioral preferences [11].Table 1: Workshop topics for CLA (Note: All 2018-2019 workshops have not yetoccurred) Engineering Leadership Core Competency
critical thinking activities. LCs first cameto our institution, City Tech, through a Title V Grant in 2000 and were adopted by the college in2005. The academic performance of students participating in LCs at City Tech reflects nationaltrends. When compared to the general population at the College, students in LC earn higherGPAs, have higher retention rates, and demonstrate greater satisfaction.In order to complement the community-building efforts within learning community classrooms,we, a cohort of faculty leaders and administrators of City Tech’s First Year LearningCommunities, a program offered through the college’s Office of First Year Programs, developed“Our Stories” digital writing project which extends the student’s network beyond the
thetraditional engineering education style. The format and different active elements of this hybridcourse was presented at the ASEE Annual Meeting 2018 as a work-in-progress project. Building on that prior work, our objective here is to prove the effectiveness of the hybrid formatintroduced in the course. To that end, two feedback tools were implemented: (1) a pre-coursesurvey was used to gauge the students’ self-reported knowledge on key element of the course. Thesame survey questions were added to the end of semester survey, thus enabling us to quantify theprogress that was made. (2) Student participation was recorded during all class sessions, thusproviding us with information about the effect of the business-school inspired elements on
theequipment handling created confusion and equipment safety issues in the lab. By providing thepre-lab videos, students were able to come prepared for the lab. They were also allowed to usethese videos as a reference. This allowed the students to complete the labs quicker than beforeand freed up time for instructors. The additional time was used for working on student projects(like soldering projects), clarifying subject-related questions, helping with course materials, etc.Students who could not come to office hours due to schedule conflicts found this additional timeuseful. In some occasions, the extra time was used to host guest speakers, which would otherwisenot fit into the tight class schedule.ECET course resultsBefore the implementation of the
. Table 1shows the specific computing contributors we selected each week along with their known under-represented identity, their years of life, one of their major contributions to computing, and theirrelevance to that week’s course work. As you can see, we generally followed a chronologicalorder (to also tie in the contributor’s work to the history of computing) and attempted torepresent contributors from a wide variety of backgrounds. Because the last two weeks of thecourse were devoted to final projects (with no lecture period), we did not present any computingcontributors during this time. Because of the limited number of contributors that we couldpresent in the given time frame (8), we chose not to highlight a contributor without a
exploring challenges and identifying at- risk characteristics among students in first-year writing courses. I also worked on an initiative focused on writing in the disciplines as part of our university’s Higher Learning Commission 10-year re-accreditation cycle. As Borderlands Writing Project Director, I have worked with K-16 teachers to strengthen quality in using writing in their courses to help students learn, regardless of discipline.Mr. Germain Degardin, Southwest Outreach Academic Research (SOAR) Center Germain graduated from New Mexico State University with a Bachelor in Economics, a Master in Busi- ness and Administration, a Master in Curriculum and Instruction, and a secondary education teaching license
Bachelor of Science in Statistics. Over the summer she had the opportunity to work with Dr. Anne Lucietto and Meher Tale- yarkhan (Graduate Student) on a project related to math anxiety focused on female and minority students. Therese has been able to continue this project with her research advisor, Dr. Natalie Hobson, at her home institution.Dr. Natalie Hobson, Sonoma State University Dr. Natalie Hobson is an Assistant Professor in Mathematics and Statistics at Sonoma State University in California. Her research background is in areas of algebraic geometry and mathematics education. She received her PhD in mathematics and her masters degree in mathematics education at the University of Georgia
Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013.Sarah Hoyt, Arizona State University Sarah Hoyt is currently the Education Project Manager for the NSF-funded JTFD Engineering faculty
Assistant for Visualization in Engineering (SAVE) is a software platform that is beingdeveloped for engineering graphics students to provide them real-time quick feedback using apuzzle-based game format. Funded by the National Science Foundation, the SAVE project aimsto create a virtual platform where students can achieve mastery of SV skills using a self-pacedgame-like environment. Currently, the pilot system has a number of quizzes that the students canpractice with and the system provides them with tips and hints for their successful completion ofthose. The system uses a library of questions that is designed to challenge the students atdifferent levels. For each question four choices of answers are created, out of which one is thecorrect
research scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship between educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co- developer of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 2200 times and he has been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Prof. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is
2018 and 2019 only. In all years, two sections of the class were taught, each by a differentinstructor. Throughout the study period the instructors used the same course materials and metregularly to ensure that course content and delivery were aligned.The traditional method relied on in-class lectures to deliver new content to the students and classperiods utilized active-learning practices to enhance this delivery. Lectures typically took the form ofpower point slides that the instructor would talk through. The slides frequently included examples andactivities that the students would be asked to work through with a partner before moving on. Therewere no pre-class activities required and homework and projects were regularly assigned to be
, andindustry professionals in order to promote retention and student success in the chemicalengineering curriculum."[6]We were persuaded by the potential benefits of such a program and eager to implement one atour own institution, so in 2016 we adapted ideas from these other camps to develop a voluntarytwo-day workshop (the "ChemE Camp") for rising sophomores. The camp is advertised tostudents who registered for the fall offering of the MEB course at a minimal cost to the student(~$25). The camp was designed to occur after campus move-in, but just before the start of fallclasses. The workshop includes team-building exercises, hands-on projects, a lab tour,presentations from faculty and upper-level students about upcoming classes, the curriculum
education helps with parents’ perceptions about their ability to support their children.Blacks are overrepresented in many sports, and consequently sports and entertainment aregenerally seen as pathways to success. As a result, parents usually place more emphasis ongetting their children involved in afterschool and weekend sports activities versus educationalprograms [4], [5], [6]. When parents do pursue educational programs for their children, theyencounter additional obstacles. Many families have difficulty supporting their children’sparticipation in educational programs due to changing work schedules and constraints such aspublic transportation and the cost to participate.This project will inform our understanding of how parents from
engineering graduates with this key communication tool. Much of thedesign work in this course will take the form of small P&ID diagrams, so students have to beintroduced to this tool early on. The complexity of their diagrams will grow as the courseprogresses and they learn more. Use of a software drafting tool such as Microsoft Visio™ orEdraw Max™ with drag and drop tools can make project work quicker, but pencil and paper willsuffice.Measuring the Thermodynamic State – SensorsWhat quantities can be measured to describe the thermodynamic state of a process stream?How are temperature, pressure, flow, weight, and level measured?It is important for engineers to understand what is possible in terms of process statemeasurement. Some measurements are
longitudinalstudy is purposed to investigate the impact of the integration of career development supports inan undergraduate biosystems engineering program on students’ vocational identity developmentin order to improve career education and engineering education. The study will take place overfour-years, with one cohort of students followed through the three-year biosystems program atthe University of Manitoba, in Canada, and into their first year as alumni. This Work-in-Progresspaper focuses on Phase 1 of this project: the career supports integrated into a first year requireddesign course. Little research has been conducted on the topic of career interventions inengineering programs. This study proposes to fill this gap through qualitative analysis
on several research projects, programs, and initiatives to help students bridge the gap between high school and college as well as preparing students for the rigors of mathematics. His research interests include engineering education, integration of novel technologies into engineering classroom, excellence in instruction, water, and wastewater treatment, civil engineering infrastructure, and transportation engi- neering.Dr. Davida Scharf, New Jersey Institute of Technology Davida Scharf has a B.A. from Barnard College in Art and Architectural History, an MLS from Columbia University, and a PhD from the Rutgers University School of Communication and Information in the area of educational assessment and information
allowscustomized design and fabrication of scaffolds that can meet specific needs of each patient.Therefore, 3D printing has been heavily studied for prototyping tissue scaffolds that can mimicthe mechanical strength and biological environment of host bone tissues.8–10An eight-week summer project on 3D printed bone materials was designed for aspiring highschool rising seniors who are interested in biomaterials and engineering research. In this project,the Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) 3D printing technique was used for the fabrication ofbone scaffold models using various polymer and biopolymer filaments. Polymer scaffolds(1×1×1 cm3 cubes) with different infill geometries and densities were fabricated. The mechanicalproperties of these scaffolds were
Paper ID #30464Results of an Intro to Mechanics Course Designed to Support StudentSuccess in Physics I and Foundational Engineering CoursesProf. Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles Menezes is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Cal State LA. His specialization is in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering. Since becoming part of the faculty in 2009, Menezes has also focused on improving student success and has led a number of engineering education projects. He is currently the Director of the First-Year Experience program at ECST (FYrE@ECST) and coordinates engineering education activities
engineering, if such courses even exist. At the same time,universities are often interested in providing their students with diverse learning opportunitiessuch as service learning, both domestically and internationally. However, students often lack theproper experience or training to deal with complex ethical, cultural, or societal situations thatwill likely be encountered or the resources to properly participate while carrying out service-learning projects [1].Numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the impact of various pedagogical andcurricular approaches on the transfer of knowledge in ethics and social justice in STEMdisciplines, often with disappointing results [2]–[5]. However, it may be that we are notmeasuring concepts of ethics
decisionsimpact each individual project that collectively represents the construction industry which is oneof the largest economic sectors of most localities, states and countries around the globe.Although research has been done in decision making and some psychometric instruments exist inthis area, there was no tool that allowed to measure the decision making process of the AECpracticing professional and students. Thus, the focus of this research paper is to introduce theConstruction Decision Making Inventory (CDMI) that was recently developed by Dr. TulioSulbaran to fill this important gap in the AEC industry. The content of this paper is veryimportant as it helps better understand practicing professionals, educators and student. Thisunderstanding of