and Aerospace Engineering, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, 1985 - present Former Chair of the Department (1999 - 2003, 2007) Fellow, ASME Associate Director, Consor- tium for Materials Development in Space 1985 - 1999 Professor, Mechanical Engineering, University of New Mexico, 1967 - 1979 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Reflecting on the Reflections Driving Variations in Heat Transfer TeachingAbstractReflecting on teaching is a powerful habit of mind that can improve one’s own teaching practice.Reflective practitioners make changes in the moment of teaching (reflection-in-action) and alsolook back on past teaching experiences
Control, Wiley, New York. [12] Seborg, D.E., T.F. Edgar, D.A. Mellichamp, F.J. Doyle III (2011). Process Dynamics and Control, Wiley, NewYork.14. Gray, J.J. (2006). Biomolecular Modeling in a Process Dynamics and Control Course. Chemical Engineering Education, 40(3): 297-306.15. Parker, R.S., F.J. Doyle III, M.A. Henson (2006). Integration of Biological Systems Content into the Process Dynamics and Control Curriculum. Chemical Engineering Education 40(3).16. Doyle III, F.J., B.W. Bequette, R. Middleton, B. Ogunnaike, B. Paden, R.S. Parker, M. Vidyasagar (2011). Control in Biological Systems from The Impact of Control Technology – T. Samad and A.M. Annaswamy (Eds.). Available at www.ieeecss.org.17. Moor
Engineering and Surveying (2015): 1-18.3. Miller, A. “FE Exam – the First ‘Reality Show’ Encounter for Engineering and Engineering Technology Undergraduates.” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL, Jun 18-21st, 2006.4. Roszelle B.N., Gordon M., Davidson B., and Laz P. “Novel Sophomore Assessment Modeled After the FE Exam.” 123rd Annual ASEE Conference, Seattle, WA, Jun 26-29th, 2016.
Construction Industry: An Application of an AlternativeApproach to Allocate Risk at the Bid Phase of the Construction Project, The National Associationof Industrial Technology NAIT, Selected Papers 40th Annual Convention, October 2007.[8] R. Mohamed and F. Hartman, “How to reduce your project cost. America Association of CostEngineers,” AACE International Transactions. pp. P15A, 7 pgs. Morgantown, 2000.[9] J. Zack, “Risk sharing – good concept, bad name,” Cost Engineering. Morgantown. July. Vol.38, Iss. 7, 1996[10] G. Winch, Managing construction projects. Blackwell Science, Inc., 2002. Appendix ARaw Data and Descriptive Statistics for Participants’ Years of Experience, Annual Project Value
Paper ID #26499The Critical Pick: A Crane Rigging DemonstrationMajor David M. Flaherty, United States Military Academy Major David Flaherty is an instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He earned a M.S. in civil engineering from the University of Colorado, Boulder, in 2017. He is currently the course director for the Fundamentals of Engineering Mechanics and Design course, which is the largest course within the Civil and Mechanical Engineering Department. He can be contacted at david.flaherty@westpoint.edu. c American
degrees in the U.S. today, only19% of undergraduate engineering students are female [5]. Additionally, those who are consideredunderrepresented ethnic minorities (URMs) in engineering account for 23% of the total U.S. population, but onlycomprise of 6% of the engineering workforce [6]. These discrepancies are compounded when an individualbelongs to multiple minority groups, i.e. only 0.6% of Black and 0.4% of Hispanic women are represented in thescience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce [6].Of the female and URM students who do pursue engineering degrees, many prefer to enroll in certain engineeringmajors more than others. This discrepancy could be attributed to differences in how each engineering disciplinetraditionally
taught within the engineeringcurriculum, fewer have looked at communication requirements in industry, as reviewed by Donnellet al. [3]. Through this review, authors determined the key disconnects between what is taught andwhat is required in industry to be 1) goals of communication in the classroom vs. in industry and2) audience of communication assignments. To better address the communication needs ofgraduating engineering students, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) has modified the outcomes for engineering programs to include communication to a widerange of audiences [2]. As a result, engineering programs will need to diversify communicationassignments.Some universities have aimed to reconcile the disconnect between
Paper ID #25955Preparing Ethical Leaders in Engineering Research and Practice: Designingan Ethical Leadership ModuleDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Ohio State University Xiaofeng Tang is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. He worked as a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Dr. Lisa Elanna Burris, Ohio State University Lisa Burris is an assistant professor of Civil Engineering at the Ohio State University. Dr. Burris’ exper- tise lies in
StudentsIntroductionDuring the past two decades, active learning techniques have received a growing attention ineducational research. Particularly in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)fields, traditional lecturing has indicated a 55% increase in failure rates of undergraduate students,compared to active learning methods [1]. Furthermore, active learning has proven to significantlyenhance students’ examination performance and educational achievements compared to passivelearning [1, 2]. In Biomedical Engineering (BME), active learning can be incorporated throughvarious techniques such as problem- and project-based learning [3]. Such approaches lead studentsto a deeper and more efficient retention of new concepts. Moreover, these methods
Paper ID #31068A Simple Model for Identifying Costs of QualityDr. Mustafa Shraim, Ohio University Dr. Mustafa Shraim is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology & Man- agement at Ohio University in Athens, Ohio. He received both of his B.S. and M.S. degrees from Ohio University in 1986 and 1989, respectively. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from West Virginia University in 1996. Dr. Shraim’s research interests are in the area of quality engineering. Specifically, they cover Lean and Quality methods and including incorporating experimental design and statistical process
the intersection of high-performance numerical simulations of wave propagation and scattering, time-frequency wavelet signal processing, and machine learning approaches to find useful information hidden inside complex radio frequency (RF) and acoustic signals.Dr. Ismail I Orabi, University of New Haven Professor Orabi received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Cairo Institute of Technology (now Helwan University), in 1975, his M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo, in 1982, and his Ph.D. degree from Clarkson University, in 1987. Dr. Orabi con- ducts theoretical and computational research in mechanical vibrations and dynamic systems and control. His more
, pp. 8410-8415, 2014.[5] A. Kaw, M. Besterfield-Sacre, Y. Lou, and A. Scott, "Improving and Assessing Student Learning in an Inverted Stem Classroom Setting," ed: http://nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1322586 (accessed on January 24, 2020).[6] R. M. Clark, A. Kaw, Y. Lou, A. Scott, and M. Besterfield-Sacre, "Evaluating Blended and Flipped Instruction in Numerical Methods at Multiple Engineering Schools," International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, vol. 12, no. 1, 2018.[7] C. Sparkes, "Flipped Classrooms Versus Traditional Classrooms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Student Achievement in Higher Education," Ph.D. Dissertation, Educational Technology
specific system or subsystem issue, or a development of a new system process and its related system issues.For all these project assignments, students need to consider major factors in the current changingengineering/business environment while working on their projects. On top of the technicalrelated issues, students need to embrace the factors of value creation, market dominance, systemseffectiveness, and the economic and political consideration in their project work. In addition,students gain knowledge on effective engineering/business practices since they need to explorethe business/engineering operations of these top technology/engineering companies when theystart their project work.In all project work, students need to do three team
and disadvantages of the elements.References[1] Sullivan, R.W. Integration of Modal Test Results of a Composite Wing into the IntroductoryAerospace Vibrations Course, 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 26, 2016,ISBN 978-0-692-68565-5.[2] Tito-Izquierdo, J., Gomez-Rivas, Feng, W. Pincus, G. An Experiment Based StructuralDynamics Course For Engineering Technology Students, 2006 Annual Conference &Exposition, June 18, 2006.[3] Abumahaimed, M., Rencis, J. Mechanics of Materials, Machine Design, and VibrationsFinite Element Learning Modules for Undergraduate Courses, Proceedings of the 2011 MidwestSection Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education.[4] MATLAB Release 2012b, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick
/ Graduate Students / Wright & Andrews / Cornell University / 2013. Data Information Literacy Case Study Directory, 2015. 2(1): p. Article 1.5. Thielen, J., S.M. Samuel, J. Carlson, and M. Moldwin, Developing and Teaching a Two- Credit Data Management Course for Graduate Students in Climate and Space Science. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 2017. 86(Spring).6. Johnston, L. and J. Jeffryes, Civil Engineering/ Graduate Students/ Johnston & Jeffreys/ University of Minnesota/ 2012. Data Information Literacy Case Study Directory, 2015. 3(1): p. Article 1.7. Holles, J.H. and Schmidt L.O., Implementing a Graduate Class in Research Data Management for Science/Engineering Students
young discipline in which individuals are trainedto solve problems at the interface of engineering and biology. Many students pursuing this fieldaim for careers in developing new medical technologies. Unfortunately, the BME-to-industrypipeline faces hurdles that appear to be keeping students from pursuing their medical industrycareer goals. Herein is a brief discussion of the history of BME and the influences that may havecreated challenges faced by students seeking industry careers. We then present a case study atThe Ohio State University (OSU), a large research I university, which evaluates and comparesthe industry employment potential of students progressing through and graduating from BME.Through this case study, we aim to identify measures
designer, he has worked on a range of projects that included houses, hospitals, recreation centers, institutional buildings, and conservation of historic buildings/monuments. Professor Sudarshan serves on the Working Group-6: Tensile and Mem- brane Structures of the International Association of Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS), the American Society of Civil Engineers’ (ASCE) Aerospace Division’s Space Engineering and Construction Technical Committee, and the ASCE/ACI-421 Technical Committee on the Design of Reinforced Concrete Slabs. He is the Program Chair of the Architectural Engineering Division of the American Society of Engi- neering Education (ASEE). He is also a member of the Structural Stability Research
Paper ID #22839Identifying Moral Foundations and Disciplinary Frameworks of EngineeringEthicsDr. Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida Jonathan Beever is Assistant Professor of Philosophy and faculty with the Texts & Technology Ph.D. Program at The University of Central Florida. Dr. Beever holds numerous national level leadership positions and works and publishes at the intersection of environmental ethics and bioethics, focusing on questions of ethics, science, and representation. He teaches a wide variety of undergraduate and graduate courses on related topics.Dr. Laurie A. Pinkert, University of Central
medicaldevices. The U.S. is the leader of the medical device technology industry followed by the E.U.and Japan2. To remain competitive in the global market, medical device manufacturers needhighly qualified engineers to develop innovative and marketable products.It is very common for undergraduate senior engineering students to be required to take a designcourse before graduation. For students who are interested in biomedical engineering, a designproject can be one of many medical device systems, including orthopedic implants, prosthetics,biomaterials, instruments, etc. In this class, students followed the standard design controlprocess3 (design input, design output, review, verification and validation, design transfer, designhistory file), and used
Paper ID #23745Applications Monday: Students Bring Real-Life Control System Experiencesinto the ClassroomDr. Rebecca M. Reck, Kettering University Rebecca M. Reck is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University in Flint, Michigan. She completed her Ph.D. in systems engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign and her master’s degree in electrical engineering at Iowa State University during her eight years at Rockwell Collins and her bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering with a mathematics mi- nor, from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2005. Her areas of research include
Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Collaboratively Developing an Introductory Infrastructure Systems Curriculum:The One Water ModuleIntroductionThe 21st century water challenges posed by decaying infrastructure, climate change, andurbanization cannot be solved by technology and engineering alone. In this context, successfulengineering decisions concerning the water infrastructure must be informed by an understandingof environmental, social, and political impacts and constraints. The future environmentalengineers tasked with tackling these 21st century challenges are ill-served by a 20th centuryeducation that presents technical systems in isolation and does not address the design andoperation of infrastructure as a
done on the job or a tool used. Like the student above whonarrows down to one specific component of the field, another student reaches a more specificidea of what engineering could look like: Pre: “I see chemical engineers as the innovators of the future. They help to create new base substances that are then used to help other disciplines create even more different technology. I think that chemical engineering just seems to affect so many people.” Mid: “I see them as creating useful substances like new compounds that make products more efficient and less wasteful. I think it is a place where you are able to improve products thus improving society.” Post: “One major thing I think of when I think of
Paper ID #22685Combining Course Flipping and a Low-Cost Experiment to Teach FrequencyResponseDr. Ryan W Krauss, Grand Valley State University Dr. Krauss received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Tech in 2006. His research inter- ests include modeling and control design for flexible robots, feedback control, and microcontroller-based implementation of feedback control systems. In addition to the freshmen introduction to engineering de- sign course, he has taught courses in mechatronics, controls, vibrations, dynamics and robotics as well as senior design. c American Society for
Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2008. 8 Joseph Dues. Avoiding finite element errors. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2006. 9 Randy Shih. The applied finite element analysis course at oregon institute of technology. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2007.10 Natasha Smith and Julian Davis. Connection theory and software: Experience with an undergraduate finite element course. Computers in Education Journal, 7:49–57, 2016.11 An introduction to stress analysis applications with solidworks simulation, student guide.12 Paul M. Kurowski. Engineering Analysis with SolidWorks Simulation 2016. SDC Publications, 2016.
. Rubio-Herrero worked at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, where he applied optimization and machine learning techniques to a diverse array of areas such as national security, deep learning, and energy. He also has experience in industry (in the context of supply chain and manufacturing) and in the public sector, where he was part of the Transport and Energy unit at the Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Dr. Rubio-Herrero has published articles in journals and conference proceedings, and serves as an active reviewer in peer-reviewed publications. His research interests deal with the applications of optimization and operations research techniques to solve engineering problems
also interested in technology-enhanced teaching and in experiential learning for undergraduates in science and engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Student Choice of Traditional or Blended Learning Activities Improves Satisfaction and Learning OutcomeOf particular interest to designing effective BME courses is how to align content-dependentprofessional expectations with a learner-centered classroom environment. Often the focus isprimarily on what the instructor is doing to deliver content rather than what the student is doingto interact with the content and take responsibility for his/her own learning. Course designs thatprovide students with choices of
Paper ID #21913Students’ Responses to Professionally Contextualized Activities in a StudioClassMr. Ayman M. Alabdullatif, Oregon State UniversityMr. Shane Paul Lorona, Oregon State UniversityDr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level
-Based Learning Approach inEngineering Technology,” Proc. 2006 ASEE Annual Conf., 2006.[7] Felder, R., and Spurlin, J., “Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles,” Int.Journal of Engineering Education, 2005, Vol. 21, No. 1, 103-112.[8] Felder, R., and Silverman, L. K., “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education,” Eng. Educ.,78(7), 1988, pp. 674-681.[9] Du, W. Y., Furman, B.J., and Mourtos, N.J., “On the Ability to Design Engineering Experiments,” Proc.8th UICEE Annual Conf. on Eng. Ed., 2005. Kingston, Jamaica. 13
skill level in using the software and from the instructor's perspective waskeeping the students involved in a long-term project problem as well as introducing newtheoretical concepts in a single design problem. This paper describes learning modules andprovides information on how the modules are integrated into a cohesive system at the end of theproject.Introduction and background:Mechatronics Engineering is a flexible, broad degree that prepares graduates to work in manybranches of industry. Mechatronics combines mechanical and electrical engineering withcomputer technology and computer science to create smart devices that improve the quality ofour lives. Electrical and mechanical systems, controlled by computers, are at the core of a widerange
Paper ID #25524Determinants of Systems Thinking in College Engineering Students: ResearchInitiationErin StirgusMr. Morteza Nagahi, Mississippi State University Morteza Nagahi is the third year Ph.D. candidate at ISE department at Mississippi State University. He is a graduate research assistant at ”Management Systems Engineering Lab”, and a reviewer in ”Systems Engineering (Wiley)” and ”International Journal of Engineering: Transaction B.” He is a member of ASEE, INFORMS, IEEE, INCOSE, and IISE. His main areas of research interest are systems thinking, complex systems/SoS, engineering education, organizational behavior