guide the program’s overallwriting integration. Initial assessments of the EGR 4900 papers indicate that the students stillhave room for growth in their writing. However, we will not have assessments from the fullwriting integration program until 2023 when the first cohort that experienced the total integrationgraduates. Until then, we will only use the scores based on the general education writingassessment to compare the engineering students with others across campus.This is the first offering of our senior capstone design course. Therefore, we did not have anyfindings or observations except the writing requirements for the course at the time of this paper.In the senior capstone design course, each team will be completing a formal project
work will be extended and integrated with structural engineering, construction managementand other aspects of the project as the students work to complete their capstone experience. The other useful feature of the course is that it is also proving to be a convenient vehiclefor discussing or incorporating advances in technology and discussing current events. CE390 isan excellent method for introducing and evaluating some of the American Society of CivilEngineers developed Body of Knowledge outcomes that are more difficult to judge performancein with more traditional CE courses. Page 12.980.2Why teach a Site Design course? Recent
Paper ID #23931 learners. She also has extended experience in curriculum development. Dr Husanu developed laboratory activities for Measurement and Instrumentation course as well as for quality control undergraduate and graduate courses in ET Masters program. Also, she introduced the first experiential activity for Applied Mechanics courses. She is coordinator and advisor for capstone projects for Engineering Technology.Mr. Carlos Michael Ruiz, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 An Advanced Manufacturing Workshop for Enhancing Engineering and Technology EducationAbstractAn Advanced Manufacturing Workshop for educators
-centric environments for design, invention, andprototyping. In a makerspace, users work side by side on different projects within an openculture of collaboration. Makerspaces are generally equipped with traditional manufacturingequipment, such as manual mills and lathes, more advanced equipment, such as CNC-mills(Computerized Numerical Control) machine tools, and emerging rapid prototyping tools such as3D printers, along with worktables, chairs, and even couches. Similar to traditional workshops,especially larger makerspaces are divided into areas, based on the materials groups andmanufacturing methods.These spaces exist to facilitate a culture of design, invention, and prototyping. Physicalprototyping is a key activity in product development and
predominantly reflect thecenturies old traditional engineering science model. In this model the fundamental conceptsof mathematics and science are viewed as content that is prerequisite to practice anddelivered to students as abstracted cognitive instruction through a sequence of lectures,tutorials and examinations. Despite a strong demand by engineering stakeholders forincreased emphasis on engineering ability and professional competencies, there is littleopportunity within this model for these to be addressed within the types of authentic contextsthat are required if learning is to be situated as practice3. While Capstone project-baseddesign courses have found their place as culturally acceptable vehicles for many of theengineering ability and
required courses in simulation, manufacturingsystems integration, and two semesters of project management and senior design. The seniordesign projects are team-based and are frequently sponsored by industrial clients. The remainingcourses are technical electives and social science and humanities electives. This relatively openschedule was developed so that this exchange could be facilitated when the University ofMinnesota system switched from quarters to semesters.The fourth year for IE students going to Luleå requires that they take courses in simulation,automated systems integration, a team-based industry-sponsored capstone project, computerintegrated manufacturing, a technical elective, and an integrative course in Swedish language,culture, and
emphasis would shift to team presentations with a technicalemphasis. Material would be presented in class to indicate aspects of presenting and sellingtechnical ideas. The student presentations are group oriented and focus on the results of thestudents’ design efforts. In the capstone design course, ISE 4005/4006, oral communication hashistorically been emphasized from a number of different perspectives. As the student teams areinvolved in a number of meetings with their faculty advisors, the course coordinator, and thecompany contacts, basics of planning and conducting meetings are discussed. Additionally,personal interactions with people from the companies “at the shop floor level” are frequentelements of a project and communications aspects of
transform the way students are prepared for theworkforce in post-secondary programs. For example, a recent article in Forbes magazine detailedthe pioneering work in STEM education initiated at the Harvey Mudd College in 1963. Thearticle describes how the “Clinic Program” paired a small group of students with a facultyadvisor/faculty member for approximately one year. The faculty member would assign the groupof students a current challenge of a selected industry partner. The students would then attempt todevelop prototypes, create new manufacturing processes, deliver code, and analyze data toaddress the challenge. The highly successful Clinic Program has served as a model forengineering departments around the country with capstone project adoption
roles for the second vignette, a capstone design scenario. One student was designated the “Team Leader”, one the “Team Member”, and the rest were “Observers”. In this vignette, the Team Member was to express concerns about calculation results, and the Team Leader was to respond in a such a way as to promote psychological safety. During the debrief for each vignette, the Observers led the discussion by sharing what they saw that promoted psychological safety and what they saw that hindered or removed it.Methods: This project was predicated on the research question: Does teaching psychological safety improve teaming experiences for first-year students? We hypothesized that we could improve students’ team interactions by directly
variety of information technology software packages used as the modernengineering tools in the Civil Engineering program. Spreadsheets (Excel) and mathematicalprograms (MathCAD) are used in many courses and several courses use specific programs: • Site Civil Engineering Design: ArcGIS and Civil3D • Geotechnical Engineering: Slope/w • Hydrology/Hydraulics Engineering: HEC-RAS and HEC-HMS. • Advanced Mechanics of Materials: SolidWorks and Autodyn • Structural Analysis: ROBOT and REVIT • Advanced Structural Analysis: ROBOT, MASTAN, and CONWEP • Construction Management: MS Project, Google Earth, and Google SketchUp • Transportation Engineering: STREETThe intent of the Civil Engineering Program’s capstone course is to then integrate
Proceeding of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationfollowing discussion, we will cite examples from the five modules that the three authors of thispaper developed. These modules deal with computational skills in the technical area, with oralcommunication skills in the communications area, project management skills in the professionalarea, and ethical interpretation and global and societal impact skills in the ethical-societal area.Table 1. Instructional modules subdivided by skill category Technical Skills Professional Skills Communication Skills Ethical-Societal Skills Computational
grouped into four categories as shown in Table 1. Technical Skills Professional Skills Communication Skills Ethical-Societal Skills Computational Project Management Graphical Communication Contemporary Issues Design Lifelong Learning Oral Communication Ethical Interpretation Experimental Teaming Written Communication Global-Societal Impact Modeling Time Management Problem SolvingTable 1. Instructional modules subdivided by skill categoryBefore beginning to develop the actual instructional material, the developers agreed on a set ofspecification so that the modules met a series of general requirements and, perhaps
, PHPMyAdmin or by inserting SQL codedirectly in Ruby to produce custom reports. Class time could now be spent on solving databaseproblems. Issues of how to handle foreign keys and properly normalized databases could now bedealt with firsthand. RoR additionally provided complete backup and recovery processes thatcould be evaluated. Furthermore, not only Access was learned, but MySQL was introducedwhich would be much more helpful in Senior Capstone projects. The Learning Outcomes were a)learning how to bring up Access and MySQL database servers, and b) witnessing first-hand howa complete Web application functions and depends upon a robust relational database.7 INFORMATION SECURITY (ITM 470/475)The sequence of security courses, ITM 470 and ITM475
sequences and capstone courses. We standardized the EML coursework implemented inthe standard course sequence so that it could readily apply to these other courses. This involvedthe development of direct and indirect assessments for each of the 3Cs [16]. With thisdevelopment, we modified our learning objectives to meet our EML goals and created rubrics tomeasure student performance with each assessment type [17]. As it currently stands, the honorscourse sequence also consists of two courses where the second course (ENGR 1282) is designedto provide students with the knowledge of engineering fundamentals as well. Much like ENGR1182, ENGR 1282 is divided into two segments: (1) Graphics and (2) Design project where thedesign project is primarily how
agreed to the programrequirements. These requirements included: • Attend and actively participate in a mandatory introductory meeting and working session; • Attend and actively participate in a minimum of four of nine working sessions in June/July; • Attend and present the final products at a mandatory capstone program in September; • Complete any “homework” assigned during the program; • Prepare these final deliverables by August 1, 2017: o Revised gateway course learning and project outcomes; o An implementation plan that will help to meet the outcomes; o An assessment plan to determine if the desired outcomes have been met; • Implement and assess the course improvements in the next
demonstrate theskills they acquired in the class. In addition to designing and building dynamic data-base drivenweb sites in the course, each student also built and secured his or her own web server. They thenshowcased all the skills they learned in the course by building an on-line portfolio illustratingwhat they had learned in the course.The faculty involved immediately saw the potential of the portfolio assignment and developed itas a semester-long senior ‘capstone’ project with a primary goal of showcasing technical skillsstudents acquired during their undergraduate education. Specifically, it provided students with anopportunity to communicate and demonstrate their Internet, programming, and database skills.As the portfolio project developed
) coupled with several engineering design projects/competitions (bottlerockets, solar cars, bridge building, catapults, hovercrafts, and robotics) help students see therelevance of their summer STEM courses. The percentage of students who participate in theprogram, attend college, and graduate in STEM fields has been tracked throughout the programshistory. The success of the program in attracting above average numbers of young men andwomen to pursue engineering and other STEM fields is presented and related to the programmethods. Several key factors influencing the success of the program, which has grown to serveover 350 students per year locally, are identified presented as a model that can be duplicated inan effort to increase the number of
unified block to be competitive in the new global market.Some of the opportunities are:Multinational ProjectsSo far, just the undergraduate global design projects have been considered. There is room formore advance and challenging international projects that can be carried out among institutions inthe Americas and they include:1. Capstone or senior design projects: Integrated teams can be formed where a single multinational team solves the problem together. These are usually a semester or two semester long projects and might involve some traveling to meet with your partner in the foreign country. Contrary to the global design projects for freshman and sophomore, these projects demand a higher level of student and faculty commitment and
, and problem solving discourse among students, faculty, and practitioners. Dr. Olewnik is also the Director of Experiential Learning for the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information and Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical and Biological En- gineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Educa
amount of copper in the crushed car during recycling. This was achieved with the useof inexpensive breakaway connectors at each point where the power line branched off toa component. Telephone conference calls with the industry professionals providedimportant context and background information for the project.This was a highly successful senior design project which can serve as a model in anumber of pedagogical areas including socially relevant design problems,interdisciplinary team building, interacting with industrial professionals and serving as anall around capstone experience to a student’s undergraduate engineering scienceeducation. Page
members of Marwa Village. The conclusion was that thecommunity had the desire and organizational capacity to be a strong partner for aninternational water development project. A multi-disciplinary team was assembled, traveled toMarwa in May 2016, and established the foundation that would evolve into a multi-year, multi-phase community development project: Maji Marwa. The Maji Marwa project was introduced to students as a capstone project option in theundergraduate civil engineering program and has expanded to collaboration amongst twouniversities, five colleges and participation from over 175 students. The rainwater harvestinginitiatives goal was to collaborate with in-country partners to construct three rainwaterharvesting (RWH) systems
humanistic qualities though social history education as amethod of encouraging critical thinking methods and a spirit of scientific inquiry. Condoor(2004)7 stressed the importance of teaching history of technology and outlined a method ofintegrating it into the framework of a capstone design project. This project provided students ameans to understand the evolutionary nature of technology, the impact of engineering on society,and the role of engineering failures. Condoor’s approach helped students to understand thehistorical contingency central to the evolution of emerging technologies.The American Historical Association (Stearns, 1998)8 asserts: “History helps us understandchange and how the society we live in came to be.” Teaching history of
Interdisciplinary Freshman Experience Chuck Cone, Steve Chadwick, Tom Gally, Jim Helbling, and Randall Shaffer College of Engineering Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Prescott, ArizonaAbstractThis paper summarizes a cooperative effort undertaken by the Aeronautical, Electrical, andComputer Engineering Departments at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University that led to thedevelopment of a team-taught interdisciplinary engineering course offered to incomingfreshmen. The authors discuss the inception of the project, the development of the coursecontent, and the lessons learned from the first year of teaching the
. Thus, in the spring of 2001, community service-learning concept was introduced into two Manufacturing Systems Engineering senior courses atCalifornia State University, Northridge (CSUN). In the first community service-learning project,students shared their knowledge and skills gained in a senior level course, Facilities Planning andDesign, with a small company located within a federal enterprise zone. The second communityservice-learning project integrated a senior design class with a local high school as part of theFIRST (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology) robotics organization.Engineering students mentored Granada Hills High School (GHHS) senior students in building arobot to compete in both regional and national
]. Between accreditation requirements, general education courses andother school/department policies and obligations, there is a very limited number of credits thatcan be dedicated to classes that focus mainly on specific industry code, standards and commonpractices.To approach this problem, educators typically respond by introducing industry standards andpractices through projects/case studies in higher-level courses (usually 300/400 levels) and, morecommonly, in capstone projects and internships [11]. However, the authors believe that thisapproach may limit students' exposure to industry standards and practices to only the onesdirectly related to their projects. Moreover, students may sometimes confuse industry standardsand codes with textbook
various forms, including independent study and senior capstone projects.In this research, we present our initial progress on a unique prosthetic hand project which is carriedout by a group of undergraduate students from mechanical engineering and biomedical engineeringbased on student interests, faculty expertise, and available resources. Despite today'sadvancements in prosthetic technology, prosthetic rejection still stands as the main obstacle in thefield of prosthetics. A study conducted by the Medical University of Vienna over a period of twentyyears shows that the rejection rate across all levels of upper limb amputation was 44% [2]. Anothersurvey conducted by Bloorview Research Institute over a twenty-six years period, found thatrejection
Paper ID #11559e-Learning Modules for Improving Lifelong Learning AbilityDr. Michele Miller, Michigan Technological University Dr. Michele Miller is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan Technological University. She teaches classes on manufacturing and does research in engineering education with particular interest in hands-on ability, lifelong learning, and project-based learning.Dr. Sheryl A. Sorby, Ohio State University Dr. Sheryl Sorby is currently a Professor of STEM Education at The Ohio State University and was re- cently a Fulbright Scholar at the Dublin Institute of Technology in Dublin, Ireland. She is
engineering design with writing (primarily), but secondarilyspeaking and drawing (free-hand and CAD); there are now in the implementation stagesnew capstone-level courses combining engineering design with speaking (primarily), andsecondarily writing and prototyping. The pioneer department to do this is BiomedicalEngineering (BME), and the second department to join in this year is IndustrialEngineering and Management Sciences. An indication that this evolution represents morevalue-adding to our educational experience is the fact that three of the four college-wideawards for capstone projects last year went to BME projects.The other emerging development is the formation of a new organizational unit of theMcCormick School, the Institute for Design and
] and portfolio-based additions to capstone courses at the senior level.For the past two years, a research and teaching team in the chemical engineering department at NorthCarolina State University has been iteratively designing and implementing a junior-level writing andspeaking module as part of a larger NSF grant.[4] The purpose of this module is to provide instruction intechnical writing, oral presentation, teaming, and project management skills within the context of thelaboratory course. This serves as a precursor to a similar senior capstone course that includes instructionin multidisciplinary teaming.Design featuresThe Teaming, Writing, and Speaking (TWS) instruction series is a discipline-specific module andconsultation series that was
AC 2011-1204: IMPLEMENTING A CEAB GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES BASEDCO-OP WORK TERM CURRICULUMAnne Marie Coolen, Dalhousie University Ms. Coolen has been the director of the Engineering and Computer Science Co-operative Education Program for 22 years. She is a former president of the Canadian Association for Co-operative Education (CAFCE) and secretary the CAFCE Accreditation Council. She has been spearheading a project in the Faculty of Engineering to enhance the educational value of co-operative education for three years in an effort to shift the program’s focus from placement outcomes to learning outcomes. Page