Contribution Award as well as the ”Excellence in the Use of Technology ” (research) at EIU. His publications include: ”Ethical and Social Consequences of Biometric Technologies in the USA”, ”Technology in Central America and the Impact on CAFTA” and ”Design of an Industrial Control Laboratory” amongst others. Dr. Chinchilla has been awarded numerous grants and serves in numerous departmental and university committees at Eastern Illinois University.Mr. Harold Jay Harris, Eastern Illinois University School of Technology Page 22.697.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011
3 103 toronto 3 26 other 6 65 correction 3 104 university 3 27 total 6 66 costs 3 105 while 3 28 will 6 67 current 3 106 widgets 3 29 with 6 68 driving 3 107 actions 2 30 would 6 69 example 3 108 agency 2 31 all 5 70 first 3 109 allowed 2 32 alternative 5 71 flaps 3 110 analysis 2 33 decision 5 72 following 3 111 axes 2 34 ethics 5 73 give 3 112 back 2
includes understanding the basics of financial management along withorganizational management including cross-functional team effectiveness, interpersonalcommunication skills and conflict resolution.Societal Values - EMEs value and help promulgate the free enterprise system. They promotehigh standards of engineering and business ethics. EME‟s also possess personal characterattributes typical of entrepreneurs: intuition, integrity, tenacity, courage, and honesty. [10] Page 22.244.4 Figure 1, The KEEN PyramidAssessing the Impact of KEEN Programs on Engineering Education ReformAs the KEEN network develops new
analytical skills. 2 Exhibit creativity and practical ingenuity. 3 Ability to develop designs that meet needs, constraints and objectives. 4 Ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. 5 Good communication skills with multiple stakeholders. 6 Good team skills with people from diverse backgrounds and disciplines. 7 Leadership and management skills. 8 High ethical standards and a strong sense of professionalism. 9 Dynamic/agile/resilient/flexible. 10 Ability to learn and use the techniques and tools used in engineering practice. Ability to recognize the global, economic
M Mcontrast ethical and relatedissues in...Program Learning Outcome 4Plan, Integrate and implementmultiple types of Second (2G) I D M Mand Third Generation (3G)wireless...Program Learning Outcome 5Create strategic analysissoftware and tools to develop I D M M Dwireless, networks and serviceplans.Program Learning Outcome 6Develop simulation models ofthe radio component of wireless I D D M Msystems using MATLAB,SIMULINK and...Program Learning
theirresponse, the Opinio software ensured that only bona-fide students were able to respond, andeach student had only one opportunity to complete the survey. The study had been vettedthrough the research ethics board of Dalhousie University prior to survey administration. Page 22.350.5The survey consisted of eleven questions that were consistent with survey questions administeredto University of Colorado students. The first four questions were for housekeeping, asking foragreement with the consent form, their entering year, gender, and student ID# (for the purpose ofa prize draw). The remaining questions were grouped so as to have no general theme
4.42 4.11 ‐1.50 0.15 f) understand professional and ethical responsibility 2.98 3.33 1.00 0.33 g) communicate persuasively, in writing and orally 2.90 3.39 1.39 0.17 h) understand the impact of engineering solutions in global and society context 2.93 4.11 3.68 1E‐04 i) recognize the need for engaging in life-long learning 3.36 4.06 2.27 0.03 j) know and understand contemporary issues 3.19 4.00 2.55 0.02 k) use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for
document it is stated that “In 2025, civil engineers will serve as masterbuilders, environmental stewards, innovators and integrators, managers of risk and uncertainty,and leaders in shaping public policy.” ASCE continues on to challenge educators in that“Colleges and universities must examine their curricula as they relate to the future civil engineerso advancement toward the vision can be realized.”ASCE now prescribes a body of knowledge (i.e.BOK23) which specifies 24 outcomes needed forprofessional licensure. Of the 24 outcomes, 9 focus on professional practice. These 9 outcomesare: Communication, Public Policy, Business and Public Administration, Globalization,Leadership, Teamwork, Attitudes, Lifelong Learning, and Professional and Ethical
of information needed Access the needed information effectively and efficiently Evaluate information and its sources critically Incorporate selected information into one‟s knowledge base Use information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose Understand the economic, legal, and social issues surrounding the use of information, and access and use information ethically and legally.3Despite the growing importance of lifelong learning skills in our rapidly evolving work Page 22.237.2environment, where technical knowledge has a half life of less than five years, Lattuca,Terenzini, and Volkwein reports that
engineering problems 5. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. 6. An ability to communicate effectively 7. An ability to use modern engineering tools for the practice of engineering.X. References1. “Improving Engineering Design – Designing for Competitive Advantage”, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 19912. Dewhurst, Peter, “DFMA and Simultaneous Engineering – Current Status and Future Trends”, ASME Design Conference and Show, March 1993.3. “The Design and Manufacturing Clinic: Bringing Industrial Projects Into the Classroom”, Philip E. Doepker, ASEE National Conference, June 1999.4. “Implementing the Product Realization Process in the Design Sequence
was developing anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibilities. Only 11 of the 16 students respondedpositively on this item. Somewhat related areas where the students did not overwhelmingly feelthat the course contributed towards meeting the ABET goals were:a) an ability to function in multi-disciplinary teams (9)b) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context (4)c) a knowledge of contemporary issues (9)This information was used to help guide the topics to be considered in more detail in subsequentcourses.One clear theme emerged from the students’ comments on how to improve the course. Thereclearly was some frustration concerning the somewhat ambiguous nature
4 Subtotal 11 Spring Semester CEM 701 Construction Seminar II 1 CEM 751 Advanced Construction Estimating 3 CEM 775 Construction Operations and Management 3 MBA 706 Laws, Regulations, and Ethical Issues 2 CEM 797 Research Thesis 3 Subtotal 12 Fall Semester Business Administration/Civil Engineering Elective 3
also include aspects ofeconomics, sociology, history, and even philosophy which are rarely if ever treated in standardundergraduate engineering curricula. Philosopher of technology Carl Mitcham has recentlycalled upon engineers to philosophize as a way of both improving ethical behavior and increas-ing self-understanding. 7 One classical definition of the proper function of those within a univer-sity is to study the universe and everything in it. While it is true that bits and pieces of the widerfield of engineering knowledge appear in science, history, sociology, and mathematics courses, apicture of engineering as an integrated and significant human activity seldom emerges from thesetreatments by other disciplines. Technological
Industrial Engineering. She holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineer-ing from UTEP. She has interned with Allegiance Healthcare Corporation.LARRY J. SHUMANLarry J. Shuman is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Industrial Engineering at the Universityof Pittsburgh. His primary areas of interest are the application of operations research to improving the engineeringeducational experience and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers. He served as the co-General Chair of the1997 Frontiers in Education Conference held in Pittsburgh, PA.CYNTHIA J. ATMANCynthia J. Atman is an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Washington and Directorfor the Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching (CELT). Her research
processes of Australian University Students:investigations of contextual and personological factors,” Bri. J. educ. Psychology, 51, 384-393(1981) Page 5.110.1122. G. Feletti, J. Drinan and B. Maitland, “Students’ approaches to learning and satisfaction withproblem-based curricula for four different professions,” Assessment and Evaluation in HigherEducation, 13, 163-176 198323. W.G. Perry, Jr., “Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Behaviour in the College Years,” HoltReinhardt and Winston, New York, NY., 1970.24. D.R. Woods, “Problem-based learning: how to gain the most from PBL,” Woods, Waterdown,1994. Text distributed by
American Society of Engineering Education Conference Proceedings.Bush, V., (1945) Science: The endless Frontier, Office of Scientific Research and Development, Washington, D.C., (reprinted 1990 National Science Foundation).De Vries, M.J. (1996). Technology Education: beyond the “Technology is Applied Science” paradigm Journal of Technology Education, Vol. 8, Number 1, Fall, 1996.Garry, F.W. (1986). What does industry need? Engineering Education. January.Gorman, M.E. (1999). Ethics, Invention and Design: creating cross-disciplinary collaborations. 1999 ASEE Conference Proceedings.Gorman, M.E., Richard, L.G., Scherer, W.T., & Kagiwada, J.K. (1995). Teaching invention and design: multidisciplineary learning module
, Mass:Kluwer, forthcoming, 1998.5. Jehn, et al., op. cit. Ancona, D. G., “Outward Bound: Strategies for Team Survival in an Organization,”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, No. 2, 1990, pp. 334-65.RICHARD DEVON is an Associate Professor of Engineering Design & Graphics and Director of the PennsylvaniaSpace Grant Consortium. He has twice been Acting Director of the Science, Technology, and Society Program. Hepublishes on design education, design ethics, international education, and spatial visualization.DOMINIQUE SAINTIVE is Professeur d'Anglais Certificat and in charge of international relations in theDepartment of Organization and Management of Production at the Institut Universitaire Technologie (IUT) on theBethune campus of the University
Leadership research in academia also needs to focus on the ethical aspects andhow it affects learning. This includes the relationship between leadership and learning.There appear to be comparable characteristics of IT professionals and academic faculty. The ITprofessional has been described as high maintenance, and thus unique to lead. The older ITprofessionals are considered stagnant with little desire for new knowledge. They are alsoperceived as not desiring positions of management. 5 Similarly, academic faculty have beendescribed as “the last group of workers in the world who actually own the means of projection intheir job and have life-time job security”. 9 These practices are now being questioned ascorporate management styles are being adopted
between engineers andnon-engineers. Carol Christ, President of Smith College, has noted that the rise of Area Studiesin the humanities and social sciences has arisen out of the growing awareness that for people tounderstand a region, like Asia, Latin America, or (especially during the Cold War), Russia, “theyneeded the tools of multiple disciplines – history, political science, economics, sociology.”6On a more dramatic note, authors ranging from Eric Drexler7 to Bill Joy8 to Braden Allenby9have noted the profound social and ethical challenges of a possible merging humanity withtechnology, and the need for dialog between technologists and humanists.Engineering education, guided by ABET’s Criteria 2000,10 increasingly stresses breadth in
. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.13. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, p. 15.14. Elliott, J., & Luke, D. (2008). Epistemology as ethics in research and policy: the use of case studies. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 4287-119. doi:10.1111/j. 1467-9752.2008.00629.x.15. Shelley, J.S., & Bowen, M. (2009). Innovation in engineering outreach: Engineering 11 as a tool for recruiting minority students to engineering. Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Austin, TX. June
and Technology’s (ABET) General Program Outcomescriteria1 require engineering programs to demonstrate that their students attain an “ability todesign a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical health and safety, manufacturability (orconstructability), and sustainability” and “an ability to use techniques, skills, and modernengineering tools necessary for engineering practice.” For organizations responsible fordesigning, constructing, and maintaining levees and dams, these are two especially importantqualifications for apprenticing engineers. Committee members agree that one of the mosteffective means for achieving these two criteria is through
-class time, required discussion questions were used to give the students achance to interact with each other and with the professor. The questions, posed by the professor,were open ended. Often, they had to do with ‘gray areas’ of materials – ethics, recycling, thepros and cons of changing from one material to another, etc. Other questions required students toresearch a certain topic, and provide links to information that they found interesting or helpful.A portion of the grade for the course was based on an open ended group project. Each group hadan open ended design question to research and answer, with an emphasis on material selection.Normally, student groups would present their solution to such a problem in front of the class.However, due
skills, project management, engineering ethics and other relatedskills.1, 2 This paper focuses on the assessment of the curriculum improvement from these threenew courses.Various methods have been reported in the engineering education literature to assess theeffectiveness of the curriculum improvement. Dempsey et al. 3 presented using senior mini-projects instead of traditional senior capstone projects in electrical and computer engineeringcurriculum assessment. Ricks et al. 4 used student perceptions of their abilities and quantitativemeasures of student performance using both written assignments and laboratory assignments toevaluate the effective of a new embedded systems curriculum. Gannod et al. 5 described the gapanalysis and its impact on
communicating, a. Identifying the goals of and audience for their communication b. Using their understanding of goals and audience to choose appropriate media, language, and content 2. Organize their work, a. Establishing a clear structure or principle of organization b. Creating effective introductory and concluding passages in which they identify their main point and set their work in a larger context 3. Develop content appropriately, a. Displaying a clear ethical sensibility (e.g., reporting data accurately, citing sources of information) b. Asserting and elaborating on claims using evidence and reasoning that are appropriate for their audience and their discipline
seminars often introduce ethics and professionalresponsibility and cover some study survival skills. Intimacy of small group settings is preferredto provide student-faculty interaction. In rare cases, the seminars may have a liberal arts orinterdisciplinary backdrop. Stengel,10 for example, describes a Princeton seminar on space flightwhich exposes liberal arts students to details of technology and engineering students to societalimpacts of technology. Tryggvason and Apelian11 have argued that the engineer of the 21stcentury will be redefined. Advances in information technology have made all informationavailable to everyone everywhere with almost infinite speed and ease. A paradigm shift ineducation is indicated. Now, rather than merely to deliver
heard a story about aprofessor at another university selling solutions manuals online through eBay. While it would benice if all our students were perfectly ethical, it really is not reasonable to expect them not tolook at the solution manual when it is freely and readily available, and it is unfair to grade theproblems when part of the class already has access to the solutions and the other part does not.Since that time the author has picked homework problems from a textbook other than theassigned textbook (and of course not telling the students the source of the new problems).Textbook publishers are quite willing to send copies of alternative titles to instructors, so there isno shortage of sources for questions, and a different book can be
experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. 5. Design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. 6. Function on multi-disciplinary teams. 7. Understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. 8. Understand professional and ethical responsibility. 9. Communicate effectively. 10. Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning. 11. Knowledge of contemporary issues.Figure 11 shows the results of the student survey. The students gave a high score for all items.The students were asked to put a score for their level of confidence in each of the presentedareas. It is important to notes that most of these skills are introduced in all the levels of theengineering
profit businesses through to completion and delivery to the • Analyze business case studies client. • Discuss ethical and legal aspects of business decisions • Communicate effectively in a short oral presentation • Interview potential clients to determine their needs • Work
within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, health and safety, and manufacturability. 10. Function effectively on teams. 11. Identify, analyze and solve technical problems. 12. Communicate effectively through the use of industry accepted software, verbal and written communication. 13. Recognize the need for and engage in life‐long learning. 14. Demonstration of professional and ethical responsibility. 15. Understand the impact of solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context. 16. Committed to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement. Table 1 Management-Oriented Skills Assessed During Alumni SurveyA header to each set of questions showed a Likert-type scale to
(c) design a system, comp or process (l) proficiency in math (d) function on teams (m) proficiency in four areas (e) solve engineering problems (n) experiments in more than one area (f) prof & ethical responsibility (o) perform civil eng design (g) communicate effectively (p) prof practice issues (h) broad education (q) work experience (i) lifelong learning a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p qCE 493-eng design S09