Baltimore , Maryland
June 25, 2023
June 25, 2023
June 28, 2023
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
Diversity
19
10.18260/1-2--43178
https://peer.asee.org/43178
587
Katherine is an adjunct professor at the Colorado School of Mines in the Humanities, Arts & Social Sciences. Currently a PhD candidate in Higher Education at the University of Denver, Katherine's dissertation research used ground-breaking methods to collaborate with underrepresented engineering students and uncover how they experience being socialized into the professional culture of engineering during their education.
Jon A. Leydens is Professor of Engineering Education Research in the Division of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences at the Colorado School of Mines, USA. Dr. Leydens' research interests center on sociotechnical thinking and the nexus between engineering education and social justice.
Abstract Previous quantitative research indicates that engineering students have “high rates of mental health struggles” (Danowitz and Beddoes, 2018, 2020, 2022a; Jensen and Cross, 2021; quoted in Beddoes and Danowitz, 2022b). However, until recently, research had not provided significant insight into why. Building on Seron and colleagues’ research on how professional socialization affects women in engineering (2016; 2018), the three participants in this study explored their own experience of socialization into the culture of engineering during their education. This study used a culturally responsive and creative inquiry framework and qualitative research methods of conversational interviews, journals, and student-generated creative content, from which emerged the lived-experience narratives of female undergraduate STEM students with multiple underrepresented identities. Findings of this study show that underrepresented students exert hidden efforts that the current engineering meritocracy does not know of, value, account for, or understand. This culture manifests itself as a lack of time and flexibility to rest and maintain control over one’s life and wellbeing. From the perspective of students with embodied differences, like physical and learning disabilities, this conception of rigor dehumanizes and removes their dignity, which can exacerbate mental health issues that many neurodivergent students already struggle with. Importantly, the participants’ narratives show how they actively resisted the culture and developed practices of self-care.
Robert, K., & Leydens, J. A. (2023, June), Dignity and well-being: Narratives of modifying the culture of engineering education to improve mental health among underrepresented STEM students Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43178
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015