student-sponsored teaching/mentorship award in 2009 and led a two-year pilot project to introduce Blended Learning into Engineering Capstone Design Courses. He is a co-author with Marnie V. Jamieson on a number of recent journal, book, and conference contributions on engineering design education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 CATME vs. ITP Metrics - Which one should I use for design team development and assessment? Marnie V. Jamieson and John M. Shaw Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta mvjamies@ualberta.ca and jmshaw@ualberta.ca AbstractThe characteristics of high
, theirperformances on the senior design capstone oral presentation were compared to those of studentswho had not taken ME 419. The senior design oral presentation is given by each senior designteam (4-6 students per team) in a celebratory event, Senior Design Exposition, at the end of theacademic year. Students, faculty, staff, industrial representatives, and other guests attend thisevent to view and support students’ design projects. These participants give feedback on each Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Conference Copyright © 2013, American Society for Engineering Education
studies at three institutions: California PolytechnicState University, San Luis Obispo; Missouri University of Science and Technology; andTennessee Technological University.California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly)Written by Thomas Katona, Assistant Professor, Biomedical EngineeringDescription of Innovative Entrepreneurial ProgrammingCal Poly received an initial course development grant from VentureWell that started in August2015. The grant was focused on developing a yearlong interdisciplinary and entrepreneurialsenior design capstone sequence. The course was to include students from the colleges ofengineering and business, and was focused on student-initiated entrepreneurial projects, andspecifically potentially high
. • Plan a multidisciplinary capstone senior design project course for all departments in the College of Engineering to engage computing intensive disciplines with other engineering disciplines. • Create a junior year multidisciplinary project that relies on extensive collaboration with computing intensive disciplines. • Initiate formal computing concentrations in select engineering departments.In addition, a primary thrust of Year 3 will be on summarizing the results of the first two years ofthe project and preparing for an undergraduate computing education transformation plan. Effortsof the community that are successfully implemented at this university will be integrated intomodels that can be replicated at other
, or dispersed researchers in a variety of disciplines located atinstitutions on different continents. The collaboration may be of students in a capstone course ora blend of student researchers and faculty within a research group. The combination of thoseinvolved in a research project can be endless.In engineering, the momentum toward innovation often promotes a collaborative mindset andenvironment. More specifically, in engineering education, the nature of the field (i.e., living atthe border of multiple disciplines) encourages and sometimes necessitates collaboration. Eventhough engineering education now has degree-granting programs, an opportunity and a need tofoster collaboration among emerging scholars exists and is made evident by the
CYBR C280 Advanced DFIR Capstone 3 Total 18The project has picked up momentum since late 2020 when a lack of resources for labdevelopment caused some delays in progress. The first four courses have been offered, which hasprovided for student feedback and assessment of learning outcomes. The final steps will be tofinalize course content for all six courses and then to disseminate model course content to otherinterested colleges and universities to adapt and adopt for their institutions.3.2. Approach to curriculum developmentAn initial review of other similar academic programs was conducted to include the AAS inCyber Forensics from Union County College in
.[9] J. McManus, P. Costello, “Project-based learning in computer science: a student and researchadvisor's perspective,” Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 34(3), 38–46, 2019.[10] N. Ismail, N. A. Aziz, C. K. Hong, M. Z. Zainal, Assessing Teamwork Value in Project-Based Learning of Capstone Project Course. Atlantis Press, 2020.https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200921.025[11] C. Cortázar, M. Nussbaum, J. Harcha, D. Alvares, F. López, J. Goñi, V. Cabezas.“Promoting Critical Thinking in an Online, Project-Based Course.” Computers in HumanBehavior 119, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106705[12] K. Kuladinithi, L. Fisser, K. Fuger, D. Stolpmann, Z. Vatandas, A. Timm-Giel, A. Dürkop.“Online teaching of project-based learning courses
Paper ID #34926Design and Manufacturability of Medical Ventilators from the Perspectiveof a Global Automotive FootprintDr. H. Bryan Riley, Clemson University H. Bryan Riley Ph.D., joined Clemson University in July 2019 and currently teaches controls and man- ufacturing processes courses. He has taught courses in signal processing, electrical communication sys- tems, EE capstone design, electric machines, adaptive signal processing, and hybrid and electric vehicles. Riley, who spent his early career in the automotive industry, has managed multi-disciplined and global en- gineering teams responsible for introducing advanced
important objective is to improve and re-develop seven currentindustrial training modules covering prototyping, machine tool calibration, precision metrology,offline and online quality control, remote monitoring and supervision of machining and roboticassembly processes, and quality assurance. This activity is currently undergoing, its progressbeing highlighted in the sections below. We will develop industry-supplied and coordinatedprojects, as well as capstone projects for collaborative student teams. The newly-equippedlaboratories will be networked for cross-institutional use between Drexel University andaffiliated community colleges. The heart of this project is the hardware and software described inthe following sections of the report. The
Session 2309 A Series of Design Courses in Biomedical Engineering Frank J. Fronczak, John G. Webster University of Wisconsin-MadisonAbstractThe curriculum for the BSBME degree at the University of Wisconsin-Madison requires a seriesof six design courses. Students begin in their third semester with prerequisites of calculus,physics and chemistry. We solicit real projects from faculty in biomedical engineering and thelife sciences. Groups of two or three students interact with these clients to define thespecifications for their projects. Instructors teach them design principles and
to work in groups to complete projects, which fosterscollaboration and teamwork skills. They help to prepare students for their future careers byexposing them to the safety training, tools, equipment, and processes that they will encounter intheir future professional engineering practice.Since 2000, there have been reported research on exploring virtual laboratory in engineering andscience. A virtual engineering laboratory is presented in [3] for hybrid electric vehiclestarter/alternator experimentation. A virtual laboratory environment is developed in [4] for anelectronic circuits course. Using interactive TV and the internet, Gurocak [5] created a newapproach for distance delivery of a Manufacturing Automation laboratory course. Compared
Engineering DesignProgramConstanza Miranda, PhD 1*, Elizabeth Logsdon, PhD 1, Amadea Martino Smith 11 Johns Hopkins University, Biomedical Engineering DepartmentABSTRACTThis is a work in progress. To instruct design abilities in undergraduate engineering students, it iscommon for programs to engage in problem-based learning projects. In addition, project-based instructionis often done with students in teams and these teams have formal or informal leadership structures. In thiscontext, the success of the student project is usually attributed to the mindset of the leader, managementstyles, team dynamics that are cultivated by the leader, as well as a clear team structure and goals. Thisvertically operating leadership model is manifested as an
UIC1 include i) Multi-university and Multi-company Collaborations, ii)Single-university and Multi-company Collaborations, iii) Multi-university and Single-companyCollaborations, and iv) Single-university and Single-company Collaborations. Although eachform serves a different purpose and requires a different scale of supporting infrastructure,collaborations on all levels of education and research are beneficial for the ecosystem.Traditionally, U-I partnerships include the following activities: • Classroom Activities: guest lectures by industry representatives, industry supported class projects and capstone projects; • Seminars: joint seminars for faculty, students, industry professionals and leaderships; • Field Visits: tours
. C. (2014) ‘Curriculum Design in the Middle Years’, in Johri, A. and Olds, B. M.(eds) Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,pp. 181–200. doi: DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.014.Nasir, M., Kleinke, D. K. and McClelland, M. (2016) ‘Multidisciplinary patient-centered capstone seniordesign projects’, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. New Orleans,Louisiana: ASEE Conferences. doi: 10.18260/p.25764.Nezafati, M., Chua, M. and LeDoux, J. M. (2020) ‘Work in progress: A case study of integrating inclusiveengineering skills into a middle-years biomedical engineering course via model-based reasoning’, ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. Virtual On
Undergraduate Studies and Professor of Instruction in Mechan- ical Engineering at the Temple University College of Engineering. He received his Bachelor of Textile Engineering from Georgia Tech and his Sc.D. in Mechanical Engineering from MIT. He is a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. He was responsible for re-imagining and leading the college-wide capstone senior design course Currently he is the College -wide Coordinator of ABET ac- creditation. Prior to joining Temple University in 2014 he was Dean of the School of Engineering and Textiles at Philadelphia University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 WIP: Rethinking How We Teach in Engineering
they may be able to trackthe impact of the integrated project as students’ progress through the curriculum.References 1 Striebig, B., Ogundipe, A., and Morton, S. 2014. Lessons in implementing sustainability courses into the engineering curriculum. 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 15-18th, 2014, Indianapolis, IN. 2 Striebig, B. 2016. Applying US EPA sustainability criteria to capstone design. Engineering for Sustainability. ASEE SE Section Annual Conference, March 13-15, 2016. Tuscaloosa, AL. 3 Striebig, B. and Morton, S. 2016. A Sustainability Indicators Based Curriculum. Engineering for Sustainability. ASEE SE Section Annual Conference, March 13-15, 2016. Tuscaloosa, AL. 4 Striebig
the operationalization of LMMI in thecontext of EML which will inform future curriculum development, particularly for large first-year engineering design and project-based learning courses.References[1] A. J. Dutson, R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, and C. D. Sorensen, “A review of literature on teaching engineering design through project-oriented capstone courses,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 1997.[2] D. Clive et al., “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning,” J. Eng. Educ., no. January, pp. 103–120, 2005.[3] C. Charyton and J. A. Merrill, “Assessing general creativity and creative engineering design in first year engineering students,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 145–156, 2009.[4
programming was done as a part of senior electricalengineering capstone project at the University of Southern Maine. It has been used in thecharacterization of MEMS Resonator Gas Sensors under different temperature and gascompositions. It is currently being improved by incorporating USB based data acquisition boardsto replace some of the expensive GPIB interfaced instruments to reduce the overall cost of thesystem, and make the system compact and portable. It is the hope of the authors that this systemwill lend itself to be reproduced and adapted for other uses in laboratories and applicationsrequiring an inexpensive and portable means of computer controlled test systems
involved in develop- ing and facilitating the first-year engineering program at ONU. He earned his PhD from the University of Colorado Boulder where his research focused on pre-engineering education and project-based learning.Mr. Bruce Wellman, Olathe Northwest High School Bruce Wellman is a National Board Certified Teacher (NBCT, Chemistry) who teaches Engineering Chemistry as part of Engineering Academy at Olathe Northwest High School in Olathe, KS and serves as a Co-Principal Investigator on an NSF funded (DR K-12) research project entitled ”Building Informed Designers”. Wellman is a member of ASEE’s Board of Directors’ Committee on P-12 Engineering Educa- tion. Wellman completed his B.S. degree in general science
Paper ID #17396Approaches to Entrepreneurship and Leadership Development at an Engi-neering UniversityMrs. Galina Burylina, Kazan National Research Technological UniversityDr. Phillip Albert Sanger, Purdue University - West Lafayette Dr. Sanger is a professor in the School of Engineering Technology in the College of Technology of Purdue University. His focus and passion is real world, industry based, senior capstone experiences both domes- tically and internationally. He has successfully developed this area at Purdue and at Western Carolina University. Prior to his career in academia, Dr. Sanger had a successful 30 year
worked for Lockheed Palo Alto Research Laboratories prior to coming to Taylor Universityin 1994. He is currently a Professor of Engineering and Physics at Taylor University. Some of the courses that he regu- larly has taught include Principles of Engineering, Intro to Electronics, Statics, Advanced Electronics, Jr. Engineering Projects, FE Review, Control Systems, Fundamentals of Space Flight Systems, Astronomy, and Sr. Capstone Sequence. He enjoys mentoring undergraduate students in aerospace, sensors, and energy-related research projects. Some of the research areas include spacecraft nano-satellite technologies, satellite payload instrumenta- tion, High Altitude research Platform (HARP) experiments, wave particle
terms of seeing what types of STEMefforts have been previously funded. This review may also provide contact information for othergrantees that may be willing to share their proposal development experiences.Proposal PreparationHere we list some, hopefully obvious, but often overlooked issues in the proposal preparationprocess. This is not intended to be an all inclusive list, but rather a compilation of some of themore important facets of the proposal preparation process. 1. Project goals – The project goals must be clearly articulated and consistent with the solicitation objectives. These goals must include rational development, evaluation and assessment. Important ideas must be clearly delineated in the proposal. NSF program
identify business and engineering issues associated withcomplex business problems with a strong engineering component.ENGR/BUSI 3520: Integrating Business and Engineering Theories with Practice(Semester 2. First offered in Spring 2002).BUSI 3530: Entrepreneurship and E-Commerce, (first offered in spring 2002)BUSI 4540: Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation(Semester 3. First offering fall 2002). Selected case studies included in this course are:ATT Automotive, BMW AG: The digital auto project, Duriron: Cell manufacturing,Boeing 777 development, Campbell Soup Company, Spin Master Toys (A), PlusDevelopment Corporation, and Quantum Corporation.ENGR/BUSI 4970 and 4980: Capstone Project I (1 credit) and II (3 credits)(Semesters 3 and 4
Interdisciplinary Environment Along with Media Art and Marketing, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 2007 3. Todd, R. H., Magleby S. P., Sorenson C. D., Swan B. R., and Anthony D. K.: A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America, Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), 165 – 174, 1995 4. Amon C., Wesner J., and Hoff R.: Identifying and Implementing Projects for a Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Projects Course at Carnegie Mellon, Proceedings of the Page 22.1181.7 ASEE Annual Conference, 2006 5. Frei F. X.: The Four Things a Service Business Must Get
, doi: 10.1109/te.2007.906894.[5] M. D. Koretsky, C. Kelly, and E. Gummer, "Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially Situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories," Journal of Engineering Education, Article vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 540-573, 2011, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00026.x.[6] C. M. Cunningham and G. J. Kelly, "Epistemic practices of engineering for education," Science Education, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 486-505, 2017, doi: 10.1002/sce.21271.[7] M. D. Koretsky, E. J. Nefcy, S. B. Nolen, and A. B. Champagne, "Connected epistemic practices in laboratory‐based engineering design projects for large‐course instruction
Paper ID #5945Work-in-Progress: Teaching Responsibility for Safety in Bioengineering De-signDr. Denny C. Davis P.E., Washington State University Dr. Denny Davis is emeritus professor of Chemical and Bioengineering at Washington State University. He has taught bioengineering multidisciplinary design for approximately a decade, with recent attention given to entrepreneurial projects. Dr. Davis recently co-developed instructional materials on Prevention through Design in Bioengineering for the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). He is a Fellow of ASEE.Dr. Howard P Davis, Washington State University
instruments;this main objective encompasses the following specific ones: 1) to use systematic methods forthe development of devices: specifications, analysis, simulation, implementation and testing; 2)to have in consideration safety, noise and power consumption; 3) to use CAD tools for schematiccapture, simulation and PCB routing; 4) to understand the basic configurations and specificationsof medical power supplies and 5) to write microcontroller DSP software for real time acquisition,storage and transmission of biomedical data. MEDELAB is the most advanced required course for BME students following electricalconcentration. The course serves as a sort of capstone, consolidating the various skills studentshave acquired over their studies in the
Paper ID #42092GIFTS: Improved Team Skill Development through a Semester-Long TeamworkReportDr. Melissa M. Simonik, State University of New York at Binghamton Melissa received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Union College (Schenectady, NY) in 2014 and her M.Eng. degree in Biomedical Engineering from Cornell University (Ithaca, NY) in 2015. Melissa started at Binghamton University in 2015 as a Mechanical Engineering doctoral student. She served as a teaching assistant (TA) for Watson Capstone Projects for two years. She continued as a TA for the Engineering Design Division in 2017 where she taught both Introduction to
) master’s degrees, there isa need for students to assume control of their personalized educational journeys from programselection to becoming lifelong learners. Acquisition of transferable professional skills andexploration of careers through experiential learning are widely promoted among many master’s(and undergraduate) programs as desirable features of IDPs. In practice, transferable skills havesector specific definitions and delivery of training is variable in quality and modes. Experientiallearning has a wide range of manifestations from individual internships/apprenticeships atcompanies, capstone projects which are common in engineering, and group industrial projects thatmay be done at the university. Inclusion of transferable skills
school students to biomedical engineering through summer camps,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 24–809.[6] E. G. Meyer and M. Nasir, “Fostering the entrepreneurial mindset through the development of multidisciplinary learning modules based on the” quantified self” social movement,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 26–794.[7] M. Nasir, E. G. Meyer, and Y. Li, “Work in progress: Providing diverse opportunities for capstone projects in biomedical engineering,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 26–1756.