) Improved Stirling engine; FinalLab 7 Th Semester Project (Stirling Engine) Evaluation report on Stirling engine Page 26.184.13Document 2: Example of Manufacturing Protocol (part 6) Example Manufacturing Protocol Cylinder Base 1. Original Material Ordered a. Supplier: Liebovich Aluminum & Steel b. Material: Aluminum 6061-T6 c. Dimensions: 0.75”OD x 12’L d. Cost: $29.12 2. Stock Material a. 0.75”OD x 2.75”L 3. Tools
% considered themselves “B” students (one person did not provide a clear answer). Incomparison, the high school GPA for the COT for 2014-2015 academic year was similar with anaverage GPA being 3.58/4.0.ParentsEighteen parents participated in the survey. One person from each household was asked torespond, and mothers represented 83.33% of the group. When asked for their education level, thedistribution was as follows:Table 2Self-reported distribution of educational levels among parents of the PI studentsEducational level Percentage of parents (N=168), %High School Diploma 11.1Some college
paragraphbased on questions that prompted them to think about: what they thought they learned, how theylearned, what was their inspiration to learn, and how reflective writing helped them through theprocess. We then evaluated the quality of reflection paragraphs and looked into any relationshipswith course grades. We found a statistically significant correlation between this quality and finalcourse grades5. For the spring of 2013, we continued the promotion of metacognition in chemicalprocess control and safety, another undergraduate chemical engineering core course using amodified assignment. Students were given one technical problem and then assigned the followingfour activities each week: a) solve the problem, b) personalize the problem, c) integrate
in their engineering courses between their first year and the Engineering Design Processes class in their junior year, although in their sophomore year they are required to view a librarianproduced “searching for standards” tutorial and then find a standard on their own in order to complete a lab report. There was no randomization or subsampling involved in this study; every student in the Engineering Design Processes course who turned in an assignment was assessed. Process Table 1 summarizes the differences between the Spring 2013 and Fall 2013 library sessions and course assignments. See Appendix B for full details of the lesson plans for the Spring and Fall 2013
., Riley, J., and Frey, R. A Transition Program for Underprepared Students in General Chemistry: Diagnosis, Implementation, and Evaluation. The Journal of Chemical Education 2012, 89, 995-1000. 9. Botch, B., Day, R., Vining, W., Stewart, B., Rath, K., Peterfreund, A., Hart, D. Effects on Student Achievement in General Chemistry Following Participation in an Online Prepatory Course. The Journal of Chemical Education 2007, 84, 547-553. 10. Gasiewski, J., Eagan, M., Garcia, G., Hurtado, S., and Chang, M. From Gatekeeping to Engagement: A Multicontextual, Mixed Method Study of Student Academic Engagement in Introductory STEM Courses. Research in Higher Education
designprocess, and technical writing and to apply this new knowledge to the real-world challenge ofdesigning for patients with disabilities.Course BreakdownCourse Materials and TopicsThis course focused on three objectives which are (a) to introduce design principles and theirapplication, (b) to develop technical writing skills, and (c) to gain experience through servicewith local partners. More specifically, teams of students were tasked with designing creative,effective, low-cost supportive equipment for children with disabilities.The core material for this course focused on lectures and class discussions that revolved arounddesign principles in engineering and technical writing. The writing topics for the course includedtargeting an audience
2005;4(WINTER):298- 310.11. Graham G.M., Fidan I. Innovative applications of classroom response devices in manufacturing education. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings 2012.12. Frank B.M., Web-based audience response system for quality feedback in first year engineering. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings 2013.13. Fischer M.P., Tech services on the web: Poll everywhere; http://Www.polleverywhere.com/. Technical Services Quarterly 2014;31(4):413-4.14. Gray G.L., Costanzo F., Evans D., Cornwall P., Self B., and Lane J.L., The dynamics concept inventory assessment test: A progress report and some results. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings 2005
-voltagesource. Page 26.522.4Solution OverviewThe overall process of our solution is to have the microprocessor output a sine wave intothree separate, external DACs. The output of the DACs will then be filtered and amplifiedusing a low-pass filter and class B amplifier. The high-level block diagram is shown inFigure 1. Filter- Phase A Amp Filter- Phase B Amp
process begins with a state diagram (a), which, given a state encoding(b), implies a truth table (c) which leads to combinational logic (d), a part of the standard architec-ture of a finite state machine (FSM) (e). To implement this in a laboratory environment, severaldecisions must be made.First, should the design be implemented using discrete 74x logic gates? While the simplicity isbeneficial, this approach has several drawbacks. First, the approach scales poorly when moving tolarger datapath designs. For example, the design shown in Figure 5 would require a prohibitive Page 26.1082.4number of devices and wiring. Second, it provides no
removed using conventional engineeredsystems for water and wastewater treatment and b) become less toxic to living organisms. Thelecture modules provided balanced coverage related to the opposing perspectives on the stabilityof nanomaterials. Therefore, the lectures provided a unique opportunity for the respective groupsof students to be exposed to the opposite end of the life cycle than what would be covered withinindividual departments.The cross-departmental teaming exercise was facilitated following the lecture modules to allow Page 26.426.4students in both classes to collaborate to identify potential solutions to the complex challenge
bioengineeringcourses. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 1–11.Gereffi, G., Wadhwa, V., Rissing, B. & Ong, R. (2008) Getting the numbers right:international engineering education in the United States, China, and India, Journal ofEngineering Education, 97, 13-25.Hong, D., Xuan, T., & Zhang, W. (2010). Enhance the internationalization of teaching& learning through summer schools: A case of Renmin University of China (inChinese). China University Teaching, (2), 73-74.Jesiek, B.K., Borrego, M., & Beddoes, K. (2010). Advancing global capacity forengineering education research (AGCEER): Relating research to practice, policy, andindustry. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(2), 107-119.Jonassen, D. H. (1997
before and after studying used.electromagnetism electromagnetism in a media-concepts? rich environmentsConceptual Sangam, D ASEE To discuss the details of an Quantitative Lecture Pre and post Test scores indicate significantunderstanding of Jesiek, B. Conference instructional module concept increase in students learning which canresistive electric Proceedings, implemented and present inventory test, be attributed to
second quarter):Overall experience. No one indicated they had a bad experience so far. The majority (12/20)seemed to feel that the team experience was good, but had reservations with remarks such as “Ilike my group, but I feel we are not creative as we can be” and “Overall my team is workingtogether decently well.” A few seemed to be very excited about the project, remarking “Tosummarize my experience thus far with my yearlong project group, to say it has gone smoothlyis an understatement”, “In conclusion, my team has strong creativity, communication, and hardwork”, and “terrific, couldn’t be better.”What is working well. Student responses grouped around four major themes: (a) distribution ofworkload, (b) communication, (c) work being performed
Page 26.1266.12construction. In doing so, they sometimes failed to recognize that their weaknesses were notbeing improved, as can be seen in the following exchange: Teammate A: I feel like that’s the point of teamwork, is like whatever skill you have, that’s what you should apply it to. So if [Teammate B] and I aren’t too good at cutting or we can’t build a certain thing, I feel like that’s what [Teammate C] was useful for. And whereas [Teammate C] didn’t really quite know how to calculate some of the math that went into it, that’s where [Teammate B] and I came in. And I feel like that’s what made our team a good team, like we were efficient and effective, but- Teammate B: But then what happens
submit lab reports jointly in groups of two students. In the DynamicSystems course, the students were grouped based on their academic records, i.e., every groupwould have one A/B student, one or two C students and one D/E student, determined as theiraverage mark from the Physics and Chemistry course. The setting in ProLab enabled thestudents to work effectively in groups and to present their work to their own group (smallscreens) and to the whole class (large screens). The physical design of ProLab enabled a highdegree of flexibility and allowed rapid transition between different activities. The students areactivated by inclusion, as group members solving tasks, and as presenters for their class. Thepre-class activities were designed on an
Programs for Youth, 40 pages. Available on-line:http://dmp.nysci.org/system/files/filedepot/1/NYSCI_MAKER_BLUEPRINT.pdf.[6] Makerspace/Maker Media (2013). The Makerspace Playbook. School Edition, 84 pages. Available on-line:http://makerspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/MakerspacePlaybook-Feb2013.pdf[7] Young Makers (2012). Maker Club Playbook, 77 pages. Available on-line:https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9esWAj9mpBLNmRlMWYxZjUtZjJjMi00NTdhLThmNjUtMmM5ZDk5NTZmMzBh/edit[8] Richardson, M., Elliott, S., and Haylock, B. (2013). This home is a factory: Implications of the Maker movementon urban environments. Craft + design enquiry, Australian National University Press, Issue 5, 6 pages.[9] Rollins, J. C. (2014). Makerspaces and evolution of work
groups (4 to a group) received at least a score of 9,indicating successful achievement of the “b” student outcome goal.Student Outcome “k” – Ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice.Structural Module #2 demonstrates the use of modern engineering tools (i.e., RISA 2D2structural analysis program) to distribute the loads on a selected part of the structure to selectedcolumns. Loads such as dead load, wind load, snow load including snow drift, live loads andcontingency loads are distributed to the selected columns. Loads are distributed through joist,W-shape beams and a truss. The truss is model in RISA 2D and member forces and deflectionsare calculated with the software. Most student
Education in a Knowledge Society (pp. 67-98). Chicago, IL: Open Court. Page 26.1648.178. Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C (2006). Knowledge Building: theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.9. Scardamalia, M, Bransford, J, Kozman, B, Quellmalz, E (2012). New Assessments and Environments for Knowledge Building (pp 231-300) In P. Griffin et al. (Ed.s), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.10. Scardamalia, M (2004) CSILE/Knowledge Forum. In A. Kovalchick
attitude persists formany students until the junior year.The remainder of this paper outlines the assignment provided in Appendix A, and the solutionprovided in Appendix B. Other resources include kinematics, structures, and digital logic 3, 4.Tolerance Stacks and Simple AnalysisThe tolerance analysis problem chosen was a linear stack of parts with nominal dimensions andstatistical variation. The first problem-solving step is to identify a tolerance loop in an assembly.A table of values is constructed including the nominal dimension and tolerance for each part. Thetable also indicates whether each part has a positive or negative effect on the characteristicfeature, often a gap. In addition, all parts are identified as fixed or variable based on
measurements. Sensors areused to monitor pH, conductivity, and temperature of the environment. Peripherals attached tothe control system are used to drive the sensor measurements. The mobile notification systemutilizes JAVA, PACHE, and PYTHON languages. The designed control of the system uses the Page 26.1275.4data reading to constantly maintain and balance the environment without any human interaction.The system incorporates a unique alert system via SMS if any sensors failed. The teamcompleted the design by December 2012, and delivered a full prototype by the end of the springsemester of 2013 as seen in Figure 1 (a) and (b) below. We met our second
two or three exams per semester, and even use basic lectures 60–70% of the Page 26.197.5time. It is the other 30–40% of the class that will fundamentally distinguish it from a from atraditional dynamics course. An IDLC class will typically begin with a 5-minute introductory 4lecture in which the instructor presents the goal of the day’s IDLC activity. This introduction isintended to (a) point out important things students should look for during the activity and (b)provide a context for the students’ work so that they see that what they do in class is indeedrelated to “real-life” problems. After
/10690727124752903. Eccles J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.4. Wigfield, A. (1994). The role of children's achievement values in the self-regulation of their learning outcomes. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 101-124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.5. Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J
tocomplete optional tasks that are designed to encourage them to improve their experimental dataand analysis (relating to ABET objective B) and to promote their exploration of the broaderimpacts of the experiments they are performing (relating to ABET objectives H and I).Completing these tasks would increase a students’ team’s total of common, uncommon, and/orrare points, depending on the specific task completed. These points allow students to berewarded for performing these extra tasks, but the rewards are not grade points, which does notdiminish the importance of required coursework. A summary of these tasks and the pointsawarded is shown in Table 1. Note that some tasks award two types of points. This designchoice was made thinking that it would
Paper ID #11490Project-based learning in a high school pre-engineering program: Findingson student achievement (RTP, Strand 3)Todd France, University of Colorado Boulder Todd France is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Colorado Boulder. He is part of the Graduate STEM Fellows in K-12 Education Program and helps teach and develop curriculum at a high school STEM academy. His research focuses on pre-engineering education and project-based learning. Page 26.1265.1 c American Society for
the problem is.The modality of online class is coming like a wave in today’s world not only because it opens up newdoors for students to gain knowledge, get degrees, and further their chances of securing better futuresbut also it brings forth an opportunity to bring big dollars to many stake holders and partners of the © American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 6 2015 ASEE Zone III Conference (Gulf Southwest – Midwest – North Midwest Sections)educational market Reference: Bloom, B., & Associates. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David McKay. © American Society for Engineering Education
the Research. Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26.[3] Brown, S., L Flick, and T. Fiez (2009), “An Investigation of the Presence and Development of Social Capital in an Electrical Engineering Laboratory”, Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1). 93-102.[4] Etcheverry, E., Clifton, R., & Roberts, L. (2001). Social Capital and Educational Attainment: A Study of Undergraduates in a Faculty of Education. Alberta J. of Educational Research, 47(1). 24-39.[5] Gates, S.J. and Mirkin, C. (2012). Engage to Excel. Science, 335(6076), 1545.[6] Goodwin, B., and Miller, K. (2013). Evidence of Flipped Classrooms is Still Coming In. Educational Leadership 70(6), 78-80.[7] Lage, M.J., Platt
psychological constructs in response to instructional interventions appear to be whollylacking.We thus sought to answer two questions: (a) similar to knowledge and comprehension, are grit,curiosity, creativity, and self-efficacy mutable by an active educational environment, and (b) doesa learning environment that incorporates academic advising offer additional benefit in bolsteringthese traits? So-called “intrusive advising” is believed to increase academic performance andpersistence in majors (reviewed in Banta et al. 2). We hypothesized that the effects of intrusiveadvising would reach beyond these usual academic indicators to influence the above-namedpsychological constructs as well.Two sections of an introductory engineering design course were
Research Experiences”. Science, Vol. 316, No. 24, pp. 548-549.10. Yoder, B. Engineering by the Numbers: www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/14_11-47.pdf.11. Huston, J.C. and Burnet, G. (1982). “Iowa State University Senior Engineering Student Attitudes about Graduate Study”, Proceedings of the 1982 Frontiers in Education Conference, Columbia, SC.12. Carpinelli, J. D., Hirsch, L., S., Kimmel, H., Perna, A., & Rockland, R. (2007). “A Survey to Measure Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Attitudes toward Graduate Studies”, Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Education, Honolulu, HI.13. Hirsch, L. S., Carpinelli, J. D., Kimmel, H., and Perna, A. (2008). “Measuring Engineering
below indicate the highest and lowest meanscores for students’ perceptions of self-efficacy for sub-skills that contribute to creating anddelivering presentations (Table 1), writing (Table 2), developing and using visual literacy (Table3), and working in teams (Table 4) at all three universities, identified as University A, B, and C.In each of the tables, cells in blue indicate the three highest means in confidence in specific sub-skills that contribute to one of the four communication competencies, and the cells in tan indicatethe three lowest means in confidence for specific sub-skills. We have only included a sub-skill ifstudents in at least two of the three universities reported they were either most confident or leastconfident in it.There
ideas were accurate. Examples of apre and post-concept map are shown in Figures 1 a and b. Page 26.1251.7Figure 1a. Example of a Systems Medicine Concept Map at Start of Program. Page 26.1251.8Figure 1b. Example of a Systems Medicine Concept Map at End of Program.Figure 1a shows a map that is primarily “linear” in terms of the branches out from the center-point of Systems Medicine. There are some linkages between the branches, but many aremissing, such as a complete disconnect between experiments (bottom center) and other branchescontaining lab work, analysis tools