qualitative data analysis.,” in Analyzing and interpreting qualitative research: after the interview, C. Vanover, P. Mihas, and J. Saldaña, Eds., First Edition.Los Angeles: SAGE, 2022, pp. 133– 146.[32] J. Fereday and E. Muir-Cochrane, “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 80–92, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1177/160940690600500107.[33] “Entrepreneurial Mindset | Engineering Unleashed.” https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset (accessed Nov. 26, 2022).[34] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications, 2013.[35] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative
incident technique,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 327– 358, 1954, doi: 10.1037/h0061470.[32] American Society for Engineering Education, “Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2020,” Washington, DC, 2021.[33] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice, Fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2015.[34] D. J. Clandinin and F. M. Connelly, Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.[35] T. D. Allen, L. T. Eby, and E. Lentz, “Mentorship behaviors and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring programs: Closing the gap between research and practice.,” J. Appl. Psychol
the course are fairly standardundergraduate mechanics problems, they are often stated differently, and the solution paths are often q uitedifferent from what one finds in traditional textbooks. However, there are outcomes from the currentmodel that are worth noting.Engagement. The first outcome is the shift in course engagement. Creating and documenting engagementwas a big emphasis of the redesign. Engagement can take many forms, but some include providingopportunities for students to engage with the material, with each other, or with the instructors. Therecitation environment allows a more personalized interaction to happen between the faculty and eachstudent. It allows students to be more comfortable expressing what they don’t understand
U.S. Universities,” Struct. Mag., no. August, 2020.[2] S. M. Francis, “2019 NCSEA Structural Engineering Curriculum Survey Results,” Struct. Mag., pp. 32–33, 2021.[3] Q. Ulrike and H. Klaus, “Design of timber structures in civil engineering education,” in CLEM, 2019, no. 1.[4] B. Chorlton, N. Mazur, and J. Gales, “Incorporating Timber Education into Existing Accredited Engineering Programs,” in Proceedings Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference, 2019, pp. 1–8.[5] A. C. Woodard, T. P. Council, and G. N. Boughton, “TIMBER ENGINEERING EDUCATION IN AUSTRALIA,” NZ Timber Des. J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 6–14.[6] H. Daneshvar, T. Goni
on atorsional pendulum, which is used to determine the response of the semicircular canal. Thebehavior of the endolymph in the semicircular canal can be represented by a second-orderdifferential equation. The equation is given as: 𝑑2 𝑞 𝑑𝑞 (1) 𝑚 2 +𝑐 + 𝑘𝑞 = 𝑓 𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑡where q(t) is the displaced volume of endolymph, c is the damping coefficient and k is the stiffnessof the cupula. The mass of the fluid in the canal is represented as m. The applied inertial force isrepresented as f(t).The transfer function
. Toronto, ON: TheAdult Education Company, 1975.[27] Q. Liu, J. Sweeney and G. Evans, “Exploring Self-directed Learning Among EngineeringUndergraduates in the Extensive Online Instruction Environment During the COVID-19Pandemic,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. Available:https://peer.asee.org/37145, July, 2021. [Accessed Jan. 22, 2023].APPENDIX A1. Science and Environmental Policy - Modules and ReadingsModules Readings(Number of 80 min class (Recommended to review the discussion questions attached to the weeklyperiods on module) assignments before you start reading) be updated)Introduction - Introduction: class format, team
Engineering Education, 1(1).[44] Liu, Q., Sweeney, J., & Evans, G. (2021, July). Exploring Self-directed Learning Among Engineering Undergraduates in the Extensive Online Instruction Environment During the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Society for Engineering Education Virtual Annual Conference.[45] American Society for Engineering Education. (2020). Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2019. Washington, DC.[46] McCallum, F., & Price, D. (2016). Nurturing wellbeing development in education: From little things, big things grow. Routledge.[47] Verdín, D., Godwin, A., Kirn, A., Benson, L., Potvin, G. (2018). Understanding How Engineering Identity and Belongingness Predict Grit for First
Worker. In 2021 ASEE VirtualAnnual Conference Content Access.Hennecke M., Bleidorn, W., Denissen, J., and Wood, D. “A three–part framework for self–regulated personality development across adulthood.” European Journal of Personality, 2014,28(3), pp.289-299.Kim, B., Wen, R., Zhu, Q., Williams, T. and Phillips, E., 2021, March. Robots as moral advisors:the effects of deontological, virtue, and confucian role ethics on encouraging honest behavior. InCompanion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction pp. 10-18.King, P.M. and Kitchener, K.S., 2004. Reflective judgment: Theory and research on thedevelopment of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational psychologist, 39(1), pp.5-18.Koehler, J., Pierrakos, O
multiple days and recording panels or presentations provides additional flexibility to those who might have teaching or work conflicts and/or personal commitments at an event’s scheduled time, although it precludes participation in Q&A or panel discussions.● Attendance over time at the CIMC sessions has declined, a trend in keeping with reports of increased faculty exhaustion in the face of ongoing pandemic adjustments and increased task demands, especially for faculty mothers [45] as well as Zoom fatigue, which impacts women more than men [46]. A&A sessions had considerably less attendance than pre-pandemic sessions; however, the in-person sessions were better attended than the online sessions
inengineering practices.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant DRL-1742195. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.ReferencesAmerican Society for Engineering Education (2020). Framework for P-12 engineering learning. American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-100-1153-1Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Wiliam, D., & Johnson, D. (1997). Effective Teachers of Numeracy in Primary Schools: Teachers' Beliefs, Practices and Pupils' Learning.Capobianco, B., & Lehman, J. D., & Huang, Q., & Nyquist, C. (2016, June
time investment when first creating these problems is about one to two hours. Afterthey are created, they can be reused for subsequent classes with usually only minor updates (e.g.,adding clarity to the problem statement). The automated grading does save time but can generatea substantial increase in student questions. The quantity of these questions can be managed bythe following guidelines: • Provide students with a “MATLAB Grader Q & A” worksheet that contains answers to commonly asked questions regarding MATLAB Grader. • Insist that students come prepared with neatly written work describing their process instead of just their code. • Update the feedback within MATLAB Grader tests to reflect common errors or
Consumer Protection. https://datenethikkommission.de/wp-content/uploads/DEK_Gutachten_engl_bf_200121.p dfDesai, S. (2021, April). Stanford University CS 21SI: AI for Social Good. https://explorecourses.stanford.edu/search?view=catalog&filter-coursestatus-Active=on& page=0&catalog=&academicYear=20192020&q=CS%2021SI%3A%20AI%20for%20So cial%20Good&collapse=D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data Feminism. MIT Press.Ethics & Compliance Initiative (ECI). (2021). The PLUS Ethical Decision Making Model—Ethics & Compliance Toolkit. Ethics and Compliance Initiative. https
Globalized World: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 22, C. Murphy, P. Gardoni, H. Bashir, C. Harris, Jr., and E. Masad, Eds. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 229-247.[9] Q. Zhu and B. K. Jesiek, “A pragmatic approach to ethical decision-making in engineering practice: Characteristics, evaluation criteria, and implications for instruction and assessment,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 23, no. 3, 2017, pp. 663–679.[10] S. J. Hitt, C. E. P. Holles, and T. Lefton, “Integrating ethics in engineering education through multidisciplinary synthesis, collaboration, and reflective portfolios