TourScholars were taken on an industry field trip to Proctor and Gamble in Pineville, LA, where theytoured the laundry detergent production facility. Over lunch, the students had a uniqueopportunity for a Q&A session with the P&G engineering team. Members of the grant team andfaculty mentors accompanied the scholars on this industry tour. The drive to and from the facilityprovided an opportunity for community building between students and the faculty memberspresent.End-of-Year SurveyAt the conclusion of the year, the SSP students shared their feedback on the program through asurvey administered by an external evaluator. Among the twenty-four students in the first cohort,twenty responded to the survey.The survey was comprised of eight
text generation using transformer-based pre-trained language models. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(3):1–37, 2023.[10] Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, et al. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023.[11] Albert Q Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Mensch, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guillaume Lample, Lucile Saulnier, et al. Mistral 7b. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06825, 2023.[12] Tiffany H Kung, Morgan Cheatham, Arielle Medenilla, Czarina Sillos, Lorie De Leon, Camille Elepa˜no, Maria
: Evaluating Two Programs through Principal-Agent Theory,” Studies inEngineering Education (Blacksburg, Va.), vol. 2, no. 2, p. 120, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.21061/see.57.[23]. М. В. Никифорова and I. N. Skvortsova, “Intercultural competence and interculturalcommunication in the context of education for sustainable development,” E3S Web ofConferences, vol. 296, p. 08026, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202129608026.[24]. Q. Jiang, M. Yuen, and H. Horta, “Factors influencing life satisfaction of internationalstudents in mainland China,” International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, vol. 42,no. 4, pp. 393–413, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10447-020-09409-7.[25]. C. I. Okeke and Tjprc, “Intervention Strategies that can Support Young Adults
://impact.enlight-eu.org/toolkit/web/en (accessed 7 Feb. 2024).[7] D.A. Martin, A. Gwynne-Evans, A.A. Kazakova, and Q. Zhu, “Developing a Global andCulturally Inclusive Vision of Engineering Ethics Education and Research,” in: InternationalHandbook of Engineering Education Research, Editor, A. Johri, Routledge, 2023 (pp. 87-114).[8] E. L. Boyer, "the Scholarship of Engagement," Bulletin of the American Academy of Artsand Sciences”, vol. 49, pp. 18-33, Apr. 1996.[9] Engineering Ethics Toolkit Advisory Group, “Best Practice in Teaching EngineeringEthics Through Case Studies,” Engineering Professors Council, https://epc.ac.uk/toolkit/best-practice-in-teaching-engineering-ethics-through-case-studies/ (accessed 7 Feb. 2024)[10] J. Lajoie, J. S. Kim, H. A. Love
for Educators. NationalResearch Center on the Gifted and Talented.Vinchon, F., Lubart, T., Bartolotta, S., Gironnay, V., Botella, M., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., ... & Gaggioli, A. (2023). ArtificialIntelligence & Creativity: A manifesto for collaboration. The Journal of Creative Behavior.Wan, Q., & Lu, Z. (2023, July). GANCollage: A GAN-Driven Digital Mood Board to Facilitate Ideation in Creativity Support.In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 136-146).Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.Zhao, P., Liao, W., Huang, Y., & Lu, X. (2023). Intelligent beam layout design for frame structure based on graph neuralnetworks. Journal of Building
., Lock, R., 2013, “Understanding engineering identity through structural equation modeling,” 2013 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2013.668478718. Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., Lock, R., 2016, “Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 105 No. 2, pp. 312-340. https://doi/pdf/10.1002/jee.2011819. Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., Smith, P. C., 2002, “Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self‐report scales,” Personnel Psychology, Vol. 55 No.1, pp. 167-194. https://doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1744- 6570.2002.tb00108.x20. van Hoof, A., Raaijmakers, Q. A
://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=133748a[17] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications, 2014.[18] M. B. Miles, M. A. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook. 2014. doi: 10.1136/ebnurs.2011.100352.[19] M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd, and T. S. Hall, “Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 185–207, 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2010.tb01056.x.Appendix A – Rough Draft of Learning InnovationReal World Engineering – Cooling Rat BrainsIntroduction – It is common knowledge that
the last decade, she has dedicated her education efforts towards developing new experiential learning curriculum, creating preparation programs to address opportunity gaps, and enhancing involvement of student organizations in engineering education. Her academic research interest includes include sensing, sensors, soft materials, wearable sensors, and remote health monitoring/devices, where she has spent the last seven years developing thin-film optical pressure sensors and infant feeding dysfunction diagnostic devices.Prof. Truong Nguyen, University of California, San Diego Truong Q. Nguyen received the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
. [19]. The prompted responses to these questions werea combination of a five-point Likert scale, polar (Yes/No), and short answer. The complete survey and response type are provided in Table 1. Participants were instructed to circle a number from one to five, with one being least confident and five being most confident, indicating how they felt towards each question. able 1.Pre- and post-survey questions and associatedresponse types. Students were asked toTcomplete these questions during the first and last week of the GCSP-REU. uestion Q Question Response Type Number 1 I know how to identify a research lab and mentor
; Exposition Proceedings, Vancouver, BC: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2011, p. 22.69.1- 22.69.18. doi: 10.18260/1-2--17351.[25] J. Jorgenson, “Engineering Selves: Negotiating Gender and Identity in Technical Work,” Manag. Commun. Q., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 350–380, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.1177/0893318902153002.[26] G. A. Dietz, “A narrative exploration of the influences of internship experiences on the identities of Black engineers,” University of Florida, Gainesville, Fl, 2022.[27] X.-Y. Du, “Gendered practices of constructing an engineering identity in a problem-based learning environment,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 35–42, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1080/03043790500430185.[28] K. L. Meyers, M. W. Ohland, A. L
engineers. Wiley. https://10.1002/9781119047063Smith, N. M., Zhu, Q., Smith, J. M., & Mitcham, C. (2021). Enhancing engineering ethics: Role ethics and corporate social responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27, 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00289-7Sottile, B. J., Cruz, L. E., Burleson, Y.-A. L., & McLain, K. (2021, July). It’s about time: An analysis of student activities under remote learning. Paper presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37412Sottile, B. J., Cruz, L. E., & McLain, K. (2022, April). Through the looking glass: STEM students’ changing relationships with time across the COVID-19 pandemic. Paper
the prime contractor,m. Related utilities connect, tie-ins, and conflicts,n. Applicable underground and overhead utility protections,o. Field sampling and testing,p. Field inspections,q. Applicable work constraints and restrictions,r. Sequence or order of constructing the work tasks, ands. Others.Factors that Affect Contract Completion TimeProject delays happen for several reasons, and some of which may depend on the scope of workand the complexity of the project. Other reasons may relate to the construction methods chosen.Figure 2 details some of the factors that could drive contract completion time. Scope of Work, and Level of
. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Banaji, M. R., et al.(2010). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. Eur. Rev. Soc.Psychol. 18, 36–88. doi: 10.1080/10463280701489053[16] Nosek, B. A., and Smyth, F. L. (2011). Implicit social cognitions predict sex differences inmath engagement and achievement. Am. Educ. Res. J. 48, 1125– 1156. doi:10.3102/0002831211410683[17] Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., and Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisonsof mathematics attitudes and affect: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Wom. Q. 14, 299–324. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402. 1990.tb00022.x[18] Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., and Gernsbacher, M.A. (2007). The science of sex
, 2012.[35] B. K. Jesiek, Q. Zhu, S. E. Woo, J. Thompson, and A. Mazzurco, “Global engineering competency in context: Situations and behaviors,” Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 3, 2014.[36] D. Parmigiani, A. Maragliano, C. Silvaggio, and A. Molinari, “Trainee teachers abroad: reflections on personal and professional teaching identity during international mobility,” European Journal of Teacher Education, no. August, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2021.1961737.[37] L. H. Pinto and P. C. Pereira, “‘I wish to do an internship (abroad)’: investigating the perceived employability of domestic and international business internships,” High Educ (Dordr), pp. 443–461, 2018, doi
. 792-798.[11] J. Luo and M. Hou, "Innovation of the Higher Education Grassroots Statistical Reports System based on Low-Code Development," in 2023 7th International Conference on Management Engineering, Software Engineering and Service Sciences (ICMSS), January 2023, pp. 36-40.[12] Lang, D., Handley, M., Erdman, A. M., Park, J. J., and Tsakalerou, M. (2019, June). "Intercultural competency differences between US and Central Asian students in an engineering across cultures and nations graduate course." In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[13] Cao, Q., Seow, C. K., Lim, L. H. I., Keoh, S. L., Dale, V., Honeychurch, S., Tasler, N. and Bremner, D. (2023). Learners’ differences in blended learner-centric approach for a
, O. A. Adedokun and G. C. Weaver, “Teachers’ perceptions of rural STEM teaching: Implications for rural teacher retention”, The Rural Educator, vol.33, no.3, 2012.[35] Y. Hu, Q. Zhang and B. Wu, “Analyzing teaching characteristics and interaction patterns of STEM classroom from the perspective of multi-dimensional evaluation”, Chinese Journal of Distance Education, vol.42, no.9, pp.44-52, 2022.[36] K. Mitchem, D. Wells and J. Wells, “Using evaluation to ensure quality professional development in rural schools”, Journal of research in rural education, vol.18, no.2, pp.96-103, 2003.[37] C. Zhao, W. Zhao and Z. Jiang, “The Design of 5E Inquiry Teaching Model for STEM Education”, Modern Educational Technology, vol.29
: 10.1088/1742-6596/1607/1/012127.[13] N. Li, Q. Shen, R. Song, Y. Chi, and H. Xu, “MEduKG: A Deep-Learning-Based Approach for Multi-Modal Educational Knowledge Graph Construction,” Information, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 91, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/info13020091.[14] N. F. Noy and D. L. McGuinness, “Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology.” Stanford knowledge systems laboratory technical report KSL-01-05 and …, 2001.[15] R. R. Starr and J. M. P. de Oliveira, “Concept maps as the first step in an ontology construction method,” Information Systems, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 771–783, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2012.05.010.[16] American Association of Colleges and Universities, “High Impact Practices,” AAC&
prompt engineering,” Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 49, no. 4, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102720.[21] Q. Jin, R. Leaman, and Z. Lu, “Retrieve, Summarize, and Verify: How Will ChatGPT Affect Information Seeking from the Medical Literature?,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 34, no. 8. Wolters Kluwer Health, pp. 1302–1304, Aug. 01, 2023. doi: 0.1681/ASN.0000000000000166.[22] T. T. Cataldo, A. G. Buhler, I.M. Faniel, B. Brannon, L. S. Connaway, C. Cyr, K. Langer, E. M. Hood, J. K. Valenza, R. Elrod, R. A. Graff, S. R. Putnam, and S. Howlad, “Mixed methods data collection using simulated Google Results: reflections on the methods of a point-of-selection behaviour study
encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage publications, 2008.[26] J. W. Creswell and V. L. P. Clark, Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications, 2017.[27] P. Liamputtong, “Focus group methodology: Introduction and history,” Focus Group Methodol. Princ. Pract., vol. 224, pp. 1–14, 2011.[28] M. Patton, “Qualitative research and evaluation methods.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA),” 2002.[29] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications, 2014.[30] M. Hesse and C. Hyman, “Using Innovative Technologies to Improve Transfer Student Success.” [Online]. Available: https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/tackling-transfer
& Exposition, June 2020.[8] R. Desing and R. L. Kajfez, “How to use Q methodology in engineering education research,” Proc. of the ASEE Virtual Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2020.[9] A. M. McAlister, D.M. Lee, K.M. Ehlert, R.L. Kajfez, C.J. Faber, and M.S. Kennedy, “Qualitative coding: An approach to assess inter-rater reliability,” Proc. of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2017.[10] J. P. Martin, “What no one tells you about writing a CAREER Proposal: Advice from a former NSF program officer,” Proc. of the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, June 2020.[11] R. A. Chin, I. R. Nettey, E. G. Tetteh, and P. Weinsier, “Negotiating the tenure and promotion process
, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.02.003.[17] E. Siemsen, A. V. Roth, S. Balasubramanian, and G. Anand, “The influence of psychological safety and confidence in knowledge on employee knowledge sharing,” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 429-447, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1287/msom.1080.0233.[18] Q. Gu, G. G. Wang, and L. Wang, “Social capital and innovation in R&D teams: The mediating roles of psychological safety and learning from mistakes,” R&D Management, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 89-102, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1111/radm.12002.[19] Y. Liu and R. T. Keller, “How Psychological Safety Impacts R&D Project Teams’ Performance: In a psychologically safe workplace, R&D teams
research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation’s Scholarships inScience, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (S-STEM) Program entitled “Focus OnRetention in Cohorts of Engineering Students” (FORCES).References1. Veenstra, C.P., Dey, E.L. and Herrin, G.D. “A Model for Freshman Engineering Retention.” Advances in Engineering Education. Vol. 1 No. 3 (2009): 1-33.2. Li, Q., Swaminathan, H. and Tang, J. “Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention.” Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 98 No. 4. (2009): 361-376.3. Lenning, O.T., Ebbers, L. H. “The Powerful Potential of Learning Communities: Improving Education for the
knowledge g. Communicate effectively orally h. Communicate effectively in writing i. Work successfully as a member of a team j. Take initiative k. Integrate mathematics and science into your work l. Knowledge from humanities and the social sciences m. Evaluate the quality and validity of data, information and evidence n. Understanding and appreciation of ethics and professionalism o. Awareness of value of considering diversity and differences in cultures p. Awareness of the impact of your work in a global context q. Awareness of the importance of safety issues in your work 14. Use this space to provide additional comments (i.e. program
focuseson one school, identified here as Eastern Technical University (ETU). This analysis is restrictedto ETU’s first-year mechanical engineering curriculum, which typically involves students takingMechanics (ETU Physics), Calculus (ETU Math), Introduction to Manufacturing (ETUEngineering), and/or Introduction to CAD (ETU Design). Each course includes threecomponents: lecture, recitation, and laboratory. ETU’s curriculum generally identifies lectures asthe main venue through which content knowledge is imparted, while the recitation sessions areprimarily used as an opportunity to engage with the material through Q&A experiences andparticipation in group-work exercises. The laboratories serve as vehicles for specific skilldevelopment and attempt
Page 22.1347.137. Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.8. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(2), 33-35.9. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2, 1-28.10. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage Publications.11. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis: Sage.12. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL Aldine.13. Dale, N
Practitioners. 96, 359-379 (2007).11. Bursic, K.M. & Atman, C.J. Information Gathering: A Critical Step for Quality in the Design Process. Quality Management Journal 4, 60-75 (1997).12. Brown, C., Murphy, T.J. & Nanny, M. Turning Techno-Savvy into Info-Savvy: Authentically Integrating Information Literacy into the College Curriculum. Journal of Academic Librarianship 29, 386-398 (2003).13. Kuhlthau, C.C. Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services, (Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT, 2004).14. Holliday, W. & Li, Q. Understanding the Millenials: Updating Our Knowledge About Students. Reference Service Review 32, 356-366 (2004).15. Shanahan, M.C. Transforming information
Doctoral Education [Electronic Version]. Retrieved November 12, 2008, from www.phd-survey.org12. Altalib, H. (2002). Situated Cognition: Describing the Theory (No. IR 021 877 Document ED 475 183) (ERICdocument).13. Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of Learning for Instruction. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.14. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.15. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.16. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.17. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.18. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation
Disk Reactor Technology for the Manufacture of Pharmaceuticals”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39, 2175-2182, (2000).14. Kaisare, N.S., G.D. Stefanidis, and D.G. Vlachos, “Millisecond Production of Hydrogen from Alternative, High Hydrogran Density Fuels in a Cocurrent Multifunctional Microreactor,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48, 1749-1760, (2009).15. Zhang, H. G. Chen, J. Yue, and Q. Yuan, “Hydrodynamics and Mass Transfer of Gas-Liquid Flow in a Falling Film Microreactor.” AIChE Journal, 55(5), 1110-1120, (2009).16. Morena, A., K. Murphy, and B.A. Wilhite, “Parametric Study of Solid-Phase Axial Heat Conduction in Thermally Integrated Microchannel Networks,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47, 9040-9054, (2008).17. Arseneault, G