diversity with only one African-American and one student from Africa.The overall categorization of the Homework problems is shown in Table 2. Note that eventhough 33 students were registered for the course that on any given week only 25 to 30 bothturned in homework and were present to take the quiz. At the university, attendance is taken atclass and the students are allowed to miss lectures totaling 2 weeks’ worth of meetings over thecourse of the semester.The homework breakdown shows some immediate points. The number of homework problemscategorized by the fidelity paid to the published solutions is not constant but varies by problem.For example, the number of problems categorized as 3 (reflecting virtual copying of solutionmanual) varied from a
Northwestern and Director of the Northwestern Center for Engineering Education Research. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Required Computer Science Education in BME Undergraduate ProgramsAbstract Data collected for the Biomedical Engineering Education Summit Meeting in 2019 showedthat computer programming was required of undergraduates in biomedical engineering andbioengineering at more than 98% of the 57 accredited BME programs that responded to asurvey. This is an increase over an earlier dataset from 2004, reflecting the increased need forengineers to be competent in programming. However, education in computer programming cantake many forms, and there has
increases low.For instance, in 2009, an in-state, full-time student would have paid $7,226 in tuition and in theacademic year 2016-17, a full-time student has paid $8,547 in tuition. These modest tuition ratesreflect approximately a 3% increase each year since 2009. Although, a relatively smaller increasein percentage, it has outpaced Indiana’s annual per capita income and the financial impact oftuition increases is clearly reflected in the growing number of enrollments of students whoqualify for financial assistance. Specifically, 40.1% of ISU’s total undergraduate population hasreceived federal Pell grants in fall 2017 [4] (see Table 1). Table 1: Undergraduate Enrollment Comparison
responsible for the majorityof the light emission from surface water while the bloom dominating the water column (Zamyadiet al., 2016). Therefore, detection of the algae and cyanobacteria by aerial imaging can be donebased on fluorescent reflection from surface water. Furthermore, several algorithms weredeveloped over the past decade to correlate the aerial light reflection spectrum to the algaebiomass and species for the purpose of bloom monitoring and prediction. Interdisciplinaryknowledge on geography, biology, surface hydrology, computer science and mathematics arerequired to work on this research project. Students recruited to work on this project will have theopportunity to apply the skills learned in their own major courses, meanwhile, expose
]. Engineering from a 21st century perspective, focuses onfinding solutions aligned with the needs and expectations of clients, while adhering to ethical andsocietal expectations of making the world a better place for others to live in [14]. There isevidence that the structure of some engineering programs may not be conducive to developing amindset aligned with 21st century engineering [15]. Given the potential for makerspace projectsto be aligned with a 21st century philosophy of engineering, there is justification for assessing ifstudents are developing a 21st century engineering mindset.Belongingness and InclusionThrough the use of makerspaces, students may gain a sense of how much they perceive theybelong and are included in situations reflective of
Exploratory Activity (LCPS Challenger Center for Space Science Education) 8:00 pm – 9:00 pm Reflective/Down Time 9:00 pm Lights out/ Bed TimeThe NM PREP Academy is a two-week residential, immersive engineering education programwhere students are fully immersed in an engineering curriculum from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm.Beyond the engineering curriculum, the participants also engaged in exploratory activitiesdesigned to improve teamwork, leadership, and to expose the students to various experiences Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference
the various types/formats of research programs pursued byengineering technology students in the Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering Technology Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference Organized by The University of Texas at Dallas Copyright © 2017, American Society for Engineering Education 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference(MMET) program at Texas A&M University, and a reflection of their experiences and the feedbackobtained. Conducted either as individual or group projects, as well as those tackling hands-on vs.fundamental problems, the response from this select group of students was that they
, themicrocontroller. The steering system is implemented using a microcontrollers, and the onboard sensors.Proportional Integration Derivative (PID) feedback loop usingan encoder mounted on the steering rack. Similar feedback Ultrasonic Sensorssystems control the braking and speed control using a brake In order to ensure the safety of riders, pedestrians and theencoder and speed tachometer respectively. The APM is able vehicle itself, detecting objects is an important feature of allto detect objects in front using a LiDAR for light reflecting autonomous vehicles. One of the methods selected for objectobjects and seven ultrasonic sensors for sound reflecting detection was ultrasonic rangefinders. The Maxbotix
were reviewed by thefirst author for general themes. The first author then went through all the responses again, andlooked specifically for evidence of each theme in each response and labeled them accordingly.The number of times a theme was brought up was tabulated.2.2.3 Classroom ObservationsThe instructor recorded his observations and reflections after each class period. The instructoralso invited a peer to observe the first class period.3. Results3.1 Results from online surveyOf the 44 students in the class, 33 students participated in the survey, giving a response rate of75%.3.1.1 Demographic InformationOf the survey participants, all were freshmen save one, who was a sophomore. The genderbreakdown was 73% female, and 27% male. In terms of
significant. Failure to recognize this either means students do notunderstand the concept of significant digits or are not disciplined enough to apply it. Someactually appear to believe the answer is more accurate if they include more significant digits.Significant digits is an important concept that needs to be ingrained before starting full-timeemployment. A supervisor accustomed to working with real data will view results with too manysignificant digits as a poor reflection on the employee and potentially on the employee’s alma-mater as well.Students are normally taught about measurement uncertainty, but either fail to understand theconcept or forget it when reporting experimental results. Some seem to believe theirmeasurements are much more
, the University Registrar reported that the grade of A was themost prevalent grade at WSU.5 Over the next several years, the Faculty Senate commissioned a studyon the use of a plus-minus grade system in lieu of the current whole-letter grade system and conducteda faculty survey on the issue. Advocates for the change focused on how the new grading system wouldprovide a more accurate reflection of student performance. The proposal to change to a plus-minusgrade system was ultimately approved by a single vote during the university’s General FacultyMeeting,6 and the university transitioned to this new grading system during the 2009-2010 academicyear. Since the implementation of the plus-minus grading system, many honors students haveexpressed
. Students write about their experience during the last ten (10) minutes of class. Students wrote they felt “refreshed” after the meditation experience and were going to try to add reflective time to focus on stress management into their schedules. Many students were very concerned about their Life Stressors Index and wrote about coping mechanisms they plan to employ in order to improve their own lives. They also wrote about how they will look for signs of distress in their construction crews and work to improve work-life balance for themselves and their subordinates.Week 4 – Leadership, Personality, and Learning Styles The module begins by juxtaposing the definitions of leadership and management. For this first class in the
).To assess the whether or not student could learn pseudo-code using the online learning modulealone, a control group study was completed. While all of the students were given access to theonline learning module, only half of the students were also given in-class instruction that coveredthe same material. Since there were three different instructors involved in the course, the studentsthat received the additional in-class lectures were all taught by the same instructor. Bycomparing the performance on the third (pseudo-code) quiz we can infer whether or not theonline module alone is sufficient to teach students how to transfer their ROBOLAB knowledgeto another programming language.Grades for the reflective reports were used to assess the
learning to occur: 1) Active Experimentation (protoboards, simulations, case study,homework), 2) Reflective Observation (logs, journals, brainstorming), 3) AbstractConceptualization (lecture, papers, analogies), and 4) Concrete Experience (laboratories, fieldwork, observations). This project is investigating the impact on student learning outcomesproduced by incorporation of the Mobile Studio pedagogy in courses that will be delivered usingthe Kolb cycle to sequence the courses’ activities as follows: 1. Students are introduced to topics and are then asked to formulate hypotheses and plan/perform experiments to determine the validity of their intuition. 2. The students relate their outcomes to real-life applications and provide a sense as
(IC) chip package to theprinted circuit board (PCB). A segment of such an interconnect topology can be assembled as asimulation model using Ansoft HFSS and simulated to get a feel for a variety of parameterswhich govern the transformations of an electric signal propagating via such structure. Inparticular, once the architecture shown in Figure 1 is drawn, students can attempt the followingsets of simulations: Generate and plot S-parameters at the frequencies of interest – learn to read S-parameter tables to determine the point of rapid increase of signal attenuation and discern frequency regions with high reflection loss; Run an animation of an electric field propagation along the interconnect structure
. This procedure establishes thevalidity of the instrument. Consequently, the first step in creating this tinkering and technicalself-efficacy instrument was to survey experts in the field of engineering. The experts consistedof a volunteer sample of engineering faculty, students, and practicing engineers, who aremembers of ASEE. There were a total of 101 respondents (71 members of ASEE, 24 engineeringstudents in a design course at a large university located in the southwest, and 6 engineeringfaculty at the same institution). The gender composition of the ASEE experts is unknown butthere were two females in the ASU faculty group and four female engineering students. It isreasonable to expect that the gender composition of the ASEE group reflects
% 5%teams that functioned as part of thecurriculum, compared with 24% for non-minorities. This likely reflects transportationissues for urban minority students that limitthe students’ ability to participate inextracurricular clubs, as well as the tendencyin even highly integrated schools for the after- Public School 70%school clubs to self-segregate in ways that donot occur in class. We are analyzing casestudies of integrated schools that are successful in encouraging minority FLL participation to Figure 12a--FLL Curricular Integration for Minorities (2006
rules of emailetiquette and style for various audiences; how email reflects the author, positively or negatively;and how to establish appropriate tone in the message. At the end of the class, I informallyquestioned each section of the class about whether their emails had been suitably written, giventhe designated audience. For instance, I asked the section which wrote emails to potentialemployers whether any of the students had used emoticons in their writing.ResultsAfter I collected the papers from the two classes, I separated them according to the intendedaudience. Taking two of the eight common rules for email writing documented16--“Use ‘onlinelingo’ abbreviations cautiously” (for example, “C U” and “OMG”) and “Reserve emoticons forpersonal
followed the same coding technique to the end of each of the source documents.The descriptions of the major nodes were later modified to reflect the participants’ ideasmore accurately and comprehensively when coding the rest of the source documents.Additionally, new sub nodes were added whenever the analyst felt that the contents of thedocument did not match the existing sub nodes.Step 3: Node Structure Modification: After finishing coding all of the documents, theanalyst browsed the node and subnode categories and paid more attention to thosesubnodes that had few passages (In other words, the subnodes that were very infrequentlycoded.) The analyst reread the contents more carefully and tried to recategorize them byshaping and merging the subnodes
want companies to think we were turning out inferiorengineers.” He did not want me to reflect a negative light on the Department and risk losing their research Page 13.1125.4grants from companies like Dow Chemical or DuPont.Because I didn’t know any better, I believed him. I never told a soul what he said to me for about tenyears. My Mom still doesn’t know. I remember spending a good hour or two sitting on this hill every daycrying and praying to God to get me out of this prison of a program. It was a very humbling time of mylife.I must say that if it were not for my faith in God, I would have succumbed to a deep depression and
that individuals are self-reflective, and evaluate their decisions throughouttheir course of action; therefore, behavior is premeditated and is guided by intentions 3. Aperson’s decision upon a course of action is interrelated to his or her emotions, biological events,cognition, and environmental events. Self-efficacy influences behavior through fivemechanisms. A person’s level of self-efficacy determines his or her: a) goals; b) persistence inthe face of obstacles 1; c) strategies to attain goals; d) emotional responses; and e) selection ofenvironments 3.Self-efficacy theory proposes six sources for an individual’s self-efficacy beliefs. These sourcesare: 1) a person’s successes and failures (mastery experiences); 2) a person’s ability to
program. It is important to note that the intent ofCapstone Design program is to reflect the technical excellence and expertise of thedepartment while providing a variety of project types and challenges for the students. TheIndustry Partner program and projects are an important component of program but are notintended to be the sole source of the projects for student consideration.Capstone Design Projects Course ObjectivesThe senior design projects are developed with the support of local industry, interestedfaculty, student organizations, and interested students. The projects reflect the academicintegrity and excellence of the Mechanical Engineering department. A committed facultyand Industrial Advisory Board are instrumental in this process.It
. Most of our course outcomes have not changed withchanges in technology. Many of the fundamental concepts remain the same. However, there arechanges that truly reflect fundamental changes:Outcome: Understand decoders and memory expansion techniquesChanges: We do still cover the basics of bus interfacing and memory expansion. However,because we use microcontrollers exclusively and there no longer is an accessible bus system, thisarea has been deemphasized. Approximately, 8 hours of material down to the equivalent of threehours.Outcome: Competency in assembly language programming and programming tools including aprogramming editor, assembler, and debugger.Changes: This outcome has become essential. In the distant past, it was ok to have students
learning to occur: 1) Active Experimentation (protoboards, simulations, case study,homework), 2) Reflective Observation (logs, journals, brainstorming), 3) AbstractConceptualization (lecture, papers, analogies), and 4) Concrete Experience (laboratories, fieldwork, observations). This project is investigating the impact on student learning outcomesproduced by incorporation of the Mobile Studio pedagogy in courses that will be delivered usingthe Kolb cycle to sequence the courses’ activities as follows: 1. Students are introduced to topics and are then asked to formulate hypotheses and plan/perform experiments to determine the validity of their intuition. 2. The students relate their outcomes to real-life applications and provide a sense as
the BlackBoard or WebCT systems. The immediatefeedbacks will not only help learners to contemporaneously reflect on their learning, but alsocontribute to reflection by educators on the overarching learning design. It has been founded byBrosvic et al. that when confronted with previously encountered quiz questions on the finalexamination, a significant improvement in retention will be achieved if the students were initiallyprovided with immediate feedback rather than delayed feedback or no feedback, and even greaterretention when provided with multiple attempts on the initial encounter.To make it easier to use CAPE-authored learning experience, the eLMS platform can betransparently embedded into BlackBoard and WebCT systems. Therefore
available to both the student and their Page 12.528.10Faculty Coordinator. This will be of use in counseling the student and helping them toself-reflect upon the previous term’s practical learning experience. Additionally, FacultyCoordinators will have access to the student’s evaluation of the work term. Differentialsbetween the supervisor and the self-evaluation should provide indications of perceptiveerror on the part of either the student or supervisor. While the Faculty Coordinator willhave to engage in a credibility evaluation at this point, the information provided willcertainly identify areas of concern for the individual. Over time, it will be
by much of their academic experience in the classroom. The link betweentheory and practice may be spoken, but it is seldom experienced, for many of our students. Itis well known that all education9 is deficient that does not present a proper balance betweenexperience and reflection, and this type of imbalance is especially unfortunate when it occursin technical fields. As shrinking budgets put increasing pressure on undergraduate laboratory education, and as agreater percentage of students enter the curriculum without practical experience in mechanicsor a familiarity with tools and tooling, there is a strong need to expose aerospace engineeringstudents to these realities of the aviation workplace, a workplace that traditionally has
engineers is their problem-solving ability. Indeed, ABETcriteria5,6 reflect this since at least five of the eleven outcomes relate directly to problem-solving skills. Many engineering curricula have focused strongly on providing students athrough grounding in the basics of a given discipline as delivered through lecture. Asteady slide ruled by “content tyranny” to increased reliance on “lecturing about” moreand more technical material is a common symptom of the huge amounts of information inthe engineering disciplines. Yet with so much content to master, we as faculty frequentlyforget that effective problem solving is predicated on integrated understanding oftechnical material.Froyd and Ohland7 emphasize the need for integrated engineering
take the class because they believe that using robotics as a teaching tool fits theirlearning style; robotics not only assisted learning, applied properly it inspires students to learn.Nevertheless, there are various learning styles, they vary from person to person, and most peoplehave many of them. McKeachie reflected that too many teachers think of students as a Page 12.1174.4featureless mass; too many rarely vary their teaching methods, thinking that the method bywhich they were taught is best for everyone [4]. However learning styles are preferences andhabits of learning that have been learned and everyone is capable of going beyond the
experience. Typically, curriculum mapping would be completed by course instructors,however through student participation in the process, it was estimated that a more relevant view of whatis actually learned by the student would be produced. Through reflections from the student, instructorsand program administration responsible for curriculum organization and delivery, this paperdemonstrates the benefits and challenges of student-led curriculum mapping and how results can be usedto improve the overall student learning experience in an engineering program. The benefits specific to aninterdisciplinary curriculum, in which courses are developed and delivered by individuals from variousdepartments, are also addressed