limited to students enrolled in oneengineering course.The first administered survey, intended for Cohort 1, consisted of ten open-ended questions. Question 1: Mention the importance of delegating responsibilities and meeting frequently with your group members? Question 2: What did you learn about leadership roles and communication in a group setting? Question 3: How did you manage different ideas and opinions in the group? Question 4: What were the challenges of working in a group setting? Question 5: What was the planning process of developing and completing your project ideas? Question 6: After your experiences with the project, would you prefer group work, or independent work, and why? Question 7: Do you feel your ability
; • an overview of the process by which this task committee has reviewed the current CEPC and formulated the update; • the current draft CEPC update (as of February 2021); • a detailed explanation and justification of the proposed CEPC changes; • the task committee’s plan to solicit, obtain, and assimilate feedback on the draft CEPC update from a broad array of stakeholders; and • a summary of the remaining tasks required to complete the criteria development and approval process, along with the associated timeline.The authors of this paper are currently serving as the Chair, Secretary, and ASCE Staff contactfor the ASCE Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee.BackgroundSince 2002, the American Society of Civil
. Contact Hours: 2 Lecture, 2 Lab. ENGR 400 - Engineering Capstone I - Senior engineering project selection, planning, and development. Emphasis will be placed on defining project requirements, developing project work breakdown structure, conceptual designs, and working prototypes. 1 Lecture, 4 Lab. ENGR 450 - Engineering Capstone II - Senior engineering project design, development, fabrication, and testing. Emphasis will be placed on iterative design processes, project management and execution, fabrication and testing. 1 Lecture, 4 Lab.The PBL sequence of courses provided the participants with an opportunity to learn projectmanagement, technical communication, teaming, and problem-solving skills while
Project for Civil Engineering Freshmen to Enhance Their Entrepreneurial MindsetIntroduction In a 1972 article entitled, “Mickey Mouse for Mayor!” [1] Peter Blake said, “…it is WaltDisney Productions, and not our innumerable U.S city planning agencies and experts, that hasreally created the first, great, vibrant New Towns in America.” Walt Disney Imagineering,which is responsible for the design and construction of Disney projects, seems to understand thedesign process better than most. One might say they are particularly entrepreneurial in theirmindset and approach. They exhibit curiosity and creativity; they connect various disciplines toaccomplish major tasks; and they undoubtedly create value with nearly every project
excerpts of studentresponses.In addition to reporting on the research question itself, this paper will serve as a process guide foranalysis of a small set of qualitative data in the context of chemical engineering education. Theintent is to make thematic analysis more accessible for faculty who might otherwise not considerthis approach in pedagogical work.IntroductionLaboratory courses are often the first, and sometimes only, place where undergraduate ChemicalEngineering students encounter real Chemical Engineering equipment and work in a large-scalelaboratory environment. Beyond technical and sensory experience, capstone laboratory alsoaffords students the ability to practice other critical skills, such as safety, experimental planning
categories were assessed using hours per week, such ascommunity hours, supervised hours, and special access hours. It also included focus and plans toexpand, a unique look at a makerspace's growth.Compared to existing literature, the goal of the proposed novel taxonomy is not to be used as adirect, objective ranking system. However, the proposed dimensions and categories would leadto the creation of a well-defined vocabulary to help identify the commonality and differencesacross various makerspaces. For example, research focusing on a makerspaces' contributions inthe development of leadership qualities, aspects of the culture category would likely be weightedhigher than others. A different research effort, such as the impact on local
faculty provided some wonderful insights about how theytaught their courses and where the library could fit into that picture. However, as the authorserves as the liaison to engineering, not business, a similar study with engineering faculty at UBwas planned. Since every interview conducted with business faculty had been a brand newacquaintance, the author aimed to interview engineering faculty who had never requested alibrary resources guest lecture in their classes. This study intended to better understand how thelibrary and the engineering librarian, the author of this paper, could better support faculty in theirteaching, even if library resource instruction was not a direct part of the course.Literature ReviewExploring how engineering faculty
Case-Based Learning: A Creative Experience in Comparison to Traditional Teaching Methods Waddah Akili Geotechnical EngineeringA b s t r a c tThis paper describes the steps taken in planning, developing, and executing a case study/ casehistory course in geotechnical/ foundation engineering at an international university. The paper ed : a ab e a ec e a a ed a ; e a a ecourse; and the results of evaluating the effectiveness of this approach versus traditionallecturing. Problems and challenges that could arise when offering the course for the first time arealso addressed. Embedded in this
their projects, which they pitched inNovember. At that time, they were in a retrospective phase and working towards theirimplementation plan. In December, all teams had to submit a storyboard of a completedvisualization of their museum design, with a draft of all content, and justification for all designdecisions. Teams built their projects in January and February, and installed the final display inmid-March. Project planning Project implementation September March Project start October November December January February Project end Interview #1
Paper ID #31532Work-in-Progress: Investigating student growth through amultidisciplinary qualifying project of an interactive ball wall displayto support Pre-K STEAM learning at a community early education and carecenterMs. Jessica Anne Rosewitz P.E., Worcester Polytechnic Institute Jessica has been interested in engineering education since her undergraduate days. She participated in the NSF PIEE Project, designing and implementing engineering lesson plans in a local Worcester 2nd grade classroom. Now, each year she hosts a high school junior for a week, demonstrating what it’s like in a research laboratory. During the summer
: Community ofInquiry Framework, Tuckman’s Model of Teamwork, and assessmentmethodologies. The idea is to simulate an industrial experience in a modularapproach by introducing a structured weekly meeting to support the T&Lpedagogy used and to accomplish this without sacrificing the technical content inthe course. Furthermore, these modules include team building exercises alongwith a special leadership role that rotates weekly. A plan for implementation isdiscussed in this paper. Overall, the proposed OLT framework focusses onemulating an industrial teamwork environment in the university setting to add tostudent experience. It can be used by the wider academic community as a guidefor designing engaging online courses comprising of teamwork and
concepts and items introduced. All SURI mentors presented their research plan on the first day of the summer research. Students either singly or in groups researched their problems. As shown in Table 3, we had 5 teams and 4 individual researchers. In fact, except groups 6, 8, and 9, other individual researchers are just changed the data. Groups 3, 4, and 5 essentially applied deep learning to their own data on air quality, safety, and traffic parameters. Each week, the students were introduced to new machine learning topics, participated in update meetings, and a Friday journal meeting with all SURI participants to present their progress and see the other teams’ progress. Students
Analysis Plan, Health and Safety Plan, Quality Assurance ProjectPlan, and a Project Work Plan) is provided. The course is also an opportunity to provideinformation to the students regarding professional development activities (e.g., resumes, careerplanning). Faculty personnel provide limited formal presentations and function more in the roleof “Team Supervisors”.Table 1: Generic Syllabus for Fall Pre-Capstone CourseWeek Class Topic1 1 Personality tests Faculty Presentation - Personality types 2 Guest Speaker - Career Services Information Faculty Presentation - Introduction of Spring Capstone Project2 3 Faculty Presentation
work15 in an environment that mimics the actual construction management process. ¾ To integrate within the revised course the following topics: Construction Terminology and Accreditation, Ethical Dilemmas, Resume and Career Plan, Engineering and Tech Expo (visit and summary paper), Professional & Trade Organizations, and Guest Speakers.MethodologyThe basic methodology for the development and delivery of the revised CM&E 111 is presentedbelow. ¾ The author attended the ACCE2 Mid-Year Meeting held in Phoenix (February 2012) to discuss first-year construction management courses with construction management program directors at the Baccalaureate Program Chairs Meeting. Approximately forty- five (45) ACCE
modules. Thesesubmissions included a community needs statement (Why do we need a new library? Who arethe users? etc.), a site plan, a depiction of the exterior of the building, a sustainability plan, afloor plan and a structural plan. Students were not asked to design any elements for the structuralplan, but to do enough calculations to demonstrate that the design was feasible throughestimation of loads and rough checks of member sizes. The primary deliverable was a 20 to 25-minute presentation by each group. Students’ physical submission included the presentationslides and supporting documentation, as well as a two-page letter to the client describing how theproposed design satisfies the goals of safety, sustainability, style and society
lower-level undergraduate students. Forthe last three years, we have recruited sophomore students for president positions, first byappointment, and later by officer elections. These lower-class presidents do not have as muchexperience as senior students or graduate students in the computing fields. They do not have thesame academic and career planning pressure as senior and graduate students, however, they wereenthusiastic and energetic. They were able to recruit sufficient number of officers, expand thegroup, and organize events.The executive board of WiCSE has evolved from four positions (president, vice president,secretary, treasurer) in 2014 to eight positions in 2018. Below is the list of officers and theirmain responsibilities
and resources that enable them to succeed. Thisincludes time and task management, assistance with planning an academic roadmap as well asinformation on co-curricular and extra-curricular activities that could develop one’s portfolio as achemical engineer, such as research, internships, co-ops, study abroad and (chemical)engineering clubs. Finally, the curriculum does not typically provide early information on thesteps necessary to prepare for one’s career. Failure to understand the answers to such questionscan result in students dropping the major, struggling academically, failing to make a connectionwith peers and resources, and facing challenges when applying for jobs due to inadequate careerpreparation.To address this gap in the curriculum
, students get multiple chances to experience that transformational change. A singleterm capstone course might provide this, but often it is more discouraging than encouragingbecause things don’t always go as the students plan, and there is not enough time for anotheriteration. Three years of teaming increase the chance of a base hit, instead of either striking outon the full swing or bunting because it is safe.1.3 Why teach innovation?There are several reasons why it is critical to teach the innovation process. First, innovation isabout applying ideas and knowledge to have a real impact in the societal unit. It is throughinnovation that engineering and business students can truly improve our health, welfare, andprosperity. Second, by producing
. Observations of participants while implementing the new mathematics curriculum. 3. Focus group interview of fourth grade teachers during a collaborative planning session. 4. Written reactions to the program by participants after completing the new mathematics curriculum.The use of multiple forms of data aided in maintaining credibility and validity during the courseof this research. Each form of data may have strengths and weaknesses. By utilizing so manyforms, these weaknesses can be accounted for within the study15,17. Due to the nature of the elementary school schedule, not all teachers could be observedbefore teaching Math Out of the Box. There were, however, enough pre-observations collectedto identify themes among
SIGGRAPH. Currently she serves as Executive Vice President and as Vice President of Research of the Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of Engineering Institutions; Member-at-Large on the Board of the Minorities in Engineering Division and Secretary/Treasurer of the International Division of the American Society for Engineering Education; and is on the Executive Committee and Strategic Planning Committee of the newly formed International Federation of Engineering Education Societies. Her email is petrie@fau.eduClement Sankat, University of the West Indies Dr. Clement Sankat is the Dean of Engineering at University of West Indies, Trinidad & Tobago and is Regional Vice President of the
Baylor University’s Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) presented to theSouthern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). Faculty were given the opportunity todevelop residential learning communities for incoming freshmen that revolve around a theme.The topic of energy, and its associated societal, political, environmental and economic threads,was submitted by the authors and eventually selected for development into a course that is beingoffered for the first time last fall. A total of 28 freshmen from a wide diversity of disciplinesvoluntarily signed up for the course and will remain in it for up to four consecutive semesters.The paper examines the structure of this course and our assessment goals.The Case for Energy EducationPeople often assume
design:design for development vs. design for a well-defined problem.II. Brazil Course BackgroundThe purpose of this course was to promote effective, virtual and in-person international studentcollaboration in the undergraduate engineering and business design curricula using the theme ofsustainable product design. The goal was to create a course for which University of Pittsburghengineering and business students design, construct prototypes, and create business plans for newtechnologies, using sustainability as a framework, directly with students from the University ofCampinas in Brazil, for Brazilian and U.S. markets. That is, this course addressed the productrealization process in the context of sustainability, especially for the developing world, in
building program for current women engineering students. During the2006/07 academic year, WE@RIT hosted over 1500 participants in their various programofferings with the support of 175 people, most of whom were volunteers.The organization and its programming flourish using a managed resource strategy in a climatewhere funding is limited. Student and faculty volunteers and/or student employees performmuch of the effort involved in designing and administering various programs. A uniqueleadership structure allows a faculty member through work plan adjustment to serve as theprogram’s executive director while a full-time coordinator handles daily program activities. Inorder to run the organization using resources effectively, the group created overall
the Executive Committee of the Applied Science Accreditation Commission of ABET. His current research interests are in nanofabrication, enterprise resource planning, software applications for ERP and supply chain, technology policy and manufacturing education. Page 14.1036.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Role of Manufacturing Programs in Engineering Workforce Development V. Raju, Ph.D. Professor, Manufacturing Engineering Technology Director, Science and Technology Programs ( raju@farmingdale.edu
division ismanaged by a faculty member who role plays as a division manager. This paper describes the piloted junior level Path to Synthesis course, called EGR386 Engineering Design III - The Methods, which is vertically integrated with thesophomore course, EGR 286 Engineering Design II - The Process. The junior courseemphasizes analytical engineering skills along with sophisticated project managementtechniques including subcontract management. Written and oral communication skillsand topics on professionalism and ethics are also addressed. Greater emphasis is placedon rigorous planning and scheduling, cost estimation and economics, and coordination ofefforts between: the Design II and III teams, the Design III students and the customer,and
bring to the forefront the urgentneed for incorporating home and culture in their educational experiences.The role of teachers of American Indian students in providing effective educationalopportunities aligned with the above Executive Order and the ongoing efforts forincreased achievement of students nationwide is unquestionable. However, teachers oftenlack the knowledge and experience for planning and delivering instruction that considersthe cultural specifics of tribal life and how they relate to education. Mathematics andscience, two of the most important content areas targeted by the ongoing educationalreform, are, at the same time, areas of lowest achievement of American Indian students.A culturally relevant professional development model
Marquand Library of Art and Archaeologyrenovation and expansion was completed in 2003, and five science branch libraries merged intothe new Lewis Library, designed by renowned architect Frank Gehry, in 2008. But the lastdecade has also been marked by profound technological changes, changes in the library’scollecting focus, as well as changes in users’ information seeking behavior. These changesaffected not only space planning, but also staffing requirements and service delivery methods,making it necessary to take a critical look at our existing libraries even when they are only eightyears old. In the wake of planning and building Lewis Science Library, new user needs wererevealed and valuable lessons were learned, which have been applied to the
graduate education to nurture the further growth of industry’s Page 11.537.8core engineers on a continuous basis throughout their professional careers.4. Recommendations ─Setting the Agenda for the Next Steps for ActionDeveloping the innovative capacity of the U.S. engineering workforce in industry, through thedeliberate advancement of professionally oriented graduate education, is a critical first step inaccelerating U.S. technological leadership for economic competitiveness and for nationalsecurity purposes.4.1 Plan of ActionThe National Collaborative Task Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform proposes toinitiate and guide a major reform
2006-1043: LESSONS IMPLEMENTED ON AN INTERNATIONAL SERVICELEARNING PROJECTRachel Husfeld, Valparaiso University RACHEL HUSFELD served as the 2005 student president of the Valparaiso University chapter of Engineers Without Borders. Originally from Houston, Texas, she is a senior civil engineering major graduating in May 2006. Rachel plans to pursue a master’s degree in structural engineering beginning in the fall of 2006.Carmine Polito, Valparaiso University CARMINE POLITO is the Frederick F. Jenny, Jr. Professor of Emerging Technology at Valparaiso University, where he has taught civil engineering courses for the last five years. He serves as a faculty advisor to the Valparaiso University
1,100 high schoolsworking to improve students’ academic and technical achievement. This effort is based on anumber of unique features, such as requiring students to take the right academic courses;customizing improvement plans to the unique needs of each school; having students completequality vocational and technical courses; building programs on existing school strengths; havingteachers engage students in difficult assignments in all courses; having students receive extrahelp in meeting higher standards; having schools offer a supportive guidance system; and havingschools provide time and an organizational structure to allow teachers to work together. HighSchools That Work is about raising achievement by changing what is taught, how it is