. Before describing some specifics of our project, it is useful to reflect on past approaches to teaching core knowledge in the engineering curriculum. Literature suggests that it typically follows one of three models: 1) traditional; 2) integrated; 3) in-between [9,15,20,33]. In the traditional approach, core subjects are taught by faculty in their respective disciplines with little regard for the ultimate application. This approach, as cited earlier, is one of the reasons for low retention rates [6,15,17,19,31]. An integrated core approach is one where students learn multiple
unguided. The JavaScript syntax checker has helped Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Educationsomewhat in this regard, since it locates mismatched/missing parentheses and unrecognizablevariables. Multiple choice questions can address this issue, but they are not as effective from alearning standpoint. Since problem sets can be submitted until a student achieves their desiredscore, it would simply be too easy for a student to obtain scores that do not clearly reflect theirlevel of understanding. In fact, there is not currently a good way to make computer homeworkfeel like the same experience as handwritten
context of the region where engineering solutions willbe implemented. Because these courses are not offered every semester, the PGE also permitscourses that allow a student to independently focus on cross-cultural issues. Students can use anIndependent Study option to work with a faculty member whose research involves working withinternational colleagues, suppliers, etc. Strict guidelines for the independent study project havebeen developed (how much interface necessary with international counterparts, plans forpersonal goals on improving skills, and a reflection paper) to ensure that the student gains insightinto cross-cultural challenges. One other option is for students to take part in an EngineeringCross-Cultural Training Series. This option
(Mwhen in association with Btu means thousand). In Equation [1], S is the slope of the Y(X) line incents/kwh/$/MMBtu or 10,000 Btu/kwh. As discussed in “Co-utilization of Domestic FuelsBiomass Gas/Natural Gas” Green, A., Swansong, G., and Najafi, F., we can relate S to the netplant heat rate (NPHR) (19, 20) or to the efficiency viaS = NPHR/10,000 [2] orS = 34.12/Eff [3]The constant K (in cents/kwh) mainly reflects the capital investment, the normal rate of ownerreturn and operation and maintenance (O&M) expenses. Lowering K and S as much as possibleso to lower the cost of electricity is the goal of true
from the encoders contains position, velocity, and azimuth. • Diffuse Sensors – By emitting light that reflects from a surface back to thesensor, the frequency can be analyzed and compared to a programmedfrequency. The sensors can be programmed to detect a particular frequency (color)on the ground. • Proximity Sensors – By emitting light that reflects from a surface back to thesensor(s), the proximity sensors can find obstructions.Computers The computing system isdivided into two parallel systems.A central computer is responsiblefor planning paths, forcontrolling the vehicle, and forinterfacing to all sensors exceptfor the vision. The secondcomputer system dedicates itself
mental capabilities (such as vision, hearing, health, and judgment/reaction time) of the olderpopulation, traffic officials in certain areas of the United States have changed certain parametersin road design to accommodate (i.e. or to increase the comfort and convenience for) the needs ofthe elderly in all facets of transportation; whether it be as a pedestrian, a passenger, or a driver.The parameters that have been implemented have also been studied since implementation. Thosestudies reflect on how different cities and states have used or not used the parameters and theireffectiveness on traffic. Still there is a great diversity among states regarding how elderly driversare considered and accommodated. Greater emphasis on implementation of
goon in an iterative process with scientific methods available and usable for the actual topic. It is likewalking in a staircase. Seen from above it can look like walking in circles, but seen from the side,the students’ position, one can recognise a constantly increasing level.The supervisors of project-organised education need to be aware of that and not press the projectgroup too hard in the first part of the project period. If that phenomenon is not taken inconsideration, the students will tend to fall back to the ‘Do as Learned Method’ and find onlyconservative solutions.Process-based model for contingency - a dynamic approachThe core of the model is a balance between attention to and reflection on the potential opportunitiesand resources
. Girl Scouts exchange swaps, small crafts that canbe worn on a vest or hat, when they attend various activities. These swaps are meant to representthe person giving the swap, this could be something personal, local, or regional depending onwhen, where, and with whom the swaps are being exchanged. The activity leaders distributeswaps that are relevant to their specific activity. Thus each team of participants will have adifferent set of swaps at the end of the day, highlighting the activities that they completed. Theseswaps are displayed prominently on the bag they received, or somewhere on their person. Theseare meant to be a more personal reflection of the EAF experience.Adult WorkshopIn conjunction with EAF, a program is conducted for the
material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNo. 9987066. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Page 9.1132.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationunder-representation of women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in this workforce –issues addressed by the STEP project - remain areas of concern. See, e.g
)provide opportunities for students to develop communication and team skills; and (e)provide support in academic success strategies. Where the present effort differs from these successful freshman-engineeringprograms at other universities is, in my view, a significantly increased emphasis onengineering ethics, a significant focus on the societal and global implications of theengineering profession today and careful study and reflection upon the profound impactengineers have upon the natural world. In addition, the Watson program has, in manyways, fully integrated the freshman program with our minority-engineering program. Thedistinction between these two efforts often seems non-existent.Freshman Courses The focus of the freshman year
not used as a criterion in selecting students for this scholarship. Should two studentshave identical credentials and need but differ only in non-merit aspects, we certainly hope thatwe will be able to find support for both. The more diverse demographics perhaps reflect needand interest distributions. The lower percentage of women students in CSEMS should be viewedwith the fact that the university statistics are for the overall institute, not the subset of the moremale-dominated CSEMS colleges.Table 1. FAST demographics compared to overall GIT US citizen/resident undergrads. African- Asian- Caucasian Hispanic- Native- Women American American
noted,though, that Rice University has a site license for LabVIEW, allowing broad distribution of thesoftware across campus computers, if necessary.Virtual Labs Developed 1. Pre-Lab for Wave Tank II Experiment The VL for this experiment is a simulation of a boat’s motion with incident beam waves. A second order differential equation of a system with a forcing function is used in the Page 9.1403.3 experimental analysis and the VL simulation to model the boat’s response to the generated waves. The student solves several cases that reflect different values of natural Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for
accountable for doing their part and mastery of the material.• face-to-face interaction Some or all group members must work together to achieve the group’s goals.• appropriate use of interpersonal skills Group members learn and practice teaming, communication, conflict management and leadership skills.• regular self-assessment of group functioning. Groups periodically reflect and evaluate their performance and identify ways to improve that performance.Correctly applied, cooperative learning techniques increase the students’ motivation to learn,material retention, depth of understanding, and teamwork/communication skills [18] by forcingstudents to work in the more effective (lower) levels in Figure 2.Cooperative learning techniques may be the
build and test their product orprototype.The outcome of the design review will be decisions that set the direction of the project and astatus for the team. The decisions made will be firm and must be reevaluated by all partiesbefore any changes can be made. Upon completion of the design review, the status for the teamwill be red, yellow, or green.Red status means that the team’s design review and possibly the design has serious problems.Key information is missing or serious errors were made in the design/decision process. If a teamreceives this status they are to put the current design on hold and complete the required tasks thatwill provide them with the needed information to continue with their project. A red statustypically reflects
Planning Grant on the topic of “Information Technology in theIntegrated Civil Engineering Curriculum”, and this paper reflects findings from this effort. Theprimary emphasis of this paper is on the utilization of Information Technology within the civilengineering profession and in the large-scale products and systems the civil engineeringprofession provides, operates and maintains. Instructional technology, both general and IT isnoted more as a part of implementing changes within the educational environment.Information technology as utilized in CE can be placed into four general categories. (1) personalIT/computing tools – which all graduates and civil engineers need at a fairly high level ofproficiency, (2) civil engineering systems tools such
will also examine some of the issues and impediments confronting TechnologyEducation in this process of change.IntroductionThe shift from Industrial Arts to Technology Education in the public secondary education systemseems to be superficial. The name change more accurately reflects a shift from the industrialtools used in a wood or metal shop to that of a more current and identifiable technology. Theissue here is real change that must also include the type of knowledge used and the role it playsin the learning process. This paper will discuss the use of Design Competitions, developed inacademia, as a tool for change in secondary (9-12) Technology Education as a regional casestudy. The paper will outline the types of knowledge and the role it
students’ overall learning in laboratory so as to better prepare themfor industry and/or graduate research, we have (1) created a new lecture course on engineeringexperimentation to accompany the laboratory, (2) increased the emphasis on experimentalplanning and data analysis for each lab project, (3) implemented a peer-review and reportrevision procedure, (4) require students to follow industry standards for recording data inlaboratory notebooks, and (5) completely revised the department’s Lab Manual to reflect thesechanges in emphasis. This paper describes the organization and effectiveness of our revisedlaboratory sequence in comparison with our previous approach.IntroductionThe unit operations laboratory is generally regarded as an ideal
’ attention on the engineering aspects of their assignments.1. Asking students to reflect on the projects they completed had a definite impact. Students in the assessment sections were able to identify more types of scientific communication at the end of the semester, by a factor of 2 or 3. Section E3 Section D Control Exit survey # types 1.9 2.6 1.6 Entry survey # types 1.0 0.8 1.2 Average change 0.9 1.8 0.42. All students showed significant learning in the sections of a lab report. The writing consultant program in general effectively
-requisite courses and that these are completedwithin our college. This results in a close tie between these students and our undergraduateprogram. Because of this closeness, we contend that the outcomes from our BSCE programassessments are generally reflective of the outcomes we would expect from the two graduateprograms.We also had some concern over the fact that both graduate programs involve faculty from otherdepartments. The MSTE program includes professors from Industrial Engineering and theMSEnE program includes faculty from Chemical, Mechanical, and Biological Engineering. Wehold at least one faculty meeting each year to discuss program issues. However, to date, neitherprogram has had a student whose studies were primarily in one of the
andconstruction for our particular region, breaking from existing convention and looking to nature asa designer, innovator and problem solver that has been performing ingenious engineering featsfor billions of years. In the process of attempting to teach ourselves the basics of nature’sengineering as they apply to ensuring thermal comfort, we believe we have also stumbled upon afascinating new paradigm for engineering education. “The Natural House Project” is an excitingadventure in teaching and learning – an enjoyable opportunity for students, and also the teachers,to use art, science and engineering principles in almost equal measure to imagine, conceptualize,design and build a home that reflects the beauty and ingenuity of nature. That being an
. Page 8.610.4 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”Project assessment: During the final two weeks of the quarter, all students were asked toprovide feedback on their teaming and design experience. The questionnaire givenduring week 9 is provided as Addendum 4. Additionally, during week 10, they wereasked to provide a reflective essay in their lab books which responded to the followingtwo statements. 1) Identify three or more, items, things, or aspects about your project, your team, oryour design process that worked well and that you were happy with. Discuss why each ofthese items pleased you. 2) You
establishing appreciation of theteacher’s perspective. Students who were taught by their fellow students can also learn from thisexperience through a process of observation, self-reflection and peer judgment.Our Prior LTT ExperienceThe LTT concept was first adopted by Shih and Hollis in an NSF-sponsored project for thecreation of a dynamics system laboratory. It was used as a cost-effective way to train students toprovide assistance to their fellow students in the laboratory. Students working in a group wereasked to be responsible for the complete set up and operation of only one out of a set ofexperiments so that they could gain valuable experience by fully mastering one experiment. Theresponsible students were then asked to serve as teaching
) Correlation between personal evaluation and team evaluation: The results show the correlation between the 10-question Personal Evaluation Questionnaireand the 4-questions Team Evaluation Questionnaire. It was found that some students participatemore actively in their teams when they feel comfortable working with the team and feelingcomfortable with their role. Another deduction may be that students seems become moreopen-minded as well as enjoy/appreciate teamworkQualitative results: Abilities learned from the courseOverall, the top three abilities students gained were:(1) Effective use of time to reach consensus(2) Growth of problem-solving ability(3) Development of teamwork strategiesStudents’ Reflections on Team’s effectiveness Next, we
socialization processes start from elementary to middle school, shifting from familyattachments to peer groups and teacher-centered learning. In the "intense years" of high school(Fukuzawa and LeTendre8), learning techniques shift to small-group discussions, cooperativeprojects and self-reflective criticism preparing students for the university and for work in theadult world. At Kagoshima University, most subjects has only one 90 minute lecture per weekwith the professor (with minimal inquiries originating from students during class), afterwardsstudents are pretty much on their own if they need further help, so it was assumed that Japanesestudents would be better prepared to learn on their own via Distance Education than studentsfrom USA. Ironically
: Page 9.135.5 6 •How do groups use technological artifacts to illustrate and reify their worldview? •How do artifacts reflect a group's views about the place of humans in the universe? How do artifacts reflect notions of time and space? •What do artifacts reveal about how a group addressed and tried to resolve central puzzles or traumas? Let me offer two brief examples of the relationship between technology andcultural meaning. First, in writing about the Egyptians, I made the point that thepyramids served no economic purpose--in fact, their construction took significantnumbers of workers away from agriculture. Instead
grading. Advantage: Student Students may reflect upon their answers between the time of Q/E completion and the time of receiving faculty feedback and may reach some of the same conclusions that the faculty member may later share with them, possibly enabling some students to become more amenable to critical feedback. Page 8.1101.8 Disadvantage: Faculty.“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education” Faculty will likely have to spend more time preparing Q/E since previous Q/E are available to
Reflection - Discussion of your preparation, actual experience, and reflection on what you learned in this experience. • Peer rating of team membersProject Parameters • Presentation will cover topics such as “What is USD?”, “Why major in engineering?” “What is the engineering design process?”, and “What is Walk On Water (WOW)? • Project will be done in teams assigned by instructor • Aimed at students in high school • Educational and fun • Presentation and activities should take about 45 minutes to completeJunior/Senior EngineeringAs engineering students enter the junior and senior years, they are looking for internships,projects, ways to apply concepts learned in prior courses, or other
the lab experiences more meaningfulthrough the utilization of statistical analysis of the results and through detailed lab reports, butdeliverables were limited to analytical, data-driven reports.With only one hour of credit given for the lab, students did not understand the need for the extrawork that was being required. Lab reports were usually sterile documents reflecting what thestudents believed that the instructor wanted rather than a vehicle for a learning experience for thestudents.Traditionally, Mechanics of Materials was heavily weighted towards engineering science(analysis) with few open-ended or design problems introduced. The number of topics covered inthe class left little room for the extended development usually required for
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationfactors, albeit at a more detailed level, in her model for self-directed learning.10Candy, in his extensive review of self-directed learning, summarizes the characteristics of the self-directed learner from many sources.11 These characteristics fall into two sets, personal attributesand skills, that are analogous to Flammer’s “will do” and can do.” Candy’s lists are: “Will do” Attributes: curious/motivated, methodical/disciplined, logical/analytical, reflective/self-aware, flexible, interdependent/interpersonally competent, persistent/responsible, venturesome/creative, confident, independent
providingundergraduate engineering students an opportunity to work on real/meaningful engineeringprojects with guidance from industry mentors. Materials covered in the paper include a very briefoverview of three helicopter engine integration projects accomplished by GEDT student teams.Rational for the project selection and scope are discussed. This is followed with a review of andcomments on an overall student project model. The paper concludes with a brief discussion onproject challenges and lessons learned.The thoughts and materials presented in this paper are the sole responsibility of the author and arenot intended to reflect the interests of Boeing, Rolls-Royce, Arizona State University, and LeedsUniversity.Projects ReviewAn objective of the helicopter