their PI or advisors, the influences that impact their careerdecision-making, and other relevant matters. Qualitative data gathered from interviews with bothstudents and faculty (and former faculty) was analyzed and coded for themes. Page 26.555.8 The researchers recruited participants by first making contact with key faculty and staff atinstitutions that were selected for one or more of the following reasons: (1) pre-existingprofessional connections with the principal investigator(s); (2) ten or more Black engineeringtenured or tenure-track faculty as of 2012 data; (3) and/or contact was made at a nationalengineering-related
.AcknowledgementsLaboratory space and equipment was generously provided by the Armour College ofEngineering, Illinois Institute of Technology. We would like to thank Craig Johnson for helpingequip the laboratory and for supporting students in our machine shop. We would also like tothank our many engineering students who provided constructive feedback throughout the pilotimplementation.Bibliography1. Eagan, M., Hurtado, S., Chang, M., Garcia, G., Herrera, F., & Garibay, J. (2013). Making a Difference in Science Education: The Impact of Undergraduate Research Programs. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 683-713.2. McLaughlin, D., Schmitz, S., & Mean, E. (2013). Report on the Learning Experiences of Undergraduate Students in a Novel
that they wanted to avoid keepinga design notebook, which is a requirement for the EPICS class. After discussions with the currentstudent leaders, it was determined that the actual differential of work between EWB-USA andEPICS is not that significant and the benefits of the additional accountability of being graded forcredit motivated the change in policy to limit the number of audits.The EPICS curricular and assessment processes aligned very well with the EWB-USA structureand philosophy. Both EPICS and EWB-USA promote and rely on strong student leaders. TheEPICS structure did not reduce the student leadership and it allowed the inclusion of theprofessional mentors. The relationship between the professional mentor(s) and the faculty
Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel- final_feb.pdf 2. National Academy of Sciences (U.S.), Institute of Medicine (U.S.), and National Academy of Engineering. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participating: America's science and technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 3. Hurtado, S., Cabrera, N., Lin, M., Arellano, L., & Espinosa, L. (2009). Diversifying Science: Underrepresented Student Experiences in Structured Research Programs. Research in Higher Education, 50, 189–214
, S., Johnson, D., and Johnson, R. (2005) “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom- Based Practices.” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 87-101.7. Smith, K. (2011) “Cooperative Learning: Lessons and Insights from Thirty Years of Championing a Research-Based Innovative Practice.” Proceedings of the 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, SD.8. Prince, M. (2004) “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 223-331.9. Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., and Bunting, C. F. (2011) “Problem-based Learning: Influence on Students’ Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course.” Journal of Engineering Education
retention of the concept(s) taught.Neither Trevelyan or Carberry and Ohland discuss what preparation in pedagogy might beuseful in preparing students to teach although for some peer tutoring the students are givetraining and paid. It is argued here that substantial prior training may lead to more effectivelearning exchanges irrespective of whether it is undertaken as a tutor with one or twostudents, perhaps in a cooperative learning group, or as an instructor with a class of twentystudents.However, this brings into question the role that educational studies may have more generallyin engineering programmes.It is argued that students may benefit more if they have to teach an unfamiliar subject and thetraining may be linked to the preparation
understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. EducationalResearcher, 15(2): 4–1424 Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. HarvardEducational Review, 57(1): 1–2225 Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea?International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), (pp.1405-1416)26 Skogh, I.-B. (2006). Innovative performance: How can it be assessed? In T. Ginner & J. Hallström(Eds.), Forskningskonferens i teknikdidaktik: Styrdokument och klassrumsverklighet i skolansteknikundervisning. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press.http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp_home/index.en.aspx?issue=01727 ASEI (2005), Association of Swedish Engineering Industries, Alla barns
material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNumbers DRL-0733613 and DUE-1245590. Page 26.1500.11References 1. Berland, M., Martin, T., Benton, T., Petrick Smith, C., & Davis, D. (2013). Using learning analytics to understand the learning pathways of novice programmers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(4), 564- 599. 2. Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1990). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. Signs, 128-157. 3. Roth, W. M. (1996). Art and artifact of children's designing: A situated cognition perspective. Journal of the Learning
-2214. 2. Basoglu, E. B., & Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. The Turkish Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1-7. 3. Thornton, P. & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 217-228. 4. Lan, Y-F., & Huang, S-M. (2012). Using mobile learning to improve the reflection: A case study of traffic violation. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 179-193. 5. Wallace, S., Clark., M., & White, J. (2012). ‘It’s on my iPhone: Attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study. BMJ
material contained inthe videos was covered in class.Experimental Group 2. This group consists of five sections of ENG1101 taught fall 2014 by twofaculty members. The 308 students in this group were strongly encouraged to complete thereading and watch the video(s) prior to class, however, neither pre-lesson quizzes nor clickerquestions were used. Material covered in the video was typically not covered during class.Experimental Group 3. This group consists of five ENG1101 sections (293 students) taught fall2014 by three faculty members. Before attending class, students in Group 3 were expected tocomplete the reading assignment and watch the pre-lesson videos. To encourage preparation,short pre-lesson quizzes covering video content were also
enrolled in the class seeking their opinions, evaluations,and any comment(s) they may wish to offer. Twenty six out of a total of 30 students returned the“questionnaire” on time! The opinions expressed and comments made were, by and large,positive to say the least. After regrouping, and rephrasing to correct the English language; thecomments offered by the ex- students, could be summarized as follows: The adjunct was easy to approach every time and every where, and was always helpful, His input into the course has dramatically improved students’ understanding of the material, enlivened the experience, and made the course more meaningful, Many students felt that the adjunct faculty was eminently qualified to teach
?, 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI, 2007.[8] Jacob, S. M., & Issac, B.; The mobile devices and its mobile learning usage analysis, Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Vol. I, 19-21 March, Hong Kong, 2008.[9] Giurgiu, L., & Barsan, G.; The Impact of iPhone in education; BulletinScientific, 13(2), 2008.[10] Caverly, D., Ward, A., & Caverly, M.; Techtalk: mobile learning and access. Journal of Developmental Education, 33 (1), pp. 38-39, 2009.[11] Yu, F., & Conway, A. R.; Mobile/Smartphone use in higher education. Proceedings of the 2012 Southwest Decision Sciences Institute, pp. 831-839, 2012
., Leifer, L. J. (2005). “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning.” Journal of Engineering Education. 94(1), 103-120.6. Felder, R. M, Brent, R. (2001). “Effective Strategies for Cooperative Learning.” Journal of Cooperation and Collaboration in College Teaching. 10(2), 69-75.7. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. (2005). “Pedagogies of Engagement: Page 26.1240.13 Classroom-Based Practices.” Journal of Engineering Education. 94(1), 87-101.8. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., Mount, M. K. (1998). “Relating Member Ability and Personality to Work-Team Processes
and since instructors arepart of the student’s academic program, the instructor may fully participate in the resolutionprocess.The authors intend to continue refining the workshop content. Additional case studies will beadded and the current cases will be streamlined so that workshop participants can completemultiple cases. Ultimately, the workshop and case studies will be made available as an onlineresource for faculty and students. Page 26.1246.11Bibliography1. Howe, S. "Where Are We Now? Statistics on Capstone Courses Nationwide," Advances in Engineering Education, Vol. 2, No. 1, Spring 2010.2. W. Felps, T. R. Mitchell, and E
Science Teacher Education, 2014. 25: p. 197-210.11. Shulman, L.S., Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 1986. 15: p. 4-14.12. Shulman, L.S., Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 1987. 57: p. 1-22.13. Abell, S.K., Research on science teacher knowledge, in Handbook of research on science education, S.K. Abell and N.G. Lederman, Editors. 2007, Lawrence Erlbaum Associaties.: Mahwah, NJ. p. 1105-1150.14. Park, S. and Y.-C. Chen, Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012. 49: p. 922-941.15
caseof MITES and E2@MIT, over the course of the labs, we spent small amounts of timedescribing actual details of the Gertboard, and only focused on their specific workingsduring the final project periods as required by particular student projects.Figure 7. Raspberry Pi Model B (right) connected to a Gertboard via ribbon cable (left).Deployment of the Raspberry Pi/Gertboard assemblies in 2014 was as successful than2013’s BeagleBone Blacks in terms of student progress and project complexity. Inaddition, the increased usability and protection afforded by the Gertboard completelyremoved the danger of partial/complete loss of student work, and greatly improved thespeed and efficiency of student wiring when interfacing with the board due to the
te brain &s synt convergent divergent te he ld te ga ui
exposed is the wide range of skills andproficiency with pre-requisite knowledge and skills that are often assumed as second nature at this Page 26.1426.8level of education. Students in this course had issues with content such as the equation for astraight line and the conversion of units from rpm to rad/s. In addition, student reflections oftenprovided only cursory responses to the questions and had a right/wrong-bias or behaviorallyfocused mindset. For example, in response to a question on calculating the torque-angular speedrelation for a linear motor, a considerable number of students remarked that their errors weredirectly related to their
the engineering economy coursedid a good job of teaching them how to plan for retirement.The breakdown of the economics courses taken by the 105 students responding was: 52microeconomics, 31 macroeconomics, and 22 both micro and macroeconomics. All 105 studentssaid that the engineering economy course was more valuable than the economics course(s) theypreviously completed. In fact, 93.3% of the students (98 out of 105) felt as though every student(non-engineering and engineering) should take a course like this engineering economy course.Over 87% of the students (92 out of 105) said they felt as though a course like the engineeringeconomy course would be a good course to offer as a General Education (Social and BehavioralSciences at Penn State
argue from differentpositions is needed to diagnose the environment and propose the best solution17.Decision-making problems usually require that problem solvers select a solution from a set ofalternative solutions2. Traditional conceptions of decision making posit a set of alternativecriteria that decision makers work through in order to identify the optimal solution. Thosecriteria may be provided to the problem solver(s), or the solver(s) may have to identify the mostrelevant criteria. Everyday life is replete with decision-making problems. Businesses also dailysolve many decision-making problems. Though these problems typically require selecting onesolution, the number of decision factors to be considered in deciding among those solutions as
his company, but admitted that it made work easier forthose responsible for training and supervising the new hires as well: Page 26.278.9 I really feel like that [project work i]s a really good way to get people into the mode of thinking … that we look for here. Also, kinda—to be perfectly honest with you—it reduces the workload requirement and the management requirement of management, and it also gets all the … employees at a level of autonomy that’s just wonderful.This same employer explained that “on the by and large,” WPI students begin working at hiscompany ready to do the kind of work that was expected of
. Finally, the authors thank Dr.Julie Kalnin for conducting the focus group and overall program evaluation.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under awardnumber DUE - 1317238 and is supported in part by funds given to the National ScienceFoundation by the Intel Foundation and the GE Foundation. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References 1. American Society for Engineering Education. 2012. Going the Distance: Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering. Engineering Technology, and Computing Students. http://www.asee.org/retention
., Spencer P. Magleby, Robert H. Todd and Alan R. Parkinson (2001), Training Faculty to Coach Capstone Design Teams, International Journal of Engineering Education, v17n4&5, 353-358. 5. Watkins, Gregory (2009). Defining the Role of the Faculty Advisor in a Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design Course, Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin TX, June 14-17. 6. Somerton, Craig W., Brian S. Thompson, and Craig Gunn (2003). The Role of the Faculty Advisor in the Capstone Design Experience: The Importance of Technical Expertise, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
Introductory Integrated Science Course for STEM Majors”, J. College Science Teaching, 41(5), 44-50, (2012).11. M. L. Temares, R. Narasimhan and S. S. Lee, “IMPaCT - A Pilot Program”, 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, ASEE (1996).12. D. Pines, M. Nowak, H. Alnajjar, L. I. Gould, D. Bernardete, “Integrating Science and Math into the Freshman Engineering Design Course”, Proceedings 2002 Annual Meeting of the ASEE, ASEE (2002).13. A. Domínguez, Zavala, G., & Alanís, J.A. Integrated physics and math course for engineering students: A first experience. Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Atlanta, GA; ASEE (2013).14. E. Brewe, “Modeling theory applied: Modeling instruction in introductory
telling measures will be those graduates’ ability to get jobs asmanufacturing engineers and the initial ABET accreditation review in 2016-17. We areconfident that these measures will show that the use of the SME 4-pillars as a guiding frameworkfor MFGE program development is a good approach that other programs could replicate.References1. Mott, R., Bennett, R., Gartenlaub, M., Danielson, S., Stratton, M., Jack, H., & Waldrop, P. “Integration of Manufacturing Into Mechanical Engineering Curricula.” Proceedings of the ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, San Diego, California, November 15-21, 2013.2. Waldrop, Phillip S., and Hugh Jack. "Preparation of
). “Chinese graduate teaching assistants teaching freshman composition to native English speaking students.” Non-Native Language Teachers: Perceptions, Challenges, and Contributions, Springer US. 17. Rodrigue, T. K. (2012). The (in) visible world of teaching assistants in the disciplines: Preparing TAs to teach writing. Across the Disciplines, 9(1). Accessed online, Feb. 18, 2015. 18. Russell, David. (2002). Writing in the Academic Disciplines: A Curricular History. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.19. Lambert, L. M., & Tice, S. L. (1993). Preparing Graduate Students to Teach. A Guide to Programs That Improve Undergraduate Education and Develop Tomorrow's Faculty. From a Comprehensive
professional identity development of Chemical Engineering students and a study of meaning-making language and behaviour in student design teams.Dr. Micah Stickel, University of Toronto Dr. Micah Stickel (ECE) is Chair, First Year, in the Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering. He is also a Senior Lecturer in The Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering. Dr. Stickel first came to the Faculty when he started as an undergraduate in 1993. Since that time, he has completed his BASc (1997), MASc (1999), and a PhD (2006) - all with a focus on electromagnetics and the development of novel devices for high-frequency wireless systems. He has a great interest in engineering education and the
affected from FC.These numbers are detailed in Table 7. In this study, effect size was calculated using Cohen’s Dgiven in Equation 1, where x is the mean and s is the pooled standard deviation given inEquation 2, where n is the sample size and s1 and s2 are the variances. For Cohen’s d, 0.2signifies small, 0.5 medium, 0.8 large, and 1.3 very large effect sizes, as offered by Cohen. 𝑥1 − 𝑥2 (1) 𝑑= 𝑠 (2
Annual Conference and Exposition, 2007. [Online] . Available: http://search.asee.org/search/fetch?url=file%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%2FE%3A%2Fsearch%2Fconference%2F14 %2FAC%25202007Full1853.pdf&index=conference_papers&space=129746797203605791716676178&type=a pplication%2Fpdf&charset= . Retrieved on June 02, 2015.[4] Burkett, S, and Snead, C., “Picasso’s Clarinet: When Art and Engineering Collide,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2009,116th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX, 2009, AC 2009-32.. [Online]. Available: http://search.asee.org/search/fetch?url=file%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%2FE%3A%2Fsearch%2Fconference%2F19 %2FAC%25202009Full32.pdf&index=conference_papers
through social sciences is as real as how thesocial sciences understand society. Thus engineering education’s framing of issues as problemsmay serve to create an engineering education system that gives rise to, or exacerbates, thoseperceived problems. For example if it is widely believed there is a significant retention problemin engineering a possible solution would be to create a new first year course to better prepare1 In the late 1920’s a group of investigators from Harvard University were able to observe people at work in theWestinghouse Electrical Company’s works in Chicago. It was found that productivity increased among someworkers when the conditions of work had been changed for the worse with the expectation that productivity