Paper ID #32388Lovelace’s Program: A Challenging but Achievable Assignment forUndergraduate Students in Engineering and Computer ScienceDr. Erica Haugtvedt, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Erica Haugtvedt is an assistant professor of English and Humanities at South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. She received her PhD in British nineteenth-century literature from Ohio State University in 2015.Dr. Duane L. Abata, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Abata has worked in academia for over forty years at universities and with the Federal government around the country. He began his career at the
discussion and comparison of the KnowledgeAssessment Survey questions and Course Assessment Survey questions, this short coursesubstantially increased the confidence of the participants to assess and analyze infrastructuresystems, and action responses based on their understanding of CIKRs and Stakeholder Analysis.Other comments received from the participants indicate the course was very well received andbeneficial to their jobs, and they provided very few suggestions for improvements. The seconditeration of the short course, delivered in January 2021, was revised to increase focus on thematerials more relevant to the CAT mission and reduce focus on the education they havepreviously received elsewhere in their careers. The short course provided the
were greeted outside of the lab by the instructor, and the distancingrequirements were reiterated and explained. Over the two semesters, various arguments toconvince students of the importance of maintaining distancing were tested: ensuring the safety ofoneself and others, getting practice following workplace safety rules in preparation for a career inindustry, the risk that the Unit Ops Lab may be shut down by the administration if policies werenot followed, and others. Ultimately the most successful argument was that avoiding “closecontact” with others would prevent students from getting stuck in quarantine if someone else inlab later tested positive.5.2 MasksInitially, an open box or stack of procedure masks was provided at the PPE table
Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.” American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Overcoming Perfectionism: My journey with the Binary MindsetIntroductionSunday -11:00 am: I have my laptop opened and holding my fresh
exercises.Fourteen coaches worked with students one-on-one during the semester (some coaches workedwith multiple participants). The coaches who were paired with students had recently completedtwo graduate courses: Foundations in Professional Coaching and Coaching Groups and Teams.The majority of the coaches were mid-career professionals who were fulfilling the requirementsfor a master’s degree in education and human development fields, while a few were non-degreeseeking students who enrolled in the courses to learn how to incorporate coaching into theiroccupations.Coached participants were provided with a leadership wheel (Figure 1) during their first sessionwith their coach, and asked to fill it out according to how satisfied they felt in each
students following similar pathways into engineering education. However,we acknowledge students’ unique experiences.Theoretical Framework OverviewThis study employed Lave and Wenger’s theory of communities of practice [7] to conceptualizecommunity and identity. We operationalized engineering communities broadly to be the formaland informal groups that students participated in throughout their undergraduate careers. Wewere particularly interested in how these general communities, especially those which fitWenger’s definition of a community of practice, influenced engineering identity development.The definition comprises a community that has mutual engagement, shared repertoire, and jointenterprise. In general, engineering communities have
State University Aminul Islam Khan PhD Candidate School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Washington State University, Pullman, WA Biosketch Khan completed his B.S. and M.S. degrees in mechanical engineering from Bangladesh University of En- gineering and Technology (BUET) in 2011 and 2014, respectively. He worked as an Assistant Professor at mechanical engineering department, BUET for 6 years. Currently, Khan is a Ph.D. candidate at Wash- ington State University with multidisciplinary research including hands-on learning for STEM education, drug transport across blood-brain barrier, inverse techniques, deep learning and plans to pursue a teaching career upon earning his Ph.D.Olufunso Oje, Washington
Technology Directorate from West Point he has continued his research on unmanned systems under ARL’s Campaign for Maneuver as the Associate Director of Special Programs. Throughout his career he has continued to teach at a variety of colleges and universities. For the last 4 years he has been a part time instructor and collaborator with researchers at the University of Maryland Baltimore County (http://me.umbc.edu/directory/). He is currently an Assistant Professor at York College PA.Dr. Stephen Andrew Gadsden, University of Guelph Andrew completed his Bachelors in Mechanical Engineering and Management (Business) at McMaster University. He completed his PhD in Mechanical Engineering at McMaster in the area of estimation
subject and demand for more advanced workshops on 3D printing.The follow-up survey on Engineering and Virtual Technology reported that participants gainedknowledge about multiple tools that they can use for simulating physics concepts in their remoteclass delivery. They also learned about using 3 technology tools for instant response and gradingthat can make their classes more interactive, engaging, and time and effort saving.Future WorkIt is planned to continue these workshops on a monthly basis and hold them onsite and/or virtualto discuss more STEM related topics that can help high school teachers in their delivery, promoteand strengthen the student interest in STEM careers in their schools.AcknowledgementsThis camp is supported by LA GEARUP
in meaning.We tend to see this same phenomenon in students’ final laboratory reports as well, even in thefinal course of the laboratory sequence. There is often a disconnect between what the studentswrite and the actual meaning of their project results. Rarely do students attempt to begin with thefundamental observations and draw conclusions, supporting their ideas in a logical progression.The observations in this work indicate that this practice is not reserved for final reports, wherespace may be limited, but a common practice. Perhaps by coaching students earlier in theirstudent career, giving them ample opportunities to practice, receive feedback, revise their work,one would hope to see succinct cogent technical response to these types
an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Leadership and Program Man- agement (ELPM) in the School of Engineering (SOE) at The Citadel. Dr. Greenburg is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Leadership and Program Management (ELPM) in the School of Engineering (SOE) at The Citadel. He served over 20 years of active military service in the United States Marine Corps. During his military career he served in a variety of progressively responsible com- mand and staff and leadership positions in Infantry, Logistics, Acquisition, and Human Resources; with peacetime and combat experience. Upon completion of active military service, Dr. Greenburg served in technical program management and
learning and plans to pursue a teaching career upon earning his Ph.D.Jacqueline Gartner Ph.D., Campbell University Jacqueline Gartner is an Assistant Professor at Campbell University in the School of Engineering, which offers a broad BS in engineering with concentrations in chemical and mechanical.Dr. Prashanta Dutta, Washington State University Prof. Prashanta Dutta has received his PhD degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Texas A&M University in 2001. Since then he has been working as an Assistant Professor at the School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Washington State University. He was promoted to the rank of Associate and Full Professor in 2007 and 2013, respectively. Prof. Dutta is an elected
students’ “career and professional development, communication andleadership development, intellectual development, personal and social development, academicand social engagement, intercultural competence, satisfaction with college experiences, andcollege belonging and persistence in major and college.” [3] Working on a competition team alsocontributes to the development of students’ design and build skills, as well as students’ non-technical skills, skills that may or may not be a part of their technical coursework. [4], [5], [6] Todate, very little research has been done to evaluate the impact of the competition team experienceon the achievement of academic outcomes or the acquisition of an entrepreneurial mindset, butthe competition context is
90% of my students (N=87) strongly agreedthat sharing my teaching philosophy is critical. Additionally, underrepresented students wereempowered and archived more than half the “A”s in my courses. In conclusion, since equal is notalways fair, instructors must make their expectations exceptionally clear to ensure that anystudent can succeed and earn an “A.” I believe it is time for educators to polish their teachingphilosophy, create appealing visual models, and share them with their students.IntroductionDeveloping a Teaching Philosophy Statement (TPS) is central in any academic career [1]. TPSdeclares the educator’s approach to teaching and learning. Creating a teaching philosophyengages educators in metacognitive reflection on what they
is currently engaged in multiple research projects that involve multidisciplinary collaborations in the field of engineering, medicine, and education, as well as research on teacher preparation and the conducting of evidence-based interventions in school environments.Dr. Stacy S. Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University Stacy Klein-Gardner’s career in P-12 STEM education focuses on increasing interest in and participation by females and URMs and teacher professional development. She is an Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Vanderbilt University where she serves as the co-PI and co-Director of the NSF-funded Engineering For Us All (e4usa) project. Dr. Klein-Gardner formerly served as the chair of the ASEE
. The material learned in this course… a. will be of value to me after graduation. b. was useful in my pursuit of my career and/or graduate school goals. c. helped me see the relevance of engineering to the real world. d. helped me learn the importance of experimental design to biomedical engineering. 3. I would like to see reflections used in other courses. 4. I would recommend this course to a friend.Engagement with SBG System QuestionnaireReferring to the standards while completing work: ● While completing the written deliverable for Module 1, I referred to the standards listed on the grading rubric. ● While completing the written deliverable for Module 2, I referred to the standards listed
such as Skype and Facetime to interact with each other when they are not physically proximate. • Gen Zs desire services to be available on demand, at any time, and with low barriers to access. It’s normal for them not to wait. • Gen Zs tend to be more career-focused earlier on in college and more of them are interested in being entrepreneurs than millennials.Learning PreferencesSome of the principal learning preferences are described below [8]: • Active learners prefer to understand and retain knowledge best through an active process such as applying or discussing information or explaining it to others. • Reflective learners prefer to absorb knowledge and think about it for some time
study, and success for first-semester students acclimating to college and learning how toself-advocate for accommodations. These basic modifications of breaking down large projectsand documents, and providing direction have been met with positive responses. Incontinuation, these modifications remain in all sections of the first-semester and second-semester engineering classes with more directed instructions during the project work times.Recent modifications due to online and hybrid learning, include making the slides available atleast 48 hours before class, and recorded lecture videos available after class. Future work willfollow students with ASD through their college career to assess their success and persistencein the engineering
´olica de Chile. His Major is Electrical Engineering and his Minor is Energy. Currently, he is a research assistant of the Engineering Education Division, responsible for supporting research tasks and collaborating in data collection and analysis. Gonzalo managed a pre-engineering program to encourage high school students to study careers in engineering and science. He also volunteered as a teacher in communication skills and personal development, aimed at training high school students in vulnerable backgrounds.Jorge A. Baier, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile He is an associate professor in the Computer Science Department and Associate Dean of Engineering Education at the Engineering School in
engineering and also outreach to pre-college students to introduce them to science and engineering career opportunities. Ms. Marlor joined University of California, Berkeley in 2013. She has a B.S. in Materials Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair for Engineering Education Research Programs at University of Michigan (U-M). Dr. Finelli is a fellow in the American Society of Engineering Education, a Deputy Editor of the Journal for Engineering Education, an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education, and past chair of
East Hartford, CT as well as Crash Safety located in East Hampton, CT. Both of these experiences has helped him strengthen his knowledge in data analytics and optimization. One of Michael’s biggest interests in Ergonomics and Human Factors which he plans to purse later in his career. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Analysis of STEM Students’ Ability to Respond Algebra, Derivative, and Limit Questions for Graphing a Function 1 Emre Tokgöz, 1Samantha Scarpinella, 1Michael Giannone 1 Emre.Tokgoz@qu.edu, 1 Samantha.Scarpinella@qu.edu
demonstrate it.* The definition of “meeting a course objective” is achieving a “C” level (70%) on the task. Table 2: CE401 Course Assessment for 2020 Course Objective Assessment How Evaluated and Remarks a. Describe challenges facing civil All graded events in the course address this engineers in professional practice now 4 objective and students solidly met the and in the future. requirements. b. Develop short-term and long-term This specific course objective is only professional goals, to include directly addressed by the Career Paper, but
experience from another class or extracurricular activities that have their own designprocess to follow.Of the observations made during the research many of them were not surprising and expectedresults. These included the following. The senior ME 465 students didn’t have much change intheir design processes from the beginning to the end of the semester. This wasn’t surprising sincethey had already spent their entire academic career forming this process through other classesand personal experiences. The other not surprising thing with the senior ME 465 students is thatthey came in with more general knowledge of the design process than the incoming freshmanwith little to no engineering background. This means that during their time at [university
), computer-based simulationprojects of similar complexities were used to address the same topics.Creative thinking is an important skill needed for modern workplace in engineering and technology fields[3]. Instructors in higher education consider various ways of integrating creativity and innovation into thecourses they teach to better prepare students for their future careers [4]. Study shows that between the twocommonly-used approaches that enhance creativity, i.e., teaching vs. practice creativity, stimulatingcreativity by practices is considered to be more effective [5]. In addition, many professors used project-based learning [6, 7] when trying to foster creativity in their courses [8, 9].Due to robotics’ multi-disciplinary nature, we think
iniatives or other projectsthat are expected to last a minimum of 5 years. Courses are designed around anexperiantal learning pedagogy and not a lecture format.At NYU there are roughly 40 VIP teams operating. Students join teams for threesemesters. Each semester students enroll for one credit, and at the end of three semester,with three credits earned, students are able to apply their participation in VIP as atechincal elective towards their graduation. The three semester model creates anopportunity for students to move from beginners in their first semesters to team leaders intheir last, replicating how they might grow in their future careers. It also means that VIPprojects outlast any individual students participation. Students enter the VIP
pursuing a Master’s of Engineering in Biomedical Engineering at Cornell University.Carly Merrill, Bucknell University Carly Merrill is currently working in the healthcare industry where she is pursing a career in strategic product development. She has recently earned a Bachelor of Science Degree in Biomedical Engineering from Bucknell University.Dr. Jove Graham, Geisinger Jove Graham, PhD is an Associate Professor in the Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes at Geisinger, a nonprofit integrated health system in Pennsylvania.Troy Schwab, Bucknell University Troy Schwab is a computer scientist currently working as a federal consultant, specifically concerning data engineering. He received undergraduate degrees in
implementation of unconventional aerospace concepts, mightnaturally increase diversity in the field. Furthermore, there are many factors contributing to whether or nota student may choose to pursue a STEM-related career. Research suggests that early math achievement,math self-efficacy beliefs, and early exposure to STEM-related subjects are all indicative of whetherstudents enroll in STEM majors. While math achievement is a significant indicator of a student’s interestin engineering related fields, early exposure to STEM is one of the most influential factors in whetherstudents continue to seriously pursue related fields in their later academic career.The intent of this paper is to show that early STEM exposure, along with the implementation
level of confidence building prototypesIn the spring of 2020, questions taken from the General Engineering Self-Efficacy Scale [4] wereadded to the pre- and post-course surveys to assess student self-efficacy. Self-efficacy refers toan individual’s belief that they can do certain things [2], in this case the belief that they cansucceed in engineering. Studies have found that self-efficacy correlates with both academicperformance [5] and persistence [6]; research has found that while some aspects of women’sself-efficacy in engineering have increased over the years, their self-efficacy tends to decreaseover the course of their academic career [7]. Two questions from the survey are included here inFigures 8 and 9. The first question relates to
easierjustification of equipment and labor investment costs. Perhaps more importantly, studentsrepeatedly encounter the equipment and explore different portions of the apparatus throughout thecurriculum. Anecdotal feedback from the students on the learning gains from using real hardwareand preparing them for future careers in engineering has been positive. This feedback has beengathered verbally in the lab and through five-year post graduation surveys. Future work mayinclude more formal assessments of this apparatus specifically and an exploration on whetherstudents learn and retain information better through this tiered approach using a modularexperimental apparatus compared to an approach using independent experiments.Bill of MaterialsThe bill of materials
groups [12,13]. In 2006 the NCEES added the requirement for a master’s degree or equivalent education toits model law with a goal for implementation of this requirement in 2020; in 2014 thisrequirement was removed from the model law [14].The primary driver for graduate education is to impart the skills and knowledge needed in theprofession, which also enable a successful and rewarding career. The ASCE has explored theoutcomes that should be met to prepare civil engineers for entry into the profession, detailing“the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for entry into the practice of civil engineering atthe professional level” in the CEBOK [6, p. vii]. The Body of Knowledge has evolved andchanged over time, from an initial document in 2004