June 22, 2013
June 22, 2013
June 22, 2013
21.19.1 - 21.19.24
Designing Short-term Study Abroad Engineering Experiences to Achieve Global Competencies (Student Development Track)International experiences for engineering students are rapidly becoming more common. Whilemany factors are driving this change, one key factor is the growth of short-term study abroadexperiences that do not interfere with the typically constrained schedule of engineering students.This paper compares the assessment of a wide range of student learning outcomes associatedwith two engineering short-term study abroad courses, one taught in Argentina and one taught inPanama. The two courses are structured quite differently in both content and pedagogy, andeach contains a set of course-specific learning outcomes. However, both also share ourUniversity's set of Global Competency Outcomes (GCOs).The Argentina program is an interdisciplinary project-based class. Students work in teams onprojects at wineries in Mendoza, Argentina. Students from all disciplines are invited to apply,with engineering and undergraduate business students being the two largest groups. Most “classtime” is spent either at the client sites or working within their project team. Faculty take the roleof mentors and coaches, advising students as they progress through their projects. The projectsare diverse, including manufacturing operations, sales, logistics, and tourism. Most projectsresult in the team delivering recommendations, decision support tools, or information systems tothe clients. The final deliverables are both client-focused: a report and a briefing.The Panama program focuses on the history and modern impact of the Panama Canal, and istaught in a short-term format (about 2 weeks) in January. The course uses field trips to keylocations, interactions with Canal engineers, construction site visits, and lengthy discussion anddeliberation to explore the complicated and rich history of the Canal as a sociotechnical system.Readings from both popular culture and the scholarly literature illuminate key issues andstimulate wide-ranging discussions of politics, economics, race, culture, equity, and justice.Students write multiple papers including a final integrative essay that expresses the full breadthof the course's impact on them, both academically and personally.The GCOs defined by our University fall into five broad categories: knowledge anddevelopment of a global frame of reference; attitude toward cultural differences; attitude towardpersonal growth; skills concerning communication, adaptation, and interaction across cultures;action in seeking out opportunities for engagement. Each of these categories has specificlearning outcomes underneath them, as well as suggested evaluation strategies.This paper describes in detail how each program was structured differently to address the GCOs,giving specific instances of how these learning outcomes are targeted with course experiences,how they are assessed, and what outcomes are actually achieved. Assessment of studentachievement of the GCOs is compared between the programs. This comparison shows multiplepaths to reaching GCOs in short-term study abroad courses and also reveals insights as to therelative strengths of the different structures of the two programs.
Berger, E. J., & Bailey, R. (2013, June), Designing Short-Term Study Abroad Engineering Experiences to Achieve Global Competencies Paper presented at 2013 ASEE International Forum, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2--17224
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2013 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015