Qualitative 2/3 Qualitative Quantitative Course (N=28) (N=10) (N=18) Average (N=56) A: They are the reason I will 3.6% 10.0% 5.6% 5.4% successfully complete this class B: They were helpful in my 75.0% 80.0% 94.4% 82.1% learning C: Neutral 21.4% 0% 0% 10.7% D: Using fewer would have 0% 10.0% 0% 1.8% been better E: They were a waste of time 0% 0% 0
given a pre-course learning styles assessment using Felder and Silverman’s Index ofLearning Styles13 as well as a pre-course and post-course questionnaire that asked students toevaluate ten statements about their own perceptions of learning. Of these ten statements, threewere designed specifically to address student perceptions of learning possibly addressed by Page 23.700.8concept tests:Statement A: I need to understand the underlying concept before I can calculate an answer to aproblem using an equation.Statement B: I learn more from a correct answer than I do from an incorrect answer.Statement C: I like solving conceptual problems more than
a positive response to the matrices being helpful. Only 6% disagreed, or somewhat disagreed,with the statement. The anonymous end-of-semester survey yielded comparable results. Table 1. Student Ratings of Helpfulness of the Intervention N = 95 (Mid-semester survey) No. of Responses % of Responses a. agree strongly 24 25% b. agree 41 43% c. agree somewhat 24 25% d. disagree somewhat 4 4% e. disagree
the centrifuge facility and using this model for: (1)visual observation of the response of soil and soil-foundation systems, (2) learning the use ofinstrumentation, (3) interpretation of acquired data, and (4) comparing the experimental results totheoretical predictions. Specifically, a centrifuge experiment was introduced in undergraduatecourses to examine the performance of a shallow footing constructed on a deposit made of drysand. The following learning outcomes were set for the module. As a result of participating in themodule/lab, students will be able to: a) better understand current principles of geotechnical and foundation engineering by experiencing the actual response of soils and soil-foundation systems; b) design
Paper ID #5967Mentoring Programs Supporting Junior FacultyDr. Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University Canan Bilen-Green is Dale Hogoboom Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Di- rector of the ADVANCE Program at North Dakota State University. She holds Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Statistics from the University of Wyoming and a M.S. degree in Industrial Engineering from Bilkent University. She was recently appointed to serve as the Vice Provost for Faculty Advancement, a new position created as part of institutionalization of the NSF ADVANCE Program at NDSU.Dr. Roger A. Green, North Dakota
. Page 23.132.2Research has shown that, on average, undergraduates leave STEM fields for academic and socialreasons.4,5 Other empirical evidence consistently shows that college student success isinfluenced, at least in part, by social and psychological factors such as support/encouragement,campus climate, and personal interest in STEM. For example, Seymour conducted a three-yearstudy of 330 STEM undergraduates and concluded that students leave STEM because: (a) theybelieve that non-STEM careers offer greater intrinsic interest, (b) they lose interest in STEM, or(c) they reject the lifestyle associated with STEM careers.4 Family, peer, faculty member, andmentor support affects academic achievement,6 especially among AA males7 and URMs inSTEM
-week Summer Academy for elementary teachers who areinterested in incorporating engineering into their classrooms. Following each TPD week, theINSPIRE administered a survey to investigate the impact of the program on teachers. With the Page 23.838.4purpose of evaluating the effects of the engineering TPD on teachers’ beliefs and attitudes afterthey attended the engineering TPD, the following research questions were addressed: (a) in whatways were teachers satisfied within the engineering TPD program?; (b) what are the mostimportant things teachers learned from the engineering TPD?; (c) which aspects of theengineering TPD were meaningful for
and I/O (input/output) pin access together and servos can be easily plugged inwhile housed underneath the chassis. The visible physical features of the Boe-Bot are theBoard of education, which sits above the chassis connected to four standoffs. The chassisitself which includes two plastic machined wheels, one on each side, on the front end, and atail wheel ball attached to the rear end using a cotter pin.Figure1 (a) shows the Boe-Bot Page 23.1372.3robot. Figure 1(b) shows the non-visible features of the Boe-Bot which includes the servomotors as well as the battery pack.Figure 1(a) Figure 1(b)Hardware and
(Institutions and authors of OCW) present in OCW initiatives.The analysis focused in the actual and future collaboration, for this were analyzed twoaspects: a) the key words that are used to describe the courses and b) the co-authorship ofcourses.The first aspect, tags, intended to study the folksonomies that are formed with the use thekeywords as OCW's descriptors. A folksonomy is a social index, a collaborativeclassification using simple tags in a flat namespace without hierarchies or default kinships.This is a practice that occurs in social software environments whose best examples are sharedsites like delicious.com (bookmarks), Flickr (photos), Tagzania (places), Flof (places) o 43
://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-and-you/how-clean.html14. Voinov, A. and H. Cardwell (2009). "The Energy-Water Nexus: Why Should We Care?" Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education 143(1): 17-29.15. Graedel, T. E. and B. R. Allenby (2010). Industrial ecology and sustainable engineering, Prentice Hall.16. Likert, R. (1932). "A technique for the measurement of attitudes." Archives of Psychology 22 140: 55.17. Granderson, J., M. Piette, et al. (2011). Energy Information Handbook: Applications for Energy-Efficient Building Operations. Berkeley, CA, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: 298 pp. Page 23.570.12
toencourage participation, including small gift cards and free food. Students who completed thesurvey were invited to participate in focus groups (or individual interviews when more feasible)to gather more detailed information about their experience with communities. A total of 944students from the five institutions participated in the survey data collection and 169 in the focusgroups.Instruments: A range of instruments were used to understand student connections tocommunity including (a) Likert scale survey items that evaluated validated constructs ofbelonging and connection to community; (b) open-ended survey questions intended to furtherexplore how students experienced and valued community; (c) focus group and interviewquestions for students that
Paper ID #6935The Effect of Required Introduction to Engineering Courses on Retentionand Major SelectionDr. Marisa Kikendall Orr, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. She completed her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, as well as a Certificate of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity and diversity, and academic policy.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President
calibration process).B. Data CollectionParticipants participated in a semi-structured interview ranging from 45 to 90 minutes. Since thepurpose of the interviews was to understand the G/UTAs’ perspectives of the FYE program andtheir TA position, the questions covered a wide range of position related topics. The interviewquestions were divided into seven categories: background information, hiring process, overallexperience, thoughts on MEAs, training, expectations and responsibilities, and support andmentoring (See Appendix A). The interview categories were developed based on analysis offindings regarding the key components for a successful program utilizing UTAs,15 changes to theimplementation and grading of the mathematical modeling activities in
included in the study had the same exposure to nanotechnology in class. Theselected section consisted of 28 student teams (with 3 or 4 students per team).B. Nanotechnology Graphical User Interface (GUI) ProjectThe project partner for the nanotechnology project was a NSF-funded Network for ComputationalNanotechnology (NCN) whose mission is to support the National Nanotechnology Initiative bycreating and operating a cyber-platform for expanding and supporting the nanotechnologycommunity formation and growth by sharing computational simulations and educationalresources. The platform is called nanoHUB.org. It is an interactive online data and researchsharing environment with 64,659 interactive users; the environment primarily consists of
Paper ID #6506Analysis of Contextual Computer-aided Design (CAD) ExercisesMrs. Elif Ozturk, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University Dr. Bugrahan Yalvac is an associate professor of science education in the Department of Teaching, Learn- ing, and Culture at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received his Ph.D. in Science Education from Pennsylvania State University in 2005. Prior to his current position, he worked as a learning sci- entist for the VaNTH Engineering Research Center at Northwestern University for three years. Yalvac’s research is in STEM education, 21st century skills
. Duringmost of that first semester, the course materials were being delivered “just in time” for studentuse.EST104 Topical Syllabus A. Engineering as a Career B. Ethics C. Engineering Design and Teamwork D. Engineering Communication E. EXCEL - Workbooks & Graphs F. MATLAB programming – script files, functions, input/output, plotting, logic and conditionals, logic and relational operators, conditional statements, for loops, while loops.EST104 Schedule of topics for fall 2011 Week 1-5 EXCEL with applications to Ohm‟s Law and the Speed of Sound in air. Week 6 Flowcharting and Procedural Programming Week 7-10 MATLAB – Programming a Stepper Motor in MATLAB
Paper ID #7066Engineering Writing for the General Public: A Classroom ApproachDr. Elisa Warford, University of Southern California Elisa Warford is a senior lecturer in the Engineering Writing Program at the University of Southern Cal- ifornia, where she teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in written and oral engineering commu- nication. Her current research interests include the rhetoric of science and portrayals of engineering and technology in American literature. She is also a professional technical editor specializing in engineering writing for academia and industry. She holds a Ph.D. in English from the
Paper ID #6097Enhancing Student Learning in a Graduate Course in Manufacturing Tech-nologyDr. Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University Page 23.536.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 ENHANCING STUDENT LEARNING IN A GRADUATE COURSE IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGYABSTRACTThe manufacturing enterprises are facing fierce competition due to globalized marketplace andchanging customer demands. In order to stay competitive, the companies are widely adoptingmodern manufacturing management principles such as lean and six
Paper ID #6174Gadget Avalanche: A Technology Literacy Course for Novice AdultsDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Recruiting at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she received her Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published nearly two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing undergraduate education through hands
Paper ID #7599Helping Students find the Right Track: A Partnership for Student SuccessDr. Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University Dr. Elizabeth Stephan is a faculty member in the General Engineering Program at Clemson University. She earned B.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron, and worked as a Production Engineer at Dow Chemical in Traverse City, MI. She is the District Director for Tau Beta Pi and Chief Advisor for SC Alpha Chapter of Tau Beta Pi.Dr. Christine C Murphy, Clemson University Academic Success Center Dr. Murphy holds a Ph.D. in Plant Physiology and a BS degree in Math
Paper ID #6832Implementing a Student-Suggested Course in Engineering Career Develop-mentDr. Julie E. Sharp, Vanderbilt University Dr. Julie E. Sharp, M.A.T., M.A., Ph.D., is Professor of the Practice of Technical Communications in the Vanderbilt University School of Engineering, where she teaches written and oral communication courses in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and the General Engineering Division. Her teaching and research interests include job search communication, learning styles, and integrating com- munication in engineering courses. In 2012, she won an Apex Award for Excellence in
Paper ID #5907Improving Municipal Infrastructure in Capstone Through a Consulting FirmModelDr. Daniel M. Dulaski PE, Northeastern University Dr. Daniel M. Dulaski, PE, joined the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Northeastern University in 2009. His research is primarily in transportation engineering which includes safety, roadway design, human factors, and sustainable transportation systems. He holds a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering and is a registered professional engineer in Massachusetts. He is the academic advisor for the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) student chapter, and the
Paper ID #7040Incorporating Biometrics Technology into a Sophomore Level General Edu-cation CourseDr. Shane Cotter, Union College Dr. Shane Cotter came to Union College in August 2005 and is an associate professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. He teaches courses in introductory digital logic, digital design, signal processing, and computer networking. Dr. Cotter’s principal research interests are in the areas of speech and image processing, wireless communications, computer networking, and biological signal processing. Prior to joining Union College, he was a visiting assistant professor in the
Paper ID #7856Instrumentation to Facilitate Learning in a First Bio-potentials CourseDr. Andrew Hoff, University of South Florida Dr. Andrew Hoff is a Professor of Electrical Engineering in the College of Engineering at the University of South Florida. His research and educational focus explores bio-electric phenomena and the processing and characterization of material surfaces. He has developed educational materials for high school science and math curricula with funding provided by the National Science Foundation.Dr. Richard Gilbert, University of South Florida Dr. Richard Gilbert is a professor of Chemical and
Paper ID #7445Choosing and Adapting Technology in a Mathematics Course for EngineersJenna Tague, Ohio State University Jenna Tague is a mathematics education doctoral student at The Ohio State University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in mathematics from Bucknell University and Colorado State University, respectively. Research interests include mathematics for engineering students and problem solving.Miss Jennifer Czocher, Ohio State University Jennifer Czocher is a doctoral candidate in mathematics education at Ohio State University. Her research interests are mathematical modeling and mathematical thinking in STEM
Paper ID #7854Design and Simulation of a Sun Tracking Solar Power SystemDr. Liping Guo, Northern Illinois University Dr. Liping Guo received his B.E. in Automatic Control from the Beijing Institute of Technology at Beijing, China in 1997. She earned her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Auburn University in 2001 and 2006, respectively. She is currently an assistant professor in the Electrical Engineering Technology program in the Technology Department at the Northern Illinois University. Her research and teaching interests are in the areas of power electronics, renewable energy, embedded
Paper ID #5943Developing Authentic Projects for a Senior Level Design ClassDr. MEHMET EMRE BAHADIR, MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY MEHMET EMRE BAHADIR is an Assistant Professor of Industrial Technology at Murray State Univer- sity. His teaching and research interests are in the field of product design and sustainable manufacturing. Page 23.394.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Developing Authentic Projects for a Senior Level Design ClassAbstractAt Murray State University
Paper ID #6164Development of a materials science course to serve diverse constituenciesDr. Melissa Eblen-Zayas, Carleton College Melissa Eblen-Zayas is an associate professor of physics in the Physics and Astronomy Department at Carleton College in Northfield, MN. She completed her BA in physics from Smith College in Northamp- ton, MA and her PhD in physics at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. She an experimental con- densed matter physicist interested in the electronic and magnetic properties of correlated electron materi- als as well as physics education
Paper ID #6525Discovery Learning Experiments in a New Machine Design LaboratoryDr. Mark Nagurka, Marquette University MARK NAGURKA, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering and Lafferty Professor of Engineering Pedagogy at Marquette University. He received his B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics from the University of Pennsylvania and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from M.I.T. He taught at Carnegie Mellon University before joining Marquette University. His professional interests are in the design of mechanical and electromechanical systems and in engineering
Paper ID #5847Electronic Flashcards as a Tool to Improve Exam ReadinessDr. Susan L. Murray, Missouri University of Science & Technology Susan L. Murray is a professor of engineering management and systems engineering at Missouri Univer- sity of Science and Technology. Dr. Murray received her B.S. and Ph.D. in industrial engineering from Texas A&M University. Her M.S. is also in industrial engineering from the University of Texas-Arlington. She is a professional engineer in Texas. Her research and teaching interests include human systems in- tegration, productivity improvement, human performance, safety, project