% improvement inthe reduction of single department capstone programs over 11 years indicates that more workremains in order to achieve multidiscipline engineering capstone programs.This manuscript documents and reflects upon the University of Maine MET program’s progresstowards multidisciplinary capstone. These efforts were realized via two distinct avenues: (1) theintroduction of five MET projects having significant electromechanical components; and (2) theintroduction of an MET-EET multidisciplinary project. Both types of projects are reviewedwithin this work.2. Background2.1 Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) ProgramThe University of Maine’s MET program capstone spline consists of 2 courses ‒ MET 464 (2credits) in the fall semester, and MET 465
technical areas is very low, and thus, companiescan have an in-road into hiring our graduates. In addition, through the projects, companies getinsight into new technologies and process which are used to solve their problems. Thisinteraction is an important part of the NIU Department of Technology operations and we havedeveloped great relationships with many of the regional companies. This avenue between NIUand industry is expanding in the types of projects undertaken and the numbers of companies withwhom we work. Through industry interaction all parties win!References1. Fornaro, R.J., Heil, M.R, and Alan L. Tharp, A. L., 2006, “Reflections on 10 years of sponsored senior design projects: Students win–clients win!,” The Journal of Systems and
progressive educator John Dewey. John Dewey suggested that theprocess of learning was more important than goals or predetermined learning outcomes. Furtherhe suggested that if learning is to be successful it requires the learner to take an active role in thatprocess 3. John Dewey believed that “reflection involves not simply a sequence of ideas, but aconsequence—a consecutive ordering in such a way determines the next as its proper outcome,while each in turn leans back on its predecessors.” 4Evolution of Online EducationDistance education, defined as a method of delivering education and instruction to students whoare physically separated from the student, is certainly not a new concept. Today’s myriad ofonline education offerings, ranging from
progress of the course throughout the semester Periodically update course content to reflect evolving technology Relate curriculum to real life problems and to current events Draw on personal experience and use student examples for practical applications Provide suitable activities that appeal to each learning style Understand personal learning style Encourage class participation Use active or cooperative learning after careful planningReaching Students in Large Classes: A Seminar/DiscussionIn February, 2018, U of A faculty gathered for a seminar/discussion on how to better reachstudents in larger classes, sponsored by the U of A Teaching Support Center. The format for theevent was a short presentation by the moderator, the lead author in this
salient for ourparticipants. Participants completed an Identity Circle and reflected upon the interaction betweentheir identities and their engineering education pursuits. They selected from a list of roles andidentities that we provided, and were encouraged to add additional ones, if desired (see Figure 1).They then placed the identities on the three rings of the Identity Circle diagram (Levels 1 through3) to illustrate the centrality of a particular identity to their current experiences; respondentscould also place a particular label just outside the diagram (Level 4). For example, if the mostimportant part of her identity was being a woman, the participant would place the “gender” labelin the inner concentric circle. Participants limited their
the building collapsed similar enough that useful and the team had to come to an agreement comparisons are drawn. whose fault the collapse was. Followed Necessitates some form of debrief by a debrief on the social difficulties or reflection. associated with ethics-related engineering disasters (Lloyd & van de Poel, 2008). Feedback-practice Students practice the application of A digital game that gave students skeleton loop concepts or skills, get feedback code, asked students fill in the rest of the
(Epicenter). Chen earned her undergraduate degree from UCLA and her Ph.D. in Communication with a minor in Psychology from Stanford University in 1998. Her current research interests include: 1) engineering and entrepreneurship education; 2) the pedagogy of ePortfolios and reflective practice in higher education; and 3) reimagining the traditional academic transcript.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999
their engineeringcourses. We also found that neuroticism and conscientiousness are related to students’ feeling ofstress. These results may be reflective of students who have low emotional stability, seek tofollow social norms and conventions, and have abilities to succeed in the “stress culture” ofengineering [63]. Grit-persistence of effort was related to the other affective constructs ofidentity, motivation, and belonging, but Grit-consistency of interest had a weak negativecorrelation with many of the stress indicators. This result may point to differential factors of howGrit may operate in engineering students when compared to the larger populations in which ithas been used previously, like psychology students and adults. In a different
the data collected by U.S. Center for Disease Control andPrevention, and shows that Twitter data can improve the model prediction accuracy [12]. Theseefforts suggest that social media is an appropriate channel for better understanding STEMeducation issues.STEM education has a key implication for the workforce development and thus, the distributionof STEM workforce can be a reflection of the state of STEM education in the society.Unfortunately, the recent events and campaigns for stereotyping in the workforce indicate the poordiversity of STEM workers and how the minorities are stereotyped – particularly women. Thisbehavior further undermines the efforts to raise awareness for STEM education. On the other hand,there are several initiatives by
onrequiring matching funds from the local campuses and providing data to administratorsat the end of the project and was too limited. When the Toys’n MORE funding ended,one of the three campuses was able to support their STEM summer bridge program foronly one more summer. Reflecting on the Toys’n MORE project, a sustainability planneeds to start at the beginning of any time-limited funding. For the Engineering Aheadproject , we are pursuing three strategies for the long-term sustainability of summerbridge programs at Penn State Abington, Altoona, and Berks: Engage the campus administration early on o Share the positive results of previous bridge projects o Request a financial contribution for the summer bridge programs for each
. These programs appear to be effective atincreasing the retention and graduation of under-prepared but otherwise motivated andacademically talented students, but it could be that these struggles are reflective of broaderchallenges in attracting women to engineering. Redshirt programs can only help students whoapply - there is clearly more work to be done to encourage women to pursue engineering.While the Redshirt in Engineering model is designed with students from low-incomebackgrounds in mind, it provides a framework for supporting the success of students from othergroups historically excluded from engineering. The redshirt model targets both personal andstructural obstacles to retention - in addition to providing financial and academic support
theprogram for at least a year) and to reflect back to rate themselves in these same areas before theygot involved with the program. Retrospective post-then-pre designs are useful to reduceproblems that arise when program participants under or over-report their knowledge or abilitieson pre-tests due to a lack of understanding. Retrospective post-then-pre tests are designed toreduce this “response shift bias” (University of Wisconsin-Extension, 2005).A total of 51 retrospective surveys were collected from youth who consented to participate in theevaluation study. These included 17 TechHive participants and 34 participants from acomparison group of other interns.YouthInterviewsTechHive youth were asked to participate in an interview at the end of the
, the ADVANCE Institute conducts a faculty climatesurvey every two years. The survey was piloted in 2014, before the grant was awarded, in orderto collect baseline data. The original survey was modeled off of faculty climate surveys fromother ADVANCE grantees including the University of Wisconsin and the University ofMichigan. The last version of the survey, set to be fielded in February 2018, was revisedsubstantially to better reflect current climate concerns and areas of programmatic interest forADVANCE. That being said, we have chosen to leave core questions unchanged in order toanalyze longitudinal data over the life of the grant.The faculty climate survey is a primary source of data to understand the experiences of faculty ofcolor on
ofelectrons. When this insulating barrier is small enough, just a few nanometers, then electronscan, as defined by quantum mechanics, tunnel their way through the barrier and to the other side.The free layer changes orientation based on Spin Transfer Torque of the electrons and thedirection of the current.Parallel orientation can be generated when electrons pass through the pinned layer first,represented in Figure 1A below. The electrons take on a specified orientation that matches thefixed layer’s magnetic orientation. Due to the electron’s spin polarization they will apply atorque onto the free layer causing the free layer’s magnetic orientation to match the fixed layer’s.During this process some electrons will be reflected back towards the pinned
BPHS. 2. Have higher program retention rates for S-STEM Scholars than they would have had without the S-STEM program. Specifically, to have a 95% second-year retention rate and an 80% five-year graduation rate. 3. Improve the career-related knowledge of S-STEM Scholars through participation in career-development activities, including career counseling and formal reflection on internship experiences in relation to their assessed interests and values. 4. Have at least half of the S-STEM Scholars intern in the electric power industry and work in the industry upon graduation.Student Selection Process and Criteria The S-STEM program worked with the three partner high schools to recruit students fromeach high
, theCALSTEP team will have as one of its priorities connecting with organizations (e.g., theCalifornia Online Education Initiative, or OEI) to find resources to support the effort todisseminate the CALSTEP resources and prepare additional faculty to use the resources in theirclassrooms.AcknowledgementsThis project is supported by the National Science Foundation through the ImprovingUndergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) program, Award No. DUE 1430789. Any opinions,findings, and recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional
, Writing and Learning Disabilities Vol. 6, pp. 223-247.9. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. & Smith, K.A. (1991), “Active Learning Cooperation in the College Classroom,”Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.10. Fairhurst, A.M., & Fairhurst, L.L. (1995), “Effective Teaching, Effective Learning,” Palo Alto, CA: Davies-black Publishing11. Dale, E. (1969), “Audiovisual Methods in Teaching,” (3rd ed.), New York: Dryden Press.12. Wankat, P.H. (1999), “Reflective Analysis of Student Learning in a Sophomore Engineering Course,” Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol.88, (no.2), 195 -203.13. Finelli, C., Klinger, A., & Budny, D.D. (2001), “Strategies for Improving the Classroom Environment,” Journalof Engineering Education, Vol 90, (no.4), pp. 491
Sciences, Vol.9, No.3, pp.313-314.26. Oakes, W. C., Jamieson, L. H., and Coyle, E. j.,(2001), “EPICS: Meeting EC 2000 Through Service Learning,” Proc., ASEE Conference and Exhibition, Session 3461.27. Bright, A., and Dym, C. L., (2004), “General Engineering at Harvey Mudd: 1957-2003,” Proc., ASEE Conf. and Exhibition, Session 1471.28. Adams, R. S., Turns, J., and Atman, C. J., (2003), “Educating Effective Engineering Designers: The Role of Reflective Practice,” Design Studies, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp.275—294.29. Mills, J. E., and Treagust, D. F., (2004), “Engineering Education- Is Problem – Based or Project - Based Learning the Answer?” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, www.aaee.com. Au/journal/mills_treagust03.pdf.30
researchprojects that were funded by the universities. The data presented in this study has been collectedfrom a total of 13 research projects in the fields of architecture and manufacturing. Both currentand past research projects have been included to reflect on if undergraduate research (UR)encouraged them in future research opportunities, whether UR encouraged them to enter intograduate schools, or UR impacted their professional development. All the data presented for eachproject including students current position has been tracked over time and collected by theauthors. Student demographic data has been presented in the study to see if there is any effect ofgender, students’ academic year, GPA, immigration status, on their willingness to be engaged
& Systems course atthe end of the semester asked students to consider several reflective questions. The completesurvey presented to students is show in Appendix A. The same survey was given to students whoused the DSK board in lab and those who used the MATLAB R Audio System Toolbox.TM Intotal, all 78 students in the Spring 2017 and Summer 2017 courses responded. Of these, 45 usedthe DSK board for labs and 33 used the Audio System ToolboxTM .Several of these questions were pedagogical in nature and were posed to seek student impressionsof their self-learning after having completed the course and associated laboratories. The specificquestions relating to course learning, and hence pedagogical questions, are the first 8 questions inthe
also want to workwith faculty in other engineering disciplines to ensure that environmental protection issues areaddressed. This could include giving guest lectures in courses, particularly design-focusedcourses where environmental considerations should be part of the constraints and criteria for allengineering projects.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant#1158863. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] StartClass by Graphiq. Compare Colleges & Universities. http://colleges.startclass.com/ Accessed March 10, 2017
pollution should be responsible for the cleanup. Reflecting on thepresumption that more than one party could be identified as a “contributor” of pollution,a percentage allocation must also be determined. Once an allocation has been made, itthen must be determined if the identified “contributor” has the ability to pay theproportionate share. Which of the identified parties possesses the financial resourcesand/or insurance coverage to pay for a cleanup? Pollution cases may require adetermination of whether employees or other individuals may have been impacted byenvironmental pollution and suffered either acute or chronic health effects.In pursuit of identifying responsible parties and implementing remedies for pollution orcontamination, this paper
rankings reflect theimprovement of a student’s scores after the first test. The hours per week spent outside of classby quartile are summarized in Table 5. Table 3 Utilization of Resources by Quartiles QUESTION OF THE CLASS SUMMARIES TEXTBOOK DAY Ranked Ranked by Ranked Ranked by Ranked Ranked by by Grade Improvement by Grade Improvement by Grade Improvement Top 55% 47% 37% 38% 20% 13% Quartile Second 48% 47% 46% 42% 13
studentsare trained in an educational atmosphere that defines and strengthens their career identities [11].In order to improve career identities and success, construction curriculum should include well-designed senior projects [4]; service learning [12]; industry partnerships and professionaldevelopment workshops [13]; electives [14]; project-based learning [5]; internships [15]; and trainstudents to use updated technology [16]. Educators should not be afraid to modify existing coursesor even introduce new courses to reflect changing needs of societies [14]. Due to theirbackgrounds, some students are aware of the changing needs in the construction industry, and enterinto construction programs expecting to be prepared to meet the most current needs of
in terms of the themes and overarching goals. Faculty have varying levelsof input into and interaction with the execution of the strategic plan with the majority of theirfocus concentrating on the day-to-day operations of their research and academic programs.Faculty well-being surveys can reflect the status of the faculty views on their collectiveexperiences in an institution; some issues raised in these surveys can be addressed in targetedcollege of engineering faculty development initiatives.The purpose of this paper is to describe the process of how an established college of engineeringfaculty development office at North Carolina State University integrated the findings of aqualitative faculty well-being survey and programmatic faculty
eliminate any issues a minority of students had because they could not ask questionswhen watching video lectures. The overall depth and quality of questions generally reflected thestatus of the course as being outside the core interests of the students, who were mostlyMechanical Engineering majors.Note that the use of something like Piazza seems to be critical to making flipped classroomswork. Students need to know that they have a mechanism for asking questions, no matter whereor when they are working. Also, it encourages students to help one another. There is littlecompetition for grades in these courses because standards are clear and students are remindedover and over that our goal is that, someday, everyone will earn an A. Piazza also provides
personalized feedback. 5)Reflection allows students to think about how their pre-existing ideas about a topic have evolvedand expanded through completing the learning block. In this study, we examined the impact ofthe “Idea Generation” and “Concept Development” learning blocks. Each learning block takesapproximately 6 hours to complete and is built on pedagogical best practices that combines self-study with remote feedback [29]. It focuses on a student-centered teaching approach developedaround the constructivist learning theory [30], which allows content sharing online without timeand location limitations [31]. The learning blocks are built around the best practices in teachingand learning to promote active engagement, which is essential for success
intheir home country their entire life. A follow-up ANOVA was run between the two variables andthey were found to be predictive of each other. Over 80% of those who spoke English as asecond language and said that had lived outside of their home country said that the United Stateswas the country they had lived in for more than 6 months outside of their home country. Asmany of this subset of respondents came from different countries, they may not have deemedtheir responses as unethical when reflecting on the ethical underpinnings of their home country.As this subset of students also learned English as a second language, a limited vocabulary andlack of fluency in English may have negatively impacted their ability to answer the writtenresponses, or
4.00 0.79 0.003 I plan to use technology in my future career 3.00 4.33 0.57 0.057 I am interested in careers that use technology 2.60 4.20 0.89 0.016 I plan to use engineering in my future career 2.77 4.11 0.71 0.000 I am interested in careers that use engineering 3.00 4.44 0.55 0.005As can be seen in Table 4, the change in student STEM career interest as reflected in all but onequestion was significant. There was an upward trend in the low interest students’ interest incareers in STEM fields. The only question that was not significant is “I plan to use technology inmy future career” with a p-value of 0.057. The same