Conference Session

Ethical Reasoning and Responsibility

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Quamrul H. Mazumder, University of Michigan, Flint; Raghava Mahankali, University of Michigan, Flint

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

. (2007). The Impact of Business Education on Moral Judgement Competence: An Empirical Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(1), 73-87.6. Linda K. Lau, Brandon Caracciolo, Stephanie Roddenberry, Abbie Scroggins, Longwood University: March 2012. “College students’ perception of ethics”.7. Shurden, S., Santandreu, J., and Shurden, M. (2010). How Student Perceptions of Ethics Can Lead to Future Business Behavior. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 13(1), 117-127.8. Weeks, F. (2012). How does a culture of learning impact on student behavior? Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 332-342.9. Kitahara, R., Westfall, F., and Mankelwicz, J. (2011). New, Multi-Faceted Hybrid Approaches to Ensuring Academic

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Engineering Ethics: Five Research Questions.”Science and Engineering Ethics 7: 379-390, 2001b.[14] C. Mitcham and R.S. Duval’s Engineering Ethics. New York: Prentice Hall, 2000.[15] C.E. Harris, Jr., R.S. Pritchard, M.J. Rabins, R. James, and E. Englehardt, EngineeringEthics: Concepts and Cases, Boston: Wadsworth, 2000.[16] A. Singhapakdi, S.J. Vitell, K.C. Rallapalli, K.L. Kraft, “The Perceived Role of Ethics andSocial Responsibility: A Scale Development.” Journal of Business Ethics 15: 1131-1140, 1996.[17] W.E. Shafer, K. Fukukawa, G.M. Lee. “Values and the Perceived Importance of Ethics andSocial Responsibility: The U.S. versus China”. Journal of Business Ethics 70: 265-284, 2006.[18] M. Davis. Thinking Like An Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a

Conference Session

Innovations in Civil Engineering Education II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven Burian, University of Utah; Edward Barbanell, University of Utah

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

, J.H. (1985). “Humanities in an engineering program.” 1985 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Vol. 3, 1598-1601. 4. Fourie, A. (1994). “Will civil engineering look any different in the year 2001?” Civil Engineering, published by South African Institute of Civil Engineers, 2(12), 19-21. Page 15.660.11 5. Ansari, A. (2001). “The Greening of Engineers: A Cross-Cultural Experience.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(1), 105-15.6. Van Treuren, K. and Eisenbarth, S. (2002). “Engineering education in a liberal arts environment at Baylor University.” 2002 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 16-19 June

Conference Session

Innovative Curriculum in ET

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

James Globig

leadership and team unity, build their reputation on the skills they have, and not compete unfairly with others. Page 7.690.5 6. An engineering technology student shall get to know their peers, assist them in their “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education” professional development, and to support them in following this code of ethics. 7. An engineering technology student shall respect others’ ideas and fairly treat all people regardless of race, religion, gender

Conference Session

New Trends in ECE Education

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Thomas Keyser; Ronald Musiak; Richard Mindek; Mary Vollaro; Steven Schreiner

… Showed how engineers are responsible. Ethical decisions unexpectedly difficult.3. Increased ability to deal with ethical issues? 15 3 I had to think about issues. Taught to seek out help if problem arises. Should do things that question ethics. 7 step process for analyzing situations. More scenarios would help. Scenarios we went over were

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Vincent Drnevich

thedevelopment efforts.Bibliography 1. URL: http://www.webct.com/ 2. Richard M. Felder and Rebecca Brent, OBJECTIVELY SPEAKING, Chemical Engineering Education, 31(3), 178-179 (1997). http://www2.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Columns/Objectives.html 3. Richard M. Felder, http://www2.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Cooperative_Learning.html 4. URL: http://www.purdue.edu/odos/ccode.htm 5. URL: http://www.asce.org/aboutasce/codeofethics.html 6. URL: http://www.nspe.org/ethics/ 7. Veslind, P. A., and Ende, E., "Ethics in the Field," Civil Engineering Magazine, Vol. 55, No. 12, December, 1985, pp. 64-66. 8. Richard H. McCuen, Transparency Masters for APPLIED ETHICS IN PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE

Conference Session

Virtues in Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

,” Alexandria, VA, 2024. Accessed: Jan. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics[7] W. Sinnott-Armstrong, “Consequentialism,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA, p. 12, Oct. 04, 2023. Accessed: Jan. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism[8] M. Mallinger, “Decisive decision making: an exercise using ethical frameworks,” Journal of Management Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 411–417, 1997.[9] J. C. Flanagan, “The critical incident technique,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 327–358, 1954.[10] K. FitzGerald, N. S. Seale, C. A. Kerins, and R. McElvaney, “The critical

Conference Session

Evaluation of Ethical Development

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qin Zhu, Purdue University; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University; Megan Kenny Feister, Purdue University; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University; William C. Oakes, Purdue University; Alan D. Mead, Illinois Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

curriculum. EuropeanJournal of Engineering Education, 25, 303-313.[3] Bucciarelli, L. Ethics and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(2), 141-149. Page 24.1197.11[4] McCuen, R. (1979). The ethical dimensions of professionalism. Journal of Professional Activities, 105 (12), 89-105.[5] Vesilind, P., & Gunn, A. (1998). Engineering, ethics, and the environment. New York, NY: CambridgeUniversity Press.[6] Herkert, J. (2001). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role ofprofessional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7 (3), 403-414.[7] Rest, J., Narvaez

Collection

2014 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Edwin R. Schmeckpeper; Mike Kelley; Steve Beyerlein

better understand the dilemma and examine focus solely on ethics.7 The EPSA Rubric provides a the rubrics in more detail? In retrospect, yes. standardized means to evaluate the quality of student 3. The provided materials discuss voice recordings and discussions and to make evaluation of students’ work more transcriptions; this then allows a professional team consistent between the multiple sections of the course. The evaluation approach. It was confusing to the students to flexibility of the EPSA Method allows it to be readily adapted have the materials discuss recordings. In retrospect, the for use in courses. The course instructor plans on using the decision to not

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 10

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shuvra Das, University of Detroit, Mercy

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

this isgood professional advice, this also sends the message of not to delve into things that anengineer may not know enough about. One must wonder if such an advice encouragesengineers to focus mostly on the technical aspect but not as much on social, political, andhumanistic angles, and the broader impact of their decisions.In summary, a code of ethics sets the standards of professional conduct for a designprofession, while Design Justice is a broader framework that looks at the ways in whichdesign can be used for the betterment of marginalized communities and to rectify structuralinequalities.Table I Comparison of NSPE code of ethics [7] and the Design Justice Principles [1] NSPE Code of Ethics Design Justice

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _Monday June 26, 11:00 - 12:30

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rosalyn W. Berne, University of Virginia; William J Davis, University of Virginia; Kent A. Wayland, University of Virginia; Bryn Elizabeth Seabrook, University of Virginia; Caroline Crockett, University of Virginia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

Know What’s Right. Yale University Press, 2010. doi: 10.12987/9780300161328.5 National Society of Professional Engineers, “History of the Code of Ethics for Engineers.” [Online] Available: https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics/history-code-ethics- engineers#:~:text=The%20first%20reference%20to%20a,a%20suggestion%20for%20membership%20cons ideration.6 American Society for Engineering Education, “Papers on Engineering Education Repository.” [Online] Available: https://peer.asee.org/?q=ethics.7 ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022-2023.” [Online] Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bimal Nepal, Texas A&M University; Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Amarnath Banerjee, Texas A&M University; Glen Miller

knowledge about ethics in engineering, educators often findthemselves in a dilemma [6]. Both delivery and content are to be considered when selecting whatneeds to be taught to the students [7]. Delivery approaches are often separated based on whetherthe information is disseminated through a technical course integrated with ethics content ordelivered as part of a stand-alone course focused on either general or more field specific ethics [7].Many engineering programs also incorporate workshops and seminars focused on ethics as part ofthe course curriculum [8]. LeClair & Ferrell state that although the teaching institutions uselectures as the most common method to deliver ethics training, it may not be the most effectiveway to train students [9

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Monday June 26, 3:15 - 4:45

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jiaojiao Fu, Peking University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

contents of this course meet your needs of learning engineering ethics? 7 A. Very B. Basically C. Averagely D. Not What problems did you encounter in the course study? (Multiple choices for this question) 8 A. Too few contents B. Difficult to understand C. Single teaching method D. Excessive theoretical contents E. Others (please specify) Have you improved your interest in engineering ethics after completing this 9 course? A. A lot of improvement B. Average C. No improvement Do you think you have learned anything from this course? 10 A. A lot B. A little C. Average D. Little was gained How do you think this course will help to

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division Technical Session 1: Intercultural Competency-infused Teaching

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University; Micah Iserman, Texas Tech University; Jessica C. Pittman, Texas Tech University; Nigel Yeo, Texas Tech University; Ryan C. Campbell, Texas Tech University; Jeong-Hee Kim, Texas Tech University; Danny D. Reible, Texas Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

rationality, reflection-in-action 3. Introduction to Bildung in the classroom: autobiographical writing as philosophical Bildung exercise (askēsis) for wholistic development of self [6] 4. Visual Thinking Field trips to the university museum to practice Visual Thinking Strategies Strategies (see vtshome.org) using paintings 5. Relational Visual Semiotics (icon, index, and symbol) in the work of philosopher Charles Reasoning Sanders Peirce; small group project applying semiotics to sculptures 6. Reflective Definition and examples of moral dilemmas; engineering ethics [7]; Engineering individual character strengths (see viacharacter.org); ethical considerations

Conference Session

Awareness, Expectations, and Recognition of Ethics

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, University of Michigan, Shanghai Jiao Tong Joint Institute; Joanna Ruth Sessford, The Sino-British College, USST; Longfei An, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China; Yan Ge, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

: Microethics, macroethics and the role ofprofessional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics 7(3). 403–414.9. Bocong, L. (2012) From a Micro-Macro Framework to a Micro-Meso-Macro Framework. In Christensen,S., Mitcham, C., Li B., & An, Y. (Eds.). Engineering, Development, and Philosophy: American, Chinese, andEuropean Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.10. Van De Poel, I., Fahlquist, J., Doorn, N., Zwart, S., Royakkers, L. (2012). The Problem of Many Hands:Climate Change as an Example. Science and Engineering Ethics 18. 49-67.11. Van de Poel, I., Royakkers, L., and Zwart, S. (2015). Moral Responsibility and the Problem of ManyHands. New York: Routledge.12. Thaler, R. & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and

Conference Session

Tree-huggers, Diggers, and Queers--Oh my!

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George Catalano, State University of New York, Binghamton; Caroline Baillie, Queens University, Kingston

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education

. Vesilind et al6 focuses upon the special nature ofresponsibility that engineers have towards the environment.There are many other texts and websites which focus upon engineering ethics.7 We seek inthe present work to build on the approaches taken in the past to engineering ethicaldilemmas through first introducing and then examining several additional paradigms forethical decision making including ones based on freedom, on chaos, on the concept of amorally deep world, on a global ethic and lastly one based on love. Our strong anddetermined belief is that by adding to the number of available approaches towardsexamining ethical dilemmas we can only benefit as a profession and ultimately as a society.The present work is structured in the following

Conference Session

Communication and Collaboration

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Sharp, Vanderbilt University; Marilyn Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education

natural socializationprocess that takes place during the first term; that is, student groups start meeting away fromcampus: for pizza, movies, outdoor activities. These social encounters tend to strengthen groupbonds and create a congenial atmosphere.Meeting employer expectations. According to employer ratings included in the NationalAssociation of Colleges and Universities’ 2008 Job Outlook report, the top 10 desirable skills forjob seekers include the following, listed in order of importance:1. Communication skills 6. Problem-solving skills2. Strong work ethic 7. Analytical skills3. Teamwork skills 8. Flexibility/adaptability

Conference Session

Engaging Ethics, Internationally

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaofeng Tang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Wei Zhang, Zhejiang University; Shuxin Yang, Chinese society for engineer education(CSEE)

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

: Microethics ,Macroethics and the Role of Professional Societies.” Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3): 403–14.[21] Nieusma, Dean. 2004. “Alternative Design Scholarship: Working Toward Appropriate Design.”Design Issues 20 (3): 13–24.[22] Riley, Donna, Amy Slaton, and Joseph R. Herkert. 2015. “What Is Gained by Articulating Non-Canonical Engineering Ethics Canons?” In Proceedings of American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference.[23] Tang, X. & Nieusma, D. 2015. “Institutionalizing Ethics: Historical Debates Surrounding IEEE’s 1974Code of Ethics.” In Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.[24] Cech, Erin A., and Tom J. Waidzunas. 2011. “Navigating the Heteronormativity of Engineering

Conference Session

Promoting Communication Skills

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia; Judith Shaul Norback, Georgia Institute of Technology; Charlie Bennett, Georgia Institute of Technology; Benjamin J. Laugelli, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

. Technological & Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering (also in 2019)Divisions sponsoring papers on communication in 2019 1. Chemical Engineering (also in 2015) 2. Civil Engineering (also in 2015) 3. College Industry Partnerships 4. Design 5. Educational Research and Methods (also in 2015) 6. Engineering Ethics 7. Engineering Physics and Physics 8. Experimental and Laboratory Oriented Studies 9. First Year Programs (also in 2015) 10. Graduate Studies 11. International 12. Liberal Education/Engineering & Society (also in 2015) 13. Manufacturing 14. Mechanical Engineering (also in 2015) 15. Military and Veterans 16. Minorities in Engineering 17. Multidisciplinary (also in 2019) 18. Pre-College

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaofeng Tang, Ohio State University; Jeffrey M. Catchmark, Pennsylvania State University; Eduardo Mendieta; Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

objectives.If you do not see an objective on this list that you feel is important, please add it. Include No. Learning Objectives 1 Define ethics and engineering ethics. 2 Give examples of ethical values. 3 Interpret key elements of engineering codes of ethics, such as “conflict of interest.” 4 Summarize basic ethical frameworks according to major ethical theories. 5 Understand the psychological basis of ethical/unethical behavior. 6 Explain why it is important for Biological Engineers to act ethically. 7 Act according to ethical principles in a

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

website. http://courses.ics.hawaii.edu/ics314s17/morea/ethics/experience-se-ethics-case-study-privacy.html [Accessed October 21, 2018].[42] Princeton. Optimizing Schools: Case Study 3. Princeton Dialogues on AI and Ethics. 7 pp. https://aiethics.princeton.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/587/2018/10/Princeton-AI-Ethics-Case-Study-3.pdf [Accessed Oct 21, 2018].[43] A. Azuela and C. Herrera. Taking land around the world: International trends in the expropriation for urban and infrastructure projects. Paper commissioned by the World Bank and the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy for the Urban Research Symposium, Washington, May 2007, 42 pp.[44] J.J. Kelly, “‘We shall not be moved’: urban communities, eminent domain and the

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park; Thomas M. Philip, University of California Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

).7 Gloria Hauser-Kastenberg, William E. Kastenberg, and David Norris, Sci. Eng. Ethics 9, 377–387 (2003).8 Wm. A. Wulf, Bridge Link. Eng. Soc. 32, 3 (2002).9 Norman Augustine, Bridge Link. Eng. Soc. 32, 4–7 (2002).10 J. R. Herkert, Sci. Eng. Ethics 7, 403–414 (2001).11 Brock E. Barry and Matthew W. Ohland, J. Eng. Educ. 98, 377–388 (2009).12 D. R. Haws, J. Eng. Educ. 90, 223–230 (2001).13 Christopher Chung and Michael Alfred, Sci. Eng. Ethics 15, 189–199 (2009).14 A. Colby and W. M. Sullivan, J. Eng. Educ. 97, 327–338 (2008).15 C. Didier, Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 25, 325–335 (2000).16 C. E. Harris, M. Davis, M. S. Pritchard, and M. J. Rabins, J. Eng. Educ.-Wash.- 85, 93–96 (1996).17 Herkert J. R, Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 25, 303–313

Conference Session

Reimagining Engineering Information Literacy: Novel Perspectives on Integration, Assessment, Competencies & Information Use

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farshid Zabihian, West Virginia University Institute of Technology; Mary L. Strife, West Virginia University; Marian G. Armour-Gemmen, West Virginia University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

. The Mechanical Engineering System Design I and II courses (MAE 480 and 481) are probably the students’ last opportunity to be taught about IL. In order to integrate IL to Mechanical Engineering System Design I and II, the following learning objectives have been added to the course syllabus:  Learning Outcome Related to the Information Literacy 1. Search online information using the tools and techniques learned in the class. 2. Locate more traditional technical and engineering resources. 3. Evaluate the validity of resources. 4. Apply critical thinking to choose relevant sources to use in the project. 5. Use the information legally. 6. Cite the used information ethically. 7. Apply the

Conference Session

IED Technical Session: Preparing Students for the Future

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rick Olson, University of San Diego; Andrés Esteban Acero, Universidad de los Andes

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

Healthandsafety Economicconcerns Environmentalconcerns 30 Sustainability Notanengineeringpracticeatall 20 SocialJustice 16 12 12 Peace 10 Ethics 7 6 1 0 0

Conference Session

Aspirational Visions of Civil Engineering in 2025 & Policy 465

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald Welch, The University of Texas-Tyler; Michael Robinson, Rose-Hulman Institute; Charles Glagola, University of Florida; James Nelson, University of Texas-Tyler

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

thoughtful and careful weighing of alternatives when values conflict is crucial to the responsible conduct of engineering. Therefore, civil engineers practicing at the professional level need to demonstrate an understanding of and a commitment to practice according to the seven Fundamental Canons of Ethics and the associated Guidelines to Practice Under the Fundamental Canons of Ethics.7. An ability to communicate effectively. (ABET g) Commentary: Effective communication includes listening, observing, reading, speaking, and writing and requires understanding of the fundamentals of interacting effectively with technical and nontechnical or lay individuals and audiences in a variety of settings. Professional civil engineers

Conference Session

Trends in Construction Engineering I

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Sunil Sinha; Randolph Thomas; John Kulka

specific engineering ethicscomponent.Why do so few schools have an engineering-ethics requirement? Significant barriers includefaculty indifference, student indifference, and the belief that engineering faculty is not competentto teach ethics [7]. Engineering faculty are most comfortable with quantitative concepts, andoften do not believe they are qualified to lead class discussions on ethics. Many engineeringfaculty do not think that they have the time in an already overcrowded syllabus to introducediscussions on professional ethics, or the time in their own schedules to prepare the necessarymaterial. Koehn’s [11] findings from courses at Lamar University suggest that whileundergraduate students may lack motivation to study ethics, they do have

Conference Session

CE Body of Knowledge

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Stuart Walesh

recommend feasible solutions is an important aspect of the professional responsibilities of a civil engineer.6. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. (ABET f) Commentary: The civil engineer is to hold paramount public safety, health, and welfare. A thoughtful and careful weighing of alternatives when values conflict is crucial to the responsible conduct of engineering. Therefore, civil engineers practicing at the professional level need to demonstrate an understanding of and a commitment to practice according to the seven Fundamental Canons of Ethics and the associated Guidelines to Practice Under the Fundamental Canons of Ethics.7

Conference Session

Raising the Bar and Body of Knowledge

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Stuart Walesh

, American Society for Engineering Education” 5. an ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems. (ABET e) Commentary: Assess situations in order to identify engineering problems, formulate alternatives and recommend feasible solutions. 6. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. (ABET f) Commentary: Demonstrate an understanding of and a commitment to practice according to the seven Fundamental Canons of Ethics and the associated Guidelines to Practice Under the Fundamental Canons of Ethics. 7. an ability to communicate effectively.(ABET g) Commentary: Effective communication

Conference Session

FPD XI: Assessing First-Year Programs, Experiences, and Communities

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shannon Ciston, University of New Haven; Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, Ph.D., University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven; Cory Carr

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

43% of non-participants identified Engineering community as a benefit, while 48% of LLC participants and43% of non-participants identified class work collaboration as a benefit). Additional perceivedbenefits of the LLC included: accessibility of tutors (20), friendships with other engineeringstudents (9), an environment that promoted positive study habits and work ethic (7), benefitsrelated to the building facilities and the particular dormitory (4), and LLC programming such asguest lectures and field trips (3).Of all responses, by far the most common perceived drawback was potential for social isolationand reduced opportunities to meet students of other majors. 53 respondents expressed thisconcern. “Social isolation to engineering majors

Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED) Technical Session 4

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sukeerti Shandliya, University of Cincinnati; Cedrick Kwuimy, University of Cincinnati; So Yoon Yoon, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED)

= 18) (n = 8) (n = 8)Philosophical 7 3 3 Peer Support (2), Encounter during Program (2), Cultural Activities (2)Moral & Ethics 7 4 2 Cultural Activities (4), Professional Exposure (3), Encounter during Program (3), Field Trips (3)Psychological 11 4 5 Cultural Activities (6), Peer Support (4), Instructor Support (4), Professional Exposure (4), Debrief/Reflection (4)Sociological 15 7 6 Cultural Activities (8), Encounter during Program (5), Field