families from traditionally underrepresented populations in engineering are able to develop engineering interest, skills, knowledge, and ways of thinking as a result of engaging in authentic engineering activities within a wide range of learning contexts.Catherine Wagner, University of Notre Dame Catherine Wagner is a research staff member at the Center for STEM Education at the University of Notre Dame. She earned her Master of Education degree from Notre Dame in 2019 while teaching middle school science. She has collaborated with faculty in the Center for STEM on engineering research for several years, most recently leading an undergraduate research lab on early childhood engineering research. In the Center, she also
developed a prescriptive guide for educators.K-12 engineering education has adopted the models used for higher education and industry, andsimplified them to be more age- and developmentally-appropriate. Most of the models arecreated to be prescriptive for the use of educators. In elementary grades, the Engineering isElementary [18] and PictureSTEM [19] curricula introduce simple versions of the engineeringdesign process to students. The Next Generation Science Standards have also presented anengineering design model that is used across all K-12 grade, with three main components:defining and delimiting engineering problems, developing possible solutions, and optimizing thedesign solutions. The recent ASEE Pre-college framework for engineering
Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including Dean’s Awards for Outstanding New Faculty, Outstanding Teacher Award, and a Faculty Fellow. Dr. Matusovich has served the Educational Research and Methods (ERM) division of ASEE in many capacities over the past 10+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal, Advances in Engineering Education and she serves on the ASEE committee for
) advancing engineering design research by integrating new theoretical or analytical frameworks (e.g., from data science or complexity science) and (3) conducting design-based research to develop scaffolding tools for supporting the learning of complex skills like design. He is the Division Chair Elect for the Design in Engineering Education Division for the 2023 ASEE conference.Dr. Jessica E S Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Jessica Swenson is an Assistant Professor at the University at Buffalo. She was awarded her doctorate and masters from Tufts University in mechanical engineering and STEM education respectively, and completed postdoctoral work at the University of Michigan. Her current
Engineers (AIChE) and American Society of Chemical Engineering Education (ASEE) where she adopts and contributes to innovative pedagogical methods aimed at improving student learning and retention.Dr. Yan Chen, University of New Mexico Yan Chen is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University of New Mexico. Her research interests focus on computer supported collaborative learning, learning sciences, online learning and teaching, and educational equity for multicultural/multiethnic edu- cation.Dr. Susannah C. Davis, University of New Mexico Susannah C. Davis is a research assistant professor at the University of New Mexico. She holds a Ph.D. and M.Ed. from the University
Engineering Division of ASEE, as well as recognition for excellence in teaching from the NSPE, the AAEES, and the Association of Environmental Engineering and Science Professors (AEESP). He participated in both the 2006 and the 2015 conferences of the National Academies Keck Futures Initiative (NAKFI) as well as the 2011 Frontiers of Engineering Education Symposium (FOEE) of the U.S. National Academies. Oerther is a four-time recipient of Fulbright, and he has been recog- nized with a Meritorious Honor Award by the U.S. Department of State. Due to his collaborations with nurses and healthcare professionals, Professor Oerther has been inducted as a Lifetime Honorary Member of Sigma Theta Tau, the International Honor Society
. Her primary research interest is science identity, STEM education, and participation in online communities.Mr. Matthew Bahnson, North Carolina State University Matthew Bahnson is a doctoral student at North Carolina State University in Applied Social and Com- munity Psychology. His research interests include engineering identity, diversity, bias, stereotypes, and STEM education. He works with Dr. Cheryl Cass at NCSU.Mrs. Marissa A. Tsugawa-Nieves, University of Nevada, Reno Marissa Tsugawa is a graduate research assistant studying at the University of Nevada, Reno in the PRiDE Research Group. She is currently working towards a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. She expects to graduate May of 2019. Her research
Professional teaching in Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Cui Bono. Engineering and Technological Literacy and Higher EducationAbstractDuring the last five years the TELPhE Division of ASEE been engaging in constructivedialogue with its members about its purposes and intents. In 2016 the author presented apaper at ASEE’s annual conference that raised questions about the intent of technologicalliteracy in society at the present time. To further encourage dialog the Division invited itsmembership to submit short responses to the issues raised in the paper with a view topublishing them in one of the Divisions handbooks. These were published in 2017. Thepublication of the responses serves
, her research spans education and practice, working on the integration of community research into project based learning. Her work overlaps areas of GIS mapping, global sustainable urbanism, design and creativity.Dr. Andrew N Quicksall c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Deep Observation: Geo-Spatial Mapping as a Strategy for Site-Engagement and Problem-DesignAbstractWhile project-based learning powerfully brings students into real world economic andenvironmental contexts, a subject-oriented approach to such work means that they are often ableto remain aloof from real stakeholder engagement and participation, even when working on alocal site [1]. Given
engineering program evaluator for the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). He is an American Society of Civil Engineering Fellow (ASCE), a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), and Phi Kappa Phi National Honor Society. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Exam Wrappers, Reflection and Student Performance in Engineering Mechanics – Part IIAbstractThis paper presents the authors’ continuing study in implementing a metacognitive exercisecalled exam wrappers. Although a previous study of a sophomore-level engineering mechanics(statics and dynamics) course found that exam wrappers did not have a significant
innovative thinking. He is a co-holder of a Guinness World Record. His new book is titled: ”Everyone Loves Speed Bumps, Don’t You? A Guide to Innovative Thinking.” Dr. Daniel Raviv received his Ph.D. degree from Case Western Reserve University in 1987 and M.Sc. and B.Sc. degrees from the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology in 1982 and 1980, respectively.Mr. Daniel Ryan Barb, Florida Atlantic University Daniel Barb is an undergraduate student studying Mechanical Engineering at Florida Atlantic Univer- sity. He spent six years in the United States Navy working in a nuclear power plant aboard a fast attack submarine. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Visual, Intuitive and
given 113 professional presen- tations. She holds membership of the American Chemical Society, the Soil Science Society of America, and SigmaXi. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Analysis of Students’ Personalized Learning and Engagement within a Cyberlearning SystemAbstract“Advance Personalized Learning” is one of the 14 grand challenges of engineering asidentified by the National Academy of Engineering. One possible approach for thisadvancement is to deploy systems that allow an investigator to understand the differencesin the learning process of individuals. In this context, cyberlearning systems, like remoteand virtual labs, that use networked
, curricula materials,professional learning, management, and research.References 1. B. Nelson, “Biologically inspired design: A unique multidisciplinary design model,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2008. 2. M. Eggermont and R. Paul, “Developing holistic engineering competencies in a bio- inspired design course,” Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), 2020. 3. S. Vattam, M. Helms and A. Goel, “Compound analogical design: Interaction between problem decomposition and analogical transfer in biologically inspired design,” Third International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition, June 2008. 4. K. Fu, D. Moreno, M. Yang, and K. L. Wood, "Bio
versions of this analysis and paper with members of the FIU Equity Research Group, FIUSTEM Transformation Institute UMD engineering education research group, Austin Peters. We thankthese individuals and the reviewers for their helpful feedback.References[1] D. Riley, “Inclusivity in Engineering Education,” in The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Philosophy of Science, Routledge, 2020, pp. 409–420.[2] Secules, S., Kali, M. B., & McCall, C. (2022, August). Audio Dissemination for Qualitative and Broadening Participation Research: Lessons Learned and Future Possibilities. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[3] Secules, S., & McCall, C. (2023). What Research Can DO: Rethinking Qualitative Research
teacher practitioner articles, chapters, and research articles, and presents her research regularly through the ASEE Pre-College Engineering Education Division, a division she has chaired. Her current research includes investigating how children plan, fail, and productively persist; how mixed-reality simulated classroom environments can be used to help pre-service and in-service teachers practice facilitating challenging discussions in science and engineering; and how undergraduate engineering design teaching assistants address (and may be able to practice addressing) team conflict within similar simulated environments.Dr. Haritha Malladi, University of Delaware Haritha Malladi is an Assistant Professor of Civil and
the effectiveness of these pedagogies in promoting students’comprehension of engineering principals and interpersonal skills. It presents qualitative datafrom interviews and surveys, along with retention rate data. Overall, the goal is to provideawareness into this pedagogical approach to engineering education and contribute to ongoingdiscussions on approaches that promote holistic, transdisciplinary learning through emotionalengagement of students.BackgroundRetention rates for students enrolled in postsecondary engineering programs have shownfluctuations between forty to sixty percent over the past several decades [1]. According to astudy conducted by the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) in 2017, theretention rates for
role of hip-hop celebrities in constructing racial identity on Black Twitter," Information, Communication & Society, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 352-368, 2019.[3] M. Randle and S. Dolnicar, "Does Cultural Background Affect Volunteering Behavior?," Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 225-247, 2009.[4] S. A. Amponsah‐Afuwape, L. B. Myers and S. P. Newman, "Cognitive predictors of ethnic minorities' blood donation intention," Psychology, Health & Medicine, pp. 357-361, 2002.[5] J. A. Youngman and C. Egelhoff, "Best practices in recruiting and persistence of underrepresented minorities in engineering: a 2002 snapshot.," 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, vol. 2, pp. F2D-11, 2003.[6] E. R
manufacturing au- tomation. As a student, she worked at Kimberly-Clark, Motoman, and Intel and gained experience in the areas of industrial automation, manufacturing, and sensors. As a professor she has grown an international reputation for BID process and pedagogy research and has given invited talks/webinars/lectures to SWE, INCOSE, NASA, and at universities in Canada, France, and USA. As a consultant, she leads practicing engineers and organizations through the process of taking inspiration from nature to solve problems.Dr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University Dr. Carpenter is Founding Dean of Engineering at Campbell University. She is the 2022-23 President of ASEE and one of the recipients of the 2022 NAE Bernard M
Suturin, Monash UniversityDr. Robert Lee Read, Public Invention Robert L. Read, PhD, founded Public Invention in 2019, 35 years after first being inspired to do so by Buckminster Fuller. He is a professional computer programmer and manager, an amateur scientist, physicist, mathematician, mechanical engineer and electrical engineer. He speaks Esperanto fluently. He hopes that 20 years from now you will be able to go to a party and say, ”I’m a Public Inventor” and have everyone know what that means. Email: . Twitter: @robertleereadNathaniel Bechard ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023A democratized open-source platform for medical device troubleshootingIntroductionThe COVID pandemic
the survey items. In contrast, severalsurvey items were found to be correlated with second semester enrollment, specifically theWellness Composite score from the PWS, the overall wellness rating from the ICOPPE, and astudent’s confidence in graduating from WMU. Previous work by the authors found correlationsbetween second semester enrollment and confidence in graduating from WMU for first-yearstudents in Fall 2020 but not for students in Fall 2019 [17]. When survey responses werecompared to third semester enrollment (i.e., retention to the second year), confidence ingraduating from WMU was positively correlated with retention for both cohorts. Additionalwork is required to determine if the current wellness and self-efficacy correlations will
Texas A&M University. He holds a Master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Masdar Institute of Science & Technology and a Bachelor’s degree in Mechan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Paper ID 39732 ASEE 2023 Annual Conference & Exposition, 25-28 June 2023, Baltimore, MD, USA How to Address Sustainability in a Mechanical Engineering Program ― Implementation and ChallengesAbstractWith the growing consciousness of depleting material and energy resources, the concepts ofrenewability and sustainability are becoming increasingly important. Sustainable engineeringrequires improved design of products, systems, and services, targeting better
faculty member for the Scientista Foundation and ASEE student chapters at Binghamton University.Mr. Koenraad E. Gieskes, State University of New York, Binghamton Koen Gieskes currently serves as the Watson College Interim Assistant Dean for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and Interim Director of the Engineering Design Division. He is also director for LSAMP and co-director for STEP and UBMS. Koen first joined the Engineering Design Division at Binghamton Uni- versity as a graduate student in 2004, then, in 2009, he was hired on as a full-time lecturer, in 2017 he became the Assistant Director, and in 2022 began serving as the Interim Director. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
21st Century,” J. Exp. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 91–98, 1999.[2] J. Cantor, “Experiential Learning in Higher Education: Linking Classroom and Community,” 1995.[3] R. Graham, “The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2018. Accessed: Oct. 04, 2018. [Online]. Available: file://engin-storage.m.storage.umich.edu/engin- storage/jcallew/windat.v2/Documents/Conferences/ASEE/2019/MIT_NEET_GlobalStateE ngineeringEducation2018.pdf[4] L. Harrisberger, “Experiential Learning in Engineering Education,” ERIC Clearinghouse, 1976.[5] D. R. Fisher, A. Bag, and S. Sarma, “Developing Professional Skills in Undergraduate Engineering Students Through Cocurricular
Knowledge: AFramework for Teacher Knowledge,” Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarshipin Education, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1017–1054, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.[15] M. Schmid, E. Brianza, and D. Petko, “Developing a short assessment instrumentfor Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK.xs) and comparing the factorstructure of an integrative and a transformative model,” Comput Educ, p. 103967, Jul.2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103967.[16] C. S. Chai, “Teacher Professional Development for Science, Technology,Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Review from the Perspectives ofTechnological Pedagogical Content (TPACK),” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 5–13, 2019
Education,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 858–885, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1080/00221546.2014.11777350.[4] L. Lattuca and J. Pollard, “Towards a Conceptualization of Faculty Decision-Making About Curricular and Instructional Change,” p. 20, 2016.[5] M. Paretti, J. Deters, and M. Menon, “Building a Sustainable University-Wide Interdisciplinary Graduate Program to Address Disasters,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://strategy.asee.org/41956[6] J. R. Deters, M. Menon, M. C. Paretti, and M. Webb, “Exploring Interdisciplinary Identity Development Using Possible Selves: An Exploratory Study,” REES AAEE 2021 conference: Engineering Education Research Capability
iterations.In general, both based on direct positive experience, student feedback, and resulting quality of studentachievement, the author cannot recommend using an ungrading approach highly enough.References(1) Schinske, J; Tanner, K. CBE—Life Sciences Education 2014, 13(2), 159–66.(2) Starch, D.; Elliott, E.C. School Review 1912, 20: 442–57.(3) Starch, D.; Elliott, E.C. School Review 1913a, 21: 676–81.(4) Starch, D.; Elliott, E.C. School Review 1913b, 21: 254–95.(5) Stevenson, D. “A, B, C, D, and F: Meaningful Grades or Random Letters?” Paper presented at the2019 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics conference, September 25–27, 2019, Boston, MA.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFR93oiwFEk#action=share(6) Blum, S.D. “Just One Change (Just
Quarterly Insights, Fall 2021.34. D. Laughlin and B. Laughlin, “Virtual and Augmented Realities – Continuing EngineeringEducation,” in C. Baukal (ed.), Continuing Engineering Education Handbook, Nova Science,New York, 2022, 129-154.35. C. Baukal, B. Olson, and R. Ernst, “Virtual Reality for Continuing ProfessionalDevelopment,” paper 26721 presented at American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)Annual Conference & Exhibition, Tampa, FL, June 2019.36. L. Ausburn, F. Ausburn, J. Martens, C. Baukal, I. Agnew, and R. Dionne, UserCharacteristics, Trait vs. State Immersion, and Presence in a First-Person Virtual World, Journalfor Virtual Worlds Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, December 2019.