Engineering Education, 90, 2, 223-229.Herkert, J.R. (2000). Engineering ethics education in the USA: content, pedagogy andcurriculum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25 (4), 303-313.Herkert, J.R. (2001). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethicsand the role of professional societies. Science and Technology Ethics, 7, 3, 403-414.Jalali, Y., Matheis, C., & Lohani, V. K. (2019). Ethics instruction and the role of liberatorypraxis and theory. Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa,Florida.Keating, A. (2002). Charting pathways, marking thresholds… a warning, an introduction, in G.E.Anzaldúa & A. Keating (Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation
morality as it relates tofundamental canons included in the NSPE Code of Ethics [7].9 In effect, with a focus on appliedethics, we provide a scaffold on which ethics, professional skills, and technical skills can bejoined as a fabric of components necessary to successful engineering practice.Structuring the Lessons: ARCS and “Full Stack Ethics” as a guideIt may be no surprise that matters of professional ethics are sometimes considered by students tobe outside their central focus, and even unimportant to their success as engineering students andeventually as engineers [9]. This is clearly indicated in student comments in response to ourinterventions (see below) and is at least in part attributable to the fact that “ethics” as a topic israrely
activities was useful to increasestudents’ employability [6], professional ethics [7], skills for writing a business plan [8] andthe like. Despite of the promotion of these educational efforts, however, the impact of TIECson engineering students’ entrepreneurship intention and behaviors, remain scarcely answered.Entrepreneurial intention, as the prerequisite and the best prediction of entrepreneurialbehavior, have an important impact on actual entrepreneurial behavior. This research focuseson engineering students’ entrepreneurial intention and sets out to explore the impact ofengagement in TIECs on their entrepreneurial intention. This study aims to examine tworesearch questions: 1) In the context of TIECs, what are the factors that affect
across these articles. A summary of priorwork on engineering ethics in the classroom is shown in Table 1.Table 1. Summary of engineering ethics methods from the literature. Author Year Pedagogical Ethics Focus Area Elements Carpenter et al. 2005 Challenge game Professional and ethical [7] responsibility Wittig [8] 2013 Problem Based- Ethical decision-making Learning Troesch [9] 2016 Phenomenological Ethical reasoning and emotional approach engagement with ethics VanDeGrift et
Construction Engineering and Management,” Proc. 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[4] Maryam Tabibzadeh and S. Jimmy Gandhi, “Comprehensive analysis of current engineering risk management curriculum,” Proc. 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[5] W. Robison, Ethics Within Engineering. NY, USA: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017.[6] ASME Policies, Section 15.7 Ethics[7] IEEE Policies, Section 7.8 IEEE Code of Ethics[8] https://riskinnovation.org/think-differently/orphan-risks/[9] S. Hearn, “Outcome Mapping”, http://www.theoryofchange.org/wp-content/uploads/ toco_library/pdf/2001-Hearn-Presentation-Outcome-Mapping-Building-Learning.pdf (accessed August 6, 2019).[10] E. DeBartolo
. Technological & Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering (also in 2019)Divisions sponsoring papers on communication in 2019 1. Chemical Engineering (also in 2015) 2. Civil Engineering (also in 2015) 3. College Industry Partnerships 4. Design 5. Educational Research and Methods (also in 2015) 6. Engineering Ethics 7. Engineering Physics and Physics 8. Experimental and Laboratory Oriented Studies 9. First Year Programs (also in 2015) 10. Graduate Studies 11. International 12. Liberal Education/Engineering & Society (also in 2015) 13. Manufacturing 14. Mechanical Engineering (also in 2015) 15. Military and Veterans 16. Minorities in Engineering 17. Multidisciplinary (also in 2019) 18. Pre-College