: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825914531920.[6] National Center for Education Statistics. (2019, February). Indicator 23: Postsecondary graduation rates. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/raceindicators/indicator_red.asp[7] N. J. Gozik and Heather Barclay Hamir, Promoting Inclusion in Education Abroad. Taylor & Francis, 2023.[8] Institute of International Education. (2023). Open Doors: 2023 Fast Facts on International Educational Exchange. https://opendoorsdata.org/fast_facts/fast-facts-2023/[9] Institute of International Education. (2023). Open Doors: Report on international educational exchange. https://opendoorsdata.org/annual-release/u-s-study-abroad/#key-findings[10] Gorbett, D. M., Shenberger-Trujillo, J. M
. References[1] P. Chakraborty, P. Mittal, M.S. Gupta, S. Yadav, & A. Arora, "Opinion of students on onlineeducation during the Covid‐19 pandemic". Human behavior and emerging technologies 3(3),2020, 357-365.[2] S. Oncu & C. Hasan, “Research in online learning environments: Priorities andmethodologies”. Computers & Education 57(1), 2011, 1098-1108.[3] E. Gross & D. Peters, “Comparison of Returning and Direct Pathway Graduate EngineeringStudents”. Journal of Continuing Higher Education 69(3), 2021, 145-168.[4] Tulane University. "Evolution of Distance Learning." School of Professional AdvancementBlog, https://sopa.tulane.edu/blog/evolution-distance-learning#:~:text=In%20fact%2C%20it%20was%20in,correspondence%20learning%20really%20took
365 1600 Active Students Enrolled Students 1400 1200 s t 1000 n e d u t S e 800 t a u d a 600 r g r e d n
leadership in summercamps and outreach activities. Her efforts to boost the outreach activities of the College ofEngineering have inspired this work. This work has been supported through with NSF grantsECCS-1201878 and ECCS-0845669 to SMI. Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, The University of Texas at Arlington, March 21 – 23, 2013. Copyright 2013, American Society for Engineering Education References1. C. K. Lee, T. T. Wu, P. L. Liu, and S. Hsu, "Establishing a K–12 Nanotechnology Program for Teacher Professional Development ", IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 141
Society for Engineering Education References 1. C. McCraig, F. Arai, A. Jacoff, S. Tadokoro, M. Gaitan, “RoboCupSoccer – Nanogram Competition,” White Paper, NIST, 2007. Available online: http://www.eeel.nist.gov/812/nanogram/white_paper.pdf 2. 2010 NIST Mobile Microrobotics Challenge, at IEEE Int’l Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, Alaska, May 2-6, 2010. Available online: http://www.nist.gov/pml/semiconductor/robots_042710_program.cfm 3. 2013 IEEE RAS MMC Competition Rules, Available online: http://www.uta.edu/ee/ngs/mmc 4. M.R. Pac, K. Rathatha, B. Rukavina, J. Weir, “Development of Microrobotics Control System - UT Arlington Microrobotics
(Excellence 7 in Civil Engineering Education) Teaching Workshop, or ETW for short. 8 9 The ETW99 was designed by faculty of the U. S. Military Academy and delivered to 24 faculty10 members with 1-4 years of teaching experience. This workshop was the first in what was11 expected to be a series of annual teaching workshops for C.E. faculty. Concurrent with this12 workshop nine senior faculty from engineering programs around the country formed a program13 design team which was charged with to observing the ETW and making recommendations on14 content and conduct of future teaching workshops that could be delivered in other venues. The15 result of this design activity was the versions of ETW conducted in 2000 and subsequent yeas at16 the
in an undergraduate course in probability andrandom processes are given. Protocols for four experiments are available from the first author’swebsite. The effectiveness of this laboratory in increasing student outcomes will be studiedduring the Fall 2004 semester.Bibliography[1] S. Srinivasan, L. C. Pérez, R. D. Palmer, M. F. Anderson, A. J. Boye, “An Integrated Signals and Systems Laboratory at the University of Nebraska: Laboratory Philosophy and Study Design”, Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, TN., June 22-25, 2003.MICHAEL F. ANDERSON: Michael Anderson is an Associate Professor of Education and Department Chair atClarke College in Dubuque, Iowa.LANCE C. PÉREZ: Lance C. Pérez received his Ph.D
component. However, the students’ self-reflections provided a very interesting lookinto their experiences, knowledge transfer, professional and personal development, as well as afeedback for the improvement of future projects. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Midwest Section Conference References1. Bruner, J., 1966, Toward a Theory of Instruction, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.2. Bruner, J., 1990, Acts of Meaning, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.3. Papert, S., 1992, The Children’s Machine, Basic Books, New York.4. Jonassen, D.H., Peck, K.L., Wilson, B.G., 1999, Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective, Prentice Hall
learning.Keywords: manufacturing engineering education, globalization, experiential learningIntroductionHistorically, civil and industrial engineering were the largest concentrations, producing themajority of engineering graduates at Geneva College, a Christian liberal arts college in westernPennsylvania1. Since the mid-1960’s, however, the engineering program saw an increase ofdiversification into mechanical, electrical, computer and chemical engineering. By the early1990’s, the Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering (BSIE) program, once the mainstay ofthe Engineering Department, was attracting less and less students. This trend was in line withthe termination of the GI program after World War II and the steady decline of the steel industry
machinery at a safe temperature. Design a heated scraper tool to aid in the removal of asphalt on paving Industry Partner: Bergkamp Inc equipment. This tool would reduce time and effort required by workers to clean Conclusion the paving equipment. Additionally, the tool would be safer than previous Company Representative: Scott Bergkamp Our team feels confident that Bergkamp Inc.’s required design and
studs on 16” centers and be 9’ tall. The studentshad to select the components in the wall between the inner and outer layers, which had to be thesame construction for all outside walls. The house had to have an outer wall facing eachdirection (N, S, E, and W) and all outer walls had to be straight.There had to be two outside doors (1 in the front and 1 in the back) at least 36” wide that werecommercially available and had some type of window in them. The outside windows had to alsobe commercially available and all rooms except bathrooms and the laundry room had to have atleast one window of reasonable size (no port holes). The students had to select actual doors andwindows and use the given manufacturers’ insulation specifications.The house had
intended to serve as a springboard for discussion of ideasand approaches, offering our current approach as a starting point for addressing two of the moreenigmatic criteria. Ultimately, the issue is to improve the education of our students, devisingbetter educational tools for conveying an appreciation for and ability to immerse themselves inboth life-long learning and contemporary issues in our ever-changing world.BibliographyNoneProceedings of the 2010 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 3Biographical InformationMICHAEL S. DETAMOREDr. Detamore is an Associate Professor of Chemical & Petroleum Engineering
_______________________ (Name of the program(s)) has conducted an honest assessment of compliance and has provided a complete and accurate disclosure of timely information regarding compliance with ABET’s Criteria for Accrediting Technology Programs to include the General Criteria and any applicable Program Criteria, and the ABET Accreditation Policy and Procedure Manual.________________________________Dean’s Name (As indicated on the RFE)____________________ ___________________Signature DateWhat can make tracking thechanges easier? A useful aid is the ABET Reader’s Guide. Each commission has one and the guide compares the exact changes to each commission’s criteria (2009-2010 cycle
involvinghazardous materials, bio-terrorism, and major natural disaster events. In addition to identifying newworldwide business ventures, Dick oversaw all operations in Iraq and the Middle East. 12John S. Sofia – DTA 2006, BS MET 1984, MBA 1993 from University of Detroit Mercy. In 2006,he was the Vice President of Quality Assurance and Customer Satisfaction, American Axle &Manufacturing. John is responsible for maintaining exceptional world-class quality at all of theAAM manufacturing facilities—efforts that have made AAM a benchmark among its peers. Inaddition, he utilizes data, facts, and trends to establish strategies that save AAM customers millionsof dollars in warranty costs.Joseph M. Zachman – DTA
Dr. Dennis John FallonDennis John Fallon is presently The Citadel Distinguish Professor of Engineering Education.He is formerly the Dean of the School of Engineering and holds the Louis S. LeTellier Chair atThe Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina. He received his BSCE from Old Dominion University(ODU) with honors in 1970, and his MSCE and PhD. from North Carolina State University in1972 and 1980, respectively.Dr. Fallon’s industrial experience includes seven years at Carolina Power and Light Companyin Raleigh, NC, two years as Chief Structural Engineer with a consulting firm, and three yearswith the Underwater Explosion Research Division in Portsmouth, Virginia. He is aProfessional Engineer in the State
physician is designed to be holistic early in medical school. Their first courseis gross anatomy. Clinically based medical education is far more effective, if not veryefficient, as one can surmise from the cost of medical school. Even thoughengineering educators do not have eight year programs, except for Ph.D. s,engineering education might still profit some from the context of medical education,which introduces clinical experiential learning early and continues throughout theprogram and into residency.The abstractions and reductive nature of teaching engineering science are highlyefficient in terms of the metrics of cost and time and are reasonably predictive ofsuccess in practice. In terms of its growing specialization and depth of focus
solution to a particular design problem, which begs thequestion: if the ideal (or even a ‘very good’) solution lies outside the student’s cognitiveboundaries, how will he or she be led to find it?3. Managing Psychological Inertia in the Early Stages of DesignResearchers have observed that the effects of psychological inertia can be reduced throughthe awareness of one’s cognitive boundaries and the adoption of techniques that expand one’scognitive level and/or simulate different cognitive styles3, 4, 5, 14, 18. Fey and Rivin5 illustratethe impact of psychological inertia through an example from the former Soviet space agency,as follows: In the 1970’s, the space agency decided to launch an unmanned vehicle to land onthe Moon’s surface. A projector
,”which meant that it had to include a laboratory component. All Princeton students are required to taketwo “S&T” courses. This was an additional incentive for liberal arts students to take the course. Therequired preparation for the class was limited to algebra, a little calculus, and good high-school science.It was open to all class years. Engineering students were welcome on the grounds that their knowledgewould enrich the class; they were expected to find the technical approach elementary but would get acomprehensive overview of the space flight problem. They were limited to no more than 25% of theavailable seats.2. Course DesignThe catalog description of the course was: This is an introductory aerospace engineering course for non
. Proceedings of the 2007 Middle Atlantic Section Fall Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 4References[1] Alabanese M., “Problem-Based Learning: why curricular are likely to show little effect on knowledge and clinical skills,” Medical education, Vol. 34, No.9, 2000, P.729.[2] Alabanese M., & Mitchell, S. “Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues,” Academic Medicine, Vol. 68, 1993, No. 1.[3] K. Sheppard and B. Gallois, “Implementation of technogenesis in the undergraduate engineering curriculum,” proceedings of the 2002 ASEE/SEFI/TUB colloquium
; Exposition, 2018. [9] C.-W. Lee, A. Schleife, D. R. Trinkle, J. A. Krogstad, R. Maass, P. Bellon, J. K. Shang, C. Leal, M. West, T. Bretl, G. L. Herman, and S. Tang, “Impact of computational curricular reform on non-participating undergraduate courses: Student and faculty perspective,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[10] J. Wagemann, F. Fierli, S. Mantovani, S. Siemen, B. Seeger, and J. Bendix, “Five guiding principles to make Jupyter notebooks fit for earth observation data education,” Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 14, 2022.[11] M. West, G. L. Herman, and C. Zilles, “PrairieLearn: Mastery-based online problem solving with adaptive scoring and recommendations driven by machine learning,” in 2015 ASEE Annual
for the retention of first-year students [10]. A report entitled“STEM Students & Their Sense of Belonging: S-STEM Programs’ Practices & EmpiricallyBased Recommendations” identifies cohort experiences as an important factor in academicintegration and success [9]. Offering retention programs is valuable, but if students do not attendor participate, they will not receive the maximum benefits that these programs can provide.Students are more likely to participate in retention programs if they feel a sense of communitywithin the institution [9]. Furthermore, female engineering students, who have been found tohighly value the sense of connectedness, benefit from the positive impact of a supportivecommunity, enhancing their resilience. Thus
. Chemical Engineering Progress, 2023. 119(May): p. 49-55. DOI: https://www.aiche- cep.com/cepmagazine/may_2023/MobilePagedArticle.action?articleId=1876571&app=fa lse#articleId187657112. Jackson, A., C. Mawson, and C.A. Bodnar, Faculty motivation for pursuit of entrepreneurial mindset professional development. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 2022. 5(3): p. 320-346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/251512742098851613. Bosman, L. and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the entrepreneurial mindset to engineers. 2018, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing14. Kern Entrepreneurship Engineering Network. Engineering Unleashed powered by KEEN. 2024 [cited 2024 January]; Available from: https://engineeringunleashed.com
stakeholders, (b) rigorous inclusion of moral philosophy to avoid anti-regulationtactics such as “ethics washing,” (c) standardized reporting to maintain quality control andaccountability, (d) standardized curricula for accreditation and quality assurance, and (e) theinternalization of institutional self-governance. Mitcham and Engelhardt (2019) mention severalof these factors, and additionally suggest evaluating the relation between RCR and engineeringethics education and EAC programs.While the holistic ethics intervention framework centers on engineering ethics education at thecourse level, Martin et al.'s (2021) multi-level framework delves into how faculty, serving asdecision-makers in engineering education, perceive and establish connections
across disciplines of physics, chemistry, biology, and engineering. He is interested specifically in the interactions between ferroelectric, ferromagnetic, and ferroelastic materials on the nanoscale, with emphasis placed on the applications of these materials to electronic devices. Dr. Carvell is also interested in research in engineering and physics education and has presented research on multiple topics in this area, with more projects moving forward. While at Marian, Dr. Carvell has taught eleven courses across the physics and engineering programs. He also received the Marian University Advisor of the Year and the E. S. Witchger School of Engineering Award for Service Excellence, both in 2022, and the E. S
Undergraduates Leave STEM Majors: Changes Over the Last Two Decades,” in Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in undergraduate stem education, E. Seymour & A.-B. Hunter, Eds., Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2, 2019, pp. 87-114.[6] A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change,” Psychological Review, vol. 84, pp. 191-215, 1977.[7] C. Dweck, “Is math a gift? Beliefs that put females at risk” in Why aren’t more women in science?, S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams, Eds.,Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2007, pp 47-55.[8] C. Good, J. Aronson, & M. Inzlicht, “Improving adolescents
Sustainable Development Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals. Accessed 2024-01-21. [2] A. Van den Beemt, M. MacLeod, J. Van der Veen, A. Van de Ven, S. Van Baalen, R. Klaassen, and M. Boon, “Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support,” Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 508-555, 2020. [3] E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, D. Brodeur, and K. Edstrom, Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. Springer, 2014. [4] ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022-2023. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for- accreditingengineering-programs-2022-2023/. Accessed 2024-01-22. [5] J. L. Hennessy and D. A
in a newlydefined core curriculum in our undergraduate courses, and a more integrated approach of differentdisciplines that is consistent with sustainable energy technologies.References:[1] Nall, D. H., “An Engineering Approach to Evaluating Energy Technology,” ASHRAE Journal, Vol. 61, Issue 10, October 2019.[2] Pacala, S., Socolow, R., “Stabilization Wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies,” Science, Vol 305, Issue 5686, pp. 968-972, 13 Aug 2004. https://doi.org/doi:10.1126/science.1100103[3] The CMI at the High Meadows Environmental Institute at Princeton University https://cmi.princeton.edu/resources/stabilization-wedges/introduction/[4] Winters, J., “ASME’s unique approach to
designand fabrication in upper-division mechanical design courses.AcknowledgmentsWe gratefully acknowledge Christopher Lee for collaborations on project advising in the pilotcourses and Steven Santana for insights on framing the design process stages.References[1] S. B. Shooter, “A systems engineering design experience for the machine design curriculum,” in Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change, Pittsburgh, PA, USA: Stipes Publishing, 1997, pp. 1588– 1593. doi: 10.1109/FIE.1997.632756.[2] H. R. Börklü, N. Yüksel, K. Çavdar, and H. K. Sezer, “A practical application for machine design education,” J. Adv. Mech. Des. Syst. Manuf., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. JAMDSM0036
Aeronautical Sciences, ICAS 2014, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84910611467&partnerID=40&md5 =dfb1accc4f70983f9f4bfc12f40d9a06[2] M. K. Orr, N. M. Ramirez, S. M. Lord, R. A. Layton, and M. W. Ohland, “Student Choice and Persistence in Aerospace Engineering,” J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 365–373, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.2514/1.I010343.[3] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, C. Swan, D. Knight, and N. Canney, “An overview of the microethics and macroethics education of computing students in the United States,” in 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Indianapolis, IN: IEEE, Oct. 2017, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2017.8190445.[4] L. L. Bucciarelli, “Ethics
Engineering Learning Community to Promote Retention and Graduation of At-Risk Engineering Students.” American Journal of Engineering Education, 5(2), pp.73-90, 2014.[2] S. J. Correll, “Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences, Contemporary Sociology, 26(5), p. 644, 1997[3] NAEP - National Assessment of Educational Progress. The Nation Report Card, Accessed: Mar. 5, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/profiles/stateprofile?chort=1&sub=MAT&sj=&sfj=N P&st=MN&year=2022R3[4] J. Gleason, . et al. , “Integrated engineering math-Based summer Bridge Program for student retention”- Alabama experimental Program to stimulate Competitive Research