Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 4531 - 4560 of 5155 in total
Conference Session
Best of Computers in Education Division
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cameron H. G. Wright P.E., University of Wyoming; Thad B. Welch P.E., Boise State University; Michael G. Morrow, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
York: McGraw-Hill, revised ed., 1992.[25] Y. Wang, J. Ostermann, and Y.-Q. Zhang, Video Processing and Communications. Prentice-Hall, 2002.[26] “Texas Instruments SYS/BIOS real-time kernel,” 2013. http://www.ti.com/tool/sysbios.[27] “OpenCV website,” 2013. http://opencv.org/.[28] Educational DSP (eDSP), L.L.C., “DSP resources for TI DSKs.” http://www.educationaldsp.com/. Page 24.1062.12
Conference Session
Discipline Specific Topics and Techniques
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mandy Wheadon, Purdue University; Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
. Patton, M. Q. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (Sage, 2002).46. Harrell, M. C. & Bradley, M. A. Data collection methods: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. 148 (2009).47. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (Sage, 1998).48. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L. & Zoran, A. G. A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. Int. J. Qual. Methods 8, 1–21 (2009).49. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. (W.H. Freeman, 1997).50. Bandura, A. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52, 1–26 (2001).51. Brown, J. S., Collins
Conference Session
Flipping ECE Courses
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Micah Stickel, University of Toronto
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
Inventory Assessment Instruments for Electromagnetic Education,” in Proc., IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Int. Symp., San Antonio, Texas, 2002.13. Hake, R., “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,” Amer. J. of Phys., Vol. 66, No. 64, 1998.14. Camtasia Studio 8.0, TechSmith, available at http://www.techsmith.com/camtasia.html, accessed January 3, 2014.15. Stickel, M., Liu, Q., and Hari, S., “The Effect of the Inverted Classroom Teaching Approach on Student/Faculty Interaction and Students’ Self-Efficacy,”, Proceedings 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 2014
Conference Session
K-12 and Pre-college Engineering: Research on Teachers' Perceptions, Attitudes and Impacts of Teacher PD
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cathy P. Lachapelle, Museum of Science; Jonathan D Hertel, Engineering is Elementary, Museum of Science, Boston; Muhammad Faiz Shams, Museum of Science - EiE; Chris San Antonio, Museum of Science, Boston; Christine M Cunningham, Museum of Science
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
Structural Equations Modeling,” Manag. Inf. Syst. Q., vol. 22, no. 1, p. 14, Mar. 1998.[8] S. J. Finney and C. DiStefano, “Non-Normal and Categorical Data in Structural Equation Modeling,” in Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, United States of America: Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2006, pp. 269 – 314.[9] C. M. Cunningham and C. P. Lachapelle, “The impact of Engineering is Elementary (EiE) on students’ attitudes toward engineering and science,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY, 2010.[10] IBM Corporation, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation, 2012.[11] L. K. Muthén and B. O. Muthen, Mplus. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén, 2012.[12] D. Hooper, J. Coughlan, and M. R
Conference Session
Changing the Classroom Environment in Mathematics Education
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert Talbert, Grand Valley State University
Tagged Divisions
Mathematics
. Quizzes were administered onpaper and collected after three minutes of work. After collecting the students’ work, the quiz wasimmediately debriefed at the board and document camera so that students received instantfeedback. Page 24.1233.9Following the Q&A time and the Entrance Quiz, the class was typically left with about 30minutes to work on class activities. As described above, these activities were often taken fromthe Activities in the Active Calculus book and modified to fit the particular needs of theaudience. Most were on the cognitive level of homework that would be assigned for out-of-classwork in a traditional setting. Students were
Conference Session
Data Analytics in Education
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matthew A. Verleger, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
Conference Session
Biological and Agricultural Engineering Education Technical Session
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ernest W. Tollner PE, University of Georgia; Qianqian Ma, University of Georgia; Caner Kazanci, University of Georgia
Tagged Divisions
Biological & Agricultural
mapped the key elements of a typicalundergraduate engineering curriculum onto each of the four selected systems. The particles (quanta) areconserved, but particle attributes are not conserved. We hypothesized the following relations to model therespective quanta. E(t)j=E(0)j + Beta i (1 – exp(-t%ji/tc%i)) (1) E(t)j=E(0)j exp(-t%ji/tc%i) + Beta i (1 – exp(-t%ji/tc%i)) (2) E(t)j=E(0)j+1 (3)Where E(t)j represents the exergy or information of a particle “j” at time ”t”; t%ji: residence time at compartment “j” for particle “i”; Time constant (tc%i) = 1+Beta i/Heat loss(Qi), if Q = 0, tc=1; and, Beta i is the exergy
Conference Session
Socio-cultural Dimensions of Community Engagement
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrea Mazzurco, Purdue University; James Huff, Harding University; Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Community Engagement Division
Program in the Engineering Disciplines”. The interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abraod, 10, 237, 2004.18. J. R Mihelcic, K. G. Paterson , L. D. Phillips , Q. Zhang , D. W. Watkins, B. D. Barkdoll, V. J. Fuchs, et al. “Educating engineers in the sustainable futures model with a global perspective”. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 25(4), 255–263, 2008.19. K. Paterson, and V. Fuchs. “Development for the other 80%: Engineering hope”. Proceedings of the 2007 AAEE Conference, Melbourne, December 2007.20. Y. Tang, M. Compere, Y. L. Wong, J. A. Coleman, C. Selkirk. 2High tech high touch: Lessons learned from Project Haiti 2011”. Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX, June 2012.21. A
Conference Session
A Challenge to Engineering Educators
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lisa DuPree McNair, Virginia Tech; Wende Garrison, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
Identity Construct. Paper presented at ePIC 2011: ePortfolio and Identity Conference. London, England. Retrieved December 26, 2012 from: http://www.epforum.eu/sites/www.epforum.eu/files/ePIC%202011.pdf.26. Banta, T.W. (2012). Our primitive art of assessment. Peer Review 13, 4. Retrieved January 6, 2013, from: http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/pr-fa11wi12/realitycheck.cfm.27. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.28. Committee on Graduate Education. 1998. Report and recommendations. Washington, DC: Association of American Universities.29. Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy (COSEPUP). 1995. Reshaping the education of scientists and engineers
Conference Session
FPD 5: Transitions and Student Success, Part I
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Carolyn Skurla, Baylor University; Steven R. Eisenbarth, Baylor University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
surveyquestions are provided below. These results were selected because they show interestingdifferences and similarities between the transfer and non-transfer students. Also, these resultsshow the views of all the students of the SAS scholarship program.In Figure 1, a clear difference is shown in the timing of when students decided to major inengineering or computer science. The transfer students were split across all responses, while thenon-transfer students mostly chose to major in the last two years of high school. These resultsmay give insight on how to improve recruitment of transfer students.Figure 1: Decision to major in engineering or computer science. Q 14. When did you decide to major in engineering or Tranfers computer
Conference Session
Case Studies in Entrepreneurship
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ravi T. Shankar, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL; Francis Xavier McAfee, Florida Atlantic University; Michael S Harris, Florida Atlantic University; Ravi S Behara, Florida Atlantic University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
industry professionals F2F or online and are given feedbackon feasibility (technical, artistic and marketing), uniqueness and useful links to find code andassets. After that , by the 10th week, they start on their final three weekly project assignments, ondevelopment of individual software components, graphic assets, and marketing plan; onintegration and testing; and finally on a portfolio presentation to well-respected local BASEprofessionals to evaluate these Apps. The presentations (by the 13th week) includes a slidepresentation by the team, a three minute promotional video, a live demo with a phone, discussionof the code and assets created, and a Q&A session. All the code, assets, documentation, & theproject folder had to be submitted
Conference Session
FPD 9: First-Year Engineering Courses, Part III: Research, Sustainability, and Professionalism
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dirk Colbry, Michigan State University; Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Conference Session
Programs in Support of Systems Engineering Education
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael C Smith, University of Virginia; Barry Horowitz, University of Virginia; Thomas S. Brett, Dept of Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
!following!rehabilitation!and!military!service! o Information!Session!at!Ft.!Eustis!Education!Center! o Drop!In!Q!&!A!at!Ft.!Lee!Education!Center! o Visit!to!Educational!Director!at!Ft.!Benning,!GA! o Personal!meeting!and!AMP,V!presentations!to!the!Commander,!Naval!Sea! Systems!Command!and!two!of!his!direct!reports! o Presentation!at!the!Virginia!Veterans!Memorial!in!Richmond,!VA! o Visit!to!Ft.!Bragg!to!reach!returning!veterans!who!relocate!within!proximity!to! AMP,V! o Discussions!with!ROTC!leadership!at!UVa,!VMI,!and!The!College!of!William!&! Mary,!and!the!University!of!Richmond!to!promote!the!program!among!ROTC! students!• AMP,V!presentation!for!NAVSEA!at
Conference Session
Curricular Issues in Computing and Information Technolog Programs
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James P Cohoon, University of Virginia; J. McGrath Cohoon, University of Virginia; Luther A Tychonievich, University of Virginia; Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants
Tagged Divisions
Computing & Information Technology
of refreshments available throughout the day. ● Leave meals unscheduled. Attendees want to have at least that much time to chat, compare notes, and socialize; working lunches cause them to engage in these social activities at other times, displacing scheduled activities to do so. ● Avoid scheduling important content in evening presentations. Short conversations, tours, and Q&A with industry partners go over well, but content-driven talks are best restricted to daytime sessions. ● Do not schedule long days. Intense scheduling results in weariness and prevents the networking and goal setting that helps the attendees in the long run. We found that the longest appropriate daily schedule is six hours of
Conference Session
Novel Teaching Methods In Engineering Technology
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Edward E. Osakue, Texas Southern University; Jonathan J. Lewis, Texas Southern University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
= conversion factor from Metric to English qM q E = k M qM = (2) unit kE 1 kM = (3) kEExamples:a) Convert 200 MPa to psi. b) Convert 1500 mm to feet.qM = 200 MPa = 200x1000 kPa qM = 1500 mm = 1.5 mk E = 6.895 kPa/psi (Table A1) k E = 0.3048 ft/m (Table A1) qM 200x1000
Conference Session
Capstone and Senior Design Projects Session
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Antonio Francisco Mondragon, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST); Adriana Becker-Gomez, Rochester Institute of Technology (KGCOE); Carmen A Bovalino III, Rochester Institute of Technology, Student; Michael B Jones, RIT; Derrick Brazil, Rochester Institute of Technology; Michael R Caldwell, Graduate Student Rochester Institute of Technology; sajin george, RIT
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
havediscovered and are using to develop their projects and applications. Of course this is not acomprehensive list, but rather our personal exposure to these embedded tools you as an educatordid not have when you grew up.The work is going to be divided into several sections. The next section contains the commonfeatures that these tools have; there are some tools that have each end every one of these features,while others just have a subset. We will not provide a thorough cross matching of all thesefeatures and the reader is welcomed to find more information at the respective websites. Wewould also present a Q&A responded by students and faculty using these tools, each intervieweeresponds to a set of directed questions in an attempt to give a fair
Conference Session
Motivation and Self-Efficacy
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Philip Reid Brown, Virginia Tech; Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Conference Session
Technical Sessions 1
Collection
2024 Fall ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
Zhou Zhang, SUNY Farmingdale State College; Yizhe Chang, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Tagged Topics
Professional Papers
, July 26-29, 2022.[37] Kusam, V.A., 2024, “Generative-AI Assisted Feedback Provisioning for Project-based Learning in CS Education” (Doctoral dissertation).[38] Salinas-Navarro, D.E., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Michel-Villarreal, R. & Montesinos, L., 2024, “Using Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools to Explain and Enhance Experiential Learning for Authentic Assessment”, Education Sciences, Vol. 14, No, 1, p.83.[39] Li, H., Xu, T., Zhang, C., Chen, E., Liang, J., Fan, X., Li, H., Tang, J. & Wen, Q., 2024, “Bringing Generative AI to Adaptive Learning in Education”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.14601.[40] Weng, J.C., 2023, “Putting Intellectual Robots to Work: Implementing Generative AI Tools in Project Management”, NYU SPS
Collection
2013 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
Alan Wheatley; David Baglee; Mike Knowles; Alastair Irons
manufacturing sector.REFERENCES1. Anil Kunar, Neil Randerson, Louisa Kiwana et al, Engineering UK 2013, The State ofEngineering. See: http://www.theengineer.co.uk/Journals/2013/08/02/q/s/w/Engineering-UK-2013-Interactive.pdf2. Office for National Statistics, UK: See: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/index.htmlAlso see: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/datasets-and-tables/index.html3. Engineering UK 2013, Executive Summary and Recommendations; See:http://www.engineeringuk.com/_resources/documents/EUK_Executive_Summary_2013_Web.pdf4 Susan Kay and Anil Kumar, (2013), EPC-Engineering-UK-report-on-UK-HEI-engineering-student-capacity-June-2013-summary.See:http://epc.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/EPC-Engineering-UK-report-on-UK-HEI-engineering-student-capacity
Collection
2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conference
Authors
Kaycie Lane; Jason Hawkins
and Discussion,” Comput. Sci. Educ., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 137–172, Jun. 2003, doi: 10.1076/csed.13.2.137.14200.[8] Q. Cao, L. H. I. Lim, V. Dale, and N. Tasler, “EXPERIENCES IN PYTHON PROGRAMMING LABORATORY FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDENTS WITH ONLINE COLLABORATIVE PROGRAMMING PLATFORM,” presented at the 14th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Online Conference, Nov. 2021, pp. 5784–5791. doi: 10.21125/iceri.2021.1305.[9] D. G. Balreira, T. L. T. D. Silveira, and J. A. Wickboldt, “Investigating the impact of adopting Python and C languages for introductory engineering programming courses,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 47–62, Jan. 2023, doi
Conference Session
Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 9
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer Ackerman, Texas A&M University; América Soto-Arzat, Texas A&M University; Christine A Stanley, Texas A&M University; Reuben A Buford May, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
/10.1126/sciadv.abo1558[12] K. G. Wilkins-Yel, A. Arnold, J. Bekki, M. Natarajan, B. Bernstein, and A. K. Randall, “I can’t push off my own Mental Health’: Chilly STEM Climates, Mental Health, and STEM Persistence among Black, Latina, and White Graduate Women,” Sex Roles, vol. 86, no. 3–4, pp. 208–232, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01262-1[13] Q. R. Alexander and M. A. Hermann, “African-American women’s experiences in graduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education at a predominantly white university: A qualitative investigation,” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 307–322, 2016, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0039705[14] J. A. Muñoz
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 2: AI, Computation, and Electronics
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yume Menghe Xu, Tufts University; Ethan E. Danahy, Tufts University; William Church
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
generative AI (many wrote about multiple types of experiences), 5 students mentioned theirexperience using generative AI for schoolwork. Examples included using DALL-E to generateimages when making a zine for a senior English project and generating practice problems forclasses. 4 talked about learning with or about generative AI in out-of-school settings. Forexample, one student had attended a summer program hosted by a university where they codedan AI using Q-learning and Monte Carlo tree search. 3 students used generative AI for theirhobby by setting generative AI up as their opponent for video games or creating stories aboutcharacters for role-playing games. 10 students stated their experiences testing out generative AIon their own or with their
Conference Session
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 12
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alexis Gillmore, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Courtney June Faber, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
to B and J for participating in this study by sharing your experiences and insights.Thank you to Maryrose Weatherton and Betsy Chesnutt for excellent feedback on the interviewand poem method. Thanks to the engage™ Engineering Fundamentals Program for researchspace and administrative support.References[1] M. E. Brenner, “Interviewing in Educational Research.,” in Handbook of complementary methods in education research, J. L. Green, G. Camilli, and P. B. Elmore, Eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2006, pp. 357–370. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-05382-021[2] M. Q. Patton, “Chapter 8: Qualitative analysis and interpretation,” in Qualitative research and
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 10: Curricular & Program Design
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven; Ronald S Harichandran P.E., University of New Haven; Stephanie M Gillespie, University of New Haven
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
, 2024. Date. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?q=ED610707&id=ED610707[20] I. Fomunung, C. Silver, and M. Porter, “Increasing the success rates of engineering students after transferring into four year colleges from community colleges: It’s much more than dollars” in Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, Aug., 2022. https://peer.asee.org/42050[21] M. McGinnis and R. Welch, “Capstones with an industrial model,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY, June 2010. https://peer.asee.org/16899[22] C.E. King, “Industry engagement versus faculty mentorship in engineering senior capstone design courses,” in Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE
Conference Session
Reimagining Pathways: Nurturing Diversity and Identity in STEM Education
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yume Menghe Xu, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
reinforcing the status quo. Therefore, theengineering industry should take the students’ concerns as input if the industry wants to worktowards the reframing of engineering as sociotechnical, and the commitment to social justice.References[1] D. M. Hatmaker, “Engineering identity: Gender and professional identity negotiation among women engineers: identity negotiation among women engineers,” Gend. Work Organ., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 382–396, 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00589.x.[2] J. Jorgenson, “Engineering selves: negotiating gender and identity in technical work,” Manag. Commun. Q., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 350–380, 2002, doi: 10.1177/0893318902153002.[3] E. A. Cech, “Culture of disengagement in engineering education?,” Sci. Technol. Hum
Conference Session
Homer's Handy Homework: STEM Adventures from Sofa to School, Mmm... STEM
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amber Simpson, Binghamton University; Sawsan Werfelli, State University of New York at Binghamton
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
morelikely to engage in the epistemic practice, consider problems in context. This supports priorresearch that has shown empathy to be a skilled developed through user-centered engineeringcontexts [33-34]. Similar, the structure and open-ended nature of the kits to align with anengineering design process elicited engagement in particular epistemic practices such asenvisioning multiple solutions. In the context of this study, envisioning multiple solutions weregrounded in the process of sketching which has been shown to promote the development ofinnovative ideas, building upon ideas, and deeper thinking about their solutions [35]. Second, theinclusion of familiar and everyday materials (e.g., q-tips, cotton balls, sandpaper, straws)supported children
Conference Session
Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 2: Graduate Student Pipeline and Workforce Development
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
, cumulative GPA, number of papers authored (research productivity) , and successfuldegree completion. The results of these studies are not consistent or conclusive, depending asthey do on the type and level of the program, the discipline, the sample size and diversity, andthe statistical methods and controls.However, some general observations can be made based on the literature. Kuncel et al. [33]performed a meta-analysis of nearly 100 studies involving 10,000 students. They reportoperational validities of 0.38 and 0.30, respectively, for the predictive validity of the GRE-V andGRE-Q for masters-level GPAs. For doctoral students, the corresponding values are 0.27 and0.28. They conclude, “The primary implication of these findings is that the evidence
Conference Session
Community Engagement and Humanitarian Engineering: Creating Inclusive Engineers
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Patrick John Sours, The Ohio State University; xinquan Jiang, The Ohio State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Community Engagement Division (COMMENG)
Proceedings, Austin, Texas: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2009, p. 14.455.1-14.455.13. doi: 10.18260/1-2--4846.[11] M. R. Hammer, “Additional cross-cultural validity testing of the Intercultural Development Inventory.” Jounrnal of Intercultural Relations, 2011.[12] M. J. Bennett, “Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity,” in The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication, 1st ed., Y. Y. Kim, Ed., Wiley, 2017, pp. 1– 10. doi: 10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0182.[13] E. De Graaff and W. Ravesteijn, “Training complete engineers: Global enterprise and engineering education,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 419–427, Dec. 2001, doi: 10.1080/03043790110068701.[14] B. K. Jesiek, Q. Zhu, S. E
Conference Session
Experiential Learning in ET Programs I
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Otilia Popescu, Old Dominion University; Isaac L. Flory IV, Old Dominion University; John R. Hackworth, Old Dominion University; Murat Kuzlu, Old Dominion University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology Division (ETD)
Learning, 12(5), 237-245.10. Wang, Q., Huang, C., & Quek, C. L. (2018). Students’ perspectives on the design andimplementation of a blended synchronous learning environment. Australasian Journal ofEducational Technology, 34(1).11. Szeto, E. (2014). A comparison of online/face-to-face students’ and instructor's experiences:Examining blended synchronous learning effects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116,4250-4254. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187704281400943412. https://online.odu.edu/about-us/our-experience13. Hackworth, J. & Jones, R. (2004). Assessment Methods for Comparison of On-Campus andDistance Learning Laboratory Courses in an Engineering Technology Program. Proceedings ofthe 2004 ASEE Annual
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division WIPS 3: Courses and Curricula
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrew Paul Summerfield, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Will Cashel-Cordo; Hadi Kazemiroodsari, Wentworth Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
words, why did we not skip the process of flocculation and go directly to filtering? 7. What additional steps would you take to make the water potable?ENGR 1203Module 6: Life Cycle AssessmentUse the following carbon footprint database to find the kg CO2e/kg for each ingredient.https://apps.carboncloud.com/climatehub/search?q=pizza&market=USA&sort=market%3AdescDeliverables 1. One table showing total kg CO2e/kg for each meal (three rows, one column) 2. Three pie charts, one for each meal, showing what proportion of the total impact is caused by each ingredient 3. One bar graph, showing how the total kg CO2e/kg breaks out by "phase" (agriculture, transportation, etc.) 4. Discussion