; it cannot be simply counted. Equity suggestsspecial consideration and treatment to achieve a goal. 8Unlike the Civil Rights Act, there were no provisions within Title IX to examine equality ofeducational opportunity on the basis of sex. A search of the ERIC database for journal articlespublished between 1972 and 1978 reveals a very modest increase in publications. However,these publications continued to reflect an emphasis on compliance with non-discriminatorypractices, that is, an emphasis on equality. While this information is still very useful in terms ofdocumenting the slow pace of progress in eliminating discrimination, it provides littleinformation for programmatic interventions to enhance women’s success in engineering.IV. The Women’s
expectations.Changing the faculty reward system will not be an easy task. Faculty rewards are heavilydriven by incentives created across the entire university and are part of a nationwidenetwork. Nevertheless, it is important that rewards reflect the goals of the institution andit is important to begin the conversation now. As each institution establishes its visionand charts new directions, it should ensure that its faculty reward system supports theinstitutional goals.”Thus, a major task in reshaping graduate education will be to begin this task and to definea parallel system of faculty reward for teaching, creative professional scholarship, andprofessional service that compliments the traditional research-based system for teaching,research, and service in
mentioned core knowledge and skills of present day engineers 12 - 14 . Someengineering programs have been almost totally revised to allow room for learning through doing,that is by creating educational environment that closer reflects real-world engineering practice 15 . Critical thinking and effective problem solving was described by numerous authors, among themCloete who describes Eight Elements of Reasoning and problem solving heuristic 17 .3. Teaching InventivenessIn technical inventions, the more difficult the task of invention (which in itself is very difficult toassess at the beginning of the process) the more numerous are the initial solutions which have tobe analyzed in order to produce a set of feasible solutions. As described above
in class and out of class. 2 Students distinguish goodteaching from bad teaching in part by whether they perceive the learning as being deep, engaging,and reflective, versus superficial, passive, and mostly memorization. This latter condition ariseswhen workload is too high. 1 Therefore, the teacher faces a dilemma. On the one hand, he or shemust demand enough of students, 2 but on the other this will only be effective, and be perceived aseffective, if students have sufficient resources to rise to those demands and to fulfill them in adeep fashion. Time is a resource, and an excessive workload can force students to complete taskssuperficially. These general instructional issues apply to much of the contemporary developmentof computer-based
Divergers WHAT IF? WHY? Active Reflective Experimentation Observation (Doing) (Watching) Type 3 Type 2 Convergers Assimilators HOW? WHAT? (Thinking) Abstract Conceptualization Figure 1
indicated they were focusing more on the higher levels of BloomsTaxonomy.[2] Specifically, students asked more questions reflecting thinking at the synthesisand evaluation levels, rather than the comprehension level that is more common.[3]The introduction of new delivery technologies also allowed the introduction of some new classcontent. An example is the use of a vending machine to demonstrate how digital devices(controllers) can be embedded into ordinary everyday objects. The demonstration also showedhow Finite State Machines behave in the real world. As part of the course, the instructormodeled a vending machine as a Finite State Machine. The Next State Diagram was developedat the end of a lecture. During the following lecture, a remote session
graduating senior survey reflects this sentiment as well. “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationSome of the biographical data of interest are as follows. 177 respondents reported advanced degreesto include law, MD, MBA, MA, Ph.D., MS, and other. 32 alumni reported holding the professionalengineering (PE) designation, and 32 report to be EIT qualified. Obviously, o ur department needs tofind a way to encourage passing the EIT and pursuing the PE designation. We also asked alumni toreport how long after graduation until they hold their first supervisory position. Those results are asfollows: Year
information.” (Tom Peters and Robert Waterman in `In Search of Excellence') [9]• Who are “skilled at creating, acquiring and transferring knowledge and at modifying its behaviour to reflect new knowledge and insights.” (David Garvin in Harvard Business Review) [10] If you are not into this new form of management, then you might just be out!Our conclusion is therefore that “Industry wants graduates who have team based learning skills”and that it might expect its employees to “develop these skills based on a model of lifetime learning.” Page 7.1057.4 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education § Final report-out session, including “Points of Learning." Participants were asked to reflect on the key things they learned from the workshop. § Summary reports from Huffman participants Thad Baird, Vice President of Operations and Chet Janes, Manager of Quality AssuranceContinuous Improvement in Our Backyard: Practicing What We PreachSo we continue to ask the questions: What are the lessons learned? What do we need to do toimprove TEI? What does our continuous improvement model look like? We want to have asuccessful workshop—but we must be able to measure that success, not simply generate a feel-good
and two wayinteraction should be the enticement of field trips, not just a way to get out of teaching that day.This is especially useful for understanding construction because the materials are altered so muchfrom delivery on site to the inclusion in a finished assembly. Construction is a process and as suchit is crucial that students understand it from the unloading of bulk shipments of materials, throughthe cutting and adjustments of the assembly process through to the cleaning and prepping of thefinal product. It is even more important to customize the learning objectives and preparematerials for a field trip that reflect the uniquely obtainable observations available on site.Focusing the learning objectives per each course based on the
Page 7.592.1States. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of theU. S. Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U. S. government. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. .also offers master's degrees in a number of other programs, including, engineering andenvironmental management, environmental science and engineering, meteorology, aerospace andinformation operations, space operations, and systems engineering. In 1954, the 83 rd Congressauthorized the Commander, Air University to confer degrees upon accreditation by a nationallyrecognized association or authority. This accreditation was achieved in
reflect the demographics of the College of Engineering, which the students attend. It was also noted that although these teams recruit at college-wide events, they are still predominantly comprised of white male students who already have pre-established friendships or connections.Opportunities for Growth auter et al. [21] have found that there is potential for team learning despite these setbacks.RShepherd et al. [22] emphasize this point by highlighting the importance of directing attention and resources to the setbacks of project team members to maintain the group’s cohesion and morale while encountering challenges during the design process. his paper, herein, considers students’ challenges and negative
behavior, such as littering ordisregard for the plants in the park. It is more difficult to see the possible motivations behind positivebehavior. I assume that most humans are refreshed by and enjoy communing with nature. The Sörqvistarticle suggests there is a certain amount of "eco-guilt" on people who knowingly cause harm to theenvironment by their choices [4]. People may feel a moral imbalance, and their response to it may be todo pro-environmental activities to compensate.Through this activity and other sustainability readings, I take a deeper look at my behaviors and theirimpact on the environment. It takes a conscious effort to look at daily activities and choices ofconsumables that meet the basic needs for life and reflect on the
Press, 3175 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648.2. Kolb, A.Y. and Kolb, D.A., 2005. Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of management learning & education, 4(2), pp.193-212.3. Andersson, A. and Kalman, H., 2010. Reflections on Learning in Interdisciplinary Settings. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), pp.204-208.4. Nickel, A.M., Farrell, J.K. and Domack, A., 2016, June. Science Fiction Literature Crossed with Nanotechnology: How Experiential Learning Enhances Engineering Education?. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.5. Nickel, A.M., Farrell, J.K., Domack, A. and Mazzone, G.E., 2018, June. Measuring
error for each datapoint reflects the heterogeneityof cells (Figure 5). Dead ReNcells are spherical, displaying little heterogeneity in morphology. Sincethese NSCs are dead before the buffer washing process, surface proteins and ion channels are similaracross these dead cells which is reflected by the smaller standard error bar. As for live progenitor cells,they exhibit a higher standard error due to the environmental stress they experience during bufferwashes with NaCl concentrations.Figure 5. Electrophoretic mobility measurements of Live Undifferentiated ReNcell VMs and DeadUndifferentiated ReNcell VMs as a function of added salt concentration. The symbols represent the average of three experimental measurements.To
connecting with nature, staying mentally, physically, spiritually, and socially active, constantly learning and reflecting, and challenging himself to improve. He is interested in learning/teaching collectively, engineering philosophy, and social and ecological justice. His purpose is to help people freely and fully develop in a sustainable world. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Towards the Mycorrhiza Framework: An Engineering Education framework for Social and Environmental JusticeAbstractNature and people require a drastic change in how we educate engineers. Social andEnvironmental Justice should be a fundamental pillar in engineering education. Both
engineering ethics education, such as using technology adoptionscenarios and cases, fostering ethical awareness, and reasoning, and promoting a culture ofethical reflection and action.KeywordsTechnology Adoption, EthicsThe Scope, Scale & Pace of Technology AdoptionEngineers are deeply engaged in the “how” of technology – delivering new functionality tosociety through products, services, infrastructure, etc. Engineering students are burdened withthe acquiring the knowledge and skills to understand current technology deployments, whilepreparing for future technology developments. In an era of increasing technology specialization,engineers, and engineering students are confronted with an ever-increasing volume oftechnological advances. The ASEE
and organizations to mutually reinforce transformation toadvance science and serve society. The initiatives recognize various identities or terms like“underrepresented groups” (URG), “underrepresented minorities” (URM), or “broadeningparticipation” should include representations of race, ethnicity, gender identity and genderexpression, persons with disabilities, neurodiverse persons, and members of theLGBTQIA+ community to reflect the true richness of our society when it comes toequality, diversity and inclusion.The ETS and GRE (Graduate Record Exam) programs [4] have developed guidelines tofacilitate institutions’ holistic admissions processes. The recommended admission processincludes the following steps: setting a timeline and goals for
to the NSF. At this point in the process we need you to think about the steps it would take for you to form your own S-SEM project. As you think about this process, prepare to answer these following questions: 1. What strategies would you use to identify partners? 2. What goals and interest would you share with your partners? 3. What resources would you share? 4. What other information do you need? If you desire additional resources around reflecting about partnerships or with partners, please see Appendix B in this open access journal article: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20403Research Methods: Descriptive Case StudyA case study is a research design methodthat involves collecting data from a specificsubject.A descriptive case
workplace. The full analysis of the larger study, which includes both quantitativeand qualitative data, was published by Henley, Lucietto, and Peters4. Therefore, this documentwill not replicate the full analysis, but will instead focus on key findings and references toanswer the research questions presented here.The researchers utilized an abbreviated Content Analysis of data that supports responding to theresearch questions. Further analysis found that the data reflected 4 areas that supported theresponse to the questions and provided a greater understanding of what the collectiverespondents were sharing with them.FindingsThe research questions in this paper are answered in accordance with the available data on eachrelevant topic. The data
largest being women who were 36 years or older (See Fig. 4).Conference SatisfactionOverall, conference attendees were satisfied with the NSF RESET Conference. 95.03% of attendeesreported that they were somewhat or very satisfied with the conference. Of those, nearly 85% (84.847%)reported that they were very satisfied (See Fig. 5). Open-ended survey responses reflected this positiveassessment of the conference, and these responses are provided throughout the findings in the report. 1.24% 3.73% Very satisifed 11% Somewhat Satisfied
discuss the weaknesses ofthe topic-subtopic structure, which is reflected in the presentation’s slides: a topic-phraseheadline supported by a bulleted list of subtopics. Heavily influenced by PowerPoint’sdefaults, this structure leads to presentations that are not well focused and do notcommunicate technical information in an effective manner [4]. Second, the mentors teach Page 24.1399.3students an assertion-evidence approach to creating presentations. In such an approach,the presenter builds the talk on assertions, rather than topics, and supports theseassertions with visual evidence rather than with bulleted lists. In their teaching, Utreeteaching
general education and practical competencerespectively. The first may reflect a long-standing belief in higher education—that students gain Page 24.894.13from every year spent in college; thus, senior engineering majors would be expected to reportgreater gains than their freshman and sophomore peers. That full-time students report higherperceived gains in practical competence than their part-time peers may seem rather intuitive;those who attend college full-time, taking more credits, and more courses have moreopportunities to learn and utilize skills such as critical thinking and effective communication.Similarly, these results may reflect
Page 24.915.3as much as cognitive development24, 25, 29. These non-technical skills, also called character, helpcomputer scientists solve problems. Learning CS often requires soft skills like cooperation,communication skills, discipline, and resilience, which prepare students for tackling obstacleshead-on.To encourage non-technical skill development, MOTIVATE girls prepare presentations on atopic they most enjoyed during the program (i.e., HTML, 3D printing, robotics, etc.,), andparticipated in a showcase at the end of the workshop. This provides them with an opportunity toself-reflect and share how they might have overcame challenges during the course of theirlearning. The MOTIVATE program provided an environment in which AA girls could
to demonstrate a rudimentary ability to move beyond “opinions” towards informed judgment that is based in facts, sound reasoning, and active Page 24.929.2 reflection. 3) Demonstrated progress in the basic technical proficiencies of higher education, including reading, writing, oral and visual presentation, independent study, teamwork, and seminar-style conversation. 4) Clear evidence of thoughtful reflections about your own learning process as related to your transition to college.In terms of course content, in the year in which assessment data was collected, the course beganwith a focus on environmental ethics
more reflectively on that course.Reason #2: The rehearsal effect. The first time one makes a presentation, mistakes areinevitable. Practice makes perfect, and reflecting on what you did in one section willhelp you do a better job in another section. One caveat: More practice is not always anadvantage, as we will discuss in the next section.Reason #3: Questions from students in one section may help in another section.Presenting the material multiple times lets you observe the reactions of different sets ofstudents. A student in one class may ask a question that leads you to present the samematerial better to the other class. Page 24.961.4Category 3
technology students and then will be used todevelop/modify curriculum at the community college and university partner. Page 24.973.6Technology Leadership Certificate and CurriculumUtilizing the Technology Leadership competency model, we will develop the content for aTechnology Leadership certificate. Course content of the certificate will reflect those essentialcompetencies, allowing all students who complete to develop a technology leadership skill set.Further, we will use the working competency model to develop and refine courses in the AS /AAS programs at the statewide community college and the university program, with a focus onstudents
or developed with persistence, effort, and focus on learning.”13 Dweck reflected on suchgrowth mindset individuals as follows: They knew that human qualities, such as intellectual skills, could be cultivated through effort. And that’s what they were doing – getting smarter. Not only weren’t they discouraged by failure, they didn’t even think they were failing. They thought they were learning.16The focus for these individuals was on learning and improving as they were challenged and evenas they failed.iii Research has suggested that students who have, are exposed to, or develop a growthmindset may experience a variety of positive outcomes. For example, middle school studentswith a growth mindset increased their
, microcontrollers,and robotics to prototype a variety of mechatronics projects. These activities illustrated real-world applications of fundamentals covered in introductory lectures to reinforce and impart agreater sense of understanding. Such a curriculum and instruction strategy exposed teachers tofundamental mechatronics design principles as they learned the core concepts through activitieswherein they built practical devices that integrated and illustrated their learning. The discussionportion of each session provided participants with an opportunity to reflect on the session’s workand to brainstorm ways of integrating these activities in K-12 STEM learning. On the last two days of guided training, an entrepreneurship module—consisting
and McTighe (2005) identified three stages: (1) Identify desiredoutcomes and results, (2) Determine what constitutes acceptable evidence of competency in theoutcomes and results, and (3) Plan instructional strategies and learning experiences that bringstudents to these competency levels. They posit this approach will help faculty designinstruction that promotes understanding and fosters student engagement.Another important approach to curricular reform that called for improvement throughoutundergraduate education has been in service-learning pedagogy. Service-learning is a teachingmethod in which students participate in organized service activity for academic credit that meetsidentified community issues, and that reflection done by the