% 10% 15% Computer skills Ethics Self-motivated match credentials meet qualifications flexibility diversity public service/customer service critical thinking Professionalism-at work on time-appropriate behavior teamworkAgain these answers greatly depend on the sector and field of the interviewees. However, threeof the six respondents stated that a strong ethical foundation, good computer skills, and theability to back up educational
formthat the student could re-play over and over? Could student-instructor interaction be handledelectronically in an effective manner?One of the concerns related to e-learning might be the loss of the tangential “information” thatwould be lost with a decrease in face to face time with the students. How does one get impressupon the student the value of ethics and academic integrity related to the engineering professionthat is not specifically stated in the course outline, yet come up in class numerous times duringthe semester? Case in point would be the issue of simply filling in the summary sheet forcoupled assignments with duplicate information rather than going back though thedocumentation to enter the computed values. Being sloppy in this
education8 beyond the four-yearprogram. According to Parsons et al.6 the environment of engineering education has changedover the past decade with new broader learning objectives as required in the ABET criteria.These objectives include ethics, teamwork, and critical thinking. Many of the learning outcomesin the ABET engineering criteria will be embedded in the social context within whichengineering work is done. The need arises in creating learning outcomes that include social skillsdevelopment woven into the cooperative education experience6.Whilst the CEAB criteria for accreditation have in the past been more prescriptive, and lessoutcomes-based, than those of ABET, the new accreditation criteria to be used for accreditationvisits starting in
research, particularly in the U.S. Wankat, for example, analyzed Journalof Engineering Education articles from 1993-1997 (n = 230) and 1993-2002 (n = 597).7-8 Sincethe journal did not use author-defined keywords during these periods, the author generated thefollowing list of categories and assigned up to four categories to each article:1. Teaching 7. ABET* 13. Distance Education* 19. Retention2. Computers 8. Learning 14. Communication/Writing 20. Programming*3. Design 9. First Year 15. Ethics 21. Aeronautical Eng**4. Assessment 10. Curriculum 16. Experiential/Hands On* 22. Quality,5. Groups/Teams 11. Laboratory 17
College offers multidisciplinary programs in the social sciences founded ona model of liberal education and designed to prepare students for law school, graduate study,decision-making roles in public and private enterprise. Students examine how public policyproblems are identified, analyzed, and resolved in the United States and globally.13Residential College in the Arts and HumanitiesThe Residential College in the Arts and Humanities (RCAH) is an interdisciplinary college forundergraduate students interested in the global connections between literature, history, ethics,culture, world languages, the visual and performing arts, and their own civic engagement in thesefields of work and study. Students, faculty, visitors, and staff are able to
member of the AIAA Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Technical Committee since 2003.Gregg Warnick, Brigham Young University External Relations and Intern Coordinator for the Mechanical Engineering department in the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at BYU. He works directly with industry to recruit projects for Capstone and is working to increase international project opportunities for students. Interests include global technology issues, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has a Master of Technology Management degree and a BS in Manufacturing Engineering Technology, from Brigham Young University. He is completing a PhD in Educational
division ismanaged by a faculty member who role plays as a division manager. This paper describes the piloted junior level Path to Synthesis course, called EGR386 Engineering Design III - The Methods, which is vertically integrated with thesophomore course, EGR 286 Engineering Design II - The Process. The junior courseemphasizes analytical engineering skills along with sophisticated project managementtechniques including subcontract management. Written and oral communication skillsand topics on professionalism and ethics are also addressed. Greater emphasis is placedon rigorous planning and scheduling, cost estimation and economics, and coordination ofefforts between: the Design II and III teams, the Design III students and the customer,and
exists incontent domains such as business, economics, and especially in medical education.29 Much can be learnedfrom models developed in these domains. The practice of engineering, however, necessitates a slightlydifferent approach. The goals of the former disciplines are to derive an optimal strategy or diagnosis that willthen be applied. There is little opportunity to test one's solution, learn from authentic feedback, and reviseone's solution accordingly. In medical education, such testing represents an ethical conflict, and in economicsand business, outcomes can usually only be assessed in the long term. Thus, a different framework is requiredfor engineering, which includes both problems and cases in the form of authentic design projects and
economic issues, legal and ethical issues that affect space-exploration and the use of nucleardevices in space are also discussed. An example requiring the cadets to consider important non-technical issuesis the following question taken from the first-term final examination: At this time, scientists from other countries are being considered for participation in the initial Falcon Base research team. Sheik (Dr.) Abdul Rhammani from the Saudi Arabian Center of Petroleum Research, Dr. Judith Spieglemen from the Israel Geological Institute, and Prof. Annibel Zirkofsvich from the Bosnian Center for Infectious Disease Studies are three foreign nationals being considered for the mission. What impact on mission planning
involved, with NEE typically feeling less concerned about these changes than SEE, and sometimes naturally a bit defensive about discussions of such. The perceived/debated changes typically fall under one or more of the following categories: A. High school preparation less rigorous and thorough, and sometimes more “politically correct”, than in the past. Page 14.293.8 B. Students too used to an overly affluent and leisurely lifestyle, with an associated compromise of work habits and work ethic, including those associated with studying. C. As implied by 1.-5. above, students more skilled and comfortable with, and
) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability;(d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams;(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems;(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility;(g) an ability to communicate effectively;(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context;(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning;(j) a knowledge of contemporary issues; and(k) an ability to use
11.1309.7Connecting in the Junior Year: CHE 395Juniors take CHE 395, Professional Development Seminar. Student learning objectives include: a) Demonstrate skills that reflect the broader professional qualities necessary for success in their careers, including • ethics and professional responsibilities • oral communications • activities in team structures. b) Write clear professional documents, including technical reports, summaries, and/or research papers. c) Demonstrate a broader knowledge of leading edge chemical engineering or other disciplines, and/or obtain a more advanced knowledge of chemical engineering or other scientific fields.An engineering librarian visits the class early in the semester to talk about
Spanning two semesters and framing a summer research experience, the technicalcommunication course sequence that was tested has been designed both to enrich the summerresearch experiences of undergraduates and to attract other undergraduates to pursue suchresearch experiences. As shown in Figure 1, the first part of the proposed course, which was Page 11.1049.3taught in the spring before the summer research experience, was to prepare undergraduates forthat research experience by having them apply and be selected for research positions, learn aboutbest research practices (including ethics in research), and perform a literature review on
and outcomes. The department’s adopted outcomes andobjectives are monitored by analysis of the FE results, alumni surveys, employer surveys, anddepartmentally developed assessment tools.The FE results are used extensively to monitor the ability of UT Martin engineering graduates toperform basic engineering and economic analysis. Secondary use involves using the results tomonitor for a basic understanding of ethics. This paper concentrates on the use of the FEexamination scores and problems associated with the use of those scores.CurriculumThe total hours required for the B.S.E degree are 128. In 1999, concentration area electives wereapproved and published in the University catalog. The total number of elective hours requiredwas set at 21
of hockey in theUnited States and produced a new generation of Americans for the NHL. Bob Allen, whooperated the Olympic Center during the 1980 Winter Games claimed Herb was also a “mastermotivator, and a great thinker” (The Associated Press, 2003, ¶ 22). Herb constantly emphasizedto all the student athletes that “athletics had given them the privilege of acquiring a collegeeducation-a tool you could use for the rest of your life” H. Brooks (personal communications,September-December, 1972).Three consistent factors found in the styles of these four coaches that enabled them to becomesuccessful coaches and managers have roots in their strong family backgrounds. None werewealthy, but they all possessed a deep work ethic and strong desire for
; the ability to demonstrate ethical judgment andintegrity; intercultural skills; the capacity for continued learning, and general breadth of skillsand knowledge 5. Thus, having disciplinary knowledge is not enough. Today’s workplacerequires applying such knowledge towards analysis, decision-making, and problem solvingwithin a complex environment6-8. 2Formal Education and Computing Professionals’ Needs It is therefore unsurprising that, in the Computing Science Curricula 2013 final report, theJoint Task Force on Computing Curricula9 stated that The education that undergraduates in computer science receive must adequately prepare
Paper ID #20602The CASCADE Experience: An Innovative Cascaded Peer-Mentoring ProjectDr. Nael Barakat P.E., Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Nael Barakat is a professor of Mechanical Engineering and Associate Dean for Research and Grad- uate Studies at Texas A&M University - Kingsville. He is a registered professional engineer in Ontario, Canada, and a fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). His areas of interest include Controls, Robotics, Automation, Systems dynamics and Integration, Mechatronics and Energy Harvesting, as well as Engineering Ethics, professionalism, and Education. Dr
combinedelectrical and mechanical engineering technology major, with several courses related torenewable energy, energy conversion, green energy manufacturing and sustainability. Our maingoal is to create a highly skilled professional workforce ready to “hit the ground running” aftergraduation and also having most of the qualities of a “global engineer”, a critical thinker and aninnovator which is in total agreement with ABET criterion c (“an ability to design a system,component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”)[7], [8]. During the past 8 years, our ET program developed courses oriented towards energyconversion
management, Hangzhou Dianzi University 2007-2012 Associate Pro- fessor, School of management, Hangzhou Dianzi University 2005-2007 Assistant Professor, School of management, Hangzhou Dianzi UniversityMiss Yuexin Jiang, Zhejiang University Master degree candidate in School of Public Affairs in Zhejiang University. Research direction: Educa- tional Economy and Management.Dr. Xiaofeng Tang, Pennsylvania State University Xiaofeng Tang is a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 University Innovation & Entrepreneurship
earned his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois in 1993 prior to joining the faculty of the University of Arkansas. Hall is very active in both the research and education communities. He has published more than 70 articles and given more than 150 presentations to various groups. His primary teaching and research interests include pavement design, materials, construction, and rehabilitation, in addition to the topics of professionalism, licensure, and ethics. On the education front, he serves as the co-Chair of the ASCE Body of Knowledge Education Fulfillment Committee (BOKEdFC), and is an active participant in the Civil Engineering Division of ASEE. In terms of technical/research efforts, he currently serves on eight
Through a Humanistic Lens” in Engineering Studies 2015 and ”A Game-Based Approach to Information Literacy and Engi- neering in Context” (with Laura Hanlan) in Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference 2015. A classroom game she developed with students and colleagues at WPI, ”Humanitarian Engineering Past and Present: Worcester’s Sewage Problem at the Turn of the Twentieth Century” was chosen by the Na- tional Academy of Engineering as an ”Exemplary Engineering Ethics Activity” that prepares students for ”ethical practice, research, or leadership in engineering.” c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Negotiating a Nineteenth-Century Solution AbstractThis
theshower chair adjustable headrest – mentioned that she wanted to provide solutions to people intheir community working at a meat-packing plant. However, she desisted from addressing thatspecific problem because she thought it would become very politicized. She understood that hercommunity had a history of struggle and subjugation and wanted to prevent any harm to them.This is a clear example of conciencia and empathy. Living in a liminal state5 provided Sofia witha different set of decision-making skills and approaches to solve problems in the community. Shewas aware that options were limited by economics, politics, and social constraints. In this way,Sofia demonstrated an understanding of the importance of ethics in engineering. Ethics
goal was to prepare graduates forengineering practice by equipping them with contextual (also sometimes called “professional”)skills. These calls for reform resulted in the EC2000 accreditation criteria, which require, amongother things, that graduates demonstrate the ability to integrate “realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability” into the design process, including the development of new products. This ability,in turn, rests on other abilities including an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; anability to define and solve problems; an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility;an ability to communicate effectively; the
teaching with engineers and scientists has been geared towards encouraging them to think about the broader social, ethical and political dimensions of their research and training.Dr. Michael R. Caplan, Arizona State University Michael Caplan earned his undergraduate degrees from The University of Texas at Austin and his PhD from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Following post-doctoral research at Duke University Medical Center in Cell Biology, Michael joined the faculty of Arizona State University in 2003, and he is now an Associate Professor in Biomedical Engineering. Dr. Caplan’s research focuses on molecular cooperativity in drug targeting, bio-sensing, and cell sig- naling. Current projects align along
Criterion 3: Student Outcomes: an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams an ability to communicate effectively the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal contextIn addition, it met several of the course objectives. Examine current automotive and robotic manufacturing methods used in the United States and Europe. Identify current and future trends in manufacturing and technology. Analyze the global impact manufacturing and technology has on society and the environment. Identify technology-based ethical issues and conflicts. Evaluate the impacts of a discipline-specific technology observed
generations to do the same2. Therefore,undergraduate civil engineering education should provide instruction in how to consider theaspects of environment, society and economy in design. For instance, the first canon of theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) code of ethics was updated in 1996 to includesustainable development3. ASCE’s Body of Knowledge4 recommends that upon completion of anundergraduate degree, engineers should have knowledge and comprehension of sustainability, andunderstand applications of sustainability.In 1996, ABET revised its accreditation criteria from being a set of detailed prescriptiveguidelines to focusing more on student outcomes in attaining certain technical and professionalskills5. ABET’s accreditation Criterion 3
individual colleges with designing their own plans to alignwith the institution’s broader goals. Change agents must be able to read their institutions’ culture,Kezar and Eckel concluded, in order to develop effective strategies for empowering stakeholderswithin their specific contexts. Empowerment can take different dimensions, and there are nobounds to what it looks like. The crux of empowerment is its result, not its process.Why empower stakeholders to develop a shared vision for change?Stakeholder empowerment is not a strategy to eliminate resistance, although it may have thateffect. Its real goal is to preempt ethical issues in a change process. In an age when “most of thecurrent ethical frameworks for organizations, as well as in society
Organization’s Lisa Tabor Award for Community Service. Using deep insights from a fourteen-year industry career and her strengths as a systems thinker, she is now developing and disseminating empirically-grounded models and strategies for improved human competence, motivation, and learning as it relates to the civil engineering profession and the construction industry. She is a discipline-based education researcher who passionately pursues research to develop an agile, ethical, diverse construction workforce enabled to lead, design, and build sustainable, intelligent infrastructure. Her mission is to transform the construction workforce and sustain change. To this end, she undertakes research that enables her to influence
develop a large range of the skills that arecurrently being underdeveloped. Maker spaces go beyond the traditional machine shopenvironment familiar to the undergraduate curriculum offering access to rapid prototypingequipment and conceptual design spaces coupled with a unique culture that can betransformative to its users.”In their synthesis on the humanitarian engineering literature, Campbell and Wilson suggest thathumanitarian engineering “provides a broader context than is found in mainstream engineeringcourses” and therefore can better address ABET learning outcomes F (professional and ethicalresponsibility), H (understanding the impact of solutions), and C (design within realisticconstraints), with a particular emphasis on ethics (Cambell
designed to assist students with self-efficacy beliefs and personal goals.At this University all engineering and computer science students take an introduction toengineering course that covers the engineering process, teamwork, communication skills, thedifferent branches of engineering, ethics, and co-curricular and extracurricular opportunities.Section sizes are ~30 students, so students can build community with peers and their professor.The professor of the Introduction to Engineering course is the academic advisor for his/her set ofstudents. Students declare or confirm their major by the end of the first semester. Resources tohelp students choose a major include laboratories, advisor meetings, student panels, a semester-long team project