Program in ConstructionThe genesis of the idea for a graduate construction program at UNLV came from a number ofnational and local sources. Nationally, the construction industry as a whole is becoming highlyspecialized and complex. New types of construction materials, innovative computertechnologies, alternative contracting methods, and involved and demanding business regulationsare but a few aspects of construction that require advanced knowledge. The complexity issimilarly reflected in the variety of courses offered in construction curriculums, the myriad oftopics discussed in construction journal articles, and the almost endless number of constructionindustry associations and related conferences. The increasing specialization and complexity
theirunderstanding of a particular concept or idea. Students are encouraged to reflect on feedbackthey receive and then work to confront any potential difficulties they are having with a particularconcept. When students take time to reflect on their writing and on the instructor-givenfeedback, the folder becomes a highly effective tool in helping them uncover and then wrestlewith their misconceptions while the learning is taking place 23. The writing activities provide awindow into understanding how well students are integrating the new knowledge into their Page 4.500.5existing knowledge schemas, thus providing a valuable tool in encouraging deeper
, however, we areoften unaware of the social, economic, political and environmental overtones of our engineering.Working in situations significantly different from their own will give students opportunity todevelop skills of cross-cultural relationships and to reflect on their own experience and culturefrom the vantage point of another. These experiences also enable students to identify and relateto the other in our own culture.Messiah is experimenting with cross-cultural service-learning projects as a means of influencinggraduates toward more responsible engineering. Goals for these projects are to: (1) Createinterdisciplinary learning and service opportunities for Messiah students and faculty. (2)Develop new ways of integrating faith and practice
wereinvolved in the evaluation of the service learning project and participate in evaluating theeffectiveness of the students.Through the service learning project, students had an opportunity to work in teams to apply thedesign and analysis skills for natural and engineered surface and groundwater systems that theylearned in CE 452 to provide a needed service to their community. The service opportunitieswere aimed at the development of the civil education of students. Activities in the class provideda method for students to think about what they learned through the service experience and howthese learning related to the curriculum. This included in-class reflection and assignments oftopics for discussions that were led by a Teacher Assistant provided
interactions which will be examined and establishes the experimental procedure.Test results are entered into the array and an ANOVA analysis of the results yields valuableinformation regarding the optimum combination of factors and levels and demonstrates theinteraction of these factors if any exists. It is important to note that while constructing the arraythe practitioner must take care to insure that the factors and interactions to be included in thearray accurately reflect properties which affect the quality of the product or process. As is truewith all experimental techniques, a poorly designed experiment, even if properly executed, yieldsresults of questionable value
, principles, and theories, and may be quick but careless. Visual / Verbal: Visual learners prefer pictures, diagrams, charts, movies, demonstrations, and exhibitions. Verbal learners prefer words, discussions, explanations, formulas, and equations. Inductive / Deductive: Inductive learning develops principles and generalities from observations, the natural human learning approach. Deductive development starts with governing principles and then develops applications, the natural teaching approach. Active / Reflective: Active learners learn by doing and participating. Reflective
sufficient flexibility to satisfy the needs of a wide spectrum of engineering programs. Attitudes And Outcomes Assessment Using QuestionnairesAssessment using well designed and tested questionnaires can provide valuable feedback forevaluation and continuous improvement. We have used questionnaires to measure: x Freshman perceptions about themselves and their abilities to succeed in engineering, and x Engineering alumni reflections about their experiences while attending school and their competencies at time of graduation.These questionnaires have been used to assess several aspects of our engineering programs andare described below.Freshman Attitudinal AssessmentThe Pittsburgh Freshman Engineering
Student ResponseStudents were asked to complete an anonymous survey regarding their dissection experience.The survey was given late in the semester so that the students could better reflect on their entiredesign experience and how the dissection project impacted it. The results of the survey werepositive. Students recognized the dissection experience as a positive model of engineering.Their perceptions of engineering improved after they completed the project.During the fall semester, 1996, two different products were dissected: the Kodak™ FunSaver™camera, and the mobile robot. Students were asked to record their overall satisfaction level forthe dissection project on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 represents not satisfied and 10 representsvery
, and the United States is its most vividexample. For these engineers and technologists, an interdisciplinary education and communicationskills play a very important role in their successful careers. A constant growth of interest in non-technical issues among engineering students is commonly observed and reflected in the design ofengineering curricula [12, 16]. Some innovative curricula assign as much as 50-60% of requiredcredits to be fulfilled by free or directed elective courses [13].2.4. Knowledge ‘when-needed’ and ‘perpetual learner’ With growing volume of knowledge needed, knowing how to learn becomes an issue of utmostimportance. Facing predicted 3 to 6 career changes in a lifetime, students must be taught how tolearn. ‘Perpetual
52 week year. This led to an hourly rate of $30.22.computer-based tutorials was based on the number of hours it Each computer was assumed to be in operation 8 hours a daytook an experienced lecturer to devise and write questions for (9am - 5pm), 5 days per week, 39 weeks a year. Fromthe UWA CPCS. The questions were designed to be more summary information obtained for 1995, the average “livenovel than questions taken from the text book. The rate of time”, or the time each student spent logged into the$50 per hour was used to reflect the academic’s experience and
not have well-defined requirements initially or the requirements can changeover the course of the project. For such projects, requirements management can be essential. Allthese complex features of project management reflect the dynamic and complex nature of thereal world. While the teaching and learning of project management in an undergraduatecurriculum can only focus on the fundamentals, appreciation of these complex facets of realworld project management is valuable and can be attainable through more open-ended seniorcapstone projects such as an undergraduate research project.A Stage-Gate Structure of Engineering and Technology Capstone ProjectsProject management should be introduced early in the student’s development so that the
. (2008, October). Chief Academic Officers' demographics and educational backgrounds [Electronic version]. Community College Review, 36(2), 116-132. Page 15.1281.1013. Langer, A. (2001). Fixing bad habits: Integrating technology personnel in the workplace using reflective practice [Electronic version]. Reflective Practice, 2(1), 99-111.14. Marquis, H. (2006, December). ITIL: What it is and what it isn't [Electronic version]. Business Communications Review, 36(12), 49-52.15. McLaughlin, G. W., Montgomery, J. R., & Malpass, L. F. (1975). Selected characteristics, roles, goals, and satisfactions of department
discussed to make the students aware of how to manage their time so thatthey can be productive. Measuring floor joists After the subfloor is completely attached, the students are assigned to four groups. Each groupconsists of five or six students. Groups are assigned a portion of the house based on four colors:red, green, yellow and blue. All the building members of the house are painted with one of fourcolors to reflect which team installs which piece of the house. The boss then reminds each groupabout how to handle the preframed walls in a safe and orderly manner, telling them never to walkbackward when carrying wall sections. The individual groups lift and secure the walls into placeone at a time until the
of theirfirst accreditation. Clearly, that number is growing quite steadily.Expanding on the historical data in Table 1, Table 2 gives considerable data about each of theinstitutions: the institutional name used by ABET, the multidisciplinary engineering program(s)offered, the year of their first accreditation, the number of other ABET-accredited engineeringprograms at the institution, and the date of the next general accreditation review. Table 3provides a numerical summary of the more detailed data in Table 2, highlighting the anticipatedvisit workload over the next six-year cycle that would be predicted from Table 2, by year andprogram area. Clearly, there is a wide variation reflected by those data in the anticipatedworkload from year to
dissertation must show that the candidate is fully aware of the pertinent published material and the dissertation must be written in a satisfactory literary style, free from typographical and other mechanical errors.No criteria are given for the oral presentation except as follows: “The purpose of the oral examination is to examine both the content of the dissertation and the candidate’s ability to defend it. “Holbrook6 quotes Kouptsov8 for Ph.D. criteria obtained by a survey of European academics asfollows: Belarus: '…Must reflect research on a disciplinary or interdisciplinary, theoretical, or applied problem, the results of which will constitute an original contribution to knowledge in the discipline or
Page 15.1343.2investigated the culture of design firms,10,16-17 global partnerships within high-tech industry,18and socialization of professional engineers19 all with the goal of making recommendations forpractice. The purpose of this paper is to use techniques from applied anthropology to illustratehow domain analysis2 can be used to advance research in engineering education.As a methodology, domain analysis is well suited to answer complex questions. Complexquestions feature “a community” as a crucial element of study, and reflect activities within asocial environment. Different people can answer these very open-ended questions differently.Moreover, complex questions connect together with other questions. Indeed, the benefit toconducting
these ninth to twelfth grade students werebeing heavily recruited to attend the University of Maryland upon matriculation from theirrespective high schools.Upon later reflection we realized how many opportunities the Maryland Libraries, includingEPSL Librarians, have taken advantage of to enhance the University of Maryland in the eyes ofnewcomers. For example, every year on the last Saturday in April, Maryland Day occurs oncampus with as many as 75,000 visitors, many below the age of 18. For several years forMaryland Day, the UM Libraries have sponsored a well-known children’s TV celebrity, Bob theVid Tech, from Maryland Public Television fame in a tent crammed full of youngsters. The otherinitiatives include "History Day", put on by the UM
required for Engineering Levels [1-3]; b) Part II addresses theOrganizational Leadership Skills and Actions required for Engineering Levels [4-6], and; c) Part IIIaddresses the Strategic Leadership Skills and Actions required for Engineering Levels [7-9]. The overallanalysis sets the foundation for building a coherent professional graduate curriculum and dynamiceducational process reflective of how experienced engineering professionals learn, grow, and create newtechnology in industry. This paper addresses Part II: the Organizational Leadership Function, Skills andActions that engineers must learn and develop from Group Leader, Functional Area Manager, SystemsEngineer through Technical Program Manager Levels [4-6
based learning as well as co-op and internship experiences that students have had by their senior year. The perceivedimportance of these skills was comparable for each group.Local Findings:The local findings seem to contradict the national results because all of the students either agreeor strongly agree that their skills have improved since coming to the university. The manyopportunities for teamwork and collaboration in the engineering curriculum and in outsideinternships made possible through university–industry collaborations at North Carolina A&Tappear to have bolstered the students’ initial strong confidence in this area. A sample ofstudents’ free responses to a reflection question is shown in Table 6. These responses
do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Akay, A., A Renaissnce In Engineering PhD Education. European Journal Of Engineering Education 2008, 33 (4), 403-413.2. National Science Board Science and Engineering Indicators. National Science Foundation: 2008; Vol. 1.3. Hogan, R.; Hogan, J., Assessing Leadership: A View From The Dark Side. International Journal Of Selection And Assessment 2001, 9 (1/2), 40-51.4. Hunt, C., Careers In Chemistry: Keys To Success...Beyond Hard Work! American Chemical Society Graduate Education Newsletter 2007, 6 (1), 1-3.5. Sekhon, J. G., The PhD Education of Industrial Mathematicians in Australia. Bulletin Of The Australian
? Page 15.46.94. A change in the planet's reflectivity can change its effective temperature. For a onepercent increase in reflectivity (that is 0.34 rather than 0.33 for the albedo), how muchdoes the ground temperature decrease with NO change in optical depth.5. Venus has an effective temperature of 240K, but its surface temperature is 700K!Find the atmospheric optical depth that is required to accomplish this.Extra Credit Calculation: To make our calculation easy, we have divided theatmosphere into layers of equal optical depth. In the real atmosphere, these layers wouldhave different thickness since the optical depth depends on the mass of the layer and thedensity of air decreases with altitude. The density of air in the Earth's atmosphere, d
interest in the subject matter Figure 5. The results of student assessment of the course for both the first and the second offering.3.1.3 GradesThe grading of the course consisted on several components: Homework (15%); Projectpresentation and report (35%); Quiz (30%) and class participation (20%).Homework, due in every lecture challenged students to reflect on the reading for the upcomingclass. The write-up was limited to one page and had to provide a synopsis of the material readand a few points for the class discussion of the material. The students initially had somedifficulty with the concept, including limiting it to a page, but after the first weeks there was anoticeable improvement
encompass a variety of benefits a senior undergraduatestudent can receive as a result of their Capstone design experience. Besides benefiting thestudent in terms of advancing their careers, building their resumes, and preparing them for post-undergraduate endeavors such as graduate school, the success metrics examined in this study (i.e.grant applications and publications) also benefit the advisors, department, company, etc. Perhapsan outcome more immediately relevant to undergraduate students would be the end-of-yearevaluation score of their design project, which is reflected by their spring semester grade. Thus,we examined the end-of-year grades to determine whether any trends in advisor demographics orteam formulation were discernable.The
ones that I knew would not be practical.”and Creativity “I’ve learned more about the design process and problem solving and have developed more cognitive skills that help with creativity.” “I learned about some of my strengths and weaknesses, especially in comparison toSelf-awareness my peers.”Students were also asked to reflect on what aspects of the project were most and least valuable.Overall and in agreement with responses on learning outcome gains (Table 1), students felt thatthe most valuable aspects during the project were learning and applying the design process (e.g.,developing ideas, meeting customer needs, generating concepts, sketching and drawing concepts
Fairchild SemiconductorQRB1134 Phototransistor Reflective Object Sensor. Using this sensor, allows the students tomake a line following robot by properly selecting resistors to properly bias the sensor as shownin Figure 2. This sensor also covers signal conditioning because it outputs a digital signal, butthis requires the students to evaluate whatvoltages are evaluated as a logical “0” and alogical “1” by the controller. VSourceThe second sensor used is the MaxSonar EZ0 Current Pull-upUltrasonic Range Finder. This sensor offers Limiting Resistormultiple output
curriculum elements, and this benefit can extend beyondthose students directly associated with the SE capstone projects. The program has received positivefeedback from most of the graduates that have participated on these projects, and the influence ofthe SE program has grown far beyond the number of students entering the graduate school forSE.Introduction The US Department of Defense (DoD) is facing major challenges associated with theirScience, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) workforce. This problem goes beyond theneeds of the core acquisition workforce that comprise only 40% of the overall STEMworkforce1, and in fact is a reflection of shortages of engineers throughout defense industries and
tochange their business plan, before a second year of simulation was run. Again, each airline wasgiven their ranking and their profit/loss statement after the second year of simulation.Each group was required to produce several deliverables. First, the groups were required todocument their business decisions. Groups were then asked to reflect on how they did after ayear of simulation. In instances in which groups succeeded at making a profit, they were askedto comment on why they thought they were successful. In instances in which groups were not assuccessful, they were asked to comment on what they thought could have hindered their abilityto make a profit. Groups were then asked to document any changes they made before the secondyear of
not effective to keep students’ interest in their majors. This is particularlytrue for the engineering majors.There are efforts to cultivate more student-centered learning pedagogies in higher education(Bransford, Brown, and Cocking, 2000; McKenna, Yalvac, and Light, 2009). Transformingengineering education context from a teacher-centered orientation to a learner-centeredorientation is a common interest in engineering education research. Group work, formativeassessment, contextualized instruction, use of peer review and self-reflective tools, and out-ofclass collaborations are some learning-centered instructional strategies (Bransford, Brown, andCocking, 2000; Yalvac, Smith, Hirsch, and Troy, 2007; Yalvac, Smith, Hirsch, & Birol, 2006
, unfortunately, and this is reflected in the rather highrate of mistakes per student.It is ill-advised to draw firm conclusions on the effect of this prerequisite skills testing on finalexam outcomes; however, from this simple analysis there is unfortunately no apparent trend thatshows students achieving a higher level of competency. Page 22.88.8Qualitative evaluationWhile the meager analysis above does not show an obvious quantitative benefit to students, theauthor nevertheless believes there are certain qualitative benefits to administering the PSE,which compel him to continue administering the exam in solid mechanics. First, many studentscome to the
American Society for Engineering Education. Austin, TX, June, 2009.21. Downey, Gary Lee, Juan C. Lucena, Barbara M. Moskal, Rosamond Parkhurst, Thomas Bigley, Chris Hays, Brent K. Jesiek, Liam Kelly, Johson Miller, Sharon Ruff, Jane L. Lehr, and Amy Nichols-Belo, “The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently,” Journal of Engineering Education, April 2006.22. Carlsen, Christopher R, “Reflection #2,” Globalhub, Page 22.131.12 http://globalhub.org/members/3531/blog/2010/8/reflection-2---carlsen, August 4, 2010, Accessed March 7, 2011.