organizationattracts. Signaling theory emphasizes the importance of both the medium and content oforganizational-based information in influencing both applicant attraction and an applicant’sdecision to pursue employment. Studies by Allen and colleagues [7] and Rynes and colleagues[8] support the notion that the organizational culture portrayed on a website significantly shapesapplicant attitudes and decisions. In this study, we use signaling theory to provide insight intohow environmental organizations communicate to engineering faculty, staff, and students theirexplicit commitments to diversity and justice, as well as how they convey their organizationalculture through images, as well as the racial makeup of their staff and boards of directors.Service
equal balancefor Introversion and Extroversion, which is perhaps surprising from engineers who often arestereotyped as “shy” or “introverted”. The results for how students “gather information”indicates a near equal balance for Intuition and Sensing, and similarly the results for howstudents “make decisions” indicates a near equal balance for Thinking and Feeling. As reportedin Table 2, the most significant difference for Jung Personality Type was observed in a strongpreference for Judging over Perceiving (i.e., a total of 50 individuals versus 24). A similar trendhas been regularly reported in courses in this Department (i.e., [8, 9, 10]). Therefore, based uponthe trends in Jung Personality Type, the use of clear “lists of instructions” was an
, “Exploring the early career pathways of degree holders from biomedical, environmental, and interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary engineering,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, ASEE Conferences, 2020. doi: 10.18260/1-2--34646.[2] M. E. Ita, G. Z. Kaletunç, and K. E. Swindle-Reilly, “Designing a Biomedical Engineering Course to Develop Entrepreneurial Mindset in Students,” Biomedical Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 179–191, Jul. 2023.[3] F. O. Soares, M. J. Sepúlveda, S. Monteiro, R. M. Lima, and J. Dinis-Carvalho, “An integrated project of entrepreneurship and innovation in engineering education,” Mechatronics , vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 987–996, Dec. 2013.[4] J. L. Gorlewicz and S
open to compromise, changing committee members and/or researchtopics, weighing the pros and cons of persisting in an unhealthy environment, switching toanother institution or program to pursue STEM graduate studies, or following another, non-STEM related career path. For example, Libby, a Black graduate student, stated, “It's okay toexplore your options and not feel like you have to be obligated to stay in a place that doesn'tsupport your growth.” Jane, a White woman, echoed similar statements when she shared, There's plenty of other people who've gone through it. Honestly, the only reason why I felt okay about [leaving my program] in the beginning was because I found someone else on Twitter who was very open about how they
meritand justifications. At one end, highly acclaimed universities pride themselves of having toprenowned mathematicians and scientists as faculty members in their engineering programs. Atthe opposing end, many other institutes of higher education, particularly community colleges,firmly require engineering degrees from their engineering faculty members.The Practice of Mathematicians and Scientists Teaching Engineering Courses:The author has been and is still an engineering faculty member at numerous institutes in the USand Saudi Arabia. During his twenty-five years of teaching and through personal interactionsand communications with other faculty members in conferences and similar academic activities,he came to know that some mathematicians and
Program underthe umbrella of the Iowa Cyber Hub [3] to foster a network of informed and resilient digitalcitizens. Created in 2017, the Iowa Cyber Hub is an initiative developed by educators andindustry professionals in Iowa. It serves various constituents, including students, employees,managers, educators, and others, by providing cybersecurity resources and guidance. The hubaims to enhance knowledge and career development in cybersecurity within the state and offers avariety of resources and opportunities. The Iowa Cyber Hub is dedicated to securing the state andexpanding the cybersecurity workforce.Launched in October of 2023, the Cybersecurity Ambassador Program [4] empowers students topromote basic cybersecurity concepts and practices within
leverage thepractical implications (e.g., “connecting questions and findings directly to teaching practices orproducing generalizable findings with implications beyond the local, studied context”).The issue of legitimacy prompted sharing other kinds of stories and triggered conversationsregarding arguments that might be effective in convincing traditional engineering faculty tounderstand and respect engineering education research. For example, one person shared a storyof how an engineering faculty member negatively critiqued a graduate student’s dissertation oneducation-related work, which prompted a discussion on the importance of building andmaintaining “community momentum” within engineering education research. As a group theycould identify
) studies havebeen used to determine in a statistically significant fashion how the interventions of which thisprogram consists can be tied to the measured achievements. Changes in the skills, knowledge,and attitudes of the teachers and students will be described as well as the influence of thisprogram on changing student attitudes toward possible STEM careers. The human subjects-basedresearch was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of the College ofWilliam & Mary.The results show that as a result of participating in the program, students have an increasedinterest in pursuing STEM careers and that they exhibit increased knowledge in and ability to usescience and mathematics. Teachers indicate a high level of support
conducted with pro-gram alumni and a member of CIRCUIT leadership; and the second-round interview is with twoadditional stakeholders (e.g., alumni, mentors). We standardize our questions but retain the abilityto explore topics and details relevant to individual applicants. Each interview lasts approximately30 minutes. At the end of the process, each interviewer fills out a rubric recording their detailedand overall impressions, in an effort to minimize bias and normalize acceptance criteria. Finaladmission decisions are made by program leadership, ensuring consistency. The values of the stu-dents chosen to participate match the core mission of the CIRCUIT program. Students are notmere beneficiaries of the program but rather are partners with
cadre of graduates who value experimentation as an essential and natural part of solving engineering problems; 4) to prepare students for industry as well as advanced courses and research and development oriented careers;Hardware DescriptionThe students are given a tutorial that leads them through the experiments, describing thehardware apparatus and the actions to be performed in each step. The hardware apparatusused in this experiment, shown in Figure 1, consist of: 1) a DC-DC switch-mode powerstage converter9, 2) a 14-bit PCI Data Acquisition Processor (DAP 840/103)10, 3) atermination board (MSTB 010-06-C1Z) [15], 4) a Pentium III 550-MHz personalcomputer (PC) with Windows NT 4.0, and 5) a micro-controller (PIC16F877)11
innovation concern included: • ABET doesn’t approve classes. They approve programs so there is room for faculty innovation. • Mechanical engineering criteria developed by ASME EAC and ETAC Commission members are broadly defined, leaving opportunity to supplement coursework as needed without the risk of negative impact on a certain criterion. • Ensuring students have flexibility in their program is key. Mechanical engineering electives are free electives that can be taken in business, public policy, education, and sciences, which allows additional room for innovation in the electives portion of the program. • Personalize the learning experience for students to meet their goals and fill the skills gap
, co-op education competencies, and others specific to faculties ordisciplines such as Engineering, for example, the Graduate Attributes, which represent 12competencies that must be taught and assessed in undergraduate engineering programs [3]. Thecompetency frameworks reviewed were those linked to the University of Toronto Co-CurricularRecord [2], The Canadian University Survey Consortium Survey of University Students [4], TheNational Survey of Student Engagement [1] and the Memorial University Career IntegratedLearning Initiative [5].Finally, interviews were also conducted with several potential employers, including the Actua’scorporate partners, regarding their hiring processes and the competencies they seek in newlygraduated STEM
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University. In 2000, he joined New York City College of Technology, City University of New York (CUNY) where he is a Professor in the Department of Computer Systems Technology. Since 2005, he has been a member of the doctoral faculty at the CUNY Graduate Center. His research interests include computer science and engineering education and the use of computational models to understand and solve problems in biology. Page 24.1334.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Using Interdisciplinary Game-based Learning to
Introductionto Engineering course at a third school. We describe and contrast the implementation experienceat each school, including specifics about how the materials were included in the courses, thesupport needed, and faculty preparation and observations. In addition, we present some of ourassessment tools, and provide a preliminary analysis of student learning across two settings. Ourassessment addresses the extent to which students are able to apply lean principles and use datato support decision-making.IntroductionGood process design can be a cornerstone of competitive advantage, and provide an opportunityto significantly improve operational performance6. The techniques and issues associated withprocess design are a significant part of the
Gül E. Okudan is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Design at The Pennsylvania State University. She received her Ph.D. from University of Missouri-Rolla. Her research interests include intelligent shop floor control, manufacturing strategy modeling and measurement, solid modeling, product design, and product design teams. Her published work appears in journals such as Journal of Engineering Design, Design Studies, Journal of Engineering Education, European Journal of Engineering Education and Technovation. She is a member of ASEE and ASME. She is also a National Research Council-US AFRL Summer Faculty Fellow of the Human Effectiveness Directorate for 2002, 2003 and 2004
exploring thespace between the world of theory and the experience of practice” [8]. In order to support ourproject-based learning strategy, we advocate for the use of evidence as a tool to inform bothlearning and decision-making. The evidence to be used will be provided by previous casesrelated to the impact of natural events to the infrastructure in Puerto Rico, using the case-basedlearning method. We use the definition stated by [9] in which a case study is “an intense study ofa single unit with the purpose of a larger class of (similar) units”, and with the pedagogicalpurposes cases have been used in academia following the methods originally pioneered byChristopher Langdell in which cases are used as instances to understand situations that later
can be better prepared for professional practice. Page 25.898.12The most practical way to offer BIM to students would be to incorporate it into a series ofrequired courses. Using BIM technology as an integrated format for construction education canbe able to provide students better quality of education. A rich and rigorous learning environmentcould be achieved through purposeful attempt of integrating BIM into various course contents.The BIM incorporation may require that more faculty members be able to use BIM technology.For this reason, faculty members who teach BIM-incorporated courses will need proper trainingand appropriate version of BIM
skills but rather that engineers shouldalso understand the broader context of their decisions and they should recognize the potentialimpacts.This approach of generating collaborative partnership projects between IAB members andacademic institutions using SD was first done with the University of Wisconsin-Platteville’sMEIE Department in Spring 2022. The participants participated in the SD process of 10 rulesover 3 hours, to generate Pathfinder projects that have a high impact and are easy to accomplishin a short time frame. Nineteen industry partners, five faculty members, and 4 staff frominstitutional advancement participated in the workshop to explore the Framing Question“Imagine that University of Wisconsin-Platteville’s MEIE graduates
in a set of core courses in the second and third years of the engineering curriculum,building incremental skills across this two-year period, and leading to their application incapstone design projects in the final year. The modules are drawn from a recently implementedDigital Engineering graduate certificate for training a civilian Air Force cohort. This twelve-credit certificate included four semester-long courses in: (i) Systems, Models and Simulation forDigital Engineering; (ii) Model-Based Systems Engineering; (iii) Cyber-Physical Systems andSimulation; and (iv) Data-Driven Decision-Making and Risk Management. The modules arehosted on an online learning and course management system. Each module includes anexperiential learning project
component of engineering degree programs acrossaccredited engineering universities [1][2]. While the capstone experience may be different foreach university, all projects serve as an opportunity for students to gain practical experience byapplying the many topics learned throughout their undergraduate education, and thereby preparefor work after graduation. The research and design are completed from September to Februarywith several progress presentations and reports throughout. Oral presentations are delivered inMarch and the end-of-project report and presentations are given during the first week of April toother faculty members, students, and industry professionals. Through the end-of-yearpresentations, students are given the opportunity to
-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of a 2014
to the welfare of people and societies. But thereare far too few institutions that are doing so. In addition, over 200 schools of engineering havepledged to become more diverse, equitable and inclusive in their enrollments at all levels and intheir hiring of staff, faculty, and administrators, but evidence of meaningful change is hard tofind. While there have been creditable increases in the numbers of women, there is still a paucityof African American, Latinx, and indigenous faculty members and graduate students inengineering in our major research universities.BackgroundThe work of engineering education is dedicated to making the world a better place. Aseducators, we are called to create classroom spaces that support this endeavor. The
, scholar and researcher. He currently holds the TI-Professorship in Analog Engineering and Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering. His re- search emphasis on industry-based issues, solved within an academic context, has attracted significant external funding. Up until now, he has graduated 31 PhD students and 11 of them hold academic posi- tions in leading Universities in the world. He along with his students have received numerous best paper awards from the IEEE Industry Applications and Power Electronics Society. His primary research inter- ests are in advancing power electronic converter designs to address complex power management issues such as: active harmonic filtering, adjustable speed
consecutively for every term of his collegiate career and was awarded the Rath Distinguished Scholarship by the Wisconsin Association of Independent Colleges and Universities (WAICU). In addition, Justin is actively involved in multiple on-campus organizations. He has been elected to serve as Vice President of the Wisconsin-Delta chapter of the Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society for the 2014-2015 academic year, and is working closely with the current Vice President on a unique collaborative project to educate high school students on extraterrestrial plant growth. Justin is also engaged in his second Rocket Design Competition, sponsored by the Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium, as well as an active member of the MSOE Swing
]Belonging (or not) AutobiographyIn high school, I thought engineering would be a great place for me to belong. The summerbefore my senior year of high school I participated in a 6-week summer research programthrough the Women in Science and Engineering (WISE) program at the University in myhometown. I was matched with a civil engineering faculty member, Prof. AULE. In the lab, Iwas closely mentored by one of her Master’s level graduate students, ANSP. I felt I belonged.These women became my role models and mentors. I continued working with Prof. AULE pastthe 6-week program - I was hired as an hourly employee for the rest of the summer and workedbasically 40-hours per week in the environmental engineering lab. I enjoyed talking with thegraduate
, limitations in language were mitigatedby creating project groups with students from both institutions, from multidisciplinarybackgrounds, and from undergraduate and graduate students, where the groups could leveragethe strengths of their respective group members.Starting Early on ProjectsTraditionally, studying abroad is seen as an option explored by students in the arts andhumanities and oftentimes, studies abroad offices may not be prepared for programs that takeengineering students abroad 4. Therefore, it is imperative to start early on the project, so that anychallenges faced due to the lack of engineering study abroad programs can be met on time.Furthermore, “engineering programs often do not have advisors who are knowledgeable aboutstudy abroad
effectively on a team, as the majority will be expected to workas part of a team upon graduation. The projects they will face during both their academic andpost-academic careers will involve problem-solving and critical thinking, and the unique skillsand perspectives of each team member are necessary to arrive at effective solutions. This paperintroduces a pedagogical boardgame aimed at simulating debates and negotiations within anengineering exercise, as well as the study planned to track the changes.A diverse team has people with different backgrounds, experience, and ways of thinking. Thiscan lead to a wider range of perspectives and ideas that can improve problem-solving anddecision-making. The wider pool of knowledge and experience of a diverse
awarenessof soft skills in the educational community and effort by policymakers [3], the soft skills gapcontinues to occur for the engineering graduates [4]. Students and faculties devote more attentionto academic success due to the orientation of school curriculum and assessment [5], lackingopportunity for students to learn the necessary soft skills in a traditional class setting. Mentoring has been one of the most effective pedagogical approaches and has beenwidely adopted in education and related fields [6]. In addition, social interaction plays a criticalrole in how learners construct knowledge and skills through the social constructivism lens [7].Thus, we designed an interdisciplinary robotics mentorship model, where the
include Computational Mechanics, Solid Mechanics, and Product Design and Development. He has taught several different courses at the undergraduate and graduate level, has over 50 publications, is co-author of one book, and has done consulting for industry in Mexico and the US. He can be reached at Karim.Muci@sdsmt.edu.Dr. Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Bedillion received the BS degree in 1998, the MS degree in 2001, and the PhD degree in 2005, all from the mechanical engineering department of Carnegie Mellon University. After a seven year career in the hard disk drive industry, Dr. Bedillion was on the faculty of the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology for over 5 years before joining
culture: • Chemical engineering courses aimed at retention – (a departmental stakeholder cultural decision) • Bringing communication, soft skills, etc. into ChE curriculum (a departmental stakeholder decision) • The use of active learning and other ways to improve retention (if faculty members embrace these teaching concepts, they can modify the culture so that the students feel more engaged in the learning process and take ownership of their own learning). • The development of novel curriculum approaches and/or department level involvement (a departmental stakeholder cultural decision)Each of these classifications will now be discussed. In many cases, the concept ofretention is linked to an