executable and choosing which tools to use. The next phase entailed identifying 3how the executable functioned and how to isolate malicious segments of code. Finally, studentsimplemented and tested their own additional modifications. Most students do not have previous experience with reverse engineering binary executables,so the first step is an exploration of the different tools available for reverse engineering software.A preliminary search reveals both IDA (particularly IDA Pro) and BinaryNinja as the most usedplatforms. Free demo versions are available for both softwares, and these are the ones most usedby students. Once a platform(s) is chosen, students must explore what settings and views
, while eliminating its most unpopular portion and reducing the workload associated withgrading.[1] A. Kolmos and E. de Graaff, “Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering Education,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. E. Olds, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 141–160.[2] J. W. Thomas, “A review of research on project-based learning,” 2000.[3] P. C. Wankat, “The Role of Homework,” ASEE Conf. Proc., 2001.[4] P. C. Wankat and F. S. Oreovicz, “Testing, homework, and grading,” in Teaching Engineering, 1st ed., McGraw-Hill College, 1993, pp. 213–234.[5] J. Widmann and K. Shollenberger, “Student use of Textbook Solution Manuals : Student and Faculty
. Raspberry Pi #1 (located on the robot) read the room information, actuated themotors, and collected and processed images of the warehouse. Raspberry Pi #2, which handledall of the path planning and tweeting to indicate the start and end of the challenge. These are justthree examples of the seven different ways students in the distributed-expertise section stitchedtogether their knowledge to solve the warehouse robot challenge. Figure 4: Three Example System Diagrams for Warehouse Robot ProjectTable 3 below summarizes the solution diversity data based on our qualitative analysis of thefinal project submissions and the availability of examples for each section. These data aredescribed using a none-few-some-many s cale to qualitatively
has a much lower shrinkage rate than ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene)which is another common plastic used in FDM printing. To avoid warping, a brim is added to thepart which expends the boundary of the first layer to increase the layer adhesion near the edgeswhich are prone to lift and warp. The printing speed/scan speed was set to 90mm/s which isabout 50% faster than the norm. The extrusion temperature is set to 210°C. The nozzle diameteris 0.4mm. The total estimated time is 6 hours and 11 minutes. The infill is set to 25% to preservematerial. The estimated material usage is 215g which is about $4.72. Figure 5. Chamfer operation Figure 6. Printing simulation in Simplify3DCNC machiningFirst and foremost, the stock needs
andInterpret the Results", Interaction Design Foundation. [Online]. Available:www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/stage-2-in-the-design-thinking-process-define-the-problem-and-interpret-the-results.[10] M. Ovando, "Constructive Feedback", International Journal of Educational Management,vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 19-22, 1994.[11] A. Bandura, "Self-Efficacy", in Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 4th ed., V.Ramachaudran, Ed. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1994, pp. 71-81.[12] S. Dalton (2012). The 2-Hour Job Search (1st ed.). New York, NY: Ten Speed Press.[13] S. Iyengar and M. Lepper, "When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of agood thing?", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 995-1006, 2000.
enableeducational development to occur outside the classroom and the means to assess overall ability indesign. Page 12.200.3 2 Russell, Jeffrey S., et al., “A Systems View of Changing Civil Engineering Education,” ASCE, September2003. Undergraduate versus Graduate Emphasis As development of curricula supporting ASCE Policy Statement PS 465 and the civilengineering BOK began, two questions immediately arose. Those two questions were: ‚ What should be addressed predominantly at the undergraduate level and what should be addressed predominantly at the graduate level? ‚ How will completion of the BOK be assured
® Competition (I2P®): http://www.ideatoproduct.org/ .[11] The website for the National Service Learning Clearinghouse: http://www.servicelearning.org/welcome_to_service-learning/history/index.php[12] P.K. Linos, S. Herman and J. Lally, “A Service-Learning Program For Computer Science And Software Engineering,” Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Thessaloniki, Greece, June 2003.[13] W.C Oakes, J. Duffy, T. Jacobius, P.K. Linos, S. Lord, W.W. Schultz, and A. Smith, “Service-Learning in Engineering,” Proceedings of the 2002 Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, November 2002.[14] W.C. Oakes, E.J. Coyle and L.H. Jamieson, “EPICS: A Model of Service-Learning in
Foundationunder grant # ESI-0341897. The authors would like to thank James Pechacek, Nicole Jackson,Peter Rhode, Karl Mueller and Vern Cottles for their invaluable help in making the activitiescome alive.Bibliography1 National Academy of Engineering (NAE). 2002. Technically Speaking: Why all Americans need to know moreabout technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.2 Pisupati, S. V., Mathews, J. P., and Scaroni, A. W., Energy Conservation Education for Non-Engineering Studentsand the Effectiveness of Active Learning Components. 2003, Proceedings of the American Society of EngineeringEducation Annual Conference, Session 2533.3 Krohn, J. L., and Apple, S. C., Energy and the Environment: An Energy Education Course for High SchoolTeachers. 2003
donation of a Phenom.ED benchtop scanning electron microscope bythe FEI corporation through their beta test program, and the LL Stewart Faculty Scholars Grantfor the development of the WISE learning tool. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.11. References1. http://www.nano.gov/html/facts/faqs.html. Accessed 01/15/07.2. Fonash, Stephen J., Carl A. Batt, Paul Hallacher, Thomas Manning, and Anna Waldron, Nanotechenology Undergraduate Education: A Report and Recommendations Based on a Workshop Held on September 11-12, 2002 at the National Science Foundation.3. Fonash, S. J. “Education and
flame. Figure 5. Bunsen premixed flame schematic and determination of the flame speed.The laminar premixed flame speed is determined according to Eq. 6, see Fig. 5: VL or S L = U local sin(α ) (6)The velocity determined with the Eq. 6 varies significantly depending on where it is determined.The tip of the flame is usually round and unstable; the location near the burner rim provides anappreciable cooling, and thus the flame speed there is slower. Page 12.1001.9In addition, the flow of the fuel/oxidizer mixture is not uniform, but fully developed with aparabolic velocity
project(s) for other groups of students. b. One or more areas are relevant to faculty’s personal research interests and faculty is/are willing to mentor one or more groups of students to continue the research. 3. Assuming positive answers to Step #2, the interested faculty develops a Progressive Research Project Master Plan. The Plan for a progressive research project must identify desired outcomes that can be achieved by successive groups of students in a series of 3- month research projects. This should be based on the results Step #1. Ideally this is done in conjunction with the students who completed the initial project. 4. Faculty, with students who have completed their project(s
, No. 2, 2001, pp. 223-229.[11] Herkert, J.R.," Future Direction in Engineering Ethics Research: Microethics, Macroethics and the Role of Professional Societies", Science and Engineering Ethics Vol. 7, 2001, pp. 403-414.[12] Hirsch, L., S. Gibbons, H. Kimmel, R. Rockland, and J. Bloom, "High School Students' Attitudes to and Knowledge About Engineering", ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO: ASEE, 2003, pp. F2A-7.[13] Herkert, J.R., "Ethical Risk Assessment: Valuing Public Perceptions", IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 1994, pp. 4-10.[14] Bielefeldt, A., "Increasing international awareness of engineering students", ASEE Annual Conference and Expo, Chicago, IL: ASEE, 2006.[15
, J., & Chen J., (1995) The Role of Decouplers in JIT Pull Apparel Cells. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology. Volume 7 Number 1, 17-35 2) Black, J., & Hunter, S. (2003) Lean Manufacturing Systems and Cell Design. Dearborn, MI: Society of Manufacturing Engineers 3) Kolar, R., & Sabatini, D.A. (2000). Environmental Modeling- A Project Driven, Team Approach to Theory and Application. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(2), 201-207. 4) Liou, F., Allada, V. Leu, M., Mishra, R., Okafor, A., & Agrawal, A. (2002). A Product Focused Manufacturing Curriculum. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2709-2718. 5) Monden, Y., (1993) Toyota Production System an Integrated Approach to Just-In
.18References1. Loftus, M., “Cream of the Crop,” ASEE Prism, 28-33, Summer 2007.2. Boschetto-Sandoval, S., C. Sandoval, and L. Phillips, “Pilot Collaboration and Program Development: Engineering Senior Design and Spanish for Cross-Disciplinary Literacy,” Proceedings American Society of Engineering Annual Conference & Exposition, June 23-28, Honolulu, HI, 2007.3. Blair, B.F., Millea, M., Hammer, J., “The Impact of Cooperative Education on Academic Performance and Compensation of Engineering Majors,” Journal of Engineering Education
dramaticallyincreasing (twenty-nine percent of all S&E degree holders in the labor force are age 50 or over3).The result is a significant and growing gap between the supply of and the demand for qualifiedengineering graduates, which serves as the talent pool of the future workforce in North America.SAE InternationalFor over a century, SAE International has served the professional needs of engineers andtransportation needs of humanity. Since 1905, mobility pioneers have led initiatives andexpanded the impact of the society. Membership in this international technical society hassteadily increased, and today more than 90,000 SAE International members – includingengineers, scientists, business executives, educators and students from 97 countries
. The U.S.still holds the edge in design innovation, and it is here that academic programs mustadapt. Failure to do so will change the future and nature of engineering education andpractice, as well as the economic well-being of our country. Innovation and creativity Page 13.1131.4that support the instruction in and practice of sustainability are at the center of thiscontroversy. While engineering sustainability has become an increasingly popular topicin engineering, few programs provide significant instruction in the subject, especiallydesign for sustainability. Beginning in the early 1990's, but specifically during the last few years
respectively,were “True/False Questions; Selection of best models for specified sets of data” and 64%. Thismeans that the CLO is not met. Analysis of this midterm exam with action taken for continuousimprovement reveals the following:• Results for Problem #’s 1 and 3 were “Very Good” with the “Objectives met” to a great extent.• Few students missed points on Problem #2 because they did not make the matrix diagonally dominant. As a result, it took more number of trials for the iterative process to converge. This was pointed out when the tests were returned to students.• For Problem #4, the results were “Fair”; there were 29 questions and one-third of students did not manage the time properly. As a corrective action, the problem for
Simulation Conference and acts as the technical coordinator for the conference’s management system.Carolyn Miller, North Carolina State University Carolyn S. Miller is a Lecturer in the Department of Computer Science at NC State University. She received her M.S. in Computer Science and worked as a Member of the Technical Staff at Bell Telephone Laboratories and a Senior Digital Systems Engineer at General Electric before joining NC State University. Ms. Miller teaches introductory computer science classes and focuses on researching and integrating new teaching techniques into the classroom.Tom Miller, North Carolina State University Thomas Kenan Miller, III received the BA degree in Mathematics and
. Place the pane flat with the edges supported on two chairs so you have a platform 18" or so off the ground with about 12"-18" of glass unsupported between the chairs. (You may also suspend the pane on 2"x4"s placed on the ground.)2. Slowly stand on the pane such that your entire weight is on the unsupported portion of the glass. The glass should hold up to 400 pounds easily. (N.B. It is extremely rare that the pane will break. If the glass does break it will break in the pane of the glass meaning that glass pieces will fly out parallel to the floor. It is best to have students remain at least 10 feet away and wear safety goggles while doing this demonstration.)If you wish to demonstrate the effect of a flaw in the glass, the
., Miller, J., and Ruff,S. The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently, Journalof Engineering Education, 95 (2), 107-122 (2006).5 Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, On-line:http://www.abet.org/Linked%20DocumentsUPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%200708%20EAC%20Criteria% 2011-15-06.pdf (2006).6 National Academies of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, NationalAcademies Press: Washington, DC, U.S.A. (2004).7 Moskal, B., Skokan, C., Munoz D., and Goskink J. (in press) “Humanitarian engineering: Global impacts andsustainability of a curricular effort.” International Journal of Engineering Education
these “survey” results were also found in analyzing student tracking data as shown inthe next section.B. Student Tracking ResultsOn 9/20/07, the first test was given with the following results based on 10: 6, 6.8, 7.5, 7.5, 8.3,8.5, 9, 9, 9.3, and 10 for an overall average of 8.19 and an obvious bi-modal distribution. On10/11/07, the second test was given with the following results based on 10: 3, 4.5, 5, 5, 6.5, 7, 7,7, 8.3, and 9 for an overall average of 6.23 (a drop of 2 points) and still showing an obvious bi-modal distribution. The final course grades were 2 A’s, 1 A-, 1 B, 2 B-’s, 1 C+ and 3 C-’s.Using the Tracking tool from the Blackboard Vista CMS, we computed the amounts of timespent by students perusing different types of files
proposed changes. Policy Paper. Education. Maxim Institute – retrieved from http://www.maxim.org.nz/files/pdf/policy_paper_ncea_reforms.pdf 10 January 2007 7. Riding, P., Fowell, S. & Levy, P. (1995) An action research approach to curriculum development. Information Research, 1(1). Accessed at http://InformationR.net/ir/1-1/paper2.html on 26 September 2006. 8. Steif, P.S. & Hansen, M.A., (2007). New practices for administering and analyzing the results of concept inventories. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), pp 205 - 212 9. Smaill, C., Godfrey, E, and Rowe, G.B. (2007). The transition from final-year high-school Physics and Mathematics to first-year Electrical Engineering: A work in
. Kimmel, H. and R. Cano. K-12 and beyond: the extended engineering pipeline. in Fronteirs in Education Conference. 2001.4. Schreiner, S. and J. Burns. Disseminating Biomedical Engineering Concepts to 8th -12th Grade Teachers. in ASEE Annual Conference. 2001.5. Zachary, L.W., J.M. Sharp, and B.M. Adams. Engineering connections: Teaching engineering mechanics to K-12 teachers. in ASEE Annual Conference. 2000.6. Yasar, S., et al., Development of a survey to assess teachers’ perceptions of engineers and familiarity with teaching design, engineering, and technology. Journal of Engineering Education, 2006. 95(3): p. 205-16
paths, but it is just as valuable for students who enter “traditional” graduate programs andgo into academic careers in that it broadens their perspectives on the uses of mathematics (A. C.Heinricher and S. L. Weekes12, B. Vernescu and A.C. Heinricher19)Here are some sample REU projects from past research summers (more are available on theCIMS web at www.wpi.edu/+CIMS ): Optimal Cession Strategies – Sponsor: Premier Insurance Co.; Faculty advisor: Arthur Heinricher; Industrial advisors: Richard Welch, CEO, and Martin Couture. In the state of Massachusetts, the automobile insurance industry is highly regulated. Not only are insurance rates fixed by the state, but no company can refuse insurance to anyone who
county. Barriers will emerge, but with guidance, persistence and determination a good student can overcome most of them.ConclusionsThe programs offered by the department and the institution were significantly enhanced throughthis exploration of remote learning. After offering two different courses in 4 separate countries,all to students at institutions where the conditions going in were unknown, the authors believethe experiment was a success. The department will continue offering courses in engineering tostudents at remote locations, and the prospects for doing that effectively and efficiently in thefuture are excellent.References1. Ressler, S. J., R. W. Welch, and Karl F. Meyer (2004). “Organizing and Delivering ClassroomInstruction
network. Services such as DNS, mail, and web must be setup just as in a realnetwork. Students are generally given wide latitude to choose their own operating systems,server applications, and network configuration, as this also helps them learn what works well andwhat does not. The setup phase can last 1-2 weeks, depending on the situation, during whichtime the students’ network(s) are isolated from any attacks. Page 12.1462.10The exercise itself can last any amount of time, but often occurs over 12-24 hours. In this phasetwo additional teams participate, referred to here as the red and green teams. The red team ismade up of educators, industry
., Vanasupa, L., Savage, R. and London, B. "Training the Eco-conscious MaterialsEngineer for the Future", Materials Science & Technology 2005, Pittsburgh, PA: September2005.10. Woods, D.R., Problem-based Learning: How to Gain the Most from PBL, Woods Publishing,Waterdown, 1994. Page 12.367.1511. Triplett, C., and S. Haag, “Freshman Engineering Retention,” Proceedings of 2004 ASEEAnnual Conference, February 24, 2005,http/www.foundationcoalition.org/events/news/conferencepapers/2004asee/triplet.pdf12. Knowles, M. S., Self-Directed Learning: A guide for learners and teachers, EnglewoodCliffs: Prentice Hall/Cambridge, 1975.13. Vanasupa, L., Stolk, J
-termengineering projects. Each team consists of a mix of sophomores, juniors and seniors. Projects ofat least one year in duration are intended to solve real problems that are defined in consultationwith advisors who are Purdue faculty members, graduate students, or representatives of industryof the end-user population. Students are encouraged to participate in a VIP team for two or moresemesters via enrollment in ECE 295V while a sophomore, ECE 395V while a junior, and ECE495V while a senior. Projects that serve customers from community service or educationalorganizations will be conducted within the EPICS framework rather than VIP.Required Text(s): None.Recommended Reference(s): None.Course Outcomes:A student who successfully fulfills the course
, 2007.7. Woods, D. (1994). Problem-Based Learning: How to Gain the Most from PBL, D.R. Woods, Waterdown, Ontario.8. Armstrong, R. (2006). (http://mit.edu/che-curriculum/index.html) last visited February 7, 2007.9. Pritchard, C. (2003) Make It a Double, PRISM, 12 (8), 37-38 , April 200310. Rugarcia, A., R. Felder, D. Woods, and J. Stice (2000). The Future of Engineering Education, Chem. Engr. Ed., 34, 16.11. Qin, S. J. and T. Badgwell (2003) A Survey of Industrial Model Predictive Control Technology, Contr. Eng. Practice, 11, 733-76412. MacGregor, J.F., H. Yu, S. Garcia-Munoz and J. Flores-Cerrillo, “Data-base Latent Variable Methods for Process Analysis, Monitoring and Control”, Computers & Chem. Eng., 29