design, sustainable design, and energy auditing. Reviewing architectural, mechanical, or electrical plans and specifications to evaluate energy efficiency or determine economic, service, or engineering feasibility. Compiling, analyzing, and interpreting graphical representations of energy data, using generic as well as application-specific engineering software. Performing energy modeling and validating results with appropriate measurements. Making recommendations regarding energy fuel selection. Preparing feasibility reports and other technical documentation. Page 26.357.2 Promoting awareness
Grintner Report, the applied,practical approach to engineering education that nurtured young innovators was replaced by amore theoretical approach6. This theoretical approach was fitting for a time when engineeringcorporations were large and sought workers to simply execute their plans. However, society isnow characterized by organizations that generate wealth from the innovations of their workers7.Indeed, employers seek graduates that can apply their knowledge, have the ability to innovate,can communicate effectively, work in teams and understand contexts and constraints8,9, all skillstypically addressed by entrepreneurship education. Such skills also prepare students to start theirown companies based on their own innovations10, which also serves
realized the distinctionsbetween theory and practice. Therefore, they demonstrated an awareness to connect theory topractice. For example, they would set extra time aside just in case for unexpected problems infeasibility tests, taking into account the gap between theory and practice. What’s more, theexperience of project-based learning can help students know more about the process of research.Based on these experiences, some students started to make plans for their future. Students reflecton the meaning of their major and the emphasis of their research orientation. Some students wonderabout whether they are going to receive further education or not. The thoughts about future plansreflected that students started to undertake major responsibilities
Paper ID #29305Implementation of a Civil Engineering High-Impact Learning Practice(HILP) Requirement in Support of ASCE Body of Knowledge (BOK) Out-comesDr. Kelly Brumbelow, Texas A&M University Dr. Kelly Brumbelow is an Associate Professor in the Zachry Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering and the Director of Interdisciplinary Engineering Program Development at Texas A&M Uni- versity. He has been a faculty member at Texas A&M since 2002, where his technical specialty is water resources engineering, planning, and management. Prior to this position, he completed his undergraduate and graduate
efforts in planning for the elective course beganfour months before the start of the spring semester, with Professor B largely focused on contentchoices and overwhelmed with the process of mapping that onto a semester. Roughly threemonths before the course began, the faculty met to discuss general course design and decidewhat resources may be most practical to help form the structure and organization of the course.In this one-hour meeting, the faculty discussed principles of backward design and learningobjectives.One of the quintessential discussions of backward design comes from Wiggins and McTighe[12], who spell out the idea in three simple stages: (1) identify what students should be able to doby the end of the course; (2) determine the
attend social events, serve as academic advisors, meet withadvisees regularly, and serve as the primary conduit for Scholars into the projects. Scholars whohave completed the program and are juniors or seniors are asked to serve as peer mentors; for thecohort under study, the Peer mentors were selected from a group of high-achieving juniors/seniorssuch as those in leadership positions. Peer mentors receive a modest annual stipend and are askedto meet twice per quarter with their assigned mentee(s), respond to an end of quarter survey, andto attend social events. Each Scholar will also be assigned an early-career professional mentor whois a recent alum working at a local engineering company. We are planning for this at the startingof the second
Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A comparison of the renewable energy and energy storage sectors in Germany and the United States, with recommendations for engineering teaching practices. L.B. Bosman, J. Brinker, and K.A. WalzAbstract: The German Energiewende is the planned transition by Germany to a low carbon,environmentally sound, reliable, and affordable energy supply. This paper reports on a U.S.faculty international study program, which took place in May 2019, to explore the intersection ofthe German renewable energy and energy storage sectors. The international program includedeleven instructional faculty from throughout the United States on a two
community based services and non-profit organizations, asking for service-learning opportunities. Proposals were discussed and selected according to pre-established project specification criteria. 2. Project promotion: Student teams assigned project with general outline and guidelines. Project requires planning, attention to detail, extra research for understanding of sustainable technologies for a creative solution, and transfer of learned concepts. 3. Designing and Project Completion: Field experts, professors and upperclassman mentors are available for guidance, support and collaborative learning. 4. Project Reflection: Written reports and oral presentations graded by professors and
investigating thephenomenon of teaching decision making in engineering education. We ask engineeringeducators to identify two memorable, recent teaching-related decisions in terms of pre-active(planning) and interactive (in-class) stages. They then describe the situation, the process ofmaking the decision, the factors that they took into account, and the outcomes of their teaching-related decisions. In this paper, we focus on time as the one specific factor that emerged acrossall the participants in this research study.IntroductionDecision making is central to the teaching of engineering, however, little has been written aboutthe teaching decisions of engineering educators. We believe that the engineering educatorcommunity can benefit from insights
to significantlyimprove subsequent years of the program. Some teachers felt that certain experiments did notaddress the frameworks needs; in fact they had this concern about their highest rated activitywhich was subsequently one used most often in their classrooms. Others felt some activities didnot fit the grade level they teach and they felt uncomfortable modifying the activity. In follow-up interviews, none of the teachers used all, or a majority, of the experiments from the year oneInstitute. Many of the simpler experiments (earthquakes, acids and bases, density) wereincorporated into lesson plans, but the teachers avoided experiments such as ethanol production,perhaps because they did not have a high comfort level with using a perceived
for other activities.The second major objective of the TExT is to provide learning activities to be used in the class-room along with detailed lesson plans describing how to conduct these activities. To the maxi-mum extent possible, this includes providing the resources necessary for conducting the in-classactivity. In cases where the resources cannot be provided, the lesson plan includes a list of all theitems the instructor will need in class along with an indication of those that must be obtainedfrom a source external to the TExT. The key points of this objective are to ensure (a) that eachactivity is well designed as a student learning experience, (b) that implementation of each activ-ity is straightforward and time-efficient and (c) that
System) 4.0Senior Fall SpringSenior Thesis I 2.0 Senior Thesis II 3.0Elective: Microwave Eng I Elective: Numerical Methods(FSK WLAN) 3.0 (Microstrip Modeling) 3.0Elective: Antennas Elective: Control Systems(Triband Antenna Design) 3.0 (Magnetic Levitation Control System) 3.0Elective: Business/Eng Elective: Business/Eng(Business Plan) 1.0 (Business Plan) 1.0Fine Art Gen Ed
as a capstone experience. To date, several pilot teams have successfullycompleted the sequence, completed their undergraduate engineering requirements andused the capstone courses to develop products and undertake business planning for theirstart up technical ventures. In addition to the courses in the entrepreneurship minor,infrastructure is in place to support a Student Entrepreneurship Competition in whichstudent teams can develop prototypes and their ideas into business plan proposals forseveral sources of possible seed funding. The infrastructure includes a mentoringentrepreneurs’ network of Lehigh alumni, an on-campus student-start-up incubator, andnew early-stage follow-up funding. This paper will describe the integration of
evaluation team will present the preliminary findings before they depart from the institution. The timeline starts from the day they depart and includes:3 • Within fourteen days: Provide any additional information and or corrections. This is the time to lay out your plan for correcting any findings. • Draft Statement is prepared by the Team Chair and forwarded to the institution. • Within thirty days: Institution responds to the Draft Statement. The responses, if appropriate, are incorporated into the Final Report. Page 11.1191.3 • Month of July: Team Chief presents final report at the ABET Annual Meeting. It should be noted that
application and companies that produce anduse the material. At the end of the semester there was “Adopt-A-Material” poster day wherestudents presented their posters and were evaluated with external judges. The fourth mode oflearning was through a visit to a materials manufacturing company, Kennametal, where studentssaw materials such as tungsten carbide and cobalt. The students were also able to observe themanufacturing processes necessary to create the tungsten carbide-cobalt composite, methods fortesting the composite, and their applications for the gas-oil industry. Mentees worked withProf. Malshe in planning, development and execution through the application of the abovefour modes of learning and teaching. In this process of learning and teaching
school year, the course instructor embraced the inquiry for changeand volunteered to help begin a curriculum overhaul of the current engineering economy coursein industrial engineering at Penn State University Park. Input from former students and anindustrial professional advisory committee (IPAC) noted that industrial engineering graduatesneeded to graduate with a more thorough understanding of the link between engineeringeconomic decisions and business planning, financial statements, financial accounting, and stockvalue. It is crucial for industrial engineering students to learn how to not only provide adefinitive argument explaining the conclusion of their engineering decision (both from thesubjective and quantitative perspectives) but also
-fibers properties synthesized by electrospinning Page 23.271.4After choosing the topic, students researched out articles on their own and made a plan of actionguided by the instructor. It was interesting to see how new ideas emerged right from the start.Directions of research were discussed with the instructor and were not altered by the instructorunless the choice was clearly wrong. Sometimes students wanted to pursue their work indirections not entirely wrong but not optimal. In such cases, the instructor refrained from stiflingthe initiative and allowed students to come to the correct conclusion
]. However, there are relatively few structured approaches to organizing,sequencing, and bounding such experimental prototyping. Given that prototyping is pervasive tothe design process through ideation, concept selection and design verification, it stands to reasonthat prototyping is a process worthy of scholarly attention. This research explores methodologiesto enhance prototyping during concept development, particularly engineering prototypes, i.e.those used to verify or improve the functionality, performance and operation of a novel device orsystem. Based on design context variables such as the total allotted time for the prototypingeffort, the methodologies introduced in this paper will provide practical planning for studentprototyping efforts
engineering studies at the University of Toronto. She is pursuing a certificate of global engineering and working towards an optional fourth-year thesis with the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. Previously, she worked as a pilot analyst summer research student, with both ILead and Patricia Sheridan, to develop a team effectiveness inventory for guided reflection and feedback. Lobna was responsible for performing quantitative and qualitative analysis of the pilot project findings and for modifying the proposed inventory based on analysis. Lobna is passionate about engineering education and plans to pursue a career path in the field.Jennie Phillips MA, University of
conferences. Furthermore, to address his passion for leadership development and community building, he kickstarted a chapter of Connect1NG; a professionally recognized yet non-traditional development program focused on engaging and assimilat- ing new employees to the workplace through leadership development activities and networking. He is currently one of two Western Region liaisons for the program. Boyd was also selected to be a part of the company’s prestigious LTP (Leadership Training Program) and, just two cycles from graduation, planned and facilitated two recent offsite retreats, events involving a hundred participants, requiring months of de- tailed planning and acute project management. An avid nature lover
AC 2012-4583: FOSTERING INDUSTRY ENGAGEMENT IN THE CO-CURRICULAR ASPECTS OF AN ENGINEERING LIVING-LEARNINGPROGRAMDr. Thomas F. Wolff P.E., Michigan State University Dr. Thomas F. Wolff is Associate Dean of Engineering for Undergraduate Studies at Michigan State University. In this capacity, he is responsible for all activities related to student services (academic ad- ministration, advising, career planning, first-year programs, women and diversity programs, etc.) and curricular issues. He is principal investigator on several NSF grants related to retention of engineering students. As a faculty member in civil engineering, he co-teaches a large introductory course in civil engineering. His research and consulting
business practicesand it takes leaders within government for public policy to be enacted. So it was taughtnext followed by business practices. Business leaders must understand public policyprocesses so that they can influence the process as appropriate. The key focus in smallbusiness practices (a large number of civil engineering firms are considered small) is thedevelopment of a business plan which is affected by public policy and the leaders withinthe firm. Once the business plan is in place, it once again requires leaders to manage firmassets to accomplish assigned tasks and missions to meet the desired level of businessperformance.2.1 Data collectedDuring the 2007-2008 assessment cycle (the UT Tyler ABET record year), everyassignment of the
design firm in industry while providing a class experience that combines field construction with an engineering design project to benefit people of the developing world.University of Pittsburgh, PA. Mascaro Offers undergraduate research and courses in sustainabilitySustainability Initiative; Department of and development. The Green Construction and Sustain-Civil and Environmental Engineering. able Development Program offers a grassroots approach towww.engr.pitt.edu/msi/ project planning and design; political economy of development; and skills in development.Purdue University
to promote higher-level thinking skills and improve retention. For the project, incoming freshman will be given a plot of undeveloped land that, by the time they graduate, will be turned into a blueprint for certain segments of the city (time constraints prevent the design of an entire city). Design tasks include all facets of the traditional civil engineering program, such as site planning and layout, sewer and water infrastructure, water supply, wastewater treatment, buildings, transportation systems, channel design, floodplain analysis, and geotechnical work. A common, four-year design project unifies the curriculum and allows material learned in early courses to carry forward, unlike
experiences in critical analysis, designed to broaden students’perspectives and provide an opportunity for integration of coursework in the area ofspecialization1. Typically, projects focus on the application of materials learned throughout theprogram to solve multi-faceted problems such as those they would encounter in the students’post-academic future employment. In these projects, students select project topics under theguidance of a faculty advisor, analyze the problem and formulate a detailed plan to reach asolution, perform necessary evaluations and/or experimentations, identify and/or proposemeaningful results and solutions, test the proposal to the extent possible, and prepare a detailedreport and associated presentation. Projects are done
throughout the state of Hawaii from elementary school to job placement.Lesley Eva Bristol, Maui Economic Development Board Lesley Bristol is a Project Assistant at Maui Economic Development Board’s Women in Technology Project. She supports Women in Technology’s many events and initiatives through research, content cre- ation, strategic program planning, and logistics assistance. She holds a Bachelor of Science in Community & International Development and has implemented educational programs and conducted community- based research in the United States as well as internationally.Graham R DeVey, Maui Economic Development Board Graham DeVey is a Project Manager with the Maui Economic Development Board’s Women in Technol
spectrum of engineering and technologyconcepts, knowledge areas, skills, and abilities that affect the planning, implementation,operation, continuous improvement, and management of the industrial functions required todevelop, produce, and improve products of all kinds. The practical design and implementation ofmanufacturing systems includes the integration of materials science, materials processing,engineering sciences, product design, and process design along with the operational aspects ofmanufacturing, supporting the premise of the importance of manufacturing to mechanicalengineering curricula.Recent work by the Society of Manufacturing Engineers through its Center for Education and theManufacturing Education and Research community have
Engineers. This paper is a collaborative effort between the NationalResource Center for Materials Technology Education (MatEd), and the Society of ManufacturingEngineers (SME), through its Center for Education and the Manufacturing Education &Research Community.1. Introduction and BackgroundThis paper focuses on the integration of materials technology into the overall field ofmanufacturing. Manufacturing relates to the transformation of materials from one form toanother. In this process, the properties of the materials involved can also be transformed—thatis, the manufacturing process can change the properties of materials. Thus in the materialsselection and manufacturing planning phases of the design process for a product, it is essentialthat
of the planning process, as it served to help grant administrators tailor activitiesaround the educators’ interests, and it also gave the educators information on what industrylearning opportunities existed for them.The focal point of the ATE Professional Development grant was the summer externshipprogram. CBIA took the initiative in setting up the industry experiences, working closely witheach teacher and company sponsor to assure that there was the potential for a beneficialpartnership. Educators were given an opportunity to express what their interests were, and torequest a particular company of interest. If an ATE leader had no company in mind, CBIAresearched general areas of interest and solicited companies that would be
ongoing instructioneffectively7. With Jung Oh, professor of chemistry, the four became a group with the goal ofexploring how IL instruction could be adopted into cooperative faculty's existing curricula.Because assessment programs were currently being planned university-wide, the IL Group alsoinvestigated ways to assess information literacies across curriculum.We adopted three near-term goals, the focus of this report: Identify cooperative faculty willing to collaborate on inservice visits tailored to the needs of specific courses taught. develop and pilot course assignments that integrate inservice librarian visits with course content